Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,068 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 101,416
Pageviews Today: 140,352Threads Today: 42Posts Today: 689
12:56 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

SIDS And The Back To Sleep Campaign

 
Shaloh
User ID: 1154777
United States
05/21/2012 02:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
SIDS And The Back To Sleep Campaign
[link to alittlelife.com]
Since 1992-2001 The back to sleep rates were consistant with increases in Autism. Babies who sleep on their backs are getting 25% less sleep. A baby's mind must grow during deep sleep cycles, a baby's developemental health and deep sleep run hand in hand. When a baby loses 25% of its sleep, who knows the damage that can be done. Studies have shown that babies who sleep on their backs have a higher rate of developemental delay, cognitive delays ect. Is it really worth the 0.01% chance of SIDS vs. the 1 in 20 autism rate? There is a definate link between the two. Now I will blame some on vaccines, as my son suffered a major seizure and developemental regression after a multi-vaccine injection. But this is something we need to look into. So many pediatricians go around telling people, "oh your baby will die if you let it sleep on it's stomach". That is absolute BS. This back to sleep campaign is just as harmful to your children as the vaccines. Please see link posted above.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16446956
United States
05/21/2012 02:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SIDS And The Back To Sleep Campaign
When I was growing up late in the early 1990s the people next door had three kids die due to sleeping on there tummy or so they say. They were military and the marines even had an ongoing investigation but they said it was sids.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1154777
United States
05/21/2012 02:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SIDS And The Back To Sleep Campaign
i would say it's abosulte bs. The likeliness of your child dying from SIDS it 1 in 1000, for all 3 to die is just fucking not happening.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1154777
United States
05/21/2012 02:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SIDS And The Back To Sleep Campaign
Then again I think 1 in 1000 is not even correct I believe its a much lower risk. Babies who sleep on their back have the SAME risk and death rate.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7801486
United Kingdom
05/21/2012 02:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SIDS And The Back To Sleep Campaign
I compromised and put my infant to sleep on his side. The sleeping on their back thing doesn't seem safe...I wouldn't leave a drunk on their back, so why would I leave a helpless infant that's probably just as prone to spitting things up and choking on them?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1154777
United States
05/21/2012 02:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SIDS And The Back To Sleep Campaign
Well sleeping on your back increases sleep apnea. They say when the baby sleeps on it's back it is less asleep so it will wake up when breathing becomes hard. But sleep apnea itself can kill you. Its a bs campaign by the same assholes who want your children injected with mercury. Why would you trust them?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16244264
Canada
05/21/2012 02:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SIDS And The Back To Sleep Campaign
Just abort the thing before it's an issue, saves you a hell a lot of money over the short AND long term. Having a spawn is so stupid.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!