Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,713 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 824,322
Pageviews Today: 1,196,412Threads Today: 309Posts Today: 6,192
12:31 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5141990
United States
06/13/2012 09:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Why do you refer to sites which post the truth about the trails as "counter intel chemtrail debunker sites"? Just because those who post there disagree with an uneducated chemtard?

It's you who acts like an animal...Chicken Little to be precise....

Fucking loser...
 Quoting: Noble


No. Just somebody who has you pegged. Those sites are official story shill sites. And you are a counter-intelligence operative assigned to counter the intelligence being spread by concerned citizens. Your running out the clock while the geo-engineering program continues.

You have been exposed and gotten to, and now you are lashing out with infantile name calling.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172



You need some serious mental health help.

There is no evidence that the trails in the sky are anything more than contrails. That's a fact.

You aren't a concerned citizen...if you were, you would take the time to learn these subjects from professionals. Instead, you accept ignorant nonsense as fact from conspiracy nuts.

That's proof right there that you couldn't care less about the truth...just the paranoid fantasy.
 Quoting: Noble


No thanks. I won't be waiting around for some authority figure in a white lab coat to tell me there is evidence of chemtrails. They are running out the clock and buying time just as you are. The scientific community is telling us carbon dioxide, and not the obvious geo-engineering programs are the culprit of climate change. This lets us know right off the bat they are corrupt.

I will use my own eyes, intuition, and common sense.

More people notice every day. No amount of shill phoney counter-intel science will stop us.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


5a5a
bump
Noble (OP)

User ID: 11621668
United States
06/14/2012 05:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Why do you refer to sites which post the truth about the trails as "counter intel chemtrail debunker sites"? Just because those who post there disagree with an uneducated chemtard?

It's you who acts like an animal...Chicken Little to be precise....

Fucking loser...
 Quoting: Noble


No. Just somebody who has you pegged. Those sites are official story shill sites. And you are a counter-intelligence operative assigned to counter the intelligence being spread by concerned citizens. Your running out the clock while the geo-engineering program continues.

You have been exposed and gotten to, and now you are lashing out with infantile name calling.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172



You need some serious mental health help.

There is no evidence that the trails in the sky are anything more than contrails. That's a fact.

You aren't a concerned citizen...if you were, you would take the time to learn these subjects from professionals. Instead, you accept ignorant nonsense as fact from conspiracy nuts.

That's proof right there that you couldn't care less about the truth...just the paranoid fantasy.
 Quoting: Noble


No thanks. I won't be waiting around for some authority figure in a white lab coat to tell me there is evidence of chemtrails. They are running out the clock and buying time just as you are. The scientific community is telling us carbon dioxide, and not the obvious geo-engineering programs are the culprit of climate change. This lets us know right off the bat they are corrupt.

I will use my own eyes, intuition, and common sense.

More people notice every day. No amount of shill phoney counter-intel science will stop us.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


And all you will do about it is whine about it on conspiracy sites...


And I have never tried to stop anyone from saying/writing anything.

By all means, I BEG you to continue.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
George B

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 07:26 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2562242
United States
06/14/2012 07:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


He doesn't have a clue George.
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/14/2012 08:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


Inquire all you want...but, when paranoid losers claim that the trails we all see are anything more than contrails...I'm going to point out that there is no evidence to support the claims.

Honestly, I consider your particular "research" a whole other matter which I don't combine with the visible trails in the sky.

I honestly don't care that you do..

I'm not here to change anyones mind about anything. I'm here to posint out that people are making assumptions and claims about things they know nothing about...and are presenting it as fact.

For instance, there is a certain moron who claims that it's an undeniable FACT that all contrails dissipate within 30 to 60 seconds. Is this person correct?

Absolutely NOT!

This person can make this claim all she wants...I don't care...just as she shouldn't care that I post the truth of the matter right behind her.

How many times do I have to explain that I'm here just to point out the fact that chemtards have no evidence? Have I ever once suggested that they stop posting their beliefs? NO!~ They can spread all the nonsense they want...but, as I see it...I will feel free to comment about it.

Should i be accused of working for the government as a "shill" for doing so? No. But that doesn't stop them...just like they won't stop me from calling them all chemtards and morons...
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/14/2012 08:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


He doesn't have a clue George. I'm an ignorant and paranoid chemtard...I would know!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2562242


Whatever, loser.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14542172
United States
06/14/2012 08:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


He doesn't have a clue George. I'm an ignorant and paranoid chemtard...I would know!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2562242


Whatever, loser.
 Quoting: Noble


I guess the shill handbook doesn't cover that.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1611462
United States
06/14/2012 08:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


He doesn't have a clue George.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2562242


bumpbumpbumpbumpbumpbumpbumpbumpbumpbumpbumpbumpbumpbump
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 1452592
United States
06/14/2012 09:39 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
You have been exposed and gotten to, and now you are lashing out with infantile name calling.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


You mean the way you call anyone more educated than you "shill"?

lmao
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Prove it......your education and work history.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3546862


Prove what?...That I am more educated than you?

Let's see scratching

I don't make up faerie tales about clouds?

cruise
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 1452592
United States
06/14/2012 09:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


First, you are simply wrong...

The current upper value as stipulated by Defence Standard 91-91 and ASTM
D1655 is 3000ppm(m) whilst there is no mandatory minimum value. However, the
mean fuel sulphur concentration within the United Kingdom and the United States is
significantly lower than the stipulated maximum value and is about 600-800
ppm(m).


www.easa.europa.eu/.../EASA_SULPHUR_Project_11-01-2010.pdf

Secondly, sulphur content is low for road diesel as it kills catalytic converters...

Look it up...

pick
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/14/2012 10:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


He doesn't have a clue George. I'm an ignorant and paranoid chemtard...I would know!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2562242


Whatever, loser.
 Quoting: Noble


I guess the shill handbook doesn't cover that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Sorry loser, there is no "shill handbook"...and I'm not a "shill".

You are just a paranoid moron who thinks people who understand these subjects have to have some nefarious agenda to post the truth where paranoid idiots post lies.

That's pathetic.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/14/2012 10:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


First, you are simply wrong...

The current upper value as stipulated by Defence Standard 91-91 and ASTM
D1655 is 3000ppm(m) whilst there is no mandatory minimum value. However, the
mean fuel sulphur concentration within the United Kingdom and the United States is
significantly lower than the stipulated maximum value and is about 600-800
ppm(m).


www.easa.europa.eu/.../EASA_SULPHUR_Project_11-01-2010.pdf

Secondly, sulphur content is low for road diesel as it kills catalytic converters...

Look it up...

pick
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


That's just what "they" want you to think!

LOL!!


Hey, did you see my question about a baitcast setup?
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 1452592
United States
06/14/2012 10:38 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Hey, did you see my question about a baitcast setup?
 Quoting: Noble


lol...Yes...

I have one or two baitcasters, but prefer spin cast...

I am a 'Spoon Puller' at heart...Use some old Penn 209's for Salmon and Lakers...
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/14/2012 10:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Hey, did you see my question about a baitcast setup?
 Quoting: Noble


lol...Yes...

I have one or two baitcasters, but prefer spin cast...

I am a 'Spoon Puller' at heart...Use some old Penn 209's for Salmon and Lakers...
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Oh...
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14542172
United States
06/14/2012 11:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


He doesn't have a clue George. I'm an ignorant and paranoid chemtard...I would know!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2562242


Whatever, loser.
 Quoting: Noble


I guess the shill handbook doesn't cover that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Sorry loser, there is no "shill handbook"...and I'm not a "shill".

You are just a paranoid moron who thinks people who understand these subjects have to have some nefarious agenda to post the truth where paranoid idiots post lies.

That's pathetic.
 Quoting: Noble


Not paranoid. I just have you pegged. And I don't think you have an agenda. I know you have an agenda. You have no understanding of anything. You are like a computer. No thoughts of your own. You only spout the counter-intel talking points you have been programmed to say.

There are counter-intel goons like you that pop up on forums across the internet to insult and counter the spreading of intelligence with regards to geo-engineering by concerned citizens.
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/14/2012 12:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Whatever, loser.
 Quoting: Noble


I guess the shill handbook doesn't cover that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Sorry loser, there is no "shill handbook"...and I'm not a "shill".

You are just a paranoid moron who thinks people who understand these subjects have to have some nefarious agenda to post the truth where paranoid idiots post lies.

That's pathetic.
 Quoting: Noble


Not paranoid. I just have you pegged. And I don't think you have an agenda. I know you have an agenda. You have no understanding of anything. You are like a computer. No thoughts of your own. You only spout the counter-intel talking points you have been programmed to say.

There are counter-intel goons like you that pop up on forums across the internet to insult and counter the spreading of intelligence with regards to geo-engineering by concerned citizens.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Nope, you don't have me pegged. You have simply jumped to conclusions based on your paranoid world view.

Why have "thoughts" of your own about subjects which are explained which have millions of man hours of scientific research over several decades, backing them up.

There is no evidence that the trails we all see in the sky have anything to do with any geoengineering program...and there is no evidence that "geoengineering" has even begun...sorry!
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 1452592
United States
06/14/2012 12:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
I just have you pegged.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Department of Redundancy Department
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
George B

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 01:38 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


First, you are simply wrong...

The current upper value as stipulated by Defence Standard 91-91 and ASTM
D1655 is 3000ppm(m) whilst there is no mandatory minimum value. However, the
mean fuel sulphur concentration within the United Kingdom and the United States is
significantly lower than the stipulated maximum value and is about 600-800
ppm(m).


www.easa.europa.eu/.../EASA_SULPHUR_Project_11-01-2010.pdf

Secondly, sulphur content is low for road diesel as it kills catalytic converters...

Look it up...

pick
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Why didn't you answer this part of the question . . . ?


"Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. ." .
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/14/2012 02:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


First, you are simply wrong...

The current upper value as stipulated by Defence Standard 91-91 and ASTM
D1655 is 3000ppm(m) whilst there is no mandatory minimum value. However, the
mean fuel sulphur concentration within the United Kingdom and the United States is
significantly lower than the stipulated maximum value and is about 600-800
ppm(m).


www.easa.europa.eu/.../EASA_SULPHUR_Project_11-01-2010.pdf

Secondly, sulphur content is low for road diesel as it kills catalytic converters...

Look it up...

pick
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Why didn't you answer this part of the question . . . ?


"Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. ." .
 Quoting: George B


How the hell would I know why these people are performing research...wherever and whenever...under what conditions?!

Who gives a shit?!


Oh yeah...you...a nobody conspiracy nut...

Carry on...
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14542172
United States
06/14/2012 02:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


I guess the shill handbook doesn't cover that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Sorry loser, there is no "shill handbook"...and I'm not a "shill".

You are just a paranoid moron who thinks people who understand these subjects have to have some nefarious agenda to post the truth where paranoid idiots post lies.

That's pathetic.
 Quoting: Noble


Not paranoid. I just have you pegged. And I don't think you have an agenda. I know you have an agenda. You have no understanding of anything. You are like a computer. No thoughts of your own. You only spout the counter-intel talking points you have been programmed to say.

There are counter-intel goons like you that pop up on forums across the internet to insult and counter the spreading of intelligence with regards to geo-engineering by concerned citizens.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Nope, you don't have me pegged. You have simply jumped to conclusions based on your paranoid world view.

Why have "thoughts" of your own about subjects which are explained which have millions of man hours of scientific research over several decades, backing them up.

There is no evidence that the trails we all see in the sky have anything to do with any geoengineering program...and there is no evidence that "geoengineering" has even begun...sorry!
 Quoting: Noble



Get real Mr. counter intelligence operative. The scientific community is not trying to figure out jack squat. They already know the spraying is going on. Everybody knows. And you know. And that is why nobody respects you. Your trying to convince us that 2 plus 2 equals 50 with transparent appeals to authority.

You got nothing but appeals to authority. What happens when the authority is compromised?
George B

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 02:45 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


First, you are simply wrong...

The current upper value as stipulated by Defence Standard 91-91 and ASTM
D1655 is 3000ppm(m) whilst there is no mandatory minimum value. However, the
mean fuel sulphur concentration within the United Kingdom and the United States is
significantly lower than the stipulated maximum value and is about 600-800
ppm(m).


www.easa.europa.eu/.../EASA_SULPHUR_Project_11-01-2010.pdf

Secondly, sulphur content is low for road diesel as it kills catalytic
converters...

Look it up...

pick
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Why didn't you answer this part of the question . . . ?


"Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. ." .
 Quoting: George B


How the hell would I know why these people are performing research...wherever and whenever...under what conditions?!

Who gives a shit?!


Oh yeah...you...a nobody conspiracy nut...

Carry on...
 Quoting: Noble



Why ask. . . .because the issue is relevant . . . if the maximum allowable concentration of sulfur in jet fuel is 3,000 ppm and the average is between 500-800 ppm. . . why would one test at 5,000. . . especially when everyone is talking about lowering the maximum allowed. . . .huffy
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/14/2012 03:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Sorry loser, there is no "shill handbook"...and I'm not a "shill".

You are just a paranoid moron who thinks people who understand these subjects have to have some nefarious agenda to post the truth where paranoid idiots post lies.

That's pathetic.
 Quoting: Noble


Not paranoid. I just have you pegged. And I don't think you have an agenda. I know you have an agenda. You have no understanding of anything. You are like a computer. No thoughts of your own. You only spout the counter-intel talking points you have been programmed to say.

There are counter-intel goons like you that pop up on forums across the internet to insult and counter the spreading of intelligence with regards to geo-engineering by concerned citizens.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Nope, you don't have me pegged. You have simply jumped to conclusions based on your paranoid world view.

Why have "thoughts" of your own about subjects which are explained which have millions of man hours of scientific research over several decades, backing them up.

There is no evidence that the trails we all see in the sky have anything to do with any geoengineering program...and there is no evidence that "geoengineering" has even begun...sorry!
 Quoting: Noble



Get real Mr. counter intelligence operative. The scientific community is not trying to figure out jack squat. They already know the spraying is going on. Everybody knows. And you know. And that is why nobody respects you. Your trying to convince us that 2 plus 2 equals 50 with transparent appeals to authority.

You got nothing but appeals to authority. What happens when the authority is compromised?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


"Mr. counter intelligence operative"

I laugh every time I read that shit..

Why would i have to be any such thing to post information that has been understood for hundreds of years.

YOUR ignorance about the relationship between air saturation and temperature is just plain sad! I couldn't care less if chemtards "respect" me or not...I don't respect a single one of you people. And I never will...

The fact that you people don't understand this basic science has NOTHING to do with me...whatsoever.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/14/2012 03:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


First, you are simply wrong...

The current upper value as stipulated by Defence Standard 91-91 and ASTM
D1655 is 3000ppm(m) whilst there is no mandatory minimum value. However, the
mean fuel sulphur concentration within the United Kingdom and the United States is
significantly lower than the stipulated maximum value and is about 600-800
ppm(m).


www.easa.europa.eu/.../EASA_SULPHUR_Project_11-01-2010.pdf

Secondly, sulphur content is low for road diesel as it kills catalytic
converters...

Look it up...

pick
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Why didn't you answer this part of the question . . . ?


"Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. ." .
 Quoting: George B


How the hell would I know why these people are performing research...wherever and whenever...under what conditions?!

Who gives a shit?!


Oh yeah...you...a nobody conspiracy nut...

Carry on...
 Quoting: Noble



Why ask. . . .because the issue is relevant . . . if the maximum allowable concentration of sulfur in jet fuel is 3,000 ppm and the average is between 500-800 ppm. . . why would one test at 5,000. . . especially when everyone is talking about lowering the maximum allowed. . . .huffy
 Quoting: George B


I have no idea...why don't you just jump to conclusions and assume the worst of people? That will mean what you come up with will be truth.

I get it!
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
George B

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 03:35 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Why didn't you answer this part of the question . . . ?


"Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. ." .
 Quoting: George B


How the hell would I know why these people are performing research...wherever and whenever...under what conditions?!

Who gives a shit?!


Oh yeah...you...a nobody conspiracy nut...

Carry on...
 Quoting: Noble



Why ask. . . .because the issue is relevant . . . if the maximum allowable concentration of sulfur in jet fuel is 3,000 ppm and the average is between 500-800 ppm. . . why would one test at 5,000. . . especially when
everyone is talking about lowering the maximum allowed. . . .huffy
 Quoting: George B


I have no idea...why don't you just jump to conclusions and assume the worst of people? That will mean what you come up with will be truth.

I get it!

 Quoting: Noble


Just give a plausible explanation Noble . . . I am not asking you to be a Chemtard . . . devil6
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14542172
United States
06/14/2012 03:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Not paranoid. I just have you pegged. And I don't think you have an agenda. I know you have an agenda. You have no understanding of anything. You are like a computer. No thoughts of your own. You only spout the counter-intel talking points you have been programmed to say.

There are counter-intel goons like you that pop up on forums across the internet to insult and counter the spreading of intelligence with regards to geo-engineering by concerned citizens.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Nope, you don't have me pegged. You have simply jumped to conclusions based on your paranoid world view.

Why have "thoughts" of your own about subjects which are explained which have millions of man hours of scientific research over several decades, backing them up.

There is no evidence that the trails we all see in the sky have anything to do with any geoengineering program...and there is no evidence that "geoengineering" has even begun...sorry!
 Quoting: Noble



Get real Mr. counter intelligence operative. The scientific community is not trying to figure out jack squat. They already know the spraying is going on. Everybody knows. And you know. And that is why nobody respects you. Your trying to convince us that 2 plus 2 equals 50 with transparent appeals to authority.

You got nothing but appeals to authority. What happens when the authority is compromised?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


"Mr. counter intelligence operative"

I laugh every time I read that shit..

Why would i have to be any such thing to post information that has been understood for hundreds of years.

YOUR ignorance about the relationship between air saturation and temperature is just plain sad! I couldn't care less if chemtards "respect" me or not...I don't respect a single one of you people. And I never will...

The fact that you people don't understand this basic science has NOTHING to do with me...whatsoever.
 Quoting: Noble


All your air saturation nonsense is worthless. The reason jet trails out of particular jets don't dissipate these day is simply because the substance coming out of them is different. No special understanding is needed.

The trial balloon articles they put out about prospective geo-engineering projects tell us what they're doing. They are already spraying to anyone with eyes but you want us to wait for so authority figure in a white lab coat to tell us what we already know.

I don't need a weather expert to tell me when it's raining.

All your shill counter-intel "science" is just obfuscation.
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/14/2012 04:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Nope, you don't have me pegged. You have simply jumped to conclusions based on your paranoid world view.

Why have "thoughts" of your own about subjects which are explained which have millions of man hours of scientific research over several decades, backing them up.

There is no evidence that the trails we all see in the sky have anything to do with any geoengineering program...and there is no evidence that "geoengineering" has even begun...sorry!
 Quoting: Noble



Get real Mr. counter intelligence operative. The scientific community is not trying to figure out jack squat. They already know the spraying is going on. Everybody knows. And you know. And that is why nobody respects you. Your trying to convince us that 2 plus 2 equals 50 with transparent appeals to authority.

You got nothing but appeals to authority. What happens when the authority is compromised?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


"Mr. counter intelligence operative"

I laugh every time I read that shit..

Why would i have to be any such thing to post information that has been understood for hundreds of years.

YOUR ignorance about the relationship between air saturation and temperature is just plain sad! I couldn't care less if chemtards "respect" me or not...I don't respect a single one of you people. And I never will...

The fact that you people don't understand this basic science has NOTHING to do with me...whatsoever.
 Quoting: Noble


All your air saturation nonsense is worthless. The reason jet trails out of particular jets don't dissipate these day is simply because the substance coming out of them is different. No special understanding is needed.

The trial balloon articles they put out about prospective geo-engineering projects tell us what they're doing. They are already spraying to anyone with eyes but you want us to wait for so authority figure in a white lab coat to tell us what we already know.

I don't need a weather expert to tell me when it's raining.

All your shill counter-intel "science" is just obfuscation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172



You're wrong...

And you are an idiot...and a paranoid one at that.

And "they" may already be "spraying". That has nothing to do with my point...The point is, the trails are NOT evidence of any "spraying".

I feel sorry for someone with such limited knowledge..and such a negative world view.

I pity you.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/14/2012 04:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


How the hell would I know why these people are performing research...wherever and whenever...under what conditions?!

Who gives a shit?!


Oh yeah...you...a nobody conspiracy nut...

Carry on...
 Quoting: Noble



Why ask. . . .because the issue is relevant . . . if the maximum allowable concentration of sulfur in jet fuel is 3,000 ppm and the average is between 500-800 ppm. . . why would one test at 5,000. . . especially when
everyone is talking about lowering the maximum allowed. . . .huffy
 Quoting: George B


I have no idea...why don't you just jump to conclusions and assume the worst of people? That will mean what you come up with will be truth.

I get it!

 Quoting: Noble


Just give a plausible explanation Noble . . . I am not asking you to be a Chemtard . . . devil6
 Quoting: George B



Why don't you ask THEM...and let me know what the answer they give is...and why you reject it...(as if I won't know why).
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
George B

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 04:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...



Why ask. . . .because the issue is relevant . . . if the maximum allowable concentration of sulfur in jet fuel is 3,000 ppm and the average is between 500-800 ppm. . . why would one test at 5,000. . . especially when
everyone is talking about lowering the maximum allowed. . . .huffy
 Quoting: George B


I have no idea...why don't you just jump to conclusions and assume the worst of people? That will mean what you come up with will be truth.

I get it!

 Quoting: Noble



Just give a plausible explanation Noble . . . I am not asking you to be a Chemtard . . . devil6
 Quoting: George B



Why don't you ask THEM...and let me know what the answer they give is...and why you reject it...(as if I won't know why).
 Quoting: Noble


I asked for YOUR opinion Noble . . . why do YOU think they are spiking jet fuel up to 5,000 ppm to test its visibility . . ? Seems an easy enough question . . . devil6
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 1452592
United States
06/14/2012 04:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


First, you are simply wrong...

The current upper value as stipulated by Defence Standard 91-91 and ASTM
D1655 is 3000ppm(m) whilst there is no mandatory minimum value. However, the
mean fuel sulphur concentration within the United Kingdom and the United States is
significantly lower than the stipulated maximum value and is about 600-800
ppm(m).


www.easa.europa.eu/.../EASA_SULPHUR_Project_11-01-2010.pdf

Secondly, sulphur content is low for road diesel as it kills catalytic converters...

Look it up...

pick
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Why didn't you answer this part of the question . . . ?


"Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. ." .
 Quoting: George B


Ask 'them'...
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 1452592
United States
06/14/2012 04:56 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
if the maximum allowable concentration of sulfur in jet fuel is 3,000 ppm
 Quoting: George B


You keep erroneously saying that...

The 3000ppm is a DOD maximum allowable for contract buying of jet fuel...

That number has nothing to do with the civi use of fuels...

pick
THIS SPACE FOR RENT

News