To a Mod: Point GLP telescopes here,,, These guys have found Planet X and reveal location

it could has filters mounted to make things invisible to user eye, tought about that -?

OP only conveyed what was in the vid, which Mut has
already stated were ambiguous.

Astromut, since you're an astronomy buff, do you yourself actively look for new objects, or are you just looking at things other people have found? Have you ever found anything unknown to anybody else? Just curious.

I just gave you the one image I was able to collect so far, my point is that you have to realize that since you are dealing with people of no integrity, they can simply revise what they meant by it or give out new coordinates altogether and just keep playing games.

DUDE......again.

WHY are you on these threads ASTRODILDO?

If this is all rubbish BULLSHIT as you like to say, then again the question is : WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU ALL OVER THESE THREADS if there is nothing to them as you say?

This is a conspiracy website, why not go piss off dude?

Go to your MENZA meeting if you are such a big brain.

Leave GLP the fuck alone, WE DONT NEED YOU fuckwad!

DUDE......again.

WHY are you on these threads ASTRODILDO?

If this is all rubbish BULLSHIT as you like to say, then again the question is : WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU ALL OVER THESE THREADS if there is nothing to them as you say?

This is a conspiracy website, why not go piss off dude?

Go to your MENZA meeting if you are such a big brain.

Leave GLP the fuck alone, WE DONT NEED YOU fuckwad!

Firstly, Astromut is not answerable to you, AC.

Secondly, the Niburu mambo jambo is not a conspiracy theory but a lunatic delusion. It lacks any common sense reasoning, plausibility, definition of motives and perpetrators what else any evidences.

Thirdly, if you don't want anyone contradicting your paranoid delusion go to the Nancy's echo-chamber.

Now, take a hike, tard.

*

I like to push the boundaries on satellite tracking, that's my major area of expertise within amateur astronomy. Spotting an object six inches wide from over 3300 km away? Few can say they've done that. Directly tracking and resolving ISS and the shuttle in broad daylight? I even surprised some NASA employees with that one. The objects themselves are not new or unknown, but the way in which I observed them was generally novel.

I also keep a watchful eye out for any new objects as well as planetary impacts and supernovae. I've come close to discovering a couple of supernovae, but ended up observing the galaxy a day or two before it went off.

I'm not as concerned about discovering something completely new as I am just collecting useful data, whether for historical or tracking purposes. Even if I don't find the latest, greatest asteroid threat myself, if I observe it then I can contribute additional astrometric data for determining it's orbit, which is just as important as initially finding it. You can't know for sure if a given asteroid's a real threat or not until you've collected enough astrometric data.

I do have one discovery I can claim though; I was the first to discover and report that the classified shuttle X-37 can flare up in brightness by several magnitudes for a brief moment when the lighting angle is just right.

Kupier belt objects are not planets

wha...um....over here...
derail happening...
one more thing mut...there where
no "Unknowns" in what you posted. Right?
As in all those snowflakes were cataloged?
Nothing obvious...and please excuse my ignorance.
im try to get help here and its like fighting ghost

Yes, there are planets there, and those are dwarf planets, bitch


Jewitt and Luu share the 2012 Kavli prize for astrophysics with Michael Brown, of the California Institute of Technology, in Pasadena, California, who followed in their footsteps and searched the Kuiper Belt for planet-sized bodies. In 2005 he found Eris, an object about the same size as Pluto but with 27% more mass. As a result astronomers had to rethink what it is to be a "planet". The subsequent relegation of Pluto to "dwarf planet" status became worldwide news.

Well there are two parallel streaks and a faint fuzzy near the center corresponds to no known nebula, but the pattern is indicative of a plane fly-over. The faint fuzzy corresponds to the strobe light and the streaks correspond to the navigation lamps; I've seen this before in images, and though the streaks resemble satellite streaks, no satellites flew through the field of view during the time of the exposure. The pattern is that of a plane. I'll double check with an additional exposure tonight.

Okay on the streaks, but doesn't the "no known nebula" raise
a flag?

The first set are said to be of Neptune (close enough, exact coordinates will depend not only on time but location). The second set are supposedly of their "object." The problem is, they're not a valid set of coordinates, or at least not a complete set. It's nonsensical. They give no formatting references and give an insufficient amount of numbers for it to be the standard equatorial hh mm ss, +/-dd mm ss (hours, minutes, seconds, degrees, minutes, seconds) format. Am I supposed to interpret that as 00h 09m 21s, 00d 41' 00"? Or am I supposed to interpret that as 00h 09m, +21d 00' 41" with an implied 00s at the end of the RA? Those are two completely different locations.

TBar and I have already shown that these guys steal real amateurs' images, lie about it, and lie about what the images contain. These guys are the scum of the earth and everything they say is BS. They have no integrity whatsoever, if I point at one or even both of the locations and show there's nothing there, they can just weasel out of it by saying that that's not what they meant by the coordinates and come up with some other contrived formatting method. They didn't specify to begin with, they left it ambiguous so that they can change what it "means" at will to weasel out of anything I can produce from it. That's why I fight them on the matter of their actual content.

One of their latest videos that they claim is a "kuiper belt object" is in fact a video of the black eye galaxy, M64, most likely stolen from Night Skies Network where they previously stole material.
[link to i319.photobucket.com]

again....no answer on why Asstro is here.


Just more insults to me,

and not an answer to the big question :why are you on EVERY fucking Nibiru thread if you think it is such bullshit.

You have not answered that one TARD and that speaks volumes.

Seriously, a real astronomer would not be messing around on GLP, this guy is a 100% shill.

Nice try Astro, you have convinced more people than you will ever know!

again....no answer on why Asstro is here.


Just more insults to me, and not an answer to the big question :why are you on EVERY fucking Nibiru thread if you think it is such bullshit.

You have not answered that one TARD and that speaks volumes.

Seriously, a real astronomer would not be messing around on GLP, this guy is a 100% shill.

Too much smoke and fire there for nothing to be going on.

Nice try Astro, you have convinced more people than you will ever know! Your actions tell us all we need to know.

Simply ignore him and his post...

Astromut - I accept and welcome your critique of Planet X related issues - but why do you think the sun has been so gosh darn bright?

There was a nasa article a couple years back which said that the sun was pumping more of its energy into UV rather than visible in recent years.