Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,902 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 251,152
Pageviews Today: 338,611Threads Today: 62Posts Today: 1,257
02:28 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Debunk this please.
Poster Handle Astromut
Post Content
...

You resort to ad hominem again, attack my integrity, meanwhile...
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
...

And again you make claims but you do not provide proof.
...

You make more claims, but I did prove that it's in front of the clouds, not behind them. I have to say it was quite amusing to watch you contradictorily claim earlier that it looked like it was behind the cloud and like it was in front of the cloud. Can't be both, and the proof at 1:24-1:33 shows it's actually in front of the cloud.
 Quoting: Astromut


I said it appears to be in front of the clouds at some point, but that it is clearly shown behind the clouds earlier.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3

It is in front of the clouds, you assumed it was behind earlier in the video, but from the point that the sun has fully emerged onwards it's indisputable that it's in front of the clouds, not behind them. It's easy to see why you thought it went behind the clouds; the clouds were saturating the pixels, thus they drowned out the filter flare, but once the sun emerged and stopped backlighting the cloud, the filter flare is seen to be in front of the clouds, not behind them. 1:24-1:33, the filter flare shows a hard edge, does not illuminate the cloud, and its brightness is not diffused by the cloud at all. It's super-imposed on top of the cloud. That is mutually exclusive with the claim that it was behind the clouds rather than in front of them.
 Quoting: Astromut


No, it was clearly seen behind the clouds, and it was while both the sun and object were behind the clouds. They were both behind the clouds, and the object can still be seen BEHIND the clouds.
 Quoting: S0L4RN1GHTM4R3


Again, you just make claims but you provide no proof. It's just your unsupported opinion. I provided detailed proof of why I know it's in front of the clouds, not behind them.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:



News