Rogue Planets Could Drive By And Scoop Up Life

Nibs?

How about the FACT that stitchin is a plagarizer, which is SOOO obvious when you read other books. How about the FACT, that none of the tablets stitchin describes, EVER were recorded discoveries. Also, his 'interpretations' of REAL tablets, is sooooo soooo wrong, you idiots will buy anything. Queue Astro's exit. I bet that guy gets really tired of you people, and he's just trying to help you discern what is truth. Isn't that why you're here? To know when the REAL shtf? Astro has the space-end covered. You should help the community by covering stuff YOU know, like fiction plagarized books. Let us know when one of those threatens our existence.

I lub dat Nibs mang...

But it breaks my heart:(

No. And now it's a star, not a planet? Just a minute ago you said it wasn't a brown dwarf, now you're saying it's a star? Which is it? Sitchin's ridiculous theory is absolutely absurd garbage. The notion that an advanced alien race evolved on a planet that spends almost its entire existence farther from the sun than Pluto is DOA. Oh I know he tried to make excuses for that, it's utterly ridiculous. Furthermore, a planet with an orbit that eccentric that enters the inner solar system would not be stable; the orbit would oscillate wildly and ultimately would probably be ejected from the solar system, or possibly end its existence in a collision after a very short period.

Here we go again, Astronut right on schedule, and i quote "Nibiru doesn't exist," so just for arguments sake, we cannot prove it does, your turn, prove it does not, oh shit you cant, you was not around 3600 years ago, you were not around when the Mayans were, as you always try to do to others, put up or shut up, if Nibiru does appear around the corner one day there is one thing i can quite guarantee nobody on this site will ever hear of Astronut ever again, mysteriously he will lose his internet connection and will not appear on here to apologize to hoards of people he has shot down over the years because he is a coward, for christs sake man at least try to have an open mind, you are so one dimensional.

so you're saying that anyone who finds inaccuracies in accepted theories should just and not try to change what is perceived as stale, rigid, and out-of-date scholarly traditions? sorry. that's the definition of

:ttb:

no, that was a fucking typo you pedantic cunt.

Last Edited by Mordier L'eft on 05/10/2012 04:20 PM

A ‘Phantom Planet’

Last year (2003), in France, a pending discovery –- an astounding discovery – was announced in the pages of the prestigious monthly Science & Vie (“Science and Life”). In its issue of February 2003 it published an update on the planetary makeup of our Solar System in light of recent discoveries in the “Kuiper Belt” (a zone on the Solar System’s fringes). Titled “PLANETS – But How Many Are There In Our Solar System?” the long article, by the journal’s Valerie Greffos, made a sensational announcement: there is one more, unknown, planet in our Solar System –

“A ‘PHANTOM PLANET’ WHOSE POSSIBLE
ORBIT IS TOO ELONGATED TO BE SEEN”

The assertion was based on statements made to the journal by Alessandro Morbidelli, an astronomer at France’s observatory at Côte d’Azur. The Solar System, he explained, was chaotic in the beginning. There was a celestial collision involving a “supplementary planet” that had existed where the Asteroid Belt is now. It happened about 3.9 billion years ago; and those events explain the unusual long elliptical orbit of the “Phantom Planet.”

“I expect that one day we will discover a new, Mars-sized planet!” he told the journal with certainty, a planet whose orbital period is “several thousand years.” He provided the journal with a sketch of the planet’s elongated elliptical orbit and even indicated in the sketch where the “Phantom Planet” is probably now: [link to www.sitchin.com]

(Sitchin): The article in Science & Vie, with its sensational statements by the French astronomer, was brought to my attention (regrettably belatedly) by a fan in France, who could not resist writing on the photocopy, above the sketch: “It’s Sitchin’s drawing!”
[link to www.sitchin.com]

(Sitchin): Should I be pleased that a respected astronomer at a leading French observatory adopted my conclusions regarding Nibiru and the Sumerian cosmogony –- or should I be upset that my life’s work was “appropriated” without any acknowledgement and credit to me?

and oscillate wildly is does, Sugar. it took many passes through our primordial system before settling into a more stable orbit, but it is still not concretely stable.

yes it's probably that it would be ejected from our system. but if that's probable, then it's also just possible that it was NOT ejected from our system.

A Message From Lloyd Pye

Since the death of Zecharia Sitchin on Oct. 9, 2010, his critics have come out in droves on the internet to try to trash his work and his legacy. Because of my well-known regard for his work, which I heavily incorporated in Part IV of my book Everything You Know Is Wrong, several people have asked me to come to Zecharia's defense now that he can no longer do it himself in the vigorous way he was known for. With that said, here is my nutshell defense of his work against any and all criticisms. It is simple and it is true. Please feel free to share it with others on the internet, and/or use it to respond to any critic you care to address:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Anyone who says Zecharia Sitchin is a fraud or mistaken in his translations of Sumerian texts, or anything in that vein, is busily grinding a heavily worn axe. They base all of their complaints on the fact that in certain key areas of the Sumerian writings, he deviates markedly from the "classical" translations, the vast majority of which were completed before 1947, before the terms "UFO" or "alien" came into common usage.
When the early translators came upon passages that could have been and should have been interpreted the way Sitchin interpreted them, they had no conceivable frame of reference for such terminology. Thus, they shoehorned it to fit into their own restricted world views, and because this nonsense was created by "experts" of that time, modern experts are inevitably brainwashed by their education process to believe no other translation is needed, much less preferable.

This intellectual claptrap has become established as the "preferred" and "accepted" translations that critics claim Stichin should have respected and stuck with in the way they are obligated to do. Sitchin rightly jettisoned the nonsense and translated the texts more like they were actually written, calling an alien an alien, so to speak, and this gross offense to modern academic sensibilities is what classic scholars consider a sacrilege to their mindset.
I have no doubt that, in the fullness of time, historians will consider Zecharia Sitchin vastly more correct than any mainstream pundit alive at this moment. Why? Because modern scholars endure years of intense training that forces them to consider the work of prior scholars sacrosanct, which produces a virtual army of close-minded sycophants who, ultimately, will be dismissed as laughably wrong.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[link to n-atlantis.com]

I had a lucid dream the other nite...which is strange for me because i always always forget the dream even if i wake immediately..but anyways in this dream i was looking up at the sky/clouds... and as the clouds moved i could see clearly behind them was a planet that literally filled the sky...the planets surface was white... was very strange...there was a object on or close to it that i cant remember clearly... but i think it was a chem plain covering the surface from my view. No b.s my friends.

You're the one with the affirmative claim, it's up to you to prove it, not for me to disprove it.

That said, I do enjoy utterly destroying such claims but you don't leave me with the opportunity. Your question wasn't even honest...

You sound uneducated, particularly since you didn't even wait for a response. How wonderfully open minded of you.

I do have an open mind, more so than you do. I put these sorts of claims to the test. You accuse me of not having an open mind simply because you don't like the answer I arrive at. That's not only close minded, that's bigoted. You want me to "put up or shut up." Fine, here you go, now you can be the one who "shuts up."
[link to www.springerlink.com]
The minimum distance for a planet larger than mars is greater than the semi-major axis of a planet whose orbital period is "3600 years." You weren't even asking the question honestly, so clearly you don't care what I have to say.

STOP CALLING ME CUTESY NAMES!!!

3600 years with an eccentricity taking into the inner solar system is not stable. 3600 years with an eccentricity taking into the inner solar system is not stable. 3600 years with an eccentricity taking into the inner solar system is not stable. AT ALL!

Last Edited by Astromut on 05/10/2012 04:30 PM

you didn't say anything, so i thought it'd be better than Honey. what about Babe?

i said "More stable" not "perfectly stable". it is NOT perfectly stable as its passes are not PERFECTLY every 3600 years, only approximate. just like the orbits of long-period comets, which follow the same retrograde orientation of Nibiru.

Last Edited by Mordier L'eft on 05/10/2012 04:36 PM

If you would have an "open mind" you wouldn't be writing 'No, it doesn't. Nibiru doesn't exist'.
Besides, it's a claim from your side, and you cannot prove it, and because there isn't a way for you to prove it, AC 12254902 didn't need to wait for your response.

Why do others attack fellow glp users who are only trying to understand. So much evil in this world. Why not kindly help others and explain whats its factual or fictitious data in a kind manner? Nameste.

that upset you? but calling you a pedantic cunt was okay?

I'm really surprised astro still hangs around here.
The stupidity and WILLFULL ignorance makes it hard to breathe in here.

"You're the one with the affirmative claim, it's up to you to prove it, not for me to disprove it."

ok numbnuts, what claim, i did not claim Nibiru existed, i said for arguments sake, and you always shoot peoples claims about Nibiru down but you cant prove that it does not exist, i bet you believe in God, something else that cant be proven,

"You sound uneducated,"

so just because you studied for 2 weeks in your mums basement and happened to throw together a tuppenny telescope that makes you educated, an educated person would not spend all their time on here putting other people down or slagging off their believes, if by some miracle you ever have children are you going to tell them the tooth fairy and santa claus does not exist, you are so shallow, why not let the people believe what they want, who made you head teacher to put them right or in their place, i have not seen you make one credible statement on here without putting someone down, live your life and let them live theirs, stop poking your nose in, no-one cares what you have to say anyway.

hes' a Nibiru Shilltard, i've never seen him post in any other threads.

THAT is your problem. You only see what YOU want to see, instead of the WHOLE truth. Fuck off, bitch!

Another thread that's starts off as interesting but then goes to shit because of the same characters and their rude comments

cool story, bro...

"THAT is your problem. You only see what YOU want to see, instead of the WHOLE truth. Fuck off, bitch!"

Great reply, i think your mate Astronut will now invite you round for drinks and biccies so you can play with each other.

is there a way to tell between a roge planet and a 3600 year orbit planet that hasnt been discovered yet? if you find this theorical planet today, how long will take you to tell between one and the other type of.

and if this planet really come too close and kill almost everything and erease all your data, how could the people 3600 in the future tell that it is a periodic panet and not a roge one..??


if this nibiru thing happens to be real, i want to see it, no matter if it is the last thing we all see..

The meteor found looks like lava rock.

Planet X inhabited and inbound!

Me too, i've got a fantastic vantage point to watch the skies planned out already. Get myself a nice front row seat.