Why are women naturally left wing and socialist?

Because men don't rule women much anymore and women are not raised and taught to be subservient to men anymore. So they are at the mercy of the socialist snakes who use emotions to manipulate opinion.

I have a feeling all this is going to change when the power grid goes down for good, though.

It's because women are smarter than men and left-wing socialism is clearly superior to the alternatives. If you don't dig it, that's tough shit for you because this isn't the country of old white angry men anymore, and never will be again, so suck it losers!

Very good. Also note how there are hardly EVER male teachers in elementary schools - when children are at the age that they need male influence.

One of the ideas behind giving women the vote was that they would be more anti-war. Now we have them in combat.

this post is full of retarded answers


by the way i think that it's due to the fact that man seeks power and wealth by competition while women naturally seek stability and well being via cooperation

This is truly due to evolutionary biology. Women in primitive times would mostly nurture the offspring and take care of the shelter. They weren't exposed to the dangers and sacrifices involved in acquiring the means of survival. Now in our current artificial societal circumstances these traits they developed through our evolutionary, rudimentary past are becoming exacerbated in unrealistic bursts of idealism. Women think "now the world is ready to be molded according to our feelings and instincts, we have surpassed our previous limitations". But they are wrong. They base their conclusions on artificial circumstances than could be gone in no time. When the artificial world we've erected crumbles down due to lack of proper administration, human nature will take over once again and women will have to face the sad reality that they wish to escape from.

'They even don't pay the minimum for a child to develop.'

a hasty generalization fallacy with an ad hominem added later on. there isn't a signal logical point in that block of text you wrote

Women simply are not intelligent enough to comprehend the principles our country was founded on or capitalism or personal freedom. Women's very thinking pattern is communist.

Of course there's nothing 'progressive' about Communism - it dates back to the Middle Ages, yet the principles the U.S. were founded on are only a little over 200 years old. But most immigrants, minorities and all women are not intelligent enough to comprehend American concepts such individual liberty. That's why the U.S. is regressing into Communism with a dictatorship. That's what the more primitive, stupid people understand. Women don't know what to do with freedom really.

Their idea of 'freedom' is the freedom the have sex with hundreds of men and have abortions- not free to actually achieve something or truly compete in the free market.

Women love communism because all they can comprehend is a a steady extortion of men (the producers) to women (the useless parasites). They also love a dictatorship because women are not intelligent enough to debate any issue intelligently (as we see one trillion times over on this forum) such as in a democracy. Women don't care about concepts like right and wrong or ethics- all they care about is who is in CHARGE, so they can fuck him and use that guy to help her leech off even more of society.

You here women talk constantly about 'privilege' as if this was Europe and it's basically hopeless to work hard and achieve success on your own. Women don't see the world that way - they're too stupid to invent anything and see actual work as below them. The whole 'caste' system was exactly why America was set up- to get away from all of that. But women are fundamentally Anti-American- they're just too stupid to understand why they are.

see how nobody is addressing this topic along with GENETIC mutation and manipulation by food and such

it's SOOOO not our faults... food and programming have changed so much that we can't even notice OURSELVES as different...

lots of man boobs now
lots of non child bearing hips now
lots of androgynous people
lots of gender confusion


IT IS ALL PLANNED DEPOPULATION and we're still doing man vs woman... you an have babies in a test tube so WHY even have sex anymore? Oh wait the PILL AND CONDOMS and such just let youi screw without consequence and such

BABY FETUS STUFF IN FOOD... nobody questions it
STEM CELL RESEARCH ... demonized

um what do you think they are doing right now to us?


see why we are in over our heads just a bit?

Ah, the old might makes right cliche. Nice play AC. So, why not we devolve into true animalistic behaviors then? What is checking us? Do you want more than that kind of a world? Look at the world that we have now, surely, our civilization can be destroyed but do YOU really desire that? I am willing to bet that not all men would seek to destroy and harm females just because "We stronger". How pathetic. Where is the astute male logic you all speak of having? Not in your post.

There is nothing natural about women being pulled into socialism. The decision was made decades ago at a Communist convention (1920's IIRC) wherein they discussed the failure of their ideas to gain a foothold in Europe, after the revolution in Russia.

They decided that because the workers failed to unite and join the communist uprisings in Europe, they would try a different approach. They targetted homosexuals, women, and racial minorities as their best hope for spreading communism.

The history has been carefully documented, with quotes, photos and video clips in this video:

[link to www.youtube.com]

Cheers,
CH

Alot of women are totally ignorant about politics, they don't care don't want to care and are more than willing to let some left wing tell them who to vote for. On the other hand the women that do pay attention are actually conservatives. They care about incomes, their family, the values of the society, about cost of living, about schools or lack there of..

In other words informed women are conservatives and dimwits are liberals.

Thanks, seems like an interesting watch.

Um, as a slim woman with nary a hip to speak of and plenty PLENTY of those like me in the world past and present...please, okay? I'll buy the earlier puberty and even the male mammary glandular tissue growth from BPA's and other chemicals that have found their way into our food supplies, interfering with out hormones...but no need to diss thin women. Not every woman is built like a brick shithouse, and that's okay. We accept that not every man is going to be as manly as we would like them to be, but at least we are evolved enough to love them for their hearts and minds and free him to be his potential.

still picking sides... see how this works? WE are all in this together ...it is still POLITICAL correctness at play

nobody accepts people as people... they somehow have to fit in this imaginary checklist of what a MAN or WOMAN is supposed to be...



not because you are wrong, but because you are still picking sides like I'm confused and not you

You have that exactly backwards. Liberal women care about the things that actually matter in life, like social justice and improving civilization for everyone's betterment.

They aren't. That is a very innacurate generalization. Some of the most right wing, conservative, red neck types I know are women. They just keep quiet about it so as to not disturb the men around them, who seem to get a little uneasy.

People aren't naturally of any political bent, it is their life experiences that determine those choices.

If what you said was a genuine fact, how would it have displayed itself before there was such a thing as socialism?

Looking at the original authors of socialist/communist theory you will see that they were all men.

All the socialist/communist despots have been men.

Leaders of socialist nations tend to be men.

Where did you ever get such an idea?

There are plenty of women inventors...always has been if given half a chance.

Your very limited mind set suggests that you have some major EMOTIONAL problems.

These "helping everyone" and "we're all one" ideologies are based upon fallacies, we're not all one, we're individuals that live in society, we're different and we're imperfect. Each is master of their own destiny and should face the consequence of their own choices. We need to find ways to manage our imperfections to make them bearable, not pursue utopias. In the name of utopias the flawed human beings have committed the worse atrocities in history, mostly fomented by dreamers who refused to heed logic and reason and allowed their emotions and instincts to lead their decisions and followed sociopaths who made false promises to gain power for themselves at the cost of these useful idiots.

Last Edited by Manu-K on 02/17/2013 01:52 PM

They are not fallacies; they are the basis of existence. Life is a web of interdependency, and the individual is the illusion.

- later - this thread is a shambles.

Women are typically left wing because the left is all about 'feelings'. The right is about pragmatic sense. Also, by and large, more single women have less $ than single men, and so they have less to loose and welcome the idea of government helping them out.

If you aren't liberal when you are young, you have no heart. If you are still liberal as an adult, you have no brain. When you have less to lose, you want other people's stuff. When its your stuff to lose, you vote conservative to keep from being stolen from by the government.

People who think like you are not human, you're merely a herd of animals and only deserve to live as such, which is the life you're granted every time your ideologies gain a foothold.

Last Edited by Manu-K on 02/17/2013 02:00 PM

Liberalism isn't about wanting stuff; it's about realizing that all that stuff is part of the commons, and so the real thieves are the capitalist class who have privatized the commons and exploited the labor of the working class for personal private profit.

Bro you think what you need/want to think, it's all peaches and cream to me. LOL sides. I don't pick sides. I just call it how I see it. That's why I only addressed one part of your post and left the other alone, and it IS entirely possible to love someone for their heart and mind. What do you think keeps long term relationships bonded and faithful after the "thrill" is gone or one partner is ailing or has changed? We need more of that kind of love for humanity at large. Shit will change then. How can we expect change from the SAME OLD SHIT and the SAME OLD PARADIGMS? Illogical.

I'm not one of these rose colored glass wearing GLP hippie types, so I can't say this shit will ever happen, or without much change in our current affairs. I don't even dig politics because it's all a bunch of malarkey. Bad people screw it up for everyone. How can the power intoxicated and corrupt lead a populace decently and soberly? Life is easy: Live your life and don't worry about living other people's lives, keep your hands to yourself, eat colorful vegetables every day, drink water, smile, be polite, ask before touching shit that don't belong to you and look both ways before crossing the street.

I can give a fuck what their 'rules' are. I live by my own. I'm not out to trouble anyone, so I live in peace.

People like me are BETTER than human, because we represent the next stage of our social evolution. The individual isn't capable of jack shit; it takes a collective society to build starships and effectively govern the planet.