Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,893 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 939,990
Pageviews Today: 1,167,297Threads Today: 199Posts Today: 4,333
09:18 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.

 
Noble (OP)

User ID: 17975050
United States
06/17/2012 06:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
You people prove your paranoid ignorance with every post. Thanks for proving my points.
 Quoting: Noble


I don't know for certain what the truth of the chemtrail/contrail issue is and I'm not interested in spending time studying the "science."

Even if I did, I would have no way of knowing whether there the "facts" were verifiable or the statistics were skewed to favor one bias or another.

That's why only a fool would state his opinions on the matter with complete certainty.

So, OP, you are obviously a fool.


I do know this, however: If there is a nefarious intent on the part of TPTB behind the chemtrails, it would fit perfectly with the pattern of behavior that TPTB have displayed in other situations that are verifiable.

So, OP, when you repeatedly criticize your detractors as "paranoid", you are demonstrating that you are either:

A) Not well informed

B) A shill or

C) Just another sheeple who is too scared to admit that we live in a world where TPTB rain death and destruction down on their own "citizens" without a second thought.

In any case, OP, you have accomplished nothing but "showing your ass" for all of us to see. Now cover it up and crawl back under the rock from which you came!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15706864


Yeah, that silly old "science"...what a waste of time..

Fucking idiot...

Just because you don't know you make paranoid assumptions...doesn't mean you don't. Sorry, the onus is on the chemtards...and time after time, you chemtards prove your complete ignorance in this matter...and some of YOU can't understand basic logic. YOU fail!

I'm very well informed about the trails in the sky

I'm not a shill..that's just more paranoid loser-speak on YOUR part.

I don't doubt the power of TPTB...I just see no evidence that the trails are anything more than contrails....and neither do you. That isn't to say I'm not aware of the other things "they" have done in the past (no, not 9/11).

You people just have so much hate and distrust of others that you have to INVENT reasons to spread your views.


It's sad.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/17/2012 07:43 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
And you conveniently ignore this from your 'abstract':

At ambient temperatures 5 K below the threshold temperature for contrail onset, the plume became visible about 10 m after the engine exit for high sulfur content, but 15 m after the engine exit for low sulfur content......The high-sulfur contrail grew more quickly but also evaporated earlier than the low-sulfur contrail.

cruise
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Yes. . . . it supports my assumption . . . the whole effort was to test the visibility and persistence trends of geoengineering level concentrations of sulfur compounds in jet fuel . . . which by-the-way was done in 1995 . . coffee4 Sufficient time to integrate these findings into operational process . . .

Received 22 June 1995; accepted 27 October 1995; published 20 March 1996.

Citation: Schumann, U., J. Ström, R. Busen, R. Baumann, K. Gierens, M. Krautstrunk, F. P. Schröder, and J. Stingl (1996), In situ observations of particles in jet aircraft exhausts and contrails for different sulfur-containing fuels, J. Geophys. Res., 101(D3), 6853–6869, doi:10.1029/95JD03405.

[link to www.agu.org]
 Quoting: George B


Here is evidence that sulfur compounds (IMO, possibly form commercial air traffic with sulfur spiked fuels) are having an effect . . .

NOAA study: Increase in particles high in Earth’s atmosphere has offset some recent climate warming

July 21, 2011

A recent increase in the abundance of particles high in the atmosphere has offset about a third of the current climate warming influence of carbon dioxide (CO2) change during the past decade, according to a new study led by NOAA and published today in the online edition of Science

“Stratospheric aerosol increased surprisingly rapidly in that time, almost
doubling during the decade,” Daniel said. “The increase in aerosols since 2000 implies a cooling effect of about 0.1 watts per square meter – enough to offset some of the 0.28 watts per square meter warming effect from the carbon dioxide increase during that same period.”
Sources of aerosols reach the stratosphere from above and below as shown in the graph. Sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbonyl sulfide (OCS), and dimethyl sulfide(DMS) are the dominant surface emissions which contribute to aerosol formation.
[link to www.noaanews.noaa.gov]


My NOTE: There is no evidence the sulfur compounds are all from surface emissions . . . why . . . they were measured in or near the stratosphere . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


And there is no evidence that natural processes and occurrences didn't result in that sulfur. As they have since the beginning of time itself.
 Quoting: Noble


Funny thing Noble. . . .the author never even acknowledges the possibility that the unknown increase in stratospheric particulates could come from aviation. . . .it is not even in their graphic of sources. . . though atmospheric scientists for years have been proposing such a solution especially with sulfur compounds. . . .and NASA has been suggesting for years that aviation has an effect as well. . . why ignore this potential explanation???? IMO, their blindness is intentional. . . any suggestion of such an effect would be heresy !!!!!! . . . coffee4
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/17/2012 07:44 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Sulfur Graph
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1611462
United States
06/17/2012 09:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
You people prove your paranoid ignorance with every post. Thanks for proving my points.
 Quoting: Noble


I don't know for certain what the truth of the chemtrail/contrail issue is and I'm not interested in spending time studying the "science."

Even if I did, I would have no way of knowing whether there the "facts" were verifiable or the statistics were skewed to favor one bias or another.

That's why only a fool would state his opinions on the matter with complete certainty.

So, OP, you are obviously a fool.


I do know this, however: If there is a nefarious intent on the part of TPTB behind the chemtrails, it would fit perfectly with the pattern of behavior that TPTB have displayed in other situations that are verifiable.

So, OP, when you repeatedly criticize your detractors as "paranoid", you are demonstrating that you are either:

A) Not well informed

B) A shill or

C) Just another sheeple who is too scared to admit that we live in a world where TPTB rain death and destruction down on their own "citizens" without a second thought.

In any case, OP, you have accomplished nothing but "showing your ass" for all of us to see. Now cover it up and crawl back under the rock from which you came!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15706864


Good for you #6864. What a perfect response. Asking questions and looking for answers is anything but paranoid.

Denial equals paranoia.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1611462
United States
06/17/2012 09:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
The skies are white from 'geoengineering'. Geoengineering is a broad term for everything aerosolized applications are doing to the atmosphere.
Weather modification
Radar enhancement
Satellite imaging
Surveillance
.................to name a few
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14110447


That's a "claim"...

By default, the trails in the sky are contrails. It's up to YOU chemtards to provide evidence that the trails have anything to do with the things listed above...

You have all failed to do so..

Just sayin...

Just because you claim something to be...and then find nonsense through a google search for "chemtrails"...doesn't mean the trails are anything more than contrails.

I'm sorry, that's just a fact.

That is NOT to say the things you listed aren't happening...I just see no evidence that the things listed above result in long white trails that look EXACTLY like persistent contrails. And neither do you.
 Quoting: Noble



Sorta like google search for contard science or metabunk, huh?

I'm sure you must know by now that the Encyclopedia Britanica will only be available on the webz in another year or so. OH, my......................
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Nope, nothing like that. The info on contrailscience is backed up with all the literature ever written on the subjects. The shit you find is backed up by other paranoid chemtards...and no one else.
 Quoting: Noble


Obviously you are in such denial that you have not read the information or watched the videos regarding geoengineering (chemtrails) as they too are backed up by all the literature ever written on the subjects. People with degrees in the topic of discussion.

Therefore, you are talking out of your ass, as usual, Mr. Disinfo Agent or whatever you are.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14110447
United States
06/17/2012 09:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


That's a "claim"...

By default, the trails in the sky are contrails. It's up to YOU chemtards to provide evidence that the trails have anything to do with the things listed above...

You have all failed to do so..

Just sayin...

Just because you claim something to be...and then find nonsense through a google search for "chemtrails"...doesn't mean the trails are anything more than contrails.

I'm sorry, that's just a fact.

That is NOT to say the things you listed aren't happening...I just see no evidence that the things listed above result in long white trails that look EXACTLY like persistent contrails. And neither do you.
 Quoting: Noble



Sorta like google search for contard science or metabunk, huh?

I'm sure you must know by now that the Encyclopedia Britanica will only be available on the webz in another year or so. OH, my......................
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Nope, nothing like that. The info on contrailscience is backed up with all the literature ever written on the subjects. The shit you find is backed up by other paranoid chemtards...and no one else.
 Quoting: Noble


Obviously you are in such denial that you have not read the information or watched the videos regarding geoengineering (chemtrails) as they too are backed up by all the literature ever written on the subjects. People with degrees in the topic of discussion.

Therefore, you are talking out of your ass, as usual, Mr. Disinfo Agent or whatever you are.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Nobel is NOT IN DENIAL

Noble is ConTARD in residence at GLP. Nobel knows whats up. Nobel is pure shill. This conTWAT is only busy on pulling wool over the eyes of whom ever is left that is either on the fence of completely new. The cat is so out of the bag but Nobel and Co. is making sure no one noticed the escape.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14110447
United States
06/17/2012 09:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Nobel is one of the LAST of the Flying Monkeys of the Jay Reynolds crowd.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17975050
United States
06/17/2012 11:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Yes. . . . it supports my assumption . . . the whole effort was to test the visibility and persistence trends of geoengineering level concentrations of sulfur compounds in jet fuel . . . which by-the-way was done in 1995 . . coffee4 Sufficient time to integrate these findings into operational process . . .

Received 22 June 1995; accepted 27 October 1995; published 20 March 1996.

Citation: Schumann, U., J. Ström, R. Busen, R. Baumann, K. Gierens, M. Krautstrunk, F. P. Schröder, and J. Stingl (1996), In situ observations of particles in jet aircraft exhausts and contrails for different sulfur-containing fuels, J. Geophys. Res., 101(D3), 6853–6869, doi:10.1029/95JD03405.

[link to www.agu.org]
 Quoting: George B


Here is evidence that sulfur compounds (IMO, possibly form commercial air traffic with sulfur spiked fuels) are having an effect . . .

NOAA study: Increase in particles high in Earth’s atmosphere has offset some recent climate warming

July 21, 2011

A recent increase in the abundance of particles high in the atmosphere has offset about a third of the current climate warming influence of carbon dioxide (CO2) change during the past decade, according to a new study led by NOAA and published today in the online edition of Science

“Stratospheric aerosol increased surprisingly rapidly in that time, almost
doubling during the decade,” Daniel said. “The increase in aerosols since 2000 implies a cooling effect of about 0.1 watts per square meter – enough to offset some of the 0.28 watts per square meter warming effect from the carbon dioxide increase during that same period.”
Sources of aerosols reach the stratosphere from above and below as shown in the graph. Sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbonyl sulfide (OCS), and dimethyl sulfide(DMS) are the dominant surface emissions which contribute to aerosol formation.
[link to www.noaanews.noaa.gov]


My NOTE: There is no evidence the sulfur compounds are all from surface emissions . . . why . . . they were measured in or near the stratosphere . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


And there is no evidence that natural processes and occurrences didn't result in that sulfur. As they have since the beginning of time itself.
 Quoting: Noble


Funny thing Noble. . . .the author never even acknowledges the possibility that the unknown increase in stratospheric particulates could come from aviation. . . .it is not even in their graphic of sources. . . though atmospheric scientists for years have been proposing such a solution especially with sulfur compounds. . . .and NASA has been suggesting for years that aviation has an effect as well. . . why ignore this potential explanation???? IMO, their blindness is intentional. . . any suggestion of such an effect would be heresy !!!!!! . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


Look, stupid....I don't deny that such things are possible...that people are researching such things...


All I'm saying is that there is no evidence that the trails in the sky that chemtards refer to as "chemtrails" are anything more than contrails. You keep bringing up irrelevant shit in response to my claim, but all you are doing is showing that people perform research....NO SHIT!!!

The trails are contrails, and there is no evidence that "they" are using them intentionally.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17975050
United States
06/17/2012 11:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Nobel is one of the LAST of the Flying Monkeys of the Jay Reynolds crowd.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14110447


Hehe, are you actually suggesting that there are more people in the world who accept this "chemtrail" crap than there are who understand that the trails are contrails?!

Keep dreaming chemtard.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17975050
United States
06/17/2012 11:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...



Sorta like google search for contard science or metabunk, huh?

I'm sure you must know by now that the Encyclopedia Britanica will only be available on the webz in another year or so. OH, my......................
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Nope, nothing like that. The info on contrailscience is backed up with all the literature ever written on the subjects. The shit you find is backed up by other paranoid chemtards...and no one else.
 Quoting: Noble


Obviously you are in such denial that you have not read the information or watched the videos regarding geoengineering (chemtrails) as they too are backed up by all the literature ever written on the subjects. People with degrees in the topic of discussion.

Therefore, you are talking out of your ass, as usual, Mr. Disinfo Agent or whatever you are.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Nobel is NOT IN DENIAL

Noble is ConTARD in residence at GLP. Nobel knows whats up. Nobel is pure shill. This conTWAT is only busy on pulling wool over the eyes of whom ever is left that is either on the fence of completely new. The cat is so out of the bag but Nobel and Co. is making sure no one noticed the escape.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14110447


Yeah, I'm a Contard for pointing out that conspiracy losers don't understand basic science and principles of aviation.


You are a paranoid idiot..and you are in denial if you can't see that.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17975050
United States
06/17/2012 11:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


That's a "claim"...

By default, the trails in the sky are contrails. It's up to YOU chemtards to provide evidence that the trails have anything to do with the things listed above...

You have all failed to do so..

Just sayin...

Just because you claim something to be...and then find nonsense through a google search for "chemtrails"...doesn't mean the trails are anything more than contrails.

I'm sorry, that's just a fact.

That is NOT to say the things you listed aren't happening...I just see no evidence that the things listed above result in long white trails that look EXACTLY like persistent contrails. And neither do you.
 Quoting: Noble



Sorta like google search for contard science or metabunk, huh?

I'm sure you must know by now that the Encyclopedia Britanica will only be available on the webz in another year or so. OH, my......................
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Nope, nothing like that. The info on contrailscience is backed up with all the literature ever written on the subjects. The shit you find is backed up by other paranoid chemtards...and no one else.
 Quoting: Noble


Obviously you are in such denial that you have not read the information or watched the videos regarding geoengineering (chemtrails) as they too are backed up by all the literature ever written on the subjects. People with degrees in the topic of discussion.

Therefore, you are talking out of your ass, as usual, Mr. Disinfo Agent or whatever you are.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


I've seen all the videos...I understand the concepts just fine. I just don't see any evidence that the trails are in any way related to geoengineering. The only reason you believe so is because it looks like "the airplanes are spraying something" .

Sorry, that's just not enough...the trails look and act exactly as contrails do.

Sorry "airplanes and spray" could be many things. You don't think crop dusting is geoengineering, do you? I
There is a plane...it's spraying something into the air...


Well, airplanes spray water vapor into the air as part of hydrocarbon combustion...it's called contrails.

Why can't you admit that there is a chance that you are wrong?

I admit it...which is why I keep asking for chemtards to show me why the trails I keep seeing couldn't possibly be contrails...and you chemtards continue to fail.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17975050
United States
06/17/2012 12:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
You people prove your paranoid ignorance with every post. Thanks for proving my points.
 Quoting: Noble


I don't know for certain what the truth of the chemtrail/contrail issue is and I'm not interested in spending time studying the "science."

Even if I did, I would have no way of knowing whether there the "facts" were verifiable or the statistics were skewed to favor one bias or another.

That's why only a fool would state his opinions on the matter with complete certainty.

So, OP, you are obviously a fool.


I do know this, however: If there is a nefarious intent on the part of TPTB behind the chemtrails, it would fit perfectly with the pattern of behavior that TPTB have displayed in other situations that are verifiable.

So, OP, when you repeatedly criticize your detractors as "paranoid", you are demonstrating that you are either:

A) Not well informed

B) A shill or

C) Just another sheeple who is too scared to admit that we live in a world where TPTB rain death and destruction down on their own "citizens" without a second thought.

In any case, OP, you have accomplished nothing but "showing your ass" for all of us to see. Now cover it up and crawl back under the rock from which you came!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15706864


Good for you #6864. What a perfect response. Asking questions and looking for answers is anything but paranoid.

Denial equals paranoia.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Wrong, I see no evidence that the trails I grew up understand as "contrails" are anything but!

Say you go to a farm stand on the side of the road whic is selling apples, and as you are about to buy one, some dude runs up and screams "don't eat that apple...it's full of poison, I read about an apple that was posted on the Internet, and it was described to be just like that one!!!"

Who has the burdon of proof?! The person making the claim? The person buying the apple? The farm stand owner? What if someone else comes by and said, " I ate one of those apples and it was fine"...is he a "shill" for disagreeing with the dude who says its poison?!


Again you chemtards are making the claim about something which has been understood for almost 100 years...PROVE IT...or stop acting like Chicken Little.


It's the chemtards who are in denial...you actually believe that you have properly educated yourselves on this subject through some google searches and by reading bullshit on conspiracy sites.

It's more pathetic than you could ever imagine.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14110447
United States
06/17/2012 12:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Nope, nothing like that. The info on contrailscience is backed up with all the literature ever written on the subjects. The shit you find is backed up by other paranoid chemtards...and no one else.
 Quoting: Noble


Obviously you are in such denial that you have not read the information or watched the videos regarding geoengineering (chemtrails) as they too are backed up by all the literature ever written on the subjects. People with degrees in the topic of discussion.

Therefore, you are talking out of your ass, as usual, Mr. Disinfo Agent or whatever you are.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Nobel is NOT IN DENIAL

Noble is ConTARD in residence at GLP. Nobel knows whats up. Nobel is pure shill. This conTWAT is only busy on pulling wool over the eyes of whom ever is left that is either on the fence of completely new. The cat is so out of the bag but Nobel and Co. is making sure no one noticed the escape.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14110447


Yeah, I'm a Contard for pointing out that conspiracy losers don't understand basic science and principles of aviation.


You are a paranoid idiot..and you are in denial if you can't see that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050



(in a giant, loud falsetto, vibrato filled, singing voice)

B U u U u L L S H I i I i I i I i I i I i I T
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17975050
United States
06/17/2012 12:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Obviously you are in such denial that you have not read the information or watched the videos regarding geoengineering (chemtrails) as they too are backed up by all the literature ever written on the subjects. People with degrees in the topic of discussion.

Therefore, you are talking out of your ass, as usual, Mr. Disinfo Agent or whatever you are.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Nobel is NOT IN DENIAL

Noble is ConTARD in residence at GLP. Nobel knows whats up. Nobel is pure shill. This conTWAT is only busy on pulling wool over the eyes of whom ever is left that is either on the fence of completely new. The cat is so out of the bag but Nobel and Co. is making sure no one noticed the escape.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14110447


Yeah, I'm a Contard for pointing out that conspiracy losers don't understand basic science and principles of aviation.


You are a paranoid idiot..and you are in denial if you can't see that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050



(in a giant, loud falsetto, vibrato filled, singing voice)

B U u U u L L S H I i I i I i I i I i I i I T
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14110447


More denial from an uneducated chemtard about his/her lack of education in subjects he/she clearly doesn't understand anything about.

You are too stupid to understand that you are stupid.

That's a fact.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1611462
United States
06/17/2012 01:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...



Sorta like google search for contard science or metabunk, huh?

I'm sure you must know by now that the Encyclopedia Britanica will only be available on the webz in another year or so. OH, my......................
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Nope, nothing like that. The info on contrailscience is backed up with all the literature ever written on the subjects. The shit you find is backed up by other paranoid chemtards...and no one else.
 Quoting: Noble


Obviously you are in such denial that you have not read the information or watched the videos regarding geoengineering (chemtrails) as they too are backed up by all the literature ever written on the subjects. People with degrees in the topic of discussion.

Therefore, you are talking out of your ass, as usual, Mr. Disinfo Agent or whatever you are.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


I've seen all the videos...I understand the concepts just fine. I just don't see any evidence that the trails are in any way related to geoengineering. The only reason you believe so is because it looks like "the airplanes are spraying something" .

Sorry, that's just not enough...the trails look and act exactly as contrails do.

Sorry "airplanes and spray" could be many things. You don't think crop dusting is geoengineering, do you? I
There is a plane...it's spraying something into the air...


Well, airplanes spray water vapor into the air as part of hydrocarbon combustion...it's called contrails.

Why can't you admit that there is a chance that you are wrong?

I admit it...which is why I keep asking for chemtards to show me why the trails I keep seeing couldn't possibly be contrails...and you chemtards continue to fail.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Doesn't look like they are spraying, they are spraying. Not water vapor.

What, admit I'm wrong and accept your overly simplified bs about condensation trails? Because I don't care what you see or want everyone else to see, because you say so.

The trails are not normal. You don't understand or comprehend anything. You have a basic knowledge of aviation and that is contrails. You are in total denial.

I'll stick to my own vision of what is going on and get my knowledge from real professionals. You don't qualify.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14110447
United States
06/17/2012 01:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Nobel is NOT IN DENIAL

Noble is ConTARD in residence at GLP. Nobel knows whats up. Nobel is pure shill. This conTWAT is only busy on pulling wool over the eyes of whom ever is left that is either on the fence of completely new. The cat is so out of the bag but Nobel and Co. is making sure no one noticed the escape.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14110447


Yeah, I'm a Contard for pointing out that conspiracy losers don't understand basic science and principles of aviation.


You are a paranoid idiot..and you are in denial if you can't see that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050



(in a giant, loud falsetto, vibrato filled, singing voice)

B U u U u L L S H I i I i I i I i I i I i I T
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14110447


More denial from an uneducated chemtard about his/her lack of education in subjects he/she clearly doesn't understand anything about.

You are too stupid to understand that you are stupid.

That's a fact.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


look..a flying monkey
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/17/2012 02:04 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Here is evidence that sulfur compounds (IMO, possibly form commercial air traffic with sulfur spiked fuels) are having an effect . . .

NOAA study: Increase in particles high in Earth’s atmosphere has offset some recent climate warming

July 21, 2011

A recent increase in the abundance of particles high in the atmosphere has offset about a third of the current climate warming influence of carbon dioxide (CO2) change during the past decade, according to a new study led by NOAA and published today in the online edition of Science

“Stratospheric aerosol increased surprisingly rapidly in that time, almost
doubling during the decade,” Daniel said. “The increase in aerosols since 2000 implies a cooling effect of about 0.1 watts per square meter – enough to offset some of the 0.28 watts per square meter warming effect from the carbon dioxide increase during that same period.”
Sources of aerosols reach the stratosphere from above and below as shown in the graph. Sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbonyl sulfide (OCS), and dimethyl sulfide(DMS) are the dominant surface emissions which contribute to aerosol formation.
[link to www.noaanews.noaa.gov]


My NOTE: There is no evidence the sulfur compounds are all from surface emissions . . . why . . . they were measured in or near the stratosphere . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


And there is no evidence that natural processes and occurrences didn't result in that sulfur. As they have since the beginning of time itself.
 Quoting: Noble


Funny thing Noble. . . .the author never even acknowledges the possibility that the unknown increase in stratospheric particulates could come from aviation. . . .it is not even in their graphic of sources. . . though
atmospheric scientists for years have been proposing such a solution especially with sulfur compounds. . . .and NASA has been suggesting for years that aviation has an effect as well. . . why ignore this potential explanation???? IMO, their blindness is intentional. . . any suggestion of such an effect would be heresy !!!!!! . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


Look, stupid....I don't deny that such things are possible...that people are researching such things...


All I'm saying is that there is no evidence that the trails in the sky that chemtards refer to as "chemtrails" are anything more than contrails. You keep bringing up irrelevant shit in response to my claim, but all you are
doing is showing that people perform research....NO SHIT!!!

The trails are contrails, and there is no evidence that "they" are using them intentionally.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Evidence that they could be laced with sulfur compounds and therefore no longer contrails but a vehicle to inject sulfur compounds to change the climate. . . .
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1611462
United States
06/17/2012 02:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
You people prove your paranoid ignorance with every post. Thanks for proving my points.
 Quoting: Noble


I don't know for certain what the truth of the chemtrail/contrail issue is and I'm not interested in spending time studying the "science."

Even if I did, I would have no way of knowing whether there the "facts" were verifiable or the statistics were skewed to favor one bias or another.

That's why only a fool would state his opinions on the matter with complete certainty.

So, OP, you are obviously a fool.


I do know this, however: If there is a nefarious intent on the part of TPTB behind the chemtrails, it would fit perfectly with the pattern of behavior that TPTB have displayed in other situations that are verifiable.

So, OP, when you repeatedly criticize your detractors as "paranoid", you are demonstrating that you are either:

A) Not well informed

B) A shill or

C) Just another sheeple who is too scared to admit that we live in a world where TPTB rain death and destruction down on their own "citizens" without a second thought.

In any case, OP, you have accomplished nothing but "showing your ass" for all of us to see. Now cover it up and crawl back under the rock from which you came!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15706864


Good for you #6864. What a perfect response. Asking questions and looking for answers is anything but paranoid.

Denial equals paranoia.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Wrong, I see no evidence that the trails I grew up understand as "contrails" are anything but!

Say you go to a farm stand on the side of the road whic is selling apples, and as you are about to buy one, some dude runs up and screams "don't eat that apple...it's full of poison, I read about an apple that was posted on the Internet, and it was described to be just like that one!!!"

Who has the burdon of proof?! The person making the claim? The person buying the apple? The farm stand owner? What if someone else comes by and said, " I ate one of those apples and it was fine"...is he a "shill" for disagreeing with the dude who says its poison?!


Again you chemtards are making the claim about something which has been understood for almost 100 years...PROVE IT...or stop acting like Chicken Little.


It's the chemtards who are in denial...you actually believe that you have properly educated yourselves on this subject through some google searches and by reading bullshit on conspiracy sites.

It's more pathetic than you could ever imagine.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Thanks again #6864. You are the voice of reason.

No chicken little here except you, Noble. We know the chemtrails are taking place and have been verified.

What's pathetic is you and your simplistic bill of goods.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1611462
United States
06/17/2012 04:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


And there is no evidence that natural processes and occurrences didn't result in that sulfur. As they have since the beginning of time itself.
 Quoting: Noble


Funny thing Noble. . . .the author never even acknowledges the possibility that the unknown increase in stratospheric particulates could come from aviation. . . .it is not even in their graphic of sources. . . though
atmospheric scientists for years have been proposing such a solution especially with sulfur compounds. . . .and NASA has been suggesting for years that aviation has an effect as well. . . why ignore this potential explanation???? IMO, their blindness is intentional. . . any suggestion of such an effect would be heresy !!!!!! . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


Look, stupid....I don't deny that such things are possible...that people are researching such things...


All I'm saying is that there is no evidence that the trails in the sky that chemtards refer to as "chemtrails" are anything more than contrails. You keep bringing up irrelevant shit in response to my claim, but all you are
doing is showing that people perform research....NO SHIT!!!

The trails are contrails, and there is no evidence that "they" are using them intentionally.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Evidence that they could be laced with sulfur compounds and therefore no longer contrails but a vehicle to inject sulfur compounds to change the climate. . . .
 Quoting: George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1611462
United States
06/17/2012 04:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


And there is no evidence that natural processes and occurrences didn't result in that sulfur. As they have since the beginning of time itself.
 Quoting: Noble


Funny thing Noble. . . .the author never even acknowledges the possibility that the unknown increase in stratospheric particulates could come from aviation. . . .it is not even in their graphic of sources. . . though
atmospheric scientists for years have been proposing such a solution especially with sulfur compounds. . . .and NASA has been suggesting for years that aviation has an effect as well. . . why ignore this potential explanation???? IMO, their blindness is intentional. . . any suggestion of such an effect would be heresy !!!!!! . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


Look, stupid....I don't deny that such things are possible...that people are researching such things...


All I'm saying is that there is no evidence that the trails in the sky that chemtards refer to as "chemtrails" are anything more than contrails. You keep bringing up irrelevant shit in response to my claim, but all you are
doing is showing that people perform research....NO SHIT!!!

The trails are contrails, and there is no evidence that "they" are using them intentionally.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Evidence that they could be laced with sulfur compounds and therefore no longer contrails but a vehicle to inject sulfur compounds to change the climate. . . .
 Quoting: George B



Yes, I believe there is evidence that they are laced with sulfur compounds. This situation is getting more aggressive everyday. We might get 3 days a week without trails these days. Whoop Whoop!!

Right before your eyes. You can watch them fly by and the white skies are forming faster now. You would have to be stupid not to notice and wonder what was going on.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14542172
United States
06/17/2012 09:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
NASA Scientist proposes using commercial air traffic to alter local climates . . . ohno


[link to www-pm.larc.nasa.gov]

Solutions?

"In principle, it may be possible to selectively
Minimize the creation of late afternoon contrail-
Induced cloudiness that will persist during the
night, when they would have a net warming
Effect, while intentionally increasing the forma-
tion of contrails early in the day, generating a
Daytime cooling. Current research is focused on
Accurately predicting the times and locations
At which contrails are liekely to persist for long
periods of time and spread over wide areas as
Contrail-induced cirrus. Such information could
Help mitigate the negative effects of aviation on
Regional and global climate by incorporating it
Into operational air traffic control and routing
Systems."
David.P.Duda@nasa.gov
 Quoting: George B




proposing something, and doing it, are to VERY different things.

I guess you've never read popular science, and seen the visions of the future presented by the scientists over the decades.

Same thing....
 Quoting: Noble


Wrong Mr. Counter-intelligence operative, they have proposed it. And they are now doing it. We are seeing the exact operation which they have laid out at their geo-engineering conferences. Any non-shill can see this.

You, being a counter-intelligence shill operative, want us to wait until a government official announces that it is going on. Your buying time and running out the clock.

Eventually, once the deny,deny,deny/ridicule counter intel technique doesn't work any more, once people in the grocery line are gossiping about it, they will have to go from covert to overt. That's why they are floating these trial balloon articles talking about it. They are using predictive programming.

That is why we, the honest citizens, must spread the word that the whole climate change/global warming meme is a scam. And if there is any warming, it is being caused by stratospheric sulfate aerosol spraying, and not carbon dioxide.


The Largest Stand Ever Against Chemtrails
Aug. 17th-19th Live conference in L.A. and global Webcast
[link to www.consciousnessbeyondchemtrails.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14542172
United States
06/17/2012 09:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Funny thing Noble. . . .the author never even acknowledges the possibility that the unknown increase in stratospheric particulates could come from aviation. . . .it is not even in their graphic of sources. . . though
atmospheric scientists for years have been proposing such a solution especially with sulfur compounds. . . .and NASA has been suggesting for years that aviation has an effect as well. . . why ignore this potential explanation???? IMO, their blindness is intentional. . . any suggestion of such an effect would be heresy !!!!!! . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


Look, stupid....I don't deny that such things are possible...that people are researching such things...


All I'm saying is that there is no evidence that the trails in the sky that chemtards refer to as "chemtrails" are anything more than contrails. You keep bringing up irrelevant shit in response to my claim, but all you are
doing is showing that people perform research....NO SHIT!!!

The trails are contrails, and there is no evidence that "they" are using them intentionally.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Evidence that they could be laced with sulfur compounds and therefore no longer contrails but a vehicle to inject sulfur compounds to change the climate. . . .
 Quoting: George B



Yes, I believe there is evidence that they are laced with sulfur compounds. This situation is getting more aggressive everyday. We might get 3 days a week without trails these days. Whoop Whoop!!

Right before your eyes. You can watch them fly by and the white skies are forming faster now. You would have to be stupid not to notice and wonder what was going on.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


...


Funny thing Noble. . . .the author never even acknowledges the possibility that the unknown increase in stratospheric particulates could come from aviation. . . .it is not even in their graphic of sources. . . though
atmospheric scientists for years have been proposing such a solution especially with sulfur compounds. . . .and NASA has been suggesting for years that aviation has an effect as well. . . why ignore this potential explanation???? IMO, their blindness is intentional. . . any suggestion of such an effect would be heresy !!!!!! . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


Look, stupid....I don't deny that such things are possible...that people are researching such things...


All I'm saying is that there is no evidence that the trails in the sky that chemtards refer to as "chemtrails" are anything more than contrails. You keep bringing up irrelevant shit in response to my claim, but all you are
doing is showing that people perform research....NO SHIT!!!

The trails are contrails, and there is no evidence that "they" are using them intentionally.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Evidence that they could be laced with sulfur compounds and therefore no longer contrails but a vehicle to inject sulfur compounds to change the climate. . . .
 Quoting: George B



Yes, I believe there is evidence that they are laced with sulfur compounds. This situation is getting more aggressive everyday. We might get 3 days a week without trails these days. Whoop Whoop!!

Right before your eyes. You can watch them fly by and the white skies are forming faster now. You would have to be stupid not to notice and wonder what was going on.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Yeah, the spraying has been going on for years. Slowly acclimating people to less and less sunlight.

It really stepped up in 2010. I think they are going to try and implement the climate change tax scam and agenda in the next four years. So they are going to increase spraying even more, to cause more and more extreme weather.

They have indoctrinated people with the climate change/global warming meme, and now they are causing the extreme weather.

They are causing the problem so they can name the solution.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14542172
United States
06/17/2012 09:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


I don't know for certain what the truth of the chemtrail/contrail issue is and I'm not interested in spending time studying the "science."

Even if I did, I would have no way of knowing whether there the "facts" were verifiable or the statistics were skewed to favor one bias or another.

That's why only a fool would state his opinions on the matter with complete certainty.

So, OP, you are obviously a fool.


I do know this, however: If there is a nefarious intent on the part of TPTB behind the chemtrails, it would fit perfectly with the pattern of behavior that TPTB have displayed in other situations that are verifiable.

So, OP, when you repeatedly criticize your detractors as "paranoid", you are demonstrating that you are either:

A) Not well informed

B) A shill or

C) Just another sheeple who is too scared to admit that we live in a world where TPTB rain death and destruction down on their own "citizens" without a second thought.

In any case, OP, you have accomplished nothing but "showing your ass" for all of us to see. Now cover it up and crawl back under the rock from which you came!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15706864


Good for you #6864. What a perfect response. Asking questions and looking for answers is anything but paranoid.

Denial equals paranoia.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Wrong, I see no evidence that the trails I grew up understand as "contrails" are anything but!

Say you go to a farm stand on the side of the road whic is selling apples, and as you are about to buy one, some dude runs up and screams "don't eat that apple...it's full of poison, I read about an apple that was posted on the Internet, and it was described to be just like that one!!!"

Who has the burdon of proof?! The person making the claim? The person buying the apple? The farm stand owner? What if someone else comes by and said, " I ate one of those apples and it was fine"...is he a "shill" for disagreeing with the dude who says its poison?!


Again you chemtards are making the claim about something which has been understood for almost 100 years...PROVE IT...or stop acting like Chicken Little.


It's the chemtards who are in denial...you actually believe that you have properly educated yourselves on this subject through some google searches and by reading bullshit on conspiracy sites.

It's more pathetic than you could ever imagine.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Thanks again #6864. You are the voice of reason.

No chicken little here except you, Noble. We know the chemtrails are taking place and have been verified.

What's pathetic is you and your simplistic bill of goods.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


...


I don't know for certain what the truth of the chemtrail/contrail issue is and I'm not interested in spending time studying the "science."

Even if I did, I would have no way of knowing whether there the "facts" were verifiable or the statistics were skewed to favor one bias or another.

That's why only a fool would state his opinions on the matter with complete certainty.

So, OP, you are obviously a fool.


I do know this, however: If there is a nefarious intent on the part of TPTB behind the chemtrails, it would fit perfectly with the pattern of behavior that TPTB have displayed in other situations that are verifiable.

So, OP, when you repeatedly criticize your detractors as "paranoid", you are demonstrating that you are either:

A) Not well informed

B) A shill or

C) Just another sheeple who is too scared to admit that we live in a world where TPTB rain death and destruction down on their own "citizens" without a second thought.

In any case, OP, you have accomplished nothing but "showing your ass" for all of us to see. Now cover it up and crawl back under the rock from which you came!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15706864


Good for you #6864. What a perfect response. Asking questions and looking for answers is anything but paranoid.

Denial equals paranoia.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Wrong, I see no evidence that the trails I grew up understand as "contrails" are anything but!

Say you go to a farm stand on the side of the road whic is selling apples, and as you are about to buy one, some dude runs up and screams "don't eat that apple...it's full of poison, I read about an apple that was posted on the Internet, and it was described to be just like that one!!!"

Who has the burdon of proof?! The person making the claim? The person buying the apple? The farm stand owner? What if someone else comes by and said, " I ate one of those apples and it was fine"...is he a "shill" for disagreeing with the dude who says its poison?!


Again you chemtards are making the claim about something which has been understood for almost 100 years...PROVE IT...or stop acting like Chicken Little.


It's the chemtards who are in denial...you actually believe that you have properly educated yourselves on this subject through some google searches and by reading bullshit on conspiracy sites.

It's more pathetic than you could ever imagine.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Thanks again #6864. You are the voice of reason.

No chicken little here except you, Noble. We know the chemtrails are taking place and have been verified.

What's pathetic is you and your simplistic bill of goods.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Well, he's working from the limited playbook of the shill.

It's basically appeal to authority, and ridicule.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17975050
United States
06/17/2012 10:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Sorry chemtards..you have failed to provide any evidence that the trails we see are anything more than contrails.


Insistence, and paranoid accusations about me, are not enough.

Sorry!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17975050
United States
06/17/2012 10:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


And there is no evidence that natural processes and occurrences didn't result in that sulfur. As they have since the beginning of time itself.
 Quoting: Noble


Funny thing Noble. . . .the author never even acknowledges the possibility that the unknown increase in stratospheric particulates could come from aviation. . . .it is not even in their graphic of sources. . . though
atmospheric scientists for years have been proposing such a solution especially with sulfur compounds. . . .and NASA has been suggesting for years that aviation has an effect as well. . . why ignore this potential explanation???? IMO, their blindness is intentional. . . any suggestion of such an effect would be heresy !!!!!! . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


Look, stupid....I don't deny that such things are possible...that people are researching such things...


All I'm saying is that there is no evidence that the trails in the sky that chemtards refer to as "chemtrails" are anything more than contrails. You keep bringing up irrelevant shit in response to my claim, but all you are
doing is showing that people perform research....NO SHIT!!!

The trails are contrails, and there is no evidence that "they" are using them intentionally.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Evidence that they could be laced with sulfur compounds and therefore no longer contrails but a vehicle to inject sulfur compounds to change the climate. . . .
 Quoting: George B


No, there isn't any evidence that the trails are laced with sulfur...of any type.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1611462
United States
06/17/2012 10:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Good for you #6864. What a perfect response. Asking questions and looking for answers is anything but paranoid.

Denial equals paranoia.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Wrong, I see no evidence that the trails I grew up understand as "contrails" are anything but!

Say you go to a farm stand on the side of the road whic is selling apples, and as you are about to buy one, some dude runs up and screams "don't eat that apple...it's full of poison, I read about an apple that was posted on the Internet, and it was described to be just like that one!!!"

Who has the burdon of proof?! The person making the claim? The person buying the apple? The farm stand owner? What if someone else comes by and said, " I ate one of those apples and it was fine"...is he a "shill" for disagreeing with the dude who says its poison?!


Again you chemtards are making the claim about something which has been understood for almost 100 years...PROVE IT...or stop acting like Chicken Little.


It's the chemtards who are in denial...you actually believe that you have properly educated yourselves on this subject through some google searches and by reading bullshit on conspiracy sites.

It's more pathetic than you could ever imagine.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Thanks again #6864. You are the voice of reason.

No chicken little here except you, Noble. We know the chemtrails are taking place and have been verified.

What's pathetic is you and your simplistic bill of goods.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


...


Good for you #6864. What a perfect response. Asking questions and looking for answers is anything but paranoid.

Denial equals paranoia.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Wrong, I see no evidence that the trails I grew up understand as "contrails" are anything but!

Say you go to a farm stand on the side of the road whic is selling apples, and as you are about to buy one, some dude runs up and screams "don't eat that apple...it's full of poison, I read about an apple that was posted on the Internet, and it was described to be just like that one!!!"

Who has the burdon of proof?! The person making the claim? The person buying the apple? The farm stand owner? What if someone else comes by and said, " I ate one of those apples and it was fine"...is he a "shill" for disagreeing with the dude who says its poison?!


Again you chemtards are making the claim about something which has been understood for almost 100 years...PROVE IT...or stop acting like Chicken Little.


It's the chemtards who are in denial...you actually believe that you have properly educated yourselves on this subject through some google searches and by reading bullshit on conspiracy sites.

It's more pathetic than you could ever imagine.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Thanks again #6864. You are the voice of reason.

No chicken little here except you, Noble. We know the chemtrails are taking place and have been verified.

What's pathetic is you and your simplistic bill of goods.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Well, he's working from the limited playbook of the shill.

It's basically appeal to authority, and ridicule.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Agreed 2172. That limited playbook is getting very boring. Same old, same old. Thanks for the info re the seminar in August. Hope they'll be able to have one on the East Coast soon.

Have a good evening.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17975050
United States
06/17/2012 10:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Nope, nothing like that. The info on contrailscience is backed up with all the literature ever written on the subjects. The shit you find is backed up by other paranoid chemtards...and no one else.
 Quoting: Noble


Obviously you are in such denial that you have not read the information or watched the videos regarding geoengineering (chemtrails) as they too are backed up by all the literature ever written on the subjects. People with degrees in the topic of discussion.

Therefore, you are talking out of your ass, as usual, Mr. Disinfo Agent or whatever you are.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


I've seen all the videos...I understand the concepts just fine. I just don't see any evidence that the trails are in any way related to geoengineering. The only reason you believe so is because it looks like "the airplanes are spraying something" .

Sorry, that's just not enough...the trails look and act exactly as contrails do.

Sorry "airplanes and spray" could be many things. You don't think crop dusting is geoengineering, do you? I
There is a plane...it's spraying something into the air...


Well, airplanes spray water vapor into the air as part of hydrocarbon combustion...it's called contrails.

Why can't you admit that there is a chance that you are wrong?

I admit it...which is why I keep asking for chemtards to show me why the trails I keep seeing couldn't possibly be contrails...and you chemtards continue to fail.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Doesn't look like they are spraying, they are spraying. Not water vapor.

What, admit I'm wrong and accept your overly simplified bs about condensation trails? Because I don't care what you see or want everyone else to see, because you say so.

The trails are not normal. You don't understand or comprehend anything. You have a basic knowledge of aviation and that is contrails. You are in total denial.

I'll stick to my own vision of what is going on and get my knowledge from real professionals. You don't qualify.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Again, just because you don't know you are stupid, doesn't mean you aren't. You provide so much laughter...at your own expense.

I have yet to see any trail which can't be explained with a basic understanding of jet engines and atmospheric science.


Name a single professional who believes in "chemtrails" and I'll prove the person has a limited understanding of the subjects, and has never studied them...you are just accepting bullshit from other chemtards who you "believe" to be qualified to instruct others in these subjects...and who aren't.


Your own viison doesn't matter if it isn't coupled with a brain which has actual knowledge of these subjects. Yours certainly doesn't. Seeing something, and understanding what you are seeing, are two different things.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17975050
United States
06/17/2012 10:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Wrong, I see no evidence that the trails I grew up understand as "contrails" are anything but!

Say you go to a farm stand on the side of the road whic is selling apples, and as you are about to buy one, some dude runs up and screams "don't eat that apple...it's full of poison, I read about an apple that was posted on the Internet, and it was described to be just like that one!!!"

Who has the burdon of proof?! The person making the claim? The person buying the apple? The farm stand owner? What if someone else comes by and said, " I ate one of those apples and it was fine"...is he a "shill" for disagreeing with the dude who says its poison?!


Again you chemtards are making the claim about something which has been understood for almost 100 years...PROVE IT...or stop acting like Chicken Little.


It's the chemtards who are in denial...you actually believe that you have properly educated yourselves on this subject through some google searches and by reading bullshit on conspiracy sites.

It's more pathetic than you could ever imagine.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Thanks again #6864. You are the voice of reason.

No chicken little here except you, Noble. We know the chemtrails are taking place and have been verified.

What's pathetic is you and your simplistic bill of goods.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


...


Wrong, I see no evidence that the trails I grew up understand as "contrails" are anything but!

Say you go to a farm stand on the side of the road whic is selling apples, and as you are about to buy one, some dude runs up and screams "don't eat that apple...it's full of poison, I read about an apple that was posted on the Internet, and it was described to be just like that one!!!"

Who has the burdon of proof?! The person making the claim? The person buying the apple? The farm stand owner? What if someone else comes by and said, " I ate one of those apples and it was fine"...is he a "shill" for disagreeing with the dude who says its poison?!


Again you chemtards are making the claim about something which has been understood for almost 100 years...PROVE IT...or stop acting like Chicken Little.


It's the chemtards who are in denial...you actually believe that you have properly educated yourselves on this subject through some google searches and by reading bullshit on conspiracy sites.

It's more pathetic than you could ever imagine.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Thanks again #6864. You are the voice of reason.

No chicken little here except you, Noble. We know the chemtrails are taking place and have been verified.

What's pathetic is you and your simplistic bill of goods.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


Well, he's working from the limited playbook of the shill.

It's basically appeal to authority, and ridicule.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Agreed 2172. That limited playbook is getting very boring. Same old, same old. Thanks for the info re the seminar in August. Hope they'll be able to have one on the East Coast soon.

Have a good evening.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462


There is no play book...but there are books about aviation and atmospheric sciennce at the library...i suggest you take the time to read a few of them. Stop being lazy.
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 1452592
United States
06/18/2012 07:12 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Evidence that they could be laced with sulfur compounds and therefore no longer contrails but a vehicle to inject sulfur compounds to change the climate. . . .
 Quoting: George B


Even after I used your own source and pointed out that higher sulphur means contrails dissipate faster...

cruise

idiot
"Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail"

deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM
George B
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 1219201
United States
06/18/2012 07:26 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Evidence that they could be laced with sulfur compounds and therefore no longer contrails but a vehicle to inject sulfur compounds to change the climate. . . .
 Quoting: George B


Even after I used your own source and pointed out that higher sulphur means contrails dissipate faster...

cruise

 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


I never said visibility or persistence was necessary . . . visibility has little to do with chemtrails. . . visibility of an aerosol is an extremely short lived characteristic. . . .that was the purpose of the cited search . . . to see if increased sulfur concentrations into geoengineering useful levels would affect engine efficiency and visibility!!!!!

I have never said in over two years of posting that visibility was a required characteristic of chemtrails. . . .it is coincidental only. . . following the laws of atmospheric science . . .
goaway

C - #1a

Last Edited by George B on 06/18/2012 07:47 AM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B

News