|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Rogue Planets Could Drive By And Scoop Up Life
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
No, it doesn't. Nibiru doesn't exist, and in fact the very definition of a rogue planet is in direct contradiction to "Nibiru." By definition a rogue planet does not orbit a star.
Quoting: Astromut then you haven't heard all the theories about Nibiru. stop concentrating on Nancy. Nibiru is said to have a 3600 year orbit, it's nothing like a rogue planet. I'm going to play your game; I have no idea who this Nancy person is, but the theory didn't originate with them, people have been saying that for decades. Sitchin's work doesn't rely on a brown-dwarf. Zecharia Sitchin posits the rogue-planet theory.
Quoting: Mordier L'eft No, he does not. Rogue planet does not mean a planet with a 3600 year orbit, it means a planet which does not orbit any star. It has nothing to do with the "Nibiru" claims, and I don't care who it comes from. don't argue sitchin with me, honey. it goes back to the birth of our system. that's when Nibiru was captured by our system as a rogue planet. you're the astronomer, you explain uranus on its side, and the chevron scar on miranda. Hello, idiot! My name is, Fact. Stitchin is a fraud. He bases his "interpretations" off of a tablet that never existed in the first place, HONEY. Maybe YOU should go do your homework. Always, ALWAYS, when trying to discern what is fact: Take into account, all accounts. Look up Stitchiniswrong.something? Or, many other sources that prove that he is a fraud. FFS, You are an idiot.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
