Ron Paul chose Ayn Rand over Jesus Christ

Jesus Christ has an "economic style"?

What is that? To wander, unmarried, homeless, poor, throughout lands...taking what you want from people and declaring that it belongs to god, therefore you can have it because you are of god?

Please help me to understand hw this economic prinicple of having nothing, owning nothing, giving all away is actually a principle....

Or are you just another christian with personalized ideals you want to use to put down others....Jesus would not be proud of you, if that is your intentions.....but I would not expect very uch from one of these so called christian types of modern day America.... who judge, insult, shame, hurt, defy, denounce, anything that is remotely different from your trained comfort zone....

Not very christian like...LOL

What good would it do to say "Jesus Christ is my favorite economist"? Ten million different people have ten million different opinions on what the 2000 year old gospels even imply.

While I may not agree with everything Ayn Rand had to say I do know she was a real person.
The same can not be said for Jesus Christ.

so did George Soros

The majority of Jesus' Apostles came from a place or places called Beth Ani - Hebrew for House of Poverty.
These towns weren't actually poor. They were communes. The citizens had taken vows of poverty renouncing all but basic posessions. They lived as non-celibate monks or nuns.

It's been a long time since I researched that. I think my sources are a couple of books, "The Passover Plot" or "Would the Real Jesus Please Stand Up".

The principles of the vow of poverty are pretty simple and universal. To avoid offending Americans, let's call it communalism. This will distinguish it from the excesses of Marxist communism. Communes and monasteries have flourished successfully in all societies, on all continents, in all periods of civilized history.

Return to Caesar what belong to Caesar and return to God what belongs to God. Jesus-Christ said one should help others but never said that it could be done through taxes and social systems.

In my opinion to have faith in God you first need to have faith in men and to have faith in men you need to have faith in yourself. The thing Ayn Rand probably did not understand is that being egoist the way Roark or Galt are, being dedicated to yourself does not imply not to be also open to others and to God but is a precondition to reach.

From what I know of Ron Paul he is both Christian and interested in Ayn Rand's objectivism. So am I. So ma answer to you question is : "Ron Paul chose both Ayn Rand and Jesus Christ" (even though I know Ayn Rand could not stand religion).

What fucking bible did you read?

Actually, if you did read it the thing is pretty clear that you have to produce something or Jesus will kill you...just like he did with the fig tree. Ayn Rand would be all for that, you dumbass.

Or the part where he fucked up the second-hander bureaucrats in the temple, flipping their table and whipping them and shit. Ragnar anyone?

Or the part where he turned down working for the devil because he could take any fucking thing he wanted anyway, and kick satan in the ass.

OR the part where he comes back and kills all the people who have been fucking around with the shit the book says he did. The economic principle is the same in both books: provide your best service to the community and you will be rewarded.

Try actually thinking about what you are reading asshat. You understand neither philosophy or economics.

Just like Jesus said, and Any Rand tried again and again to capture: If you try your very best, worry about your own shit and don't fuck over other people the world will be a much better place.

Fucking stupid humans, its all the same shit packaged differently with the hope that if one key doesn't work, another will. So busy being a key they can't see the key ring.

Wake. The. Fuck. Up.