Rogue Planets Could Drive By And Scoop Up Life

nahhh... your american TSA crowd would have rogue planets on the 'No Fly' list.. so they'd be .. well.. ughh.. anyway..

RIGHT NOW!!!

is a great programme on BBC-4 TV right now about The Moon, & how it affects the Earth, what would happen if it was too lose or far away.. presented by a very excited presenter who clearly loves the Moon.

It's on right now, repeated later.. on BBC 4.

Do you Americans get BBC Television over there?

listen to astromut... the us government pays good money for him...

at least humor the effort...

"A new world coming in to view..."
A former President of the United States.

let's not forget regan's "alien threat" speech at the UN

let's not forget regan's "alien threat" speech at the UN

After decades of ridiculing the idea of life on on other worlds we're now being spoon-fed the idea every other day. This isn't going to lead to the sort of disclosure we want. It will result in being told there is an external "threat" to our planet. There IS a threat but it's not extraterrestrial, it's humans in suits and military uniforms hell bent on returning Earth to the dark ages.

Exactly! They're really just a bunch of fucking toddlers who's right side of their brains are fucked, but have enuff evil logic to set-up 'self-destruction' just like a toddler.

This Moon documentary is quite good. It's on BBC right now.

No, they do not. I'm not a shill.

What part of it's not stable at all did you not understand?

What part of it's not stable at all did you not understand?

oh, i understand what you're saying. i just don't think you know as much as you think you do, My Dear.

Last Edited by Mordier L'eft on 05/10/2012 05:35 PM

Depends on how far away it is when it's discovered. The closer, the faster. If it were going to be here this year as part of some kind of "doom" it would already have to be deep inside the inner solar system. An approximate orbit determination that would tell us the difference between a hyperbolic and a ~3600 year orbit would not take long at all. The orbit determination I've been doing on SDO for the last several days is actually much more difficult because I'm trying to make it very, very exact.

Same way, basic orbital determination through astrometric measurement.

STOP WITH THE CUTESY NAMES! (Yes, I'd rather be openly insulted).

If you want to underestimate me, be my guest.

thanks, i think i will, Hot-stuff.

incidentally, Sitchin said PLANET Nibiru is at least 130 years out. tell me how visible that should be.

which is one of the things Sitchin incorporates into his theories. you should read Genesis Revisited.

I can't force anyone to believe anything they don't want to believe.

Maybe if you tried asking an honest question you'd get a response that didn't involve any snark. Your question was not honest. You had no intention of waiting for an answer. Don't want any attitude? Don't be a dick.

No, YOU don't care. That much is clear. You then project your personal view onto everyone else when I know for a fact you're wrong. I get messages from people who do care, even some I managed to convert.

Then post his astrometric measurements, timings, and the resulting calculated orbital elements.

Bore off Astromut.

well.. whadday know.. looks like we need the Moon after all.. so I take back what I said about 'we don't need the moon' in another thread.. lol. Just watching a doc on the Moon, 'Do We Really Need The Moon' on BBC4 now. If the moon went, we'd wobble like Mars, we'd turn on our side & have a shit time!!

So, any rogue planets joining us this year would really fuck the Earth up big time, would kill all life on our world very quickly, esp: us humans & mammals. Wow! Not good is it..!

because i don't feel like reading and typing out an entire 30+ page chapter. go do some reading, i told you which book to read.

The information I requested does not require typing out a 30 page chapter. Post his astrometric readings, timings, and the resulting calculated orbital elements. It's not hard. You won't do it because it doesn't exist.

Touche. Lots of energized left brain thinking in today's world. Many things exist in our universe that we cannot conceptualize or prove in our limited minds. I'm not saying that Nibiru exists (I don't personally know), but I'm also not ruling out that such an thing could exist. I'll find out when I find out.

Here, I'll even make it easier; just post 3 of the astrometric readings, timings, and the orbital elements. That should take you less time than it took me to write these two posts.

Sitchin makes claim to the last passing of the sun by Nibiru was around the time of ezekiel around 550 BC...

Of course he also posits that the naki's would be coming and going from their planet way before it got to the closest point to the sun as it would be travelling too fast. he posits around halfway so outwardly from sun to halfway would be 900 years - 1800 years to furthest poinmt and 2700 years to halfway towards the sun and 3600 for a full orbit.

At 900 (halfway outwards they are returning ot their planet and at 2700 3/4 full orbit they would be arriving. Work this out in the maths.

He doesnt claim exactly the 900 and 2700 he says probably before it reaches the sun or furthest distance from. Think about the time of ezekiel he went up into space did he not in machine.

Now think about 550 years later - thats right around the time of Jesus the very same time that Nibiru would be around 500 years FRom the sun on its outward journey and slowing down...! It makes perfect sense.

Now add 550 to 2012 it makes 2562 years. If a 3600 year orbit, which even he says is debatable giving a span of around 3400 years to 3600 years, nibiru is over 1000 years away from the sun. Now say it is a 3400 year orbit Nibiru is around 850 years or so away from the sun and speeding up.

Those boys and girls on nibiru are gonna be mighty hungry if they are starting to wake up about now.

our moon in suggested as being a moon FROM nibiru called Kingu, that when nibiru smashed into Tiamat (earth0 it was left behind.

We are the mixed genetic creation of Homo erectus and the anunaki. It makes perfect sense truly it does... there was link to a one hour lecture sitchin gave it truly is awesome and I for one believe it more likely than evolution.

On temple mount there are stones that are over 800 TONS in weight it is suggested that this was a launch pad, with another one being in Lebanon that fell into ruin after an anunaki war the stones on that are over 1200 TONS...! It is truly impossible that around 4500 BC Humans could have laid those stones.

He also makes claim to the anunaki using Mars as a way point, look at those spirals on the surface of Mars and tell me that the universe creates two dimensional spirals with ONE line, NO FUCKING WAY they are universal creations they are with no shadow of a doubt intelligent design.

Get used to it folks we are slaves as I have highlighted a number of times we were created to mine gold for the anunaki.

Regards
Jules

Psssst... it is 3660 years and it is due NOW.

I already tested the Nibiru claim and found it to be false. I had an open mind, the claim was wrong. It's that simple.

Already proved it.

No, I did prove it, AC had a closed mind for assuming, like you, that there was no way to prove it. I, unlike you, have an open mind. I put the other side's claims to the test. You are both incredibly close minded, which is why you will never escape your own ignorance.

of course it doesn't. that's why i told you where to find it.

Pssst... there's no massive planet anywhere near our inner solar system. Nibiru is false, even "planet X" is false and that was only supposed to have 4x earth's mass and not even come past pluto!
Thread: Robert Harrington's Planet X Does Not Exist

:cwuncle1:

why should i do the work for you? you declare WE should get out our star charts and do all the work you've supposedly done already. well, do the same. go do some reading.

Last Edited by Mordier L'eft on 05/10/2012 06:03 PM