Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age | |
You can't HANDLE the TRUT User ID: 3650237 United States 06/01/2012 10:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3650237 United States 06/01/2012 10:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501 Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time? Oooh, a Youtube clip....I'm sure science is trembling in its boots...... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3650237 United States 06/01/2012 10:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501 I'm afraid first you have to get a Master of Science or at least do the equal amount of reading... :/ Here's the forumla for your question: [link to en.wikipedia.org] You mean a Master of Indoctrination. I don't need a piece of paper to tell me that Carbon Dating is absurd. Science = House of Cards 5 *s on that,Dude. Speak the Truth and you will be hated. Get used to it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3650237 United States 06/01/2012 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3650237 United States 06/01/2012 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOL to anyone who thinks there is actually some sure fire way to accurately measure the age of something thousands of + years old. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15526347 If you don't know its age how can you say it's "thousands of years old"? DUH! Hmm let me take a guess, scientists engage in a lot of supposition, and make sure they only get "evidence" that supports their suppositions? Nah can't be, scientists are super intelligent super men who never engage in such human foibles. SUPERSHARK! LOLZ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3650237 United States 06/01/2012 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3650237 United States 06/01/2012 10:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3650237 United States 06/01/2012 10:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well that seals it, the Earth is only 6000 years old!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1510025 Praise Jesus!!! The Earth is based off of the 6000 year principle by determining the lineage of King David. The Bible is specific about the name and age of the people and that is how we get this age. I love you! |
TheFireman User ID: 454067 United States 06/01/2012 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11766256 United States 06/01/2012 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501 Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time? "Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?" They know that it hasn't C14 is destablized by arsenic, current calculations acount only for the current amount of arsenic in the atmosphere and the earth (there are trace amounts of both)... However, evolutionists admit that for evolution to be possible at one time the earth's atmosphere had to be way more dense and composed differently than it is. So considering a fossil has not been exposed to any more arsenic than it would be from normal, current atmospheric levels carbon dating is a somewhat decent approximation. However, you're assuming alot and it is admitted that at some point in the history of the earth the atmosphere had to be completely different, so it can be somewhat accurate up to that point, but if a fossil is from before that point carbon dating will tell you absolutely nothing. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11766256 United States 06/01/2012 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501 Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time? "Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?" They know that it hasn't C14 is destablized by arsenic, current calculations acount only for the current amount of arsenic in the atmosphere and the earth (there are trace amounts of both)... However, evolutionists admit that for evolution to be possible at one time the earth's atmosphere had to be way more dense and composed differently than it is. So considering a fossil has not been exposed to any more arsenic than it would be from normal, current atmospheric levels carbon dating is a somewhat decent approximation. However, you're assuming alot and it is admitted that at some point in the history of the earth the atmosphere had to be completely different, so it can be somewhat accurate up to that point, but if a fossil is from before that point carbon dating will tell you absolutely nothing. |
Zack18257 User ID: 3275809 United States 06/01/2012 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11766256 United States 06/01/2012 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501 Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time? "Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?" They know that it hasn't C14 is destablized by arsenic, current calculations acount only for the current amount of arsenic in the atmosphere and the earth (there are trace amounts of both)... However, evolutionists admit that for evolution to be possible at one time the earth's atmosphere had to be way more dense and composed differently than it is. So considering a fossil has not been exposed to any more arsenic than it would be from normal, current atmospheric levels carbon dating is a somewhat decent approximation. However, you're assuming alot and it is admitted that at some point in the history of the earth the atmosphere had to be completely different, so it can be somewhat accurate up to that point, but if a fossil is from before that point carbon dating will tell you absolutely nothing. Funny how evolutionists have to agree with the Bible that at one time the atmosphere was more dense and completely different. |
eclectic mind User ID: 12762865 Australia 06/01/2012 10:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah Yeah.. again hovind knows and the bible knows too!!?? stop joking people!!.. Radio-carbon dating has flaws, we all know that.. But how can people think 'god' knows all and knows all about science as well?? Example: When the Bible was written and compiled, things were different. People believed that we were in a geocentric universe (the earth was the center of the universe and everything revolved around it), they thought the earth was flat, and other basic scientific phenomenon were unknown to these people. Even as late as 1492, people were convinced that silly old Columbus was going to fall off of the earth. ^^^ god and the bible knows all and is correct? haha But as we know today, the earth is a sphere, and there are no ends on a sphere. Just pick up a ball and find its ends. It's not flat nor a disk shaped thing.. Columbus had to prove that and what do you think?? he did!! (religitards are ) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16735882 Australia 06/01/2012 10:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Van De Graffenburgspot User ID: 14435286 United States 06/01/2012 10:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
mathetes User ID: 16599119 United States 06/01/2012 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well that seals it, the Earth is only 6000 years old!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1510025 Praise Jesus!!! The Earth is based off of the 6000 year principle by determining the lineage of King David. The Bible is specific about the name and age of the people and that is how we get this age. True, however this only applies to human civilization, not the age of the Earth. Read Gen. 1.1 & 1.2 in the original Hebrew. Also check on what Jewish thinkers in the 1st century & and 10th century thought the age of the Universe was from a study of Scripture. The answer is surprisingly close to what scientists today think 15 billion years For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. |
MrWreckedIt User ID: 1078974 United States 06/01/2012 10:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ohwow! User ID: 16023386 United States 06/01/2012 10:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
eclectic mind User ID: 12762865 Australia 06/01/2012 11:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah Yeah.. again hovind knows and the bible knows too!!?? stop joking people!!.. Quoting: eclectic mind Radio-carbon dating has flaws, we all know that.. That's why its only 1 method they use to give a ball park figure. Then they use other methods to narrow it down and confirm it. i do know that mate.. carbon half time of the isotope 14C is variable is dependend on the environment that the objects are found in, in the dessert a similar aged object would date different then one from the arctics and if the production rate of 14C in the atmosphere is not equal to the removal rate (mostly through decay), this ratio will change... yet a combined dating method still shows many objects are much older then hovind claims.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8846775 United States 06/01/2012 11:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15526347 United States 06/01/2012 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah Yeah.. again hovind knows and the bible knows too!!?? stop joking people!!.. Quoting: eclectic mind Radio-carbon dating has flaws, we all know that.. But how can people think 'god' knows all and knows all about science as well?? Example: When the Bible was written and compiled, things were different. People believed that we were in a geocentric universe (the earth was the center of the universe and everything revolved around it), they thought the earth was flat, and other basic scientific phenomenon were unknown to these people. Even as late as 1492, people were convinced that silly old Columbus was going to fall off of the earth. ^^^ god and the bible knows all and is correct? haha But as we know today, the earth is a sphere, and there are no ends on a sphere. Just pick up a ball and find its ends. It's not flat nor a disk shaped thing.. Columbus had to prove that and what do you think?? he did!! (religitards are ) LOL typical dum tard, this is so stupid and wrong in so many ways. The geocentric theory came from Aristotle, not the Bible, which became a dominant mode of thought during the Renaissance. And not all ancient people believed the the earth was flat, some surmised even thousands of years ago it was curved. Eratosthenes measured the circumference of the earth a couple of thousand years ago. |
SolitaryWildFlower User ID: 8595770 United States 06/01/2012 11:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Read this article. NOT from youtube. [link to news.discovery.com] I see the sadness behind the smile. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17118059 United Kingdom 06/01/2012 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | RADIOACTIVE DECAY IS NOT CONSTANT Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17118059 which part of that is not making sense? the entire statement. the atomic clock is based on radioactive decay. all time is rooted in it. time is not a constant. the speed of light is not a constant. there are no constants. time is based on a pendulum. the pendulum is an arc of a circle the next round is on you : ) |
eclectic mind User ID: 12762865 Australia 06/01/2012 11:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah Yeah.. again hovind knows and the bible knows too!!?? stop joking people!!.. Quoting: eclectic mind Radio-carbon dating has flaws, we all know that.. But how can people think 'god' knows all and knows all about science as well?? Example: When the Bible was written and compiled, things were different. People believed that we were in a geocentric universe (the earth was the center of the universe and everything revolved around it), they thought the earth was flat, and other basic scientific phenomenon were unknown to these people. Even as late as 1492, people were convinced that silly old Columbus was going to fall off of the earth. ^^^ god and the bible knows all and is correct? haha But as we know today, the earth is a sphere, and there are no ends on a sphere. Just pick up a ball and find its ends. It's not flat nor a disk shaped thing.. Columbus had to prove that and what do you think?? he did!! (religitards are ) LOL typical dum tard, this is so stupid and wrong in so many ways. The geocentric theory came from Aristotle, not the Bible, which became a dominant mode of thought during the Renaissance. And not all ancient people believed the the earth was flat, some surmised even thousands of years ago it was curved. Eratosthenes measured the circumference of the earth a couple of thousand years ago. hehehe who is the indoctrinated dumbtard here? why would things be wrongfully writen down in your 'story book'?dumbtard!! just some examples?... [link to biblebabble.curbjaw.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17183435 United Kingdom 06/01/2012 11:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501 Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time? we know specifically that it has not. we know that the suns emissions change the decay rates and the variation throughout history is unknown. |
Interested Reader 1 User ID: 17135762 United States 06/01/2012 11:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If the peoples durring the Dark Ages would have had access to the Scriptures, they would have never believed the earth was flat or that the earth was the center of the our solar system. All of this was a direct result of the Roman Catholic Church. Isaiah 40:22 says " It is He who sits above the CIRCLE of the earth, And its inhabitants are like grasshoppers,...." Interested Reader 1 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17183506 South Korea 06/01/2012 11:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remaied a constant variable throughout time? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501 Time itself may not have remained constant over 'time'. If time moved faster in our 'past', then would carbon-dating show this? Probably not. If the universe was caused by some approximation of a 'Big Bang' creation concept, and if the universe is expanding from that point, then who is to say that the rate of expansion has remained a 'constant' since the beginning? If the universe is expanding, and if that expansion is slowing down, can time then be said to be perhaps slowing down as well? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16735882 Australia 06/01/2012 11:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah Yeah.. again hovind knows and the bible knows too!!?? stop joking people!!.. Quoting: eclectic mind Radio-carbon dating has flaws, we all know that.. That's why its only 1 method they use to give a ball park figure. Then they use other methods to narrow it down and confirm it. i do know that mate.. carbon half time of the isotope 14C is variable is dependend on the environment that the objects are found in, in the dessert a similar aged object would date different then one from the arctics and if the production rate of 14C in the atmosphere is not equal to the removal rate (mostly through decay), this ratio will change... yet a combined dating method still shows many objects are much older then hovind claims.. Its glad to see you have a brain and a free thought mind instead of a cultist follower mentality. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16735882 Australia 06/01/2012 11:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |