Judge revokes bond for Zimmerman!!! Back to the slammer till trial Zimmie!

Thanks... I am a fan of Harry Potter Books...

Last Edited by FATMANGOBOOM on 06/02/2012 08:41 AM

What details we know of it looks like he was defending himself... That said we don;t know a whole lot that went down that night... I am sure there is a lot of details being held...

That being said the most that has been coming out the more innocent he is looking and that does not sit well with those that want to start this race war...

Zimms lawyer DID mention there was an internet fund at the bail hearing. The Judge ALLOWED it to be brushed off.

This is just getting thrown back in our faces because we stopped talking about it.

I don't quite understand you here, I think we've already seen the outcome of the trial. It was going to be an acquittal (they let him out on low bond) now it's going to be a conviction (they revoked his bond.)

Statistically this is a very good indicator. All the criminal attorneys, prosecution and defense and judge too, know this. (I'm still looking for a reference, I read it in a recent Village Voice and it was very credible, backed by statistics.) It's a huge part of the game they play. The judge releases the defendant on reasonable bond when he expects an acquittal. And since he's the judge, his rulings during the trial will have a lot to do with forming that outcome.

Yes, the judge has changed his mind for some reason. Zimmerman should understand that.

Eh? Do you understand the judicial process?

In Zimmerman's very first exposure to the court and to the public, he lied.
Now, we can see that he is a liar.
So, why on earth would anyone base their judgment of what happened that night on Zimmerman's word?

There is that..........

Yes I do. And more than what is taught in Civics class.

Sorry Sir, but when was the trial?

Why is it all the black posters, like you Lurker, love to plan the demise of a man because he's not black?

Aside from your blatant rascism, it's really interesting that some don't want a fair trial for Zimmerman, even though all logical evidence suggests Trayvon was the physical aggressor.

I'm so sick of the black community and their non-stop whining about this-and-that. It's comment and actions like this that go a long way to foster the "generalization" about blacks that you see these days.

So, it must be a deliberate "lie" when your attorney mentions it in court, the judge doesn't seem to give a shit, it's public information that tens of thousands of people have contributed to, and something that any non-wealthy individual would need if they were being railroaded on something because they aren't black?

You guys show your true colors more and more all the time.

Keep fostering the hate (of non-blacks)....it'll serve them well in the near future. </sarcasm>

No reason to be sorry, I was never on trial.

Eh? I'm white lol.

Well that was indeed a retort full of nothing!

I find it interesting that you call out a black person for being racist in this thread and on this website, GLP. Your argument holds no weight and quite frankly, you're just making an ass of yourself.

No one needs your reasoning for why EVERY RACE IN THE WORLD HATES BLACKS. You always have some reason but the reason is simple and that is because GOD has hardened your hearts. No logic or intellect can change what is solidified in your hearts and souls. Therefore, you have already been judged by the Most High Creator God Himself and you don't know it...yet. So go ahead and keep making up reasons for why Zimmerman is innocent. You all hold yourselves not-guilty anyway. Just the fruits of who you are.

This still isn't a reference, but the information was cited by someone associated with the Manhattan Bail Project.

[link to www.vera.org]

I don't even know what this means but if its backed by statistics...

What? You implied I was on trial, I said I was not. Don't go implying things if you don't want a response.

Yes, I know.

Retired Special Forces, been through hell and back, had a black man save your lifeless body, etc. etc.

My memory is painfully photographic...

I wasn't referring to you in general, but the overall tone of the posts, and the Lurker post you commented on.

Lurker has a long history of in-your-face racism towards whites on this site...again, the painfully photographic memory thing.

It was something like people out on bail are convicted 20% of the time, those in custody on trial are convicted 90% of the time. The numbers were shockingly different.

Cause travon cant tell us.....

I thought you were implying the trial had been and gone and had been decided? No? Did I misunderstand?

Indeed.

Yep, let's throw law, logic, and decency out the window in favor of an afro-centric, racist God complex. As long as this fantasizing keeps you happy, go for it. We all need something to keep us going.

And yes, in my experience, blacks ARE THE MOST RACIST animals on this planet. Many can't stand the truth and love to turn the "race" card on everyone else to hide their own HATE of white people.

Your post illustrates this concept well.


Sounds like a winner!

:african:

well that is not true...
who aproached who...
who was stalking who?
who was walking on the sidewalk?
who was following armed with a loaded gun in a car?
who was told to not take action?
who shot an unarmed person?
who is dead?
why did Zim. not stay in his car.
the second that Mr. zimmerman left his car with a loaded gun to chase this 17 year old. he became the attacker...
so at which time do you think he became the victim?
when the young man overpowered his attacker?
or when he was arrested and charged with murder?

either persons past should not pay into the facts of that fateful night.
the young man did not come after zimmerman sitting in the car.
there were not any calls to police about the young man. police were not out looking for the young man.

what did this young man do that night to be given a death sentence? now you must only think about what he had done that night....what he could have ...or might have...
hell he might or could have ....done anything.
he could have saved someone's life, we will never know...he was shot dead?

Oh I'm sorry, but I think you did misunderstand. I'm not saying Zimmerman's trial has been formally conducted and completed. I'm just saying that the revocation of bail seems to me strong evidence that he will be convicted. I'm predicting the future as if it's a fact already.

The judge's change of attitude generally (brushing stuff off last time, having an angry tone this time) was also pretty obvious. Now the judge wants to get him.

Ummmm. *Your* racism is showing. I am *the* whitest person you will ever have contact with. My ancestors can be traced back (all of them) for *five* hundred years to the south coast of England, the Channel Isles, and Normandy in France. Not only that, my family has lived in the South since they came to Charleston, South Carolina, in 1689. In other words, I am descended from real, genuine, bonafide Southern aristocracy. You crackers, rednecks, and white trash around here can't claim to be as *white* as I am, so STFU about "racism."

I'm just being logical here. The point is that it is clear that Zimmerman, at the very least, tried to obfuscate and evade the fact that he had $200,000 hidden away in a PayPal account. That's called lying by omission.

But since you're so intent on judging Trayvon by the stereo-type of your imagination, you can't see that.

I would say it's the perpetrators, not God, who have hardened the hearts of the victims and observers of black-on-white violence.

More study needed, friend. You don't have your facts straight.