Romney Loses Nomination To Ron Paul

It's not surprising that a Paultard such as yourself would make such a statement. What is surprising is a Paultard such as yourself claiming that you "think." Remember, "thinking" requires a brain, something you Paultards lack.

Nobody cares who supports him since it's obvious by him losing every single state he ever ran in that he NEVER HAD A CHANCE IN HELL OF WINNING A SINGLE STATE. He's just been stealing money and lining his pockets because idiots like you are dumb enough to contribute to the crook.

You act like they are meant to be mutually exclusive.

I really hope you are just trolling and aren't serious.

99% of Ron Paul supporters have no idea what their candidate actually believes in. It's like the Obama delusion, except Obama polls over 12% in his home state.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9994281

You are so far off from reality it's scary, if you really think this way. This was your first post to this thread.

You tried to come here and say that 99% of Ron Paul supporters don't know his position. His position is very cleary defined and that's why both Repubs and Dems hate him, because of his position of supporting the Constitution, freedom and liberty.


Then you try to say he's a flip flopper. Now that one takes the cake. Yes after a 30 year career i'm sure he's changed his position on a few minor things. But of course the world has changed a lot in 30 years.

If Ron Paul if a flip flopper, what does that make the rest of the politicians. Ron Paul has stood strong and consistent on all the major issue. You basically discredit yourself by saying this. I've never seen anyone try to argue that point like you because they know it's a losing battle when you compare Ron Paul to any other politician.

And here's the kicker. Your very own Liberal NEW YORK TIMES, just came out with a story how Obama will flip his stance to the highest bidder! pretty sad when the ultra left NY Times prints this story!

[link to theulstermanreport.com]



And I noticed you never answered why you liked Obama, What he has done that you like. Because we both know he hasn't done jack shit.


You lost dude. Give it up OBOT




The thing about these candidates is that NEITHER will do much good. If you dont' see tha you're a bigger moran than I thought... I'll choose the one who'll do less bad.

So much for your big slam.

So tell me, why do YOU support Paul's willingness to allow corporate monopolies? Or deregulate lobbying? What about that is amazing to you?

Yea.... this is the way all Ron Paul "supporters" talk, right?

Just fucking admit you're a Obamney lover and get it over with. You're not fooling anyone, jackass.

I support him but he got his fucking ass kicked and I can live with that. You Paultards can't live with it because you're delusional idiots and the laughing stock of the internet.

Lol @ all the people who say they're "for" Ron Paul when they do nothing but criticize him he they "think" he can't win.

Herp-uh-Derp Let's not support people we are for and just drop everything and support someone you don't even like....AHHHH AMERICA!!!

I never said I agreed with everything he stands for.

But there is one big thing that he stands for that you will NEVER hear from any of the bought and paid for politicians on either side of the phoney isle.

And that is dismantling the Federal Reserve. The federal reserve is one if not the leading cause of the gutting of the middle class and inflation over the last 100 years.

Jefferson warned not to let the bankers control the money or your kids would wake up poor annd landless in the country their forefathers made for them (paraphrasing obviously). And that is exactly what happened/is happening.

When Hitler threw out the bankers and had the state control print the money after WW1, their economy literally exploded. we don't need debt instruments, we need real money. And we don't need a group of private bankers making money out of thin air and then lending it to the gov't.

So you do go for the phoney left/right paradigm and you will vote for the lesser of two evils huh. Sucker. You play right into their hands with that way of thinking. They don't give a fuck who wins between Obama and Romney. They are both bought and paid for by the same people.

Why do you think there is such a concerted effort to keep Ron Paul down on both side of the isle? Because they fear him. They have used everything they have in their playbook to make him seem fringe and unelectable, when by metrics they can't hide like attendance at political events, etc, he has way more support than is being admitted to.

It's amazing he has made it this far running against the machine. It just goes to show you how much support he really has that is being hidden.


But go ahead. Keep playing into their hands.

Give me ONE example of how you have "supported" him. Ever.

Did you donate to his campaign?

Did you try to get your friends or family interested in him?

Did you vote for him in primaries?

Did you do ANYTHING other than come into Ron Paul threads on GLP and spout your usual bullshit "support" by calling people Paultards and telling them he can't win?


Simply saying you support him does not mean you actually supported him in any way.

"Especially considering there is no such thing as a “bound” delegate at the national level, despite what some are trying to claim, Romney is not only nowhere near locking up the nomination, a brokered convention is now almost a guarantee, leaving the Ron Paul Revolution squarely in the driver's seat."


Dear Establishment,

You know all the rights you stole from us?

You know all the money you stole from us?

You know all the things you lied about?

You know all those people you murdered abroad?

You know all those people you beat and disabled here?

The CHICKENS are coming home to roost and they are gonna shit allover your fucking faces!

Ron Paul is all those things and he is going ride into town like the whitehat gunslinger and put you on the fucking ground.

20 minutes after his inaugural address, he will announce the recinding of nearly all executive orders which will release the military back to its constitutinal boundaries. Once that happens, the provost marshalls will decent on about 45% of the politicians, both state and federal and serv them. This will take about a week. During that week the old establishment will do its best to destroy this county by disabling power, water, sewage and communications systems. Be ready, but, relax.

You've heard about the mass arrests? Well, the white hats are just about to land. When they do, there will more pissing an moaning that you've ever heard in your life.

I'M GONNA GET MY COUNTRY BACK!

Pray for those involved. They may be a few bullets flying. Hopefully not, but it may be necessary.

You know, Jarhead, coming from you I'm taking this as a compliment.

If I thought you knew better I'd be insulted.


Now, on another note: how can any of you be for freedom and liberty and not support Ron Paul? It's beyond me.

I support him by telling everyone I know about his great record of stealing billions in earmarks from hard-working Americans. I don't contribute to him because I'm not an idiot that wastes money by giving it to a vagina doctor who had NO CHANCE IN HELL OF WINNING A SINGLE STATE.

Last Edited by CrazyJarhead on 05/31/2012 03:37 PM

^^^ This ^^^

Because the ideas of individual freedom, limited government, and fiscal responsibility weren't born with Ron Paul and they wont' die with Ron Paul.

Some of his ideas are good, he's a failure. He lacked the leadership ability to do anything during his tenure as a congressman. He can't win a primary election against the other republican candidates so I have no faith that he could win a general election against a still popular incumbent.

Are you so wrapped up in Ron Paul mania that you can't separate the ideas from the man?

I support what he stands for but he's just an old crook and washed-out vagina doctor who NEVER HAD A CHANCE IN HELL OF WINNING A SINGLE STATE.

JarHead,

You are one CONFUSED individual!!! Please, everyone listen to JarHead: he's the perfect example of the average American. Ugghh!

So your answer is actually "No, I did not actually support him in any way shape or form but I will continue to say I support him even though I do not."


What's your end-game? Why do you insist on saying you "support" him when you just admitted that you have not ever supported him?

EXACTLY!!!

but don't "say" that out loud... or ppl here will say YOU are the fool (oh, and that you don't care about your country)! LOL

(oh, and then some will cry to admin's to get your IP banned when you make them look like an idiot) LMAO ... ahhh, good stuff!!!!

gotta laugh at this. He wouldn't have been re-elected for 30 years straight if he was a failure of a congressman.

And as for the rest of the bs in your post.... you believe this because Keith Olberman, Chris 'Tingle Up My Leg' Mathews and the rest of the lame stream media don't you it was so?

he hasn't won the om, because the voting hasnt taken place yet? am i missing something here

that happens in august

Fair enough - yes, I can separate the ideals of Libertarianism from "Ron Paul" as a person. Furthermore, your post serves as a reminder to all of us that read it:

Do not let your goal of liberty die with the campaign of Ron Paul.

I admit I'm guilty of falling into the trap of defending "Ron Paul" bashers. Their relentless and brain-dead attacks wear thin.

You're right, he wasn't a failure as a congressman. He stole more earmarks than any other congressman in history. He also had a very successful and racist newsletter which I'm sure you love. He also made money as a vagina doctor before he realized he could steal more money in politics.

The fact you use the word 'paultard' shows your level of intelligence.

And thanks for the negative karma, hilarious.

Last Edited by H.A.A.R.P on 05/31/2012 03:44 PM

Ha... 2 words. Ted Kennedy.

So because Harry Reid has been elected so many times he's been a good congressman? What about Charles Rangel? He's been there a while too..

As for the rest of the BS, how many primaries did Ron Paul receive the most votes in? One?

lol... He was just elected riding the Kennedy coattails. At least Ron had to do it the old fashion grassroots way

I'm not sure because there was evidence of mass fraud. He probably one a lot more primaries.

So it's not BS. He didn't show the ability to win primary elections against the other republican candidates.

Harry Reid wasn't elected last time. He stole it. Talk to anyone in Nevada back then? No one, and I mean no one knows anyone who voted for him. And he made a consistent 5% lead as the vote counts came in from the districts which is statistically impossible.

I never saw one Harry Reid sign in any front yards. All Sharon Angle signs. To this day no one know how he won other than cheating because he controls the unions there. Just like in good ole Chicago with Obama.

i won't even dignigy this with a response. lol. you sure are crazy, crazyjarhead. but i guess that why they love you