HOLY PIN!!!! THE PYRAMIDS WERE BUILT 9200 BC!!!!!

Comon Folks!

Essentially, a star map was engraved, with an arrow pointing to what was seen out of that shaft.

well folks. Using our astronomy gizmos, that shaft was pointing to a section of the sky that only could have been visible 9200 BCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your History teachers were lying to you all the way long, even though it's not their fault.

Well, I dont seem to see the deeper sense of that?
Why would I put such information in a place where no human can reach it? They knew we will have robots?

Control of the school system is so important to funneling a society the way you want it to go.

The real criminals of the education system are the book publishers though. Are European countries so greedy when it comes to education?

The Egyptians were white people.

Black people are stupid.

interesting

Way more convincing is the indisputable geomorphological evidence.

The pyramids are from the same era as the Great Sphinx.

Sand erosion causes lateral scratching of rock whilst rain water causes vertical erosion of rock.

By a massive margin the dominant erosion on the Great Sphinx is VERTICAL ROCK erosion. This would indicate that it dates from shortly after or at about the same time as the end of the last Ice Age, when the region was a dense Amazon-style rainforest, being pelted daily by savage thunderstorms, at about 12,000 BC, ( 9,200BC being actually probably too recent(.

After about 7,000 BC it would have been utterly impossible to have had any degree of vertical striation, let alone the dominant.

Thats such a stupid post.

APPARENTLY White or black people didnt build these things.

I think its a very wise position for a reference point as to when the project was started.

There is also another concern regarding the pyramids.

Few people realise that the pyramids were the primary objects used to calibrate carbon dating.

The first attempt to date the pyramids using carbon dating gave a figure in the region of 8,200BC. As they were "known" to be more recent, carbon dating was recalibrated so that the pyramids come out at the current figure.

As a result, if the pyramids are indeed, from 9,200 BC, then all other carbon dating across the globe is also WRONG by a large factor.

Someone will probably say it just happens to have been a graffiti-ised stone that they just happened to use when they constructed it.

I'm not entirely convinced the Egyptians built them, as the only thing that relates the Pyramids with Kufhu, Kahfre etc is a single stone stella

wow this is interesting, it reaffirms what many of us already knew about the great pyramid and sphynx's age for other reasons.

so how far does this go to giving credence to thoth and emerald tablets and the videos of underground in giza we have all seen and all the strange constructs built.

where is the hall of records, and whats in there, is there really a one atom thick giant spaceship?

how do the lights work at the bottom of the shafts under the great pyramid?

so many many questions.

neat.

Well the father of geopolymers said himself, that the stones used at the pyramids are artificial. so that could maybe screw up the c14

so many....

now couple this carbon dating calibration error with the fluctuation in emmissions from the sun causing decay rates of radioactive elements to vary in unknown proportions, you have a completely obsolete way of dating somethign.

duh

you think they probably used parabolic mirrors to harness the heat of the sun to melt rock and create them, or are we look at somethign more technical in order to make artificial stone?

that and like i said, the father of geopolymers, davidowitz I think his name was. conclcuded the stones of the pyramids werent from any quarry.

they are artificial. that also might screw up the 14

I really like the coverage Coppens gave in his book the Ancient Astronaut Question. but heres something... [link to www.geopolymer.org]

wow this is a day of revelation!!

so far that is some solid science, im now realising iv got a lot of catching up to do.

.. so its possible they could have made the pyramids by casting the stone in place with only minimal movement of the actual set blocks.

Wow. Very cool.

Regaurdless if the stones were on site..


Lloyd Pye crunches the numbers... check it out..

about 1:20

How the pyramids were built...

There is actually a way in which the pyramdis COULD have been built using low tech.

Consider...

- All the ancient South American civilizations were built where the trade winds across the Atlantic go to and the stone monuments like Stonehenge and such circles are where the northern trade ends across the Atlantic end.
- The SOuth American temple complexes alwasy seem ot have a one mile, straight as a dye wide road through their heart ending at a stepped temple.
- The South American temples and, at that time, at the end of the last Ice Age, in Egypt, they would all have been surrounded by vast reserves of hard wood forests.
- Ley lines across Europe line up across Europe giving the most direct routes by air to connect key temple places like Delphi, the Pyramids, Stonehenge and often also geographical features like passes through the Alps.
- Imagine you are an alien, zillions of miles from hmoe. Would you really wish to risk your one means home moving rock and go to al the expense of doing so>
- Why did the PREFER to use huge blocks of stone rather than small ones and prefer to built at the top of mountains instead of down in the valleys?

So, how were the pyramids built in 22 years?

By Zeppelins.

Assuming that the main routes through the temple complexes allowed them to build hardwood framed Zepplins filled with hydrogen, using the stats on the Hindenburg for gross and net lift and assuming the removal of passenger areas, the maximum lift would be compliant with the maximum size of stones found in these structures. Further more, assuming a day to load and a day to unload, and, assuming that they would have been propelled by teams of horses on the ground, and assuming one zeppelin loading stones whilst the other unloaded, it would give a one week turn around for the journey and take the two Zeppelins 21,7 years to move all the stones into place, a caluclation that comes stuningly close to the actual reported figure of 22 years.

Additionally, if one is moving stones by Zeppelins, to ensure stability of load and swiftness of loading, it would have been most beneficial to use only the biggest possible stones AND to build at the tops of mountains as trips down into valleys would have been perilous for hydrogen filled zeppelins.

Addiitonally, there is quetion of how they could have obtained the hydrogen. There are two primary means...

1. by electrolysis - Is it not remarkable that all the stone circles are always found near horses, water and are magnetised? Could it be that the stone circles are actually ancient horse-drawn magnetos, that, by turning copper wire by hrses in the middle of the magnetised circles, an electric current could have been produced, capable of electorlysing sea or corrupted bog water? Indeed, the Romans and the Greeks even had the GOd of horses to be the same as the God of the Sea - Poseidon. Recent excavation at Stone henge has shown that the little central circle was orginally down by the river and connected by a mysterious stone gullyway to the main circle. Could this have been a cable duct to allow the small circle to be a pump or machining area to draw water from the river and to mend the Zeppelin after its dangerous wind-propelled journey across the Atlantic?
2. By chemical reaction - It isin teresting to note that chemical residue in the Queens Chamber of the Great Pyramid clearly indicates the production of hydrogen on a massive scale there.

OP

remember nowiknow.com, with the video of the rc car going down the shafts to what appeared to be underground room

im curious what did you see in the room, what did it look like to you ?