To a Mod: Point GLP telescopes here,,, These guys have found Planet X and reveal location

hello anybody?

Yes?

Kupier belt objects are not planets

Check it out Trinity or Astromut

That would be a monumental moment for either of those two to
ever confirm these findings. Come on fellas. Make this a world
changing annoucement.

SKYVIEW was exposed long ago. The first video is from SKYVIEW'S best bud who attacked Astromut before seeing the light.

Astrolpatriot, and Skyview Exposed as Hoax.



Do Not Trust the "Skyview team"

I dunno... worth dialing it in and taking a look though

If I had a big multi K telescope set up, I'd at least take a passing glance.

Astroshill will be here in 5 4 3 2 1

wow tbar, that's interesting arguement... thanks

doesnt this speak volumes

Thats so kewel, wuv you guez!

"Coordinates? We don't need no stinkin' coordinates!"

22h 20m 42.07s - 10 56' 16.1"

00 09 21 00 41

yep... these are the one's given in the vid

well worth a look!

is the glp scope capable of seeing that far out?

where is the glp obs based in usa?

can neptune be seen now, and is it too light?

Nothing.

Can you provide standard true EQ coordinates for the object or relative deviations from Neptune and estimated magnitude?

Neptune true equatorial coordinates are: RA: 22h 21m 06.4s, Dec: -10°54'12" (GMT).

*

according to the vid its a bit down from neptune and i cant find true coords for it.

gd luck!

I just checked my Google Sky app and looked for Neptune, trip out on how after zooming there is a spherical body tagged Nibiru?

This sort of nonsense is specifically made to sucker-in people who are ignorant enough about astronomy to ask questions like the one above.

Please then, O wise one... enlighten us with your wisdom



Last Edited by Deej on 06/01/2012 01:08 PM

the point of using the glp obv is to debunk it

How's that going anyway?

Be Verwee Varwee quiet, Rabbit.

The first set are said to be of Neptune (close enough, exact coordinates will depend not only on time but location). The second set are supposedly of their "object." The problem is, they're not a valid set of coordinates, or at least not a complete set. It's nonsensical. They give no formatting references and give an insufficient amount of numbers for it to be the standard equatorial hh mm ss, +/-dd mm ss (hours, minutes, seconds, degrees, minutes, seconds) format. Am I supposed to interpret that as 00h 09m 21s, 00d 41' 00"? Or am I supposed to interpret that as 00h 09m, +21d 00' 41" with an implied 00s at the end of the RA? Those are two completely different locations.

TBar and I have already shown that these guys steal real amateurs' images, lie about it, and lie about what the images contain. These guys are the scum of the earth and everything they say is BS. They have no integrity whatsoever, if I point at one or even both of the locations and show there's nothing there, they can just weasel out of it by saying that that's not what they meant by the coordinates and come up with some other contrived formatting method. They didn't specify to begin with, they left it ambiguous so that they can change what it "means" at will to weasel out of anything I can produce from it. That's why I fight them on the matter of their actual content.

One of their latest videos that they claim is a "kuiper belt object" is in fact a video of the black eye galaxy, M64, most likely stolen from Night Skies Network where they previously stole material.
[link to i319.photobucket.com]

You can control it yourself.

Remote focusing and tuning is completed and in testing on the sun scopes. Remote focusing now needs to be added to the 14" deep space scope and we'll have a fully remote operational deep space telescope for everyone to use.