HOLY PIN!!!! THE PYRAMIDS WERE BUILT 9200 BC!!!!!

Stopping the acid? Simple - they don't.

Once cut down the sides, you level to splinter it from its base and pull it free. Then pull it clear with a Zeppelin and lay it on it side , then remove much of the scruffy excess sone at the base with HF again.

Once done, you fly it into position where the stone below has a ridge (I believe that cla is resistent to HF) and pour in a pool of HF onto the top of the bottom stone. Lower the top stone from the Zeppelin into place above it and keep pumping HF into the pool at the jon into they are eroded effectively flat.

indeed similar to an acrylic glue

i believe the term is amalgamating?

EXACTLY!!!

Tewotewokan (sorry, but I am not sure of the spelling) was one of the earliest and it is absolutely bult on Flourspar, like many of the other major SOuth American structures.

There you go, now wont i look stupid if i've spelt it wrong

imposible. the religious fools tell us the Earth is only 4 thousand years old.

Waaaaay, waaaaaay, waaaay before that.



But your minds are not ready for that, yet.

Maybe, but why is that "star map" so unclear? That rock wasn't exposed to the elements. If they wanted to make a star map they could have done a better, clearer job. Some etchings are there but more investigations are needed.

Which religion says so?!

If there was a cataclysm in 9500 bc as some books suggest there would be less population in 9200 to build do nothing objects of art and mythology. I would guess all these structures are pre 11,000 bc and built by an unknown species of human that has since died off.

lol ...

Could it be the stones were poured in place. Kind of like todays cement. This would answer a lot of questions and would be a low tech way of constructing them. This type of construction would create an almost seamless fit.....sk

holy morning - good morning OP : D

even older - but that's about to come up

its 15 000 and the Sphinx more than 21 000 ;DDDDDD even the base of the Sphix - its soo old I cant even tell you how much.. O_O

buuuump

peace yo

all pyramids throughout the world were all made just like what you people say samething with all unexplained stone temple pilots time travelers something for later times

Also, did you cut off that? --->> Thread: WHO cut off that mountain in Nazca?

i did a bit of research and the process of making stone blocks it called agglomeration

woah, is this thread going to start sounding like Ridley Scott's PROMETHEUS film at some point?

Are we HELPING TO MAKE our own reality, in this concern?

:)

The ancient aliens theory is perhaps a little too far fetched for my liking, I see no reason why there could not exist an ancient human civilization which was somehow obliterated. But at this moment it is an academic question anyway.

But there is no doubt in my mind that:

- those huge stones were not cut by copper/bronze chisels. No way. Not a chance in hell; (I suggest watching the Puma Punku mystery of the Ancient Aliens series)
- those stones were not moved using tree logs and ropes. No way. Not a chance in hell;
- building with such a precision using the measuring equipment of that time seems ridiculous at best.

Yet it is still being taught at schools that in case the pyramids were not built by slaves (that's what we were taught, mind you) they were built by well paid craftsmen. Fine. But I would really like to see a demonstration regarding transport and stone cutting.
Every attempt to recreate ancient stone building that has been performed in the modern era failed miserably, to say the least.

The Graham Hancock's Ancient Civilization theory seems most logical to me, although Von Daniken's ideas are appealing too.

The mainstream archeologists themselves admit that anything beyond 4000-5000 BC is practically a complete mystery. Yet they insist the pyramids were tombs, built by primitive men. Utter bollocks.

You only have to look at the monoliths in Baalbek to know they weren't moved using log rollers, we can only just now move some of them blocks

+1. Amen to that.

We can date the entire universe sub 10k ybp so his theories are misguided & bogus.

as provided by the op earlier

this is how they make the stones for the building of the pyramid.

they dont cut the blocks away from a quarry thats probably just someones failed attempt to replicate later, but instead using moulds they made the pyramid blocks on site, probably molded right where they sit right now. thats how the edges meet, each block was cast against the next.

I agree. That's another mystery.

Link and not some religious book type site

Last Edited by F F S on 05/29/2012 06:58 AM

blocks were never moved, they were cast in place.

[link to www.geopolymer.org]

5* nice find OP..

if your wondering how they moved the raw materials, they broke up and dissolved the limestone into the big ol river and then directed the river into giant pools under the sphynx evapourated it at turning back into limestone for materials. also could simply have been broken into small pieces and carried.

Wow!! So how the hell DID they build the pyramids in that tropical rain forest environment?
There goes the ancient cement theory. With those rains, they'd have a real problem waiting for the concrete to dry out.