Sheriff Joe - is NOT buying it! Wants to see the BC himself - Update: Document Link in P. 9

the child from Slovenia obviously doesn't know dick from vagina... so let's educate.

1. the "birther" BS all started from the Clintons... /snip/

2. the breitbart "news" has NOTHING to do with "birthers." ... /snip/

3. your sorry ass "let me see your BC and SSN" argument is horrendous... /snip/

4. you have very limited knowledge of basic US law... ... /snip/

the child from Slovenia obviously doesn't know dick from vagina... so let's educate.

1. the "birther" BS all started from the Clintons... /snip/

2. the breitbart "news" has NOTHING to do with "birthers." ... /snip/

3. your sorry ass "let me see your BC and SSN" argument is horrendous... /snip/

4. you have very limited knowledge of basic US law... ... /snip/

I was compelled to write the author an email:

There were and still are legitimate questions of authenticity involving multiple “legal” documents provided by the Obama administration. I’d like to see you try to get a driver’s license using a pdf image of your birth certificate that has at least 20+ layers in it and see if you don’t get laughed out of the office.

The fact that you tried so very hard to belittle this situation with your oh so witty commentary shows how little you truly know. In fact, according to the Constitution and MULTIPLE supreme court cases, a natural born citizen is a person born of two American citizens, whereas there are no dual citizenships. So even if the Hawaii birth cert were in fact original, it still wouldn’t amount to a hill of beans constitutionally because Obama’s father was a British citizen at his birth, thereby passing his citizenship to Obama. Also, there’s the little problem of having to renounce citizenship to become an Indonesian citizen as well, which Obama was, but we’ll just look over that detail and poke fun at honest Americans seeking truth.

It’s much easier to write an article full of puns and silly sayings to discredit someone’s character. It’s an entirely different animal to take a look at hard evidence and follow the story. I’m sure someone will tell you what to believe soon enough though, just have faith. Obama will take care of everything.

1. It’s irrelevant who “invented” this crap.

2. "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck..."

3. I was replying to someone boasting he’s ready to show his BC to anyone; on the other side Obama’s BC has been published and officially confirmed by the Hawaiian authorities – what else do you want?

4. Against my alleged "limited knowledge of basic US law" I know that:

- once sworn US president can be lawfully removed from his office only by the elections or impeachment = Article 1 of the US Constitution.

- one is considered innocent until proven guilty = the presumption of innocence;

- the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges = the burden of proof;

Again, Birthers have tried their cases on courts innumerous times, but failed each time. In only 3 cases Obama had to defend the suit (Berg v. Obama, Keyes v. Bowen, Hollister v. Soetoro). In most other cases the court dismissed the case sua sponte – due inanity of legal filings.

*

1. It’s irrelevant who “invented” this crap.

2. "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck..."

3. I was replying to someone boasting he’s ready to show his BC to anyone; on the other side Obama’s BC has been published and officially confirmed by the Hawaiian authorities – what else do you want?

4. Against my alleged "limited knowledge of basic US law" I know that:

- once sworn US president can be lawfully removed from his office only by the elections or impeachment = Article 1 of the US Constitution.

- one is considered innocent until proven guilty = the presumption of innocence;

- the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges = the burden of proof;

Again, Birthers have tried their cases on courts innumerous times, but failed each time. In only 3 cases Obama had to defend the suit (Berg v. Obama, Keyes v. Bowen, Hollister v. Soetoro). In most other cases the court dismissed the case sua sponte – due inanity of legal filings.

*

1. It’s irrelevant who “invented” this crap.

2. "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck..."

3. I was replying to someone boasting he’s ready to show his BC to anyone; on the other side Obama’s BC has been published and officially confirmed by the Hawaiian authorities – what else do you want?

4. Against my alleged "limited knowledge of basic US law" I know that:

- once sworn US president can be lawfully removed from his office only by the elections or impeachment = Article 1 of the US Constitution.

- one is considered innocent until proven guilty = the presumption of innocence;

- the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges = the burden of proof;

Again, Birthers have tried their cases on courts innumerous times, but failed each time. In only 3 cases Obama had to defend the suit (Berg v. Obama, Keyes v. Bowen, Hollister v. Soetoro). In most other cases the court dismissed the case sua sponte – due inanity of legal filings.

*

what IS THIS! [link to www.azcentral.com]

um yeah ya see Sheriff Joe birth records are confidential just because you're a fat ass loud republican doesn't mean you get to see them.

what IS THIS! [link to www.azcentral.com]

See "Attached Document" with the article which is a pdf.

Okay .... so why does it have the time of birth, the dates of various signatures, but does not have the day month and year of birth?

Yeh okay born (whatever hour and minute) but on what date?

It's verified with the COLB (I take it), but not verified with what's up on the white house website, or am I wrong about that?

what IS THIS! [link to www.azcentral.com]