Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,832 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,975,889
Pageviews Today: 2,774,290Threads Today: 645Posts Today: 11,571
06:13 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Debunk this please.
Poster Handle S0L4RN1GHTM4R3
Post Content
Then all I can say is this:

Once a shill, always a shill.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

You resort to ad hominem again, attack my integrity, meanwhile...
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Anybody can go watch that video and see it appear behind the clouds.

If you can't see that, then you're not looking hard enough.
 Quoting: Solar

And again you make claims but you do not provide proof.
I only speak the truth astromut, I wouldn't call you a liar if you had actually proven it doens't go behind the clouds.
 Quoting: Solar

You make more claims, but I did prove that it's in front of the clouds, not behind them. I have to say it was quite amusing to watch you contradictorily claim earlier that it looked like it was behind the cloud and like it was in front of the cloud. Can't be both, and the proof at 1:24-1:33 shows it's actually in front of the cloud.
 Quoting: Astromut


I said it appears to be in front of the clouds at some point, but that it is clearly shown behind the clouds earlier.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

It is in front of the clouds, you assumed it was behind earlier in the video, but from the point that the sun has fully emerged onwards it's indisputable that it's in front of the clouds, not behind them. It's easy to see why you thought it went behind the clouds; the clouds were saturating the pixels, thus they drowned out the filter flare, but once the sun emerged and stopped backlighting the cloud, the filter flare is seen to be in front of the clouds, not behind them. 1:24-1:33, the filter flare shows a hard edge, does not illuminate the cloud, and its brightness is not diffused by the cloud at all. It's super-imposed on top of the cloud. That is mutually exclusive with the claim that it was behind the clouds rather than in front of them.
 Quoting: Astromut


No, it was clearly seen behind the clouds, and it was while both the sun and object were behind the clouds. They were both behind the clouds, and the object can still be seen BEHIND the clouds.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:



News