Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,709 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 529,022
Pageviews Today: 746,941Threads Today: 157Posts Today: 3,826
06:51 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age

 
You can't HANDLE the TRUT
User ID: 3650237
United States
06/01/2012 10:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
they had it on MythBusters a while back. 2 dead pigs. 1 dated to thousands of years and the other was just a few months. They burried both on the same day in the same conditions.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16851279


bump
And that IS truth.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3650237
United States
06/01/2012 10:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins.




Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501


Oooh, a Youtube clip....I'm sure science is trembling in its boots......

banana2
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17131873


1rof11rof11rof1



1dunno1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3650237
United States
06/01/2012 10:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501


I'm afraid first you have to get a Master of Science or at least do the equal amount of reading... :/

Here's the forumla for your question: [link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17116182


You mean a Master of Indoctrination. I don't need a piece of paper to tell me that Carbon Dating is absurd.

Science = House of Cards
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501


5 *s on that,Dude. Speak the Truth and you will be hated. Get used to it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3650237
United States
06/01/2012 10:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Kent was too smart for his own good. They had to get rid of him.
 Quoting: walker8989


yep...who's next?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3650237
United States
06/01/2012 10:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
LOL to anyone who thinks there is actually some sure fire way to accurately measure the age of something thousands of + years old.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15526347


If you don't know its age how can you say it's "thousands of years old"?

DUH!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17131873


Hmm let me take a guess, scientists engage in a lot of supposition, and make sure they only get "evidence" that supports their suppositions? Nah can't be, scientists are super intelligent super men who never engage in such human foibles.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15526347


SUPERSHARK!

LOLZ
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3650237
United States
06/01/2012 10:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
RADIOACTIVE DECAY IS NOT CONSTANT

which part of that is not making sense?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17118059


Shroud of Turin
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3650237
United States
06/01/2012 10:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
This is all promoted by religitardism.

No matter how muddy you make the waters, it doesn't make literal interpretation of the Bible any less RETARDED.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17175009


I am so glad I'm not as stupid as YOU!!!
LOL dumbass.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3650237
United States
06/01/2012 10:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Well that seals it, the Earth is only 6000 years old!!

Praise Jesus!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1510025


The Earth is based off of the 6000 year principle by determining the lineage of King David. The Bible is specific about the name and age of the people and that is how we get this age.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4223094


I love you!





hf
TheFireman

User ID: 454067
United States
06/01/2012 10:35 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
bump
"The Facade" by Michael S. Heiser . . . most people don't want the truth... they're looking for answers to confirm their prejudices.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11766256
United States
06/01/2012 10:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins.




Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501


"Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?"

They know that it hasn't C14 is destablized by arsenic, current calculations acount only for the current amount of arsenic in the atmosphere and the earth (there are trace amounts of both)... However, evolutionists admit that for evolution to be possible at one time the earth's atmosphere had to be way more dense and composed differently than it is. So considering a fossil has not been exposed to any more arsenic than it would be from normal, current atmospheric levels carbon dating is a somewhat decent approximation. However, you're assuming alot and it is admitted that at some point in the history of the earth the atmosphere had to be completely different, so it can be somewhat accurate up to that point, but if a fossil is from before that point carbon dating will tell you absolutely nothing.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11766256
United States
06/01/2012 10:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins.




Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501


"Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?"

They know that it hasn't C14 is destablized by arsenic, current calculations acount only for the current amount of arsenic in the atmosphere and the earth (there are trace amounts of both)... However, evolutionists admit that for evolution to be possible at one time the earth's atmosphere had to be way more dense and composed differently than it is. So considering a fossil has not been exposed to any more arsenic than it would be from normal, current atmospheric levels carbon dating is a somewhat decent approximation. However, you're assuming alot and it is admitted that at some point in the history of the earth the atmosphere had to be completely different, so it can be somewhat accurate up to that point, but if a fossil is from before that point carbon dating will tell you absolutely nothing.
Zack18257

User ID: 3275809
United States
06/01/2012 10:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
how to prove the bible false in one word........


DINOSAURS
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11766256
United States
06/01/2012 10:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins.




Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501


"Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?"

They know that it hasn't C14 is destablized by arsenic, current calculations acount only for the current amount of arsenic in the atmosphere and the earth (there are trace amounts of both)... However, evolutionists admit that for evolution to be possible at one time the earth's atmosphere had to be way more dense and composed differently than it is. So considering a fossil has not been exposed to any more arsenic than it would be from normal, current atmospheric levels carbon dating is a somewhat decent approximation. However, you're assuming alot and it is admitted that at some point in the history of the earth the atmosphere had to be completely different, so it can be somewhat accurate up to that point, but if a fossil is from before that point carbon dating will tell you absolutely nothing.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11766256


Funny how evolutionists have to agree with the Bible that at one time the atmosphere was more dense and completely different.
eclectic mind

User ID: 12762865
Australia
06/01/2012 10:45 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Yeah Yeah.. again hovind knows and the bible knows too!!?? stop joking people!!..

Radio-carbon dating has flaws, we all know that..

But how can people think 'god' knows all and knows all about science as well??
Example: When the Bible was written and compiled, things were different. People believed that we were in a geocentric universe (the earth was the center of the universe and everything revolved around it), they thought the earth was flat, and other basic scientific phenomenon were unknown to these people.
Even as late as 1492, people were convinced that silly old Columbus was going to fall off of the earth.
^^^ god and the bible knows all and is correct? haha

But as we know today, the earth is a sphere, and there are no ends on a sphere. Just pick up a ball and find its ends. It's not flat nor a disk shaped thing.. Columbus had to prove that and what do you think?? he did!!

(religitards are crazyjak)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16735882
Australia
06/01/2012 10:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Yeah Yeah.. again hovind knows and the bible knows too!!?? stop joking people!!..

Radio-carbon dating has flaws, we all know that..
 Quoting: eclectic mind


That's why its only 1 method they use to give a ball park figure.
Then they use other methods to narrow it down and confirm it.
Van De Graffenburgspot
User ID: 14435286
United States
06/01/2012 10:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
I like Turtles
mathetes

User ID: 16599119
United States
06/01/2012 10:56 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Well that seals it, the Earth is only 6000 years old!!

Praise Jesus!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1510025


The Earth is based off of the 6000 year principle by determining the lineage of King David. The Bible is specific about the name and age of the people and that is how we get this age.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4223094


True, however this only applies to human civilization, not the age of the Earth. Read Gen. 1.1 & 1.2 in the original Hebrew. Also check on what Jewish thinkers in the 1st century & and 10th century thought the age of the Universe was from a study of Scripture. The answer is surprisingly close to what scientists today think

15 billion years
For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
MrWreckedIt

User ID: 1078974
United States
06/01/2012 10:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
RADIOACTIVE DECAY IS NOT CONSTANT

which part of that is not making sense?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17118059


the entire statement. the atomic clock is based on radioactive decay. all time is rooted in it.
Ohwow!

User ID: 16023386
United States
06/01/2012 10:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
public school indoctrination rises up,. don't think, we will give you the answers.

there is a nothing that one day became a something. And here you are
eclectic mind

User ID: 12762865
Australia
06/01/2012 11:04 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Yeah Yeah.. again hovind knows and the bible knows too!!?? stop joking people!!..

Radio-carbon dating has flaws, we all know that..
 Quoting: eclectic mind


That's why its only 1 method they use to give a ball park figure.
Then they use other methods to narrow it down and confirm it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16735882


i do know that mate.. carbon half time of the isotope 14C is variable is dependend on the environment that the objects are found in, in the dessert a similar aged object would date different then one from the arctics and if the production rate of 14C in the atmosphere is not equal to the removal rate (mostly through decay), this ratio will change...
yet a combined dating method still shows many objects are much older then hovind claims..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8846775
United States
06/01/2012 11:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Carbon dating is only 1 method of 100 they use to verify these things.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16735882


1rof1
 Quoting: ~Jay~


1rof1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15526347
United States
06/01/2012 11:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Yeah Yeah.. again hovind knows and the bible knows too!!?? stop joking people!!..

Radio-carbon dating has flaws, we all know that..

But how can people think 'god' knows all and knows all about science as well??
Example: When the Bible was written and compiled, things were different. People believed that we were in a geocentric universe (the earth was the center of the universe and everything revolved around it), they thought the earth was flat, and other basic scientific phenomenon were unknown to these people.
Even as late as 1492, people were convinced that silly old Columbus was going to fall off of the earth.
^^^ god and the bible knows all and is correct? haha

But as we know today, the earth is a sphere, and there are no ends on a sphere. Just pick up a ball and find its ends. It's not flat nor a disk shaped thing.. Columbus had to prove that and what do you think?? he did!!

(religitards are crazyjak)
 Quoting: eclectic mind


LOL typical dum tard, this is so stupid and wrong in so many ways. The geocentric theory came from Aristotle, not the Bible, which became a dominant mode of thought during the Renaissance. And not all ancient people believed the the earth was flat, some surmised even thousands of years ago it was curved. Eratosthenes measured the circumference of the earth a couple of thousand years ago.
SolitaryWildFlower

User ID: 8595770
United States
06/01/2012 11:11 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Read this article. NOT from youtube.


[link to news.discovery.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17118059
United Kingdom
06/01/2012 11:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
RADIOACTIVE DECAY IS NOT CONSTANT

which part of that is not making sense?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17118059


the entire statement. the atomic clock is based on radioactive decay. all time is rooted in it.
 Quoting: MrWreckedIt


time is not a constant.
the speed of light is not a constant.

there are no constants.

time is based on a pendulum.
the pendulum is an arc of a circle

the next round is on you : )
eclectic mind

User ID: 12762865
Australia
06/01/2012 11:17 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Yeah Yeah.. again hovind knows and the bible knows too!!?? stop joking people!!..

Radio-carbon dating has flaws, we all know that..

But how can people think 'god' knows all and knows all about science as well??
Example: When the Bible was written and compiled, things were different. People believed that we were in a geocentric universe (the earth was the center of the universe and everything revolved around it), they thought the earth was flat, and other basic scientific phenomenon were unknown to these people.
Even as late as 1492, people were convinced that silly old Columbus was going to fall off of the earth.
^^^ god and the bible knows all and is correct? haha

But as we know today, the earth is a sphere, and there are no ends on a sphere. Just pick up a ball and find its ends. It's not flat nor a disk shaped thing.. Columbus had to prove that and what do you think?? he did!!

(religitards are crazyjak)
 Quoting: eclectic mind


LOL typical dum tard, this is so stupid and wrong in so many ways. The geocentric theory came from Aristotle, not the Bible, which became a dominant mode of thought during the Renaissance. And not all ancient people believed the the earth was flat, some surmised even thousands of years ago it was curved. Eratosthenes measured the circumference of the earth a couple of thousand years ago.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15526347


hehehe who is the indoctrinated dumbtard here? why would things be wrongfully writen down in your 'story book'?dumbtard!!
just some examples?...
[link to biblebabble.curbjaw.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17183435
United Kingdom
06/01/2012 11:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins.




Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501


we know specifically that it has not.

we know that the suns emissions change the decay rates and the variation throughout history is unknown.
Interested Reader 1

User ID: 17135762
United States
06/01/2012 11:37 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
If the peoples durring the Dark Ages would have had access to the Scriptures, they would have never believed the earth was flat or that the earth was the center of the our solar system. All of this was a direct result of the Roman Catholic Church.

Isaiah 40:22 says

" It is He who sits above the CIRCLE of the earth,
And its inhabitants are like grasshoppers,...."
Interested Reader 1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17183506
Korea, Republic of
06/01/2012 11:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remaied a constant variable throughout time?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501

Time itself may not have remained constant over 'time'.

If time moved faster in our 'past', then would carbon-dating show this? Probably not.

If the universe was caused by some approximation of a 'Big Bang' creation concept, and if the universe is expanding from that point, then who is to say that the rate of expansion has remained a 'constant' since the beginning?

If the universe is expanding, and if that expansion is slowing down, can time then be said to be perhaps slowing down as well?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16735882
Australia
06/01/2012 11:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Yeah Yeah.. again hovind knows and the bible knows too!!?? stop joking people!!..

Radio-carbon dating has flaws, we all know that..
 Quoting: eclectic mind


That's why its only 1 method they use to give a ball park figure.
Then they use other methods to narrow it down and confirm it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16735882


i do know that mate.. carbon half time of the isotope 14C is variable is dependend on the environment that the objects are found in, in the dessert a similar aged object would date different then one from the arctics and if the production rate of 14C in the atmosphere is not equal to the removal rate (mostly through decay), this ratio will change...
yet a combined dating method still shows many objects are much older then hovind claims..
 Quoting: eclectic mind


Its glad to see you have a brain and a free thought mind instead of a cultist follower mentality.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16735882
Australia
06/01/2012 11:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Carbon dating is only 1 method of 100 they use to verify these things.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16735882


1rof1
 Quoting: ~Jay~


1rof1
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8846775


What exactly is so funny?

News