Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,639 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 701,325
Pageviews Today: 900,540Threads Today: 174Posts Today: 3,660
08:36 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunk this please.

 
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
05/17/2012 01:50 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
...

I do have an open mind, I already tested the theory that Nibiru exists and found that it does not exist. If I did not have an open mind I would not bothered testing the theory that Nibiru exists. If Nibiru existed it would be exerting detectable effects on the positions of the planets. I've checked myself, those effects are not present, Nibiru does not exist.
 Quoting: Astromut


so were the summerians wrong about nibiru?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9003020


Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy, not a sound argument. I don't even accept the premise because I reject Sitchin's so-called "translations" outright. And yes, I know much more about astronomy than the Sumerians did. There, I said it.
 Quoting: Astromut


of course you know more than they, you should with all the instruments that you have now. this is normal. still they got it right about all the other planets that we know now.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9003020

No, they didn't, but you keep thinking that and falling for Sitchin's translations all you want. You don't seem to understand that I don't even accept the premise.
astrobanner2
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
05/17/2012 01:51 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
...


Well said my friend. Most people are still stuck in there little boxs, its sad really.
 Quoting: kcdub0184


Tell me about it.. Astroshill claimed in another thread that "Nibiru doesn't exist", how he could know that beats me,.. but the funny thing was that, in the same thread, he claimed himself to have an "open mind".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5051820

I do have an open mind, I already tested the theory that Nibiru exists and found that it does not exist. If I did not have an open mind I would not bothered testing the theory that Nibiru exists. If Nibiru existed it would be exerting detectable effects on the positions of the planets. I've checked myself, those effects are not present, Nibiru does not exist.
 Quoting: Astromut


No.. that's not having an open mind.. that's having the official point of view, and it doesn't make you a hero.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5051820

Having the "official point of view" because I did my own research and tested the claims for myself does not exclude me from having an open mind. In fact it means I do have an open mind and I follow the evidence.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8989938
United Kingdom
05/17/2012 01:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
That video seems to be getting the most interest, but what about the OTHER video?

Thread: That video seems to be getting the most interest, but what about the OTHER video?
 Quoting: libertarian83


bump
 Quoting: jacksprat

It's yet another filter flare, and once again the person filming it fails to cover the sun with their finger.
 Quoting: Astromut


In the image underneath there is a cloud in front of the top left-hand corner of the object.
S0L4RN1GHTM4R3 (OP)

User ID: 7740691
United States
05/17/2012 01:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
...


With that said, you're clearly an idiot, or a shill.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

Here we go again with the ad hominem, right after you said you wouldn't call me a shill. Sadly, I actually believed you when you said that.
You will NOT be receiving an apology this time Astroshill, for you have shown what you're worth, not a fucking dime.
 Quoting: Solar

So having failed to prove your claims, you now resort to ad hominem, of a specific form you previously claimed you would not use against me again.
 Quoting: Astromut


Again...with he exception of an undeniable proof.

This object is CLEARLY shown BEHIND the clouds, it is right there in the video. For you to say that it is NOT, is simply wrong.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

No, it's the truth. Look closely at 1:24-1:33, the "object" does not illuminate the cloud as a real object behind the cloud would, there is no diffusion of its light by the cloud, it shows a hard edge where there should be a diffuse edge. It's in front of the cloud. You can sit there and deny it all you want, but it's the truth and the proof is right there in the video.
I apologize about "lying", but the circumstances have changed, wouldn't you say?
 Quoting: Solar

No, not at all. In fact, you made this call-out thread, you wanted me to come in here and explain it to you. I did just that and now you're ignoring the proof I gave you that this is just a filter flare. It's clear now that no amount of evidence would ever change your mind and it calls into question you reason for calling me out in the first place.
 Quoting: Astromut


Proof? You've shown no proof. You've only implied ignorance by denying that the object IS shown behind the clouds. I can see it, why can't you?

Does it APPEAR to be in FRONT of the clouds at another point? Yes, it does. However, it also CLEARLY appears BEHIND the clouds.

You are wrong sir, and if you weren't, I wouldn't say you were.

I am truly fair and balanced sir. You, on the other hand, are FOX News version of "fair and balanced".
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

John F. Kennedy
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
05/17/2012 01:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
And u are basing this off nasas charts that can easily be manipulated and show us the sky as it was ten years ago instead if what it is today.
 Quoting: kcdub0184

If "NASA's charts" were showing us the sky as it was ten years ago, then they wouldn't match with reality. I've checked the "official data" on the orbits of the planets against reality and they are in agreement. This would not be the case if there were an unaccounted for brown dwarf near us. There could be a brown dwarf hiding at Oort cloud distances, but that is not compatible with the "Nibiru" theory. A brown dwarf anywhere near us is an impossibility because it's inconsistent with planetary motion which I've observed for myself.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12957312
United States
05/17/2012 01:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
So, I just happened across this video from May 12, 2012.

This very well could be the moon, however, if that were the case, it wouldn't be illuminated as it quite obviously is.

Could this be a celestial body that everybody has been talking about? Is this proof that Nibiru exist?

I'm not confident enough to say that Nibiru does exist, but I'm certainly not convinced that it doesn't.

And before you say it is Jupiter, it isn't. Jupiter was on the right side of the sun only 2 days later, so it couldn't be Jupiter, could it?

[link to www.youtube.com]

Looking forward to any and all opinions.

No flaming please. Some of you are thick-headed enough to completely disregard the existence of Nibiru, but none of you have the evidence to thoroughly deny that it could exist.

Thanks.


Do not make callout threads....
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3



No, you tell us what it is, and prove it.

Stellarium says the Moon.

What exactly is there to debunk? Only way we can/could debunk if that's what we chose- is to watch more of the video beggining and end. With the sun traversing the sky.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9003020
Romania
05/17/2012 01:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
...


so were the summerians wrong about nibiru?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9003020


Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy, not a sound argument. I don't even accept the premise because I reject Sitchin's so-called "translations" outright. And yes, I know much more about astronomy than the Sumerians did. There, I said it.
 Quoting: Astromut


of course you know more than they, you should with all the instruments that you have now. this is normal. still they got it right about all the other planets that we know now.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9003020

No, they didn't, but you keep thinking that and falling for Sitchin's translations all you want. You don't seem to understand that I don't even accept the premise.
 Quoting: Astromut


forget sitchin. go to mauro biglino.
S0L4RN1GHTM4R3 (OP)

User ID: 7740691
United States
05/17/2012 01:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
And u are basing this off nasas charts that can easily be manipulated and show us the sky as it was ten years ago instead if what it is today.
 Quoting: kcdub0184

If "NASA's charts" were showing us the sky as it was ten years ago, then they wouldn't match with reality. I've checked the "official data" on the orbits of the planets against reality and they are in agreement. This would not be the case if there were an unaccounted for brown dwarf near us. There could be a brown dwarf hiding at Oort cloud distances, but that is not compatible with the "Nibiru" theory. A brown dwarf anywhere near us is an impossibility because it's inconsistent with planetary motion which I've observed for myself.
 Quoting: Astromut


Nibiru isn't necessarily a brown dwarf, do you realize that?
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

John F. Kennedy
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
05/17/2012 01:58 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
...

Here we go again with the ad hominem, right after you said you wouldn't call me a shill. Sadly, I actually believed you when you said that.
...

So having failed to prove your claims, you now resort to ad hominem, of a specific form you previously claimed you would not use against me again.
 Quoting: Astromut


Again...with he exception of an undeniable proof.

This object is CLEARLY shown BEHIND the clouds, it is right there in the video. For you to say that it is NOT, is simply wrong.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

No, it's the truth. Look closely at 1:24-1:33, the "object" does not illuminate the cloud as a real object behind the cloud would, there is no diffusion of its light by the cloud, it shows a hard edge where there should be a diffuse edge. It's in front of the cloud. You can sit there and deny it all you want, but it's the truth and the proof is right there in the video.
I apologize about "lying", but the circumstances have changed, wouldn't you say?
 Quoting: Solar

No, not at all. In fact, you made this call-out thread, you wanted me to come in here and explain it to you. I did just that and now you're ignoring the proof I gave you that this is just a filter flare. It's clear now that no amount of evidence would ever change your mind and it calls into question you reason for calling me out in the first place.
 Quoting: Astromut


Proof? You've shown no proof.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

1:24-1:33 is irrefutable proof that it's in front of the clouds. The "object" does not illuminate the cloud as a real object behind the cloud would, there is no diffusion of its light by the cloud, it shows a hard edge where there should be a diffuse edge.
Does it APPEAR to be in FRONT of the clouds at another point? Yes, it does. However, it also CLEARLY appears BEHIND the clouds.
 Quoting: Solar

No, you assumed it was behind the clouds simply because you saw it disappear when the cloud arrived at its position and then it gradually reappeared as the cloud dimmed and the sun emerged. If you keep watching then you no longer have to assume anything, the proof is staring you in the face that it is in front of the cloud. It is impossible for it to be behind the clouds and show a hard bright edge at 1:24-1:33 without backlighting the cloud.
I am truly fair and balanced sir.
 Quoting: Solar

No, you are not, if you were you would not be ignoring the proof that it is in front of the cloud and you would admit that there's no proof that it's behind the cloud.
astrobanner2
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
05/17/2012 02:00 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
And u are basing this off nasas charts that can easily be manipulated and show us the sky as it was ten years ago instead if what it is today.
 Quoting: kcdub0184

If "NASA's charts" were showing us the sky as it was ten years ago, then they wouldn't match with reality. I've checked the "official data" on the orbits of the planets against reality and they are in agreement. This would not be the case if there were an unaccounted for brown dwarf near us. There could be a brown dwarf hiding at Oort cloud distances, but that is not compatible with the "Nibiru" theory. A brown dwarf anywhere near us is an impossibility because it's inconsistent with planetary motion which I've observed for myself.
 Quoting: Astromut


Nibiru isn't necessarily a brown dwarf, do you realize that?
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3


Some theories do have it orbiting a brown dwarf, but thanks to the limited hill sphere of a brown dwarf within the solar system, Nibiru would still have to be close to its parent brown dwarf.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11630819
United States
05/17/2012 02:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
My take is that the ball you think is a planet is the sun. The brighter object to the right and slightly below is the the reflection of the sun off of the clouds. There is clearly parts of the sunglasses that filter more light. I am disregarding the lens flare bouncing around. This does however bring up a point I made on another post. I can't remember the clouds reflecting so much sunlight as I have in the past month.
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
05/17/2012 02:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
Oh great, now you changed the thread title to delete my name and hide the fact that it was a call-out thread. Real honest of you.
astrobanner2
S0L4RN1GHTM4R3 (OP)

User ID: 7740691
United States
05/17/2012 02:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
...


Again...with he exception of an undeniable proof.

This object is CLEARLY shown BEHIND the clouds, it is right there in the video. For you to say that it is NOT, is simply wrong.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

No, it's the truth. Look closely at 1:24-1:33, the "object" does not illuminate the cloud as a real object behind the cloud would, there is no diffusion of its light by the cloud, it shows a hard edge where there should be a diffuse edge. It's in front of the cloud. You can sit there and deny it all you want, but it's the truth and the proof is right there in the video.
I apologize about "lying", but the circumstances have changed, wouldn't you say?
 Quoting: Solar

No, not at all. In fact, you made this call-out thread, you wanted me to come in here and explain it to you. I did just that and now you're ignoring the proof I gave you that this is just a filter flare. It's clear now that no amount of evidence would ever change your mind and it calls into question you reason for calling me out in the first place.
 Quoting: Astromut


Proof? You've shown no proof.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

1:24-1:33 is irrefutable proof that it's in front of the clouds. The "object" does not illuminate the cloud as a real object behind the cloud would, there is no diffusion of its light by the cloud, it shows a hard edge where there should be a diffuse edge.
Does it APPEAR to be in FRONT of the clouds at another point? Yes, it does. However, it also CLEARLY appears BEHIND the clouds.
 Quoting: Solar

No, you assumed it was behind the clouds simply because you saw it disappear when the cloud arrived at its position and then it gradually reappeared as the cloud dimmed and the sun emerged. If you keep watching then you no longer have to assume anything, the proof is staring you in the face that it is in front of the cloud. It is impossible for it to be behind the clouds and show a hard bright edge at 1:24-1:33 without backlighting the cloud.
I am truly fair and balanced sir.
 Quoting: Solar

No, you are not, if you were you would not be ignoring the proof that it is in front of the cloud and you would admit that there's no proof that it's behind the cloud.
 Quoting: Astromut


You're quite frustrating, denying that it DOES appear behind the clouds.

IT DOES!

Am I the only one who can see this?!?
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

John F. Kennedy
S0L4RN1GHTM4R3 (OP)

User ID: 7740691
United States
05/17/2012 02:03 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
Oh great, now you changed the thread title to delete my name and hide the fact that it was a call-out thread. Real honest of you.
 Quoting: Astromut


You sir, are misinformed.

A mod deleted the "ATTENTION ASTROMUT", and I changed it back to "ATTENTION" assuming that it was edited because it contained YOUR name.

Get your facts straight.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

John F. Kennedy
LazyDazy

User ID: 11124082
United States
05/17/2012 02:04 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
So OP...You specifically ask Astro in your thread title to debunk this and once he does you get mad, change the title, (remove his name) and then attack him for doing what YOU asked???? Were you intentionally trying to get him in your thread to attack him or did his debunking of an obvious filter flare just upset you enough that you changed the title, hmmm???

awhore
jacksprat

User ID: 1420740
Canada
05/17/2012 02:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
what is the agenda for making fake videos of Nibiru crossing?
jacksprat
S0L4RN1GHTM4R3 (OP)

User ID: 7740691
United States
05/17/2012 02:07 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
So OP...You specifically ask Astro in your thread title to debunk this and once he does you get mad, change the title, (remove his name) and then attack him for doing what YOU asked???? Were you intentionally trying to get him in your thread to attack him or did his debunking of an obvious filter flare just upset you enough that you changed the title, hmmm???

awhore
 Quoting: LazyDazy


Read the above post.

FFS people, I love how you jump to conclusions.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

John F. Kennedy
^ZytO^

User ID: 10482273
United States
05/17/2012 02:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
what ever that is you can see it definitely go BEHIND the clouds the lens flare is off to the left and moving around
but the other two objects are stationary
2009lincolncent.com
S0L4RN1GHTM4R3 (OP)

User ID: 7740691
United States
05/17/2012 02:09 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
what ever that is you can see it definitely go BEHIND the clouds the lens flare is off to the left and moving around
but the other two objects are stationary
 Quoting: ^ZytO^


Thank you!!

Finally, another confirmation that it DOES go behind the clouds.

If it were the artifact you claim it to be, it would NOT go BEHIND the clouds.

I love logic.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

John F. Kennedy
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
05/17/2012 02:11 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
So OP...You specifically ask Astro in your thread title to debunk this and once he does you get mad, change the title, (remove his name) and then attack him for doing what YOU asked???? Were you intentionally trying to get him in your thread to attack him or did his debunking of an obvious filter flare just upset you enough that you changed the title, hmmm???

awhore
 Quoting: LazyDazy


Read the above post.

FFS people, I love how you jump to conclusions.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3


If you want to be believed, next time a mod edits your title don't go and re-edit yourself, because right now it says you were the last one to edit it and it shows no evidence of a mod having edited it.
astrobanner2
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
05/17/2012 02:12 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
what ever that is you can see it definitely go BEHIND the clouds the lens flare is off to the left and moving around
but the other two objects are stationary
 Quoting: ^ZytO^


Filter flares are stationary. It's clearly in front of the clouds which is why it does not illuminate the clouds from behind, nor is its light diffused by the cloud, after the sun emerges from the cloud at 1:24-1:33.
astrobanner2
S0L4RN1GHTM4R3 (OP)

User ID: 7740691
United States
05/17/2012 02:14 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
So OP...You specifically ask Astro in your thread title to debunk this and once he does you get mad, change the title, (remove his name) and then attack him for doing what YOU asked???? Were you intentionally trying to get him in your thread to attack him or did his debunking of an obvious filter flare just upset you enough that you changed the title, hmmm???

awhore
 Quoting: LazyDazy


Read the above post.

FFS people, I love how you jump to conclusions.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3


If you want to be believed, next time a mod edits your title don't go and re-edit yourself, because right now it says you were the last one to edit it and it shows no evidence of a mod having edited it.
 Quoting: Astromut


Well, trust me on this, because I'd have no reason to edit the title. You have yet to prove anything Astro, anything at all, other than your blatant ignorance.

That being the case, I think I'd benefit more by keeping your name on the title.

Last Edited by ****D4RK*ST4R**** on 05/17/2012 02:14 PM
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

John F. Kennedy
S0L4RN1GHTM4R3 (OP)

User ID: 7740691
United States
05/17/2012 02:15 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
So OP...You specifically ask Astro in your thread title to debunk this and once he does you get mad, change the title, (remove his name) and then attack him for doing what YOU asked???? Were you intentionally trying to get him in your thread to attack him or did his debunking of an obvious filter flare just upset you enough that you changed the title, hmmm???

awhore
 Quoting: LazyDazy


Read the above post.

FFS people, I love how you jump to conclusions.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3


If you want to be believed, next time a mod edits your title don't go and re-edit yourself, because right now it says you were the last one to edit it and it shows no evidence of a mod having edited it.
 Quoting: Astromut


Well, trust me on this, because I'd have no reason to edit the title. You have yet to prove anything Astro, anything at all, other than your blatant ignorance.

That being the case, I think I'd benefit more by keeping your name on the title.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3


In fact, I'll re-edit to include your name, simply to see if it gets edited again.

Don't ban me mods, I'm only proving a point.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

John F. Kennedy
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
05/17/2012 02:17 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
So OP...You specifically ask Astro in your thread title to debunk this and once he does you get mad, change the title, (remove his name) and then attack him for doing what YOU asked???? Were you intentionally trying to get him in your thread to attack him or did his debunking of an obvious filter flare just upset you enough that you changed the title, hmmm???

awhore
 Quoting: LazyDazy


Read the above post.

FFS people, I love how you jump to conclusions.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3


If you want to be believed, next time a mod edits your title don't go and re-edit yourself, because right now it says you were the last one to edit it and it shows no evidence of a mod having edited it.
 Quoting: Astromut


Well, trust me on this, because I'd have no reason to edit the title. You have yet to prove anything Astro, anything at all, other than your blatant ignorance.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

Seems like a number of people are disagreeing with you on that one.
That being the case, I think I'd benefit more by keeping your name on the title.
 Quoting: Solar

Not if I were to report the post as a call-out thread. Every other call-out thread I've come across that received moderator attention was simply deleted. Perhaps they're simply changing the title in some cases, but again, you should leave it alone so that people can see a mod did it, not you.
astrobanner2
S0L4RN1GHTM4R3 (OP)

User ID: 7740691
United States
05/17/2012 02:23 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
...


Read the above post.

FFS people, I love how you jump to conclusions.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3


If you want to be believed, next time a mod edits your title don't go and re-edit yourself, because right now it says you were the last one to edit it and it shows no evidence of a mod having edited it.
 Quoting: Astromut


Well, trust me on this, because I'd have no reason to edit the title. You have yet to prove anything Astro, anything at all, other than your blatant ignorance.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

Seems like a number of people are disagreeing with you on that one.
That being the case, I think I'd benefit more by keeping your name on the title.
 Quoting: Solar

Not if I were to report the post as a call-out thread. Every other call-out thread I've come across that received moderator attention was simply deleted. Perhaps they're simply changing the title in some cases, but again, you should leave it alone so that people can see a mod did it, not you.
 Quoting: Astromut


If they edit it again, I will.

However, you did notice some people agree that it goes BEHIND the clouds, correct?

It clearly does.

I don't know how much clearer I can be, it DOES go behind the clouds.

Thus, it is NO artifact.

For future reference, I'd be more prone to believing it was another planet from our solar system, if there was one in the vicinity.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

John F. Kennedy
S0L4RN1GHTM4R3 (OP)

User ID: 7740691
United States
05/17/2012 02:25 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
...


Read the above post.

FFS people, I love how you jump to conclusions.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3


If you want to be believed, next time a mod edits your title don't go and re-edit yourself, because right now it says you were the last one to edit it and it shows no evidence of a mod having edited it.
 Quoting: Astromut


Well, trust me on this, because I'd have no reason to edit the title. You have yet to prove anything Astro, anything at all, other than your blatant ignorance.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

Seems like a number of people are disagreeing with you on that one.
That being the case, I think I'd benefit more by keeping your name on the title.
 Quoting: Solar

Not if I were to report the post as a call-out thread. Every other call-out thread I've come across that received moderator attention was simply deleted. Perhaps they're simply changing the title in some cases, but again, you should leave it alone so that people can see a mod did it, not you.
 Quoting: Astromut


Another thing, this wasn't a call-out thread. It was a shout-out for being correct about Venus being Venus.

On this subject, you have clearly shown ignorance that it does, indeed, go behind the clouds, thus, making it impossible to be an artifact.

I simply disagree, because I know what I see.

I'm not an uneducated idiot, I know when I'm wrong. I'm not here, and anybody with half a mind can see that.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

John F. Kennedy
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10705336
United States
05/17/2012 02:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
Point: Astromut
Nibirutards: 0
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10705336


Get your facts straight, I'm no Nibirutard. I'm very logical as a matter of fact, I have to be, being in software programming.

I very clearly stated that I'm still on the fence with Nibiru. For you to count it out so absent-mindedly only shows that you're the one "losing" in this game we call life.

Kindly fuck off.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3


LMAO

Hey, I'm just saying Astro did post a very plausible explaination for what was shown in the original video post. So, take note, gotta do the finger test.

But the score's not that off. Maybe Nibirudoom will tie the score in overtime.
S0L4RN1GHTM4R3 (OP)

User ID: 7740691
United States
05/17/2012 02:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
Point: Astromut
Nibirutards: 0
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10705336


Get your facts straight, I'm no Nibirutard. I'm very logical as a matter of fact, I have to be, being in software programming.

I very clearly stated that I'm still on the fence with Nibiru. For you to count it out so absent-mindedly only shows that you're the one "losing" in this game we call life.

Kindly fuck off.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3


LMAO

Hey, I'm just saying Astro did post a very plausible explaination for what was shown in the original video post. So, take note, gotta do the finger test.

But the score's not that off. Maybe Nibirudoom will tie the score in overtime.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10705336


Only time will tell.

I know, for a fact, that it's NOT out of the question.

Unlike the almighty wise-one, Astromut, whom seems to have some kind of extended knowledge. He KNOWS that Nibiru doesn't exist, even though it could be quite far away yet.

How is that for logic?

Last Edited by ****D4RK*ST4R**** on 05/17/2012 02:30 PM
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

John F. Kennedy
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1389579
United States
05/17/2012 02:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
you made nibiru disappear with your finger!!! all hail astromut!!!!
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
05/17/2012 02:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunk this please.
However, you did notice some people agree that it goes BEHIND the clouds, correct?
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

Of course Nibirutards are going to say that. But I have noticed a number of people pointing out the ridiculousness in you making a callout thread asking for me to debunk it, then calling me a shill after I debunk it.
It clearly does.
 Quoting: Solar

No, it does not. It's clearly in front of the clouds which is why it does not illuminate the clouds from behind, nor is its light diffused by the cloud, after the sun emerges from the cloud at 1:24-1:33.

Last Edited by Dr. Astro on 05/17/2012 02:31 PM
astrobanner2

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob