15 Questions That Evolutionmists CANT Answer

The problem is not that there are questions evolutionists can't answer.

The problem is that people like you aren't even trying...

Not going to debate with someone who:

1. Can't spell.
2. Doesn't understand/use punctuation.
3. Thinks the rapture is a few weeks away.

Grow up and stop being so stupid.

Its not a spelling mistake, my dad says

I call them evolutionmists because like mist they are wet and soggy and disappear in God's Truth Sunlight

That's kind of retarded, don't you think?

No more retarded than thinking my great grandad was a fish that gave birth to a pineapple, anyway checked the blog have you or are you just digging in your little heels or putting your fingers in your ears and whistling 'i can't hear you'?

Thought so

Denise

This is where you creationists fail, evolution doesn't work that way.

Small is the number of people who see with their eyes and think with their minds.
-Albert Einstein

[link to upload.wikimedia.org]

It doesn't work at all, Mr Misty

KILL IT WITH FIRE

I lost my tickets to the Rapture. Do you think that I can buy some on Stub Hub ?

By the way, who set the date for the Rapture ?

And what will you say to Jesus when he asks you why you had no faith in HIS use of evolution to achieve the magnificent creation of man ?

So you can't answer the questions either, well done!

Lets make a deal, if your rapture happens in a few weeks timespan as you mentioned, I'll quit believing evolution and support creationism. But I'll want a percentage from all the money churches gather, after all I'll support their thing eh ?

these questions are deliberately misleading and only serve to fool the fools. they are all easily refuted. I don't waste time trying to explain politics to my cat nor science to a creationist. thast what public education is for. If I wanted to be a teacher I would want to get paid for it. if a creationist were capable of understanding abiogenesis or evolution, they would not be creationists. for example... if you think a woman being created from a rib or a man created from clay is a plausible explanation for the rise of human kind, then you probabaly aren't going to be able to grasp natural selection or evolution. if you are unable to discern the differences between abiogenesis and evolution then you probably haven't learned anything in school describing the theories. why should I waste time educating those that refuse to learn?

hmmmm nice get out Mist-man!

It's pointless giving answers to people who are obviously uninterested in a response that disagrees with their point of view. You appear to have turned your brain functions to the OFF position. See you at the Rapture. (I'll be the one selling cotton candy)

No. The problem with evolutionists is science censorship. They prevent others from searching for certain things that could discredit them...

Of course I checked the blog. I'm not going to attempt to answer the questions because while I believe in evolution, I am not a scientist and cannot discuss these questions intelligently. I bet you can't either. Your statement in bold above proves that you don't understand even the basics of evolution and choose to ridicule it instead.

However, is it really any better to just refute all science and say "God did it"?

That kind of attitude is simplistic and childish.

Evolution is sooo retarded !

Obviously it was the invisible wizard that lives in the sky that made the earth, duh!

and vestigial organs are just design mistakes.......err sorry, obviously the invisible wizard doesn't make mistakes so......err?

Lol. Just because they said so, you automatically believe in human evolution? That's pretty retarded considering that science have been proven wrong over and over as we gain more knowledge. The human evolution as you know could be entirely different in 50 years.

I thought mutant hybrid reptilian tomato plants came down in pyramid spaceships and created humans to mine for gold ….. then they are coming back to kill us and take our gold?....right?

I meant theories, not science.

In a few weeks, when you aren't raptured, maybe have a look at these "questions" and see how many of them actually call into question the theory of evolution. Hint: the answer is less than one.

Ahh... Sitchin. Truth can be stranger than fiction. Mainstream academia sucks unfortunately because they leave things out that do not fit with their narrow narrative on how things should look like.

Wait, so you're saying evolutionists cant answer these 15 questions but can religious people answer these 15 questoions without referring to the bible which , lets face it, sounds like a Walt Disney fairy tale.

In answer to point 1:

How did life originate? Evolutionist Professor Paul Davies admitted, “Nobody knows how a mixture of lifeless chemicals spontaneously organized themselves into the first living cell.”

Let's try fats in water. Know what? they form into globules. Its called emulsification.
Globules of fat.. hmm. kinda like a cell membrane.


Point 2:
How did the DNA code originate?
probably from RNA (a single strand). Simpler chemical.

Do i have to go on?

I will never EVER fore my opnions on anyone else but I'll argue the hell out of ignorant people.

LOL. Just because some bronze age book and your pastor said so, you automatically believe God made everything all at once with some kind of unproven magic? That's pretty retarded considering that the bible has been proven wrong on so many things over and over as we gain more knowledge. The "God did it" theory as you know it could be entirely different, or gone altogether in 50 years.

Fixed.

Lol. Ignorant people not aware of their ignorance.

This article describes it perfectly...

[link to www.psychologytoday.com]

Where did I mention bible? I don't go to church, own Bible book or believe in creationism. I just have a different view on human evolution, that's all. I'm sure there are many other people with different view on human evolution but has nothing to do with bible stuff at all.