Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,083 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,268,751
Pageviews Today: 1,704,478Threads Today: 395Posts Today: 7,868
03:57 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14542172
United States
06/14/2012 04:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...



Get real Mr. counter intelligence operative. The scientific community is not trying to figure out jack squat. They already know the spraying is going on. Everybody knows. And you know. And that is why nobody respects you. Your trying to convince us that 2 plus 2 equals 50 with transparent appeals to authority.

You got nothing but appeals to authority. What happens when the authority is compromised?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


"Mr. counter intelligence operative"

I laugh every time I read that shit..

Why would i have to be any such thing to post information that has been understood for hundreds of years.

YOUR ignorance about the relationship between air saturation and temperature is just plain sad! I couldn't care less if chemtards "respect" me or not...I don't respect a single one of you people. And I never will...

The fact that you people don't understand this basic science has NOTHING to do with me...whatsoever.
 Quoting: Noble


All your air saturation nonsense is worthless. The reason jet trails out of particular jets don't dissipate these day is simply because the substance coming out of them is different. No special understanding is needed.

The trial balloon articles they put out about prospective geo-engineering projects tell us what they're doing. They are already spraying to anyone with eyes but you want us to wait for so authority figure in a white lab coat to tell us what we already know.

I don't need a weather expert to tell me when it's raining.

All your shill counter-intel "science" is just obfuscation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172



You're wrong...

And you are an idiot...and a paranoid one at that.

And "they" may already be "spraying". That has nothing to do with my point...The point is, the trails are NOT evidence of any "spraying".

I feel sorry for someone with such limited knowledge..and such a negative world view.

I pity you.
 Quoting: Noble


Not a paranoid world view. I just have you pegged. And I demand the right to say 2 plus two equals 4.

And no, you don't pity me. That is a lie. Someone sociopathic enough to run counter-intelligence for a program which poisons all life on the planet, including yourself, feels no pity for anything.

And yes, the fact the the trails are not dissipating is all the evidence we needs. Couple that with their admitted intent and motive to do exactly what we are observing and the evidence is overwhelming.cool2
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 05:00 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble, answer me a question. . . .

Since the standard for sulfur content for example for on road trucks is 15 ppm . . . and the maximum standard for aircraft fuel is 3,000 ppm. . . why the difference. . . ????


Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


First, you are simply wrong...

The current upper value as stipulated by Defence Standard 91-91 and ASTM
D1655 is 3000ppm(m) whilst there is no mandatory minimum value. However, the
mean fuel sulphur concentration within the United Kingdom and the United States is
significantly lower than the stipulated maximum value and is about 600-800
ppm(m).


www.easa.europa.eu/.../EASA_SULPHUR_Project_11-01-2010.pdf

Secondly, sulphur content is low for road diesel as it kills catalytic
converters...

Look it up...

pick
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Why didn't you answer this part of the question . . . ?


"Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. ." .
 Quoting: George B


Ask 'them'...

 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


I am asking YOUR opinion . . . I don't care about THEIR answer . . . why would you spike sulfur in jet fuel to 5,500 ppm when the maximum allowed concentration is 3,000 and the average is 300 to 800 . . . devil6
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 05:15 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
if the maximum allowable concentration of sulfur in jet fuel is 3,000 ppm
 Quoting: George B


You keep erroneously saying that...

The 3000ppm is a DOD maximum allowable for contract buying of jet fuel...

That number has nothing to do with the civi use of fuels...

pick
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Please refer to the bottom of page (7) . . .
[link to www.easa.europa.eu]
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
the_truth_seeker

User ID: 17519134
Canada
06/14/2012 05:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Denial is the inability to believe in the existence or reality of something. Denial is a problem that can be very dangerous, causing the person or others to rationalize, underestimate, and minimize situations. The person always feels they are in control and isn’t always able to see the negative consequences...

[link to www.youtube.com]
If you want the truth... You have to seek the truth!
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 05:20 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
if the maximum allowable concentration of sulfur in jet fuel is 3,000 ppm
 Quoting: George B


You keep erroneously saying that...

The 3000ppm is a DOD maximum allowable for contract buying of jet fuel...

That number has nothing to do with the civi use of fuels...

pick
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines

devil6

Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Apr 17;46(8):4275-82. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

Source
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
. sbarrett@mit.edu


". In contrast, the maximum sulfur content of aviation fuel has remained unchanged at 3000 ppm (although sulfur levels average 600 ppm in practice)."

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

Last Edited by George B on 06/14/2012 05:29 PM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
Noble (OP)

User ID: 11621668
United States
06/14/2012 07:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


First, you are simply wrong...

The current upper value as stipulated by Defence Standard 91-91 and ASTM
D1655 is 3000ppm(m) whilst there is no mandatory minimum value. However, the
mean fuel sulphur concentration within the United Kingdom and the United States is
significantly lower than the stipulated maximum value and is about 600-800
ppm(m).


www.easa.europa.eu/.../EASA_SULPHUR_Project_11-01-2010.pdf

Secondly, sulphur content is low for road diesel as it kills catalytic
converters...

Look it up...

pick
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Why didn't you answer this part of the question . . . ?


"Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds at work here. ." .
 Quoting: George B


Ask 'them'...

 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


I am asking YOUR opinion . . . I don't care about THEIR answer . . . why would you spike sulfur in jet fuel to 5,500 ppm when the maximum allowed concentration is 3,000 and the average is 300 to 800 . . . devil6
 Quoting: George B


My opinion doesn't matter...it has nothing to do with the trails..

Who cares?

Just a bunch of chemtards...
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 11621668
United States
06/14/2012 07:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Denial is the inability to believe in the existence or reality of something. Denial is a problem that can be very dangerous, causing the person or others to rationalize, underestimate, and minimize situations. The person always feels they are in control and isn’t always able to see the negative consequences...

[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: the_truth_seeker


Right, you are in denial about your lack of knowledge in the subjects of aviation and atmospheric science.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 11621668
United States
06/14/2012 07:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


"Mr. counter intelligence operative"

I laugh every time I read that shit..

Why would i have to be any such thing to post information that has been understood for hundreds of years.

YOUR ignorance about the relationship between air saturation and temperature is just plain sad! I couldn't care less if chemtards "respect" me or not...I don't respect a single one of you people. And I never will...

The fact that you people don't understand this basic science has NOTHING to do with me...whatsoever.
 Quoting: Noble


All your air saturation nonsense is worthless. The reason jet trails out of particular jets don't dissipate these day is simply because the substance coming out of them is different. No special understanding is needed.

The trial balloon articles they put out about prospective geo-engineering projects tell us what they're doing. They are already spraying to anyone with eyes but you want us to wait for so authority figure in a white lab coat to tell us what we already know.

I don't need a weather expert to tell me when it's raining.

All your shill counter-intel "science" is just obfuscation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172



You're wrong...

And you are an idiot...and a paranoid one at that.

And "they" may already be "spraying". That has nothing to do with my point...The point is, the trails are NOT evidence of any "spraying".

I feel sorry for someone with such limited knowledge..and such a negative world view.

I pity you.
 Quoting: Noble


Not a paranoid world view. I just have you pegged. And I demand the right to say 2 plus two equals 4.

And no, you don't pity me. That is a lie. Someone sociopathic enough to run counter-intelligence for a program which poisons all life on the planet, including yourself, feels no pity for anything.

And yes, the fact the the trails are not dissipating is all the evidence we needs. Couple that with their admitted intent and motive to do exactly what we are observing and the evidence is overwhelming.cool2
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Yes, you have a paranoid world view. I know for a fact...because your accusations are just plain wrong...and are based on your world view.

With your claims about the trails...you are using your right to claim 2 plus 2 equals pudding...you are just that far off...and too ignorant to know it.

I do pity you...to know you chemtards exist...and live your lives believing in such nonsense makes me feel bad for you...pity.


Everything we do pollutes the planet..all engines pollute..including airplane engines...but, the trails are NOT part of the pollution. They are the water vapor created through combustion.


The trails not dissipating has NOTHING to do with the composition of the trail...just the ambient air...sorry, it's all about air saturation, air temp and engine efficiency. Your ignorance about those things is pathetic, considering how much time you spend discussing the subject. It's also quite funny!

I understand that there's motive and intent in reference to "geoengineering". And I agree..it's a bad idea...but, the trails are contrails, and have nothing to do with geoengineering. Sorry.


If you are going to argue against geoengineering, you should learn what it is...and what it isn't. And you aren't even close. You aren't helping the cause. You're just making a fool of yourself.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 07:18 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Why didn't you answer this part of the question . . . ?


"Also why do research where you test the visibility of combustion trails
from aircraft where the sulfur content is 5,000 ppm. . . .???? Seems a waste of money and time to me. . . .don't you think. . . just inquiring minds
at work here. ."
.
 Quoting: George B


Ask 'them'...

 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


I am asking YOUR opinion . . . I don't care about THEIR answer . . . why would you spike sulfur in jet fuel to 5,500 ppm when the maximum allowed concentration is 3,000 and the average is 300 to 800 . . . devil6

 Quoting: George B


My opinion doesn't matter...it has nothing to do with the trails..

Who cares?

Just a bunch of chemtards...
 Quoting: Noble



You mean you can't come up with an explanation that doesn't support the possibility the researchers were concerned about the exhaust's visibility from sulfur laced jet fuel. . . .You are so totally transparent. . . 1rof1dead3rumble

Use your imagination. . . I am sure you could come up with something. . . .

1rof1

Last Edited by George B on 06/14/2012 07:26 PM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
Noble (OP)

User ID: 11621668
United States
06/14/2012 08:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Ask 'them'...

 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


I am asking YOUR opinion . . . I don't care about THEIR answer . . . why would you spike sulfur in jet fuel to 5,500 ppm when the maximum allowed concentration is 3,000 and the average is 300 to 800 . . . devil6

 Quoting: George B


My opinion doesn't matter...it has nothing to do with the trails..

Who cares?

Just a bunch of chemtards...
 Quoting: Noble



You mean you can't come up with an explanation that doesn't support the possibility the researchers were concerned about the exhaust's visibility from sulfur laced jet fuel. . . .You are so totally transparent. . . 1rof1dead3rumble

Use your imagination. . . I am sure you could come up with something. . . .

1rof1
 Quoting: George B


I honestly don't give a shit. The only reason you do is because you have assigned value to it as far as "chemtrails" go. I give it no value whatsoever.


I see no evidence that the trails in the sky have anything to do with any sort of "atmospheric sulfur aerosol program". And neither do you. You are so totally ridiculous.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17951471
United States
06/14/2012 08:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
June 1: 1.9

June 15: 1.5


(2 stars = crap)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17951471
United States
06/14/2012 08:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
we are midway between absolute BS and crap....at the midpoint.
gibs
User ID: 9572395
United States
06/14/2012 08:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
You seem very angry Noble, cat got your tongue? Really you getting so pissed off at such a imaginary reality you deny is actually quite funny, sad to but maybe you could find a job with greenpeace as they like to deny things unless it fits into there agenda, really life is to short to squabble over things that do not exist in your world.
Noble (OP)

User ID: 11621668
United States
06/14/2012 08:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
June 1: 1.9

June 15: 1.5


(2 stars = crap)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17951471


Like it matters. I couldn't care less what value chemtards give my thread.

2 stars is more than I expected though.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 11621668
United States
06/14/2012 08:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
we are midway between absolute BS and crap....at the midpoint.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17951471


...says the chemtard.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 11621668
United States
06/14/2012 08:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
You seem very angry Noble, cat got your tongue? Really you getting so pissed off at such a imaginary reality you deny is actually quite funny, sad to but maybe you could find a job with greenpeace as they like to deny things unless it fits into there agenda, really life is to short to squabble over things that do not exist in your world.
 Quoting: gibs 9572395


I'm not at all "angry". I'm more sad than anything...

It hurts to know that you ignorant paranoid morons live such pathetic lives when a little basic knowledge would benefit you so much.

You only wish I were angry...sorry to dissapoint you.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 08:45 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


I am asking YOUR opinion . . . I don't care about THEIR answer . . . why would you spike sulfur in jet fuel to 5,500 ppm when the maximum allowed concentration is 3,000 and the average is 300 to 800 . . . devil6

 Quoting: George B


My opinion doesn't matter...it has nothing to do with the trails..

Who cares?


Just a bunch of chemtards...
 Quoting: Noble



You mean you can't come up with an explanation that doesn't support the possibility the researchers were concerned about the exhaust's visibility from sulfur laced jet fuel. . . .You are so totally transparent. . . 1rof1dead3rumble

Use your imagination. . . I am sure you could come up with something. . .
.

1rof1
 Quoting: George B


I honestly don't give a shit. The only reason you do is because you have assigned value to it as far as "chemtrails" go. I give it no value whatsoever.


I see no evidence that the trails in the sky have anything to do with any sort of "atmospheric sulfur aerosol program". And neither do you. You are so totally ridiculous.
 Quoting: Noble


Contrary to your statements . . . I do believe a sulfur spiking program is quite possible and may be one of the reasons for the global dimming that has changed the rate of global warming . . . coffee4
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
Noble (OP)

User ID: 11621668
United States
06/14/2012 08:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


My opinion doesn't matter...it has nothing to do with the trails..

Who cares?


Just a bunch of chemtards...
 Quoting: Noble



You mean you can't come up with an explanation that doesn't support the possibility the researchers were concerned about the exhaust's visibility from sulfur laced jet fuel. . . .You are so totally transparent. . . 1rof1dead3rumble

Use your imagination. . . I am sure you could come up with something. . .
.

1rof1
 Quoting: George B


I honestly don't give a shit. The only reason you do is because you have assigned value to it as far as "chemtrails" go. I give it no value whatsoever.


I see no evidence that the trails in the sky have anything to do with any sort of "atmospheric sulfur aerosol program". And neither do you. You are so totally ridiculous.
 Quoting: Noble


Contrary to your statements . . . I do believe a sulfur spiking program is quite possible and may be one of the reasons for the global dimming that has changed the rate of global warming . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


Of course it's possible..

I never said it wasn't.

It's improbable...and as nothing to do with the trails in the sky which chemtards call "chemtrails".

Prove me wrong...
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 08:59 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


My opinion doesn't matter...it has nothing to do with the trails..

Who cares?


Just a bunch of chemtards...
 Quoting: Noble



You mean you can't come up with an explanation that doesn't support the possibility the researchers were concerned about the exhaust's visibility from sulfur laced jet fuel. . . .You are so totally transparent. . .
1rof1dead3rumble

Use your imagination. . . I am sure you could come up with something. . .
.

1rof1
 Quoting: George B


I honestly don't give a shit. The only reason you do is because you have assigned value to it as far as "chemtrails" go. I give it no value whatsoever.


I see no evidence that the trails in the sky have anything to do with any sort of "atmospheric sulfur aerosol program". And neither do you. You are so totally ridiculous.
 Quoting: Noble


Contrary to your statements . . . I do believe a sulfur spiking program is quite possible and may be one of the reasons for the global dimming that has changed the rate of global warming . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


It is totally possible . . . sulfur is already in fuel . .. it would be almost undetectable . . . require few people to pull off and does not suppress engine performance . . . air crews wouldn't know anything . . . coffee4
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
gibs
User ID: 9572395
United States
06/14/2012 09:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Noble is getting me paranoid now as i am thinking he,she,it is controlling one of these flying drones and if not go along with the agenda as they know its every move it will be terminated, just going by logical reasoning, ya know 2 plus two equals four.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14542172
United States
06/14/2012 09:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


All your air saturation nonsense is worthless. The reason jet trails out of particular jets don't dissipate these day is simply because the substance coming out of them is different. No special understanding is needed.

The trial balloon articles they put out about prospective geo-engineering projects tell us what they're doing. They are already spraying to anyone with eyes but you want us to wait for so authority figure in a white lab coat to tell us what we already know.

I don't need a weather expert to tell me when it's raining.

All your shill counter-intel "science" is just obfuscation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172



You're wrong...

And you are an idiot...and a paranoid one at that.

And "they" may already be "spraying". That has nothing to do with my point...The point is, the trails are NOT evidence of any "spraying".

I feel sorry for someone with such limited knowledge..and such a negative world view.

I pity you.
 Quoting: Noble


Not a paranoid world view. I just have you pegged. And I demand the right to say 2 plus two equals 4.

And no, you don't pity me. That is a lie. Someone sociopathic enough to run counter-intelligence for a program which poisons all life on the planet, including yourself, feels no pity for anything.

And yes, the fact the the trails are not dissipating is all the evidence we needs. Couple that with their admitted intent and motive to do exactly what we are observing and the evidence is overwhelming.cool2
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Yes, you have a paranoid world view. I know for a fact...because your accusations are just plain wrong...and are based on your world view.

With your claims about the trails...you are using your right to claim 2 plus 2 equals pudding...you are just that far off...and too ignorant to know it.

I do pity you...to know you chemtards exist...and live your lives believing in such nonsense makes me feel bad for you...pity.


Everything we do pollutes the planet..all engines pollute..including airplane engines...but, the trails are NOT part of the pollution. They are the water vapor created through combustion.


The trails not dissipating has NOTHING to do with the composition of the trail...just the ambient air...sorry, it's all about air saturation, air temp and engine efficiency. Your ignorance about those things is pathetic, considering how much time you spend discussing the subject. It's also quite funny!

I understand that there's motive and intent in reference to "geoengineering". And I agree..it's a bad idea...but, the trails are contrails, and have nothing to do with geoengineering. Sorry.


If you are going to argue against geoengineering, you should learn what it is...and what it isn't. And you aren't even close. You aren't helping the cause. You're just making a fool of yourself.
 Quoting: Noble


Not paranoid. I just have your number, kid. I saw the thread and I instantly saw your familiar shill jargon and standard counter intelligence talking points, and I knew I had to expose you.

Stratospheric sulfate aerosol spraying (chemtrails), is a form of geo-engineering. So when I refer to chemtrailing as geoengineering, I am using the term quite properly.

I submit that if you are going to run counter intel, you should learn your song well before you start singing.

I also submit that in fact it is you who are the fool.

Stratospheric sulfate aerosols (geoengineering)

"The ability of stratospheric sulfate aerosols to create a global dimming effect has made them a possible candidate (they're already using them) for use in GEOENGINEERING PROJECTS to limit the effect and impact of climate change (it's actually causing climate change) due to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Delivery of precursor sulfide gases such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S) or sulfur dioxide (SO2) by artillery, aircraft and balloons has been proposed.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 1452592
United States
06/14/2012 09:26 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
if the maximum allowable concentration of sulfur in jet fuel is 3,000 ppm
 Quoting: George B


You keep erroneously saying that...

The 3000ppm is a DOD maximum allowable for contract buying of jet fuel...

That number has nothing to do with the civi use of fuels...

pick
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Please refer to the bottom of page (7) . . .
[link to www.easa.europa.eu]
 Quoting: George B


Why would I do that when I already posted the relevant info from the 2nd paragraph of page 5?

:fucking idiot:
"Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail"

deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 1452592
United States
06/14/2012 09:27 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
". In contrast, the maximum sulfur content of aviation fuel has remained unchanged at 3000 ppm (although sulfur levels average 600 ppm in practice)."

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih] .gov/pubmed/22380547
 Quoting: George B


You're citing a DOD spec for the maximum allowable sulphur content in purchased jet fuel in any circumstance...

yawn

And you ignore this from your own link:

(although sulfur levels average 600 ppm in practice)

loser

Last Edited by SnakeAirlines on 06/14/2012 09:29 PM
"Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail"

deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14542172
United States
06/14/2012 09:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
You seem very angry Noble, cat got your tongue? Really you getting so pissed off at such a imaginary reality you deny is actually quite funny, sad to but maybe you could find a job with greenpeace as they like to deny things unless it fits into there agenda, really life is to short to squabble over things that do not exist in your world.
 Quoting: gibs 9572395


I'm not at all "angry". I'm more sad than anything...

It hurts to know that you ignorant paranoid morons live such pathetic lives when a little basic knowledge would benefit you so much.

You only wish I were angry...sorry to dissapoint you.
 Quoting: Noble


No, I agree. You appear to be mad. I think you have been exposed and gotten to.
That is why you are lashing out at people with infantile name calling.

You suck at being a shill. Find a new job.
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 09:33 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
if the maximum allowable concentration of sulfur in jet fuel is 3,000 ppm
 Quoting: George B


You keep erroneously saying that...

The 3000ppm is a DOD maximum allowable for contract buying of jet fuel...

That number has nothing to do with the civi use of fuels...

pick
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Please refer to the bottom of page (7) . . .
[link to www.easa.europa.eu]
 Quoting: George B


Why would I do that when I already posted the relevant info from the 2nd paragraph of page 5?

:fucking idiot:
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Guess you failed to read the last paragraph on page 5, regarding commercial maximums. . . . 1rof1
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
gibs
User ID: 9572395
United States
06/14/2012 09:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
When you get older Snake you will wish for the day only God fcked with the weather cause you will literareally feel what we do cause we fcked up and well who will fix it?
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/14/2012 09:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
". In contrast, the maximum sulfur content of aviation fuel has remained unchanged at 3000 ppm (although sulfur levels average 600 ppm in practice)."

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih] .gov/pubmed/22380547
 Quoting: George B


You're citing a DOD spec for the maximum allowable sulphur content in purchased jet fuel in any circumstance...

yawn

And you ignore this from your own link:

(although sulfur levels average 600 ppm in practice)

loser
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


No I didn't . . . I included it deliberately . . . it emphasizes the ridiculous nature of testing the visibility of 5,500 ppm sulfur concentration when the normal ever expected would be around 600 ppm. . . coffee4

Last Edited by George B on 06/14/2012 09:43 PM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
Noble (OP)

User ID: 17975050
United States
06/15/2012 05:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...



You're wrong...

And you are an idiot...and a paranoid one at that.

And "they" may already be "spraying". That has nothing to do with my point...The point is, the trails are NOT evidence of any "spraying".

I feel sorry for someone with such limited knowledge..and such a negative world view.

I pity you.
 Quoting: Noble


Not a paranoid world view. I just have you pegged. And I demand the right to say 2 plus two equals 4.

And no, you don't pity me. That is a lie. Someone sociopathic enough to run counter-intelligence for a program which poisons all life on the planet, including yourself, feels no pity for anything.

And yes, the fact the the trails are not dissipating is all the evidence we needs. Couple that with their admitted intent and motive to do exactly what we are observing and the evidence is overwhelming.cool2
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Yes, you have a paranoid world view. I know for a fact...because your accusations are just plain wrong...and are based on your world view.

With your claims about the trails...you are using your right to claim 2 plus 2 equals pudding...you are just that far off...and too ignorant to know it.

I do pity you...to know you chemtards exist...and live your lives believing in such nonsense makes me feel bad for you...pity.


Everything we do pollutes the planet..all engines pollute..including airplane engines...but, the trails are NOT part of the pollution. They are the water vapor created through combustion.


The trails not dissipating has NOTHING to do with the composition of the trail...just the ambient air...sorry, it's all about air saturation, air temp and engine efficiency. Your ignorance about those things is pathetic, considering how much time you spend discussing the subject. It's also quite funny!

I understand that there's motive and intent in reference to "geoengineering". And I agree..it's a bad idea...but, the trails are contrails, and have nothing to do with geoengineering. Sorry.


If you are going to argue against geoengineering, you should learn what it is...and what it isn't. And you aren't even close. You aren't helping the cause. You're just making a fool of yourself.
 Quoting: Noble


Not paranoid. I just have your number, kid. I saw the thread and I instantly saw your familiar shill jargon and standard counter intelligence talking points, and I knew I had to expose you.

Stratospheric sulfate aerosol spraying (chemtrails), is a form of geo-engineering. So when I refer to chemtrailing as geoengineering, I am using the term quite properly.

I submit that if you are going to run counter intel, you should learn your song well before you start singing.

I also submit that in fact it is you who are the fool.

Stratospheric sulfate aerosols (geoengineering)

"The ability of stratospheric sulfate aerosols to create a global dimming effect has made them a possible candidate (they're already using them) for use in GEOENGINEERING PROJECTS to limit the effect and impact of climate change (it's actually causing climate change) due to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Delivery of precursor sulfide gases such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S) or sulfur dioxide (SO2) by artillery, aircraft and balloons has been proposed.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Again, you have ZERO evidence that the trails have anything to do with geoengineering...and that they aren't just contrails.

You only BELEIVE they are something else...because you are ignorant.

I have exposed YOU for the paranoid idiot you are...
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 17975050
United States
06/15/2012 05:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
You seem very angry Noble, cat got your tongue? Really you getting so pissed off at such a imaginary reality you deny is actually quite funny, sad to but maybe you could find a job with greenpeace as they like to deny things unless it fits into there agenda, really life is to short to squabble over things that do not exist in your world.
 Quoting: gibs 9572395


I'm not at all "angry". I'm more sad than anything...

It hurts to know that you ignorant paranoid morons live such pathetic lives when a little basic knowledge would benefit you so much.

You only wish I were angry...sorry to dissapoint you.
 Quoting: Noble


No, I agree. You appear to be mad. I think you have been exposed and gotten to.
That is why you are lashing out at people with infantile name calling.

You suck at being a shill. Find a new job.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


I'm not a shill..this isn't a job...I just happen to think that the truth about the trails in the sky is important. Especially in the face of such paranoid ignorance.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/15/2012 06:44 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
You seem very angry Noble, cat got your tongue? Really you getting so pissed off at such a imaginary reality you deny is actually quite funny, sad to but maybe you could find a job with greenpeace as they like to deny things unless it fits into there agenda, really life is to short to squabble over things that do not exist in your world.
 Quoting: gibs 9572395


I'm not at all "angry". I'm more sad than anything...

It hurts to know that you ignorant paranoid morons live such pathetic lives when a little basic knowledge would benefit you so much.

You only wish I were angry...sorry to dissapoint you.
 Quoting: Noble


No, I agree. You appear to be mad. I think you have been exposed and gotten to.
That is why you are lashing out at people with infantile name calling.

You suck at being a shill. Find a new job.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


I'm not a shill..this isn't a job...I just happen to think that the truth about the trails in the sky is important. Especially in the face of such paranoid ignorance.
 Quoting: Noble


No you are obsessed by it. . . .horsepoop
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B

News