Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,259 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 619,714
Pageviews Today: 770,162Threads Today: 116Posts Today: 2,441
05:46 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.

 
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/21/2012 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
I do however know that Geoengineering is real, it has been and is being tested, and the agenda of the top billionaires along with leading climate scientists are pushing this for approval on a grand scale. Fact
 Quoting: To Nbl 2562242


Great..."geoengineering" is real...I don't GIVE A SHIT and I'm not arguing about "geoengineering".

I see no EVIDENCE that it's going on, and the trails are NOT evidence of it.

You want to whine about geoengineering? GREAT! But, this thread is about the misunderstandings about contrails...nothing more.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
MickWestIsAShill
User ID: 1511730
United States
06/21/2012 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
The Boeing 707 to enter service in 1958 and dominate the market for civilian airliners

Look at some movies made back in the 60's & 70's, and see if you can find any "chemtrails", oh i mean contrails. NOT
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1342995


[link to contrailscience.com]
 Quoting: Noble


Have you read the "About" section of that government run shilling site? If you believe those idiots, let's just say you're an idiot.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18345296
United States
06/21/2012 11:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Chemtrail History and Information - Alan Watt [Full]



[link to www.youtube.com]
George B

User ID: 1651785
United States
06/21/2012 11:59 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
This?
"Could a full sized aircraft deploying sulfur dioxide 30 miles above the earth be confused with normal contrails? Not even your eyes could tell the difference at that altitude."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2562242


Great, so does that mean planes which DON'T leave trails behind them could also be leaving behind sulfur compounds? Because, if you think the white trails wee see are white BECAUSE of the sulfur, then you are sadly mistaken.
 Quoting: Noble

How do you know without knowing the atmospheric data . . . ?
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/21/2012 12:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


No shit...

What does this have to do with the trails being anything but contrails?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050


Let me ask you another question, if you were going to release several tons of particulate "probably through a type of aircraft" as you so bold stated, do you just open a door and kick some barrels out or, given the current patents available, find a way to disperse said chemical more evenly and efficiently. I know, they roll down a window and hang a garden sprayer out 30 miles above the earth.
I will even go as far to agree with you to an extent by saying most contrails get blamed for being chemtrails. With that being said, if you deploy an aerosol at 30 miles above the earth with a " type of aircraft" as you stated, what would it look like? Could it be confused with your beloved contrail bearing similar characteristics? Dragging a chemical that is being deployed in the wake of an aircraft would leave a signature no?
 Quoting: Fk Nbl 2562242


Irrelevant! What it would "look like" depends on what they are depositing in the air. The trails I see look exactly like contrails from high efficiency jet engines. To assume that a single aircraft can leave a trail thousands of miles long, which spreads out a mile or more, is "spraying" something instead of pushing the air past supersaturation within VERY cold (-40) temperatures is just STUPID. Can you imagine how much "chemical" that would take?!



look, stupid...I don't dispute that IF "geoengineering" were being performed, "they" would use aircraft!

My ONLY point is that the trails in the sky have NOT been shown to be anything more than contrails. I'm asking for evidence...and you people refuse to provide it...and then provide paranoid assumptions about "geoengineering" which you APPLY to the trails in the sky...with no reason to do so!

And YOUR concession that "most contrails get blamed for being chemtrails." is ALMOST enough...but, there is no evidence that ANY trail in the sky has ANYTHING to do with any program to place any type of chemical into the air intentionally.
 Quoting: Noble



Where did I ever state this? And yes I can imagine how much chemical it would take. As much as the leading scientists who advocate the plan fucking stated it would take you moron. You do not dispute aircraft would be used, you do not dispute the agenda, but you dispute that all contrails are only contrails. Could a full sized aircraft deploying sulfur dioxide 30 miles above the earth be confused with normal contrails? Not even your eyes could tell the difference at that altitude.
 Quoting: Fk nbl 2562242


I didn't say YOU stated it, I'm saying that many chemtards make the claim...when referring to the trails in the sky.

And I'm referring to EACH plane load...not the total which scientists say...Now, explain to me how much sulfur dioxide it would take to make a VISIBLE trails of this substance...miles long and wide. Fucking idiot...

I never said "all contrails are only contrails"...stupid. I have made the claim that no chemtard has shown that a single trail referred to as a chemtrail, is anything more than a contrail...Get it? There is a clear distinction! Fucking idiot...
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/21/2012 12:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
This?
"Could a full sized aircraft deploying sulfur dioxide 30 miles above the earth be confused with normal contrails? Not even your eyes could tell the difference at that altitude."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2562242


Great, so does that mean planes which DON'T leave trails behind them could also be leaving behind sulfur compounds? Because, if you think the white trails wee see are white BECAUSE of the sulfur, then you are sadly mistaken.
 Quoting: Noble

How do you know without knowing the atmospheric data . . . ?
 Quoting: George B


I don't need the atmospheric data...

I'm not making any claim.


I'm just pointing out that planes with NO visible trail could EASILY be spraying something...and we wouldn't know it. So just because we see trails...doesn't mean it's indicative of a plane participating in a "spray program".
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/21/2012 12:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
The Boeing 707 to enter service in 1958 and dominate the market for civilian airliners

Look at some movies made back in the 60's & 70's, and see if you can find any "chemtrails", oh i mean contrails. NOT
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1342995


[link to contrailscience.com]
 Quoting: Noble


Have you read the "About" section of that government run shilling site? If you believe those idiots, let's just say you're an idiot.
 Quoting: MickWestIsAShill 1511730


If you think that its a shill site...then you are a paranoid retard. Show me anything on that site which isn't a reflection of the known aviation principles or atmospheric science.

How could that be a shill site when all the information is that which has been understood for close to 9 decades...

fucking paranoid idiot!
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
George B

User ID: 1463522
United States
06/21/2012 12:07 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
This?
"Could a full sized aircraft deploying sulfur dioxide 30 miles above the earth be confused with normal contrails? Not even your eyes could tell the difference at that altitude."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2562242


Great, so does that mean planes which DON'T leave trails behind them could also be leaving behind sulfur compounds? Because, if you think the white trails wee see are white BECAUSE of the sulfur, then you are sadly mistaken.
 Quoting: Noble

How do you know without knowing the atmospheric data . . . ?
 Quoting: George B


I don't need the atmospheric data...

I'm not making any claim.


I'm just pointing out that planes with NO visible trail could EASILY be spraying something...and we wouldn't know it. So just because we see trails...doesn't mean it's indicative of a plane participating in a "spray program".
 Quoting: Noble


So????? Changes nothing . . . Vapor trails are vapor trails, no matter what they contain . . .
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2562242
United States
06/21/2012 12:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
This?
"Could a full sized aircraft deploying sulfur dioxide 30 miles above the earth be confused with normal contrails? Not even your eyes could tell the difference at that altitude."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2562242


Great, so does that mean planes which DON'T leave trails behind them could also be leaving behind sulfur compounds? Because, if you think the white trails wee see are white BECAUSE of the sulfur, then you are sadly mistaken.
 Quoting: Noble


I said no such thing. I stated they are pushing to do it fuck tard and they are. I provided specific names and their plan to combat global warming. Then i asked could the two be confused with each other and what would it look like at 30 miles up. Can you read English? Where did I say all white trails = sulphur. More of you bullshit Taco Boy.
Fk Nbl
User ID: 2562242
United States
06/21/2012 12:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
This?
"Could a full sized aircraft deploying sulfur dioxide 30 miles above the earth be confused with normal contrails? Not even your eyes could tell the difference at that altitude."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2562242


Great, so does that mean planes which DON'T leave trails behind them could also be leaving behind sulfur compounds? Because, if you think the white trails wee see are white BECAUSE of the sulfur, then you are sadly mistaken.
 Quoting: Noble

How do you know without knowing the atmospheric data . . . ?
 Quoting: George B


I don't need the atmospheric data...

I'm not making any claim.


I'm just pointing out that planes with NO visible trail could EASILY be spraying something...and we wouldn't know it. So just because we see trails...doesn't mean it's indicative of a plane participating in a "spray program".
 Quoting: Noble


He doesn't need data, he uses his eyes and that's good enough for him. Just not everyone else.......right Taco Libre?
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 1452592
United States
06/21/2012 12:48 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Uh oh!

More facts that Noble's buddy will ignore...

Atmospheric Sulphur has been declining since the 70's in NA, and early 80's in EU...

Just one example:

www.epa.gov/airtrends/aqtrnd99/pdfs/Chapter7.pdf
"Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail"

deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM
Terrebonne
Pythagoras

User ID: 18251646
United States
06/21/2012 12:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
'EVERYGREEN' CIA OWNED AIRLINE: DROPPING POISON ON YOU AND YOUR FAMILY


Evergreen Air is a CIA front company for chemtrail operations within the US, based out of Marana Air Park near Tucson Arizona and McMinville Oregon, near Portland.



[link to www.freedumbnation.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1452592
United States
06/21/2012 01:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
'EVERYGREEN' CIA OWNED AIRLINE: DROPPING POISON ON YOU AND YOUR FAMILY


Evergreen Air is a CIA front company for chemtrail operations within the US, based out of Marana Air Park near Tucson Arizona and McMinville Oregon, near Portland.



[link to www.freedumbnation.com]
 Quoting: Terrebonne


Here we go again...


1rof1
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/21/2012 01:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Great, so does that mean planes which DON'T leave trails behind them could also be leaving behind sulfur compounds? Because, if you think the white trails wee see are white BECAUSE of the sulfur, then you are sadly mistaken.
 Quoting: Noble

How do you know without knowing the atmospheric data . . . ?
 Quoting: George B


I don't need the atmospheric data...

I'm not making any claim.


I'm just pointing out that planes with NO visible trail could EASILY be spraying something...and we wouldn't know it. So just because we see trails...doesn't mean it's indicative of a plane participating in a "spray program".
 Quoting: Noble


So????? Changes nothing . . . Vapor trails are vapor trails, no matter what they contain . . .
 Quoting: George B


No, vapor trails are NOT "vapor trails". Anything can be made into a vapor and chemtards believe these vapors are "chemicals" which are intentionally deposited into the atmosphere. I believe there is no evidence that ANY of the trails are anything more than contrails from commercial/military/civilian aviation. I'm asking for evidence to prove me wrong...and NO ONE has provided any!


And that doesn't mean that contrails are part of any intentional program to put 'vapor" into the air.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/21/2012 01:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
'EVERYGREEN' CIA OWNED AIRLINE: DROPPING POISON ON YOU AND YOUR FAMILY


Evergreen Air is a CIA front company for chemtrail operations within the US, based out of Marana Air Park near Tucson Arizona and McMinville Oregon, near Portland.



[link to www.freedumbnation.com]
 Quoting: Terrebonne


Yes, fire retardant is hazardous...so is fire.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/21/2012 01:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


Great, so does that mean planes which DON'T leave trails behind them could also be leaving behind sulfur compounds? Because, if you think the white trails wee see are white BECAUSE of the sulfur, then you are sadly mistaken.
 Quoting: Noble

How do you know without knowing the atmospheric data . . . ?
 Quoting: George B


I don't need the atmospheric data...

I'm not making any claim.


I'm just pointing out that planes with NO visible trail could EASILY be spraying something...and we wouldn't know it. So just because we see trails...doesn't mean it's indicative of a plane participating in a "spray program".
 Quoting: Noble


He doesn't need data, he uses his eyes and that's good enough for him. Just not everyone else.......right Taco Libre?
 Quoting: Fk Nbl 2562242


No, I'm using my eyes...PLUS my education in these subjects..

Oh, and you use your "intuition and common sense" right?! Yeah, common sense covers all facets of aviation, atmospheric science and the jet engine...right?

Fucking ignorant chemtard.

Is that your mom's taco I smell?
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
George B

User ID: 1472805
United States
06/21/2012 01:18 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Uh oh!

More facts that Noble's buddy will ignore...

Atmospheric Sulphur has been declining since the 70's in NA, and early 80's in EU...

Just one example:

www.epa.gov/airtrends/aqtrnd99/pdfs/Chapter7.pdf
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines

It is called fewer major volcanic eruptions until very recently coupled with major gains in ground source abatement . . . The intentional aerosol injections were probably engineered to fill the gap but couldn't keep up. . . .grinning
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
George B

User ID: 1478093
United States
06/21/2012 01:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Uh oh!

More facts that Noble's buddy will ignore...

Atmospheric Sulphur has been declining since the 70's in NA, and early 80's in EU...

Just one example:

www.epa.gov/airtrends/aqtrnd99/pdfs/Chapter7.pdf
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Seems this info from 2011 conflicts with your statement. . ..

NOAA study: Increase in particles high in Earth’s atmosphere has offset some recent climate warming

July 21, 2011

A recent increase in the abundance of particles high in the atmosphere has offset about a third of the current climate warming influence of carbon dioxide (CO2) change during the past decade, according to a new study led by NOAA and published today in the online edition of Science

“Stratospheric aerosol increased surprisingly rapidly in that time, almost doubling during the decade,” Daniel said. “The increase in aerosols since 2000 implies a cooling effect of about 0.1 watts per square meter – enough to offset some of the 0.28 watts per square meter warming effect from the carbon dioxide increase during that same period.”
Sources of aerosols reach the stratosphere from above and below as shown in the graph. Sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbonyl sulfide (OCS), and dimethyl sulfide(DMS) are the dominant surface emissions which contribute to aerosol formation.
[link to www.noaanews.noaa.gov]


My NOTE: There is no evidence the sulfur compounds are all from surface emissions . . . why . . . they were measured in or near the stratosphere . . . coffee4

Sulfur Graph
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
George B

User ID: 1476769
United States
06/21/2012 01:48 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Uh oh!

More facts that Noble's buddy will ignore...

Atmospheric Sulphur has been declining since the 70's in NA, and early 80's in EU...

Just one example:

www.epa.gov/airtrends/aqtrnd99/pdfs/Chapter7.pdf
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Hmmmm . . . I noticed these measurements are all ground measurements . . . Obviously showing EPA is doing a fine job in ground source abatement . . . Wonder what percentage of the decrease was due to all that additional air traffic added during the same years . . . Spewing out more sulfur compounds than ever before . . . Subtract low altitude for high altitude injection of sulfur I think . . .
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 6288112
United States
06/21/2012 02:27 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
My NOTE: There is no evidence the sulfur compounds are all from surface emissions . . . why . . . they were measured in or near the stratosphere . . . coffee4


 Quoting: George B


Yes there is...

And levels are still lower than they were in the 70's...

BTW...From your link:

The ‘background’ stratospheric aerosols are more of a player than we thought,” said Daniel. “The last decade has shown us that it doesn’t take an extremely large volcanic eruption for these aerosols to be important to climate.”

chuckle

Last Edited by SnakeAirlines on 06/21/2012 02:28 PM
"Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail"

deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM
Fk Nbl
User ID: 2562242
United States
06/21/2012 03:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...

How do you know without knowing the atmospheric data . . . ?
 Quoting: George B


I don't need the atmospheric data...

I'm not making any claim.


I'm just pointing out that planes with NO visible trail could EASILY be spraying something...and we wouldn't know it. So just because we see trails...doesn't mean it's indicative of a plane participating in a "spray program".
 Quoting: Noble


He doesn't need data, he uses his eyes and that's good enough for him. Just not everyone else.......right Taco Libre?
 Quoting: Fk Nbl 2562242


No, I'm using my eyes...PLUS my education in these subjects..

Oh, and you use your "intuition and common sense" right?! Yeah, common sense covers all facets of aviation, atmospheric science and the jet engine...right?

Fucking ignorant chemtard.

Is that your mom's taco I smell?
 Quoting: Noble


No that would be the taco your burning right in front of you on the grill Taco boy. You had better straighten up. The folks at Taco Bell hate when you waste their food.
George B

User ID: 6521970
United States
06/21/2012 03:33 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
My NOTE: There is no evidence the sulfur compounds are all from surface emissions . . . why . . . they were measured in or near the stratosphere . . . coffee4


 Quoting: George B


Yes there is...

And levels are still lower than they were in the 70's...

BTW...From your link:

The ‘background’ stratospheric aerosols are more of a player than we thought,” said Daniel. “The last decade has shown us that it doesn’t take an extremely large volcanic eruption for these aerosols to be important to climate.”

chuckle
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


That is simply because the concept of chemtrails is totally alien to their world view . . , since they are . . . The only logical explanation is volcanic sources which they have already stated were in decline . . .
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
George B

User ID: 6521970
United States
06/21/2012 03:34 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
My NOTE: There is no evidence the sulfur compounds are all from surface emissions . . . why . . . they were measured in or near the stratosphere . . . coffee4


 Quoting: George B


Yes there is...

And levels are still lower than they were in the 70's...

BTW...From your link:

The ‘background’ stratospheric aerosols are more of a player than we thought,” said Daniel. “The last decade has shown us that it doesn’t take an extremely large volcanic eruption for these aerosols to be important to climate.”

chuckle
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


That is simply because the concept of chemtrails is totally alien to their world view . . , since they are . . . The only logical explanation is volcanic sources which they have already stated were in decline . . .
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 6288112
United States
06/21/2012 03:37 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
That is simply because the concept of chemtrails is totally alien to their world view
 Quoting: George B


Or they are 'simply' more intelligent than you...

lmao
"Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail"

deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM
George B

User ID: 1472645
United States
06/21/2012 04:00 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
That is simply because the concept of chemtrails is totally alien to their world view
 Quoting: George B


Or they are 'simply' more intelligent than you...

lmao
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


Or maybe I am more insightful and willing to explore more rational explanations . . . They are trying to fit a square peg into a round hole . . . simply because they are not allowed to think freely and consider aerosol sources other than volcanoes. . . .

More particulate in the stratosphere than can be explained = (unknown source) + declining ground sources - major volcanic eruptions

(unknown source) = some unknown volcanic activity

Or

(unknown source) = intentional aerosol injection program

I choose = intentional aerosol injection program

Last Edited by George B on 06/21/2012 04:55 PM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14542172
United States
06/21/2012 04:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...



We don't have to prove anything to a counter intelligence operative. You will only move the goal post anyway.

All we have to do is get the word out that the symptoms of climate change/global warming generally blamed on carbon-dioxide, are in fact being caused by covert geo-engineering projects. And that the problem is being caused on purpose so that a pre-planned solution/agenda can be implemented.

If this becomes general knowledge, then people will balk at the idea of carbon taxes and credits.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


I don't expect you to back up your claims!

Fucking DUH!

That's the point, there is no evidence that the trails are anything more than contrails, stupid!

You won't prove anything...because you can't!


There is no evidence that the trails in the sky have anything do do with what you wrote. You know it...and it frustrates you.

Chemtard is obvious fail tard!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050



The only evidence that an honest observer needs is the fact that trails from certain jets no longer dissipate, but expand into a soupy grey haze which blocks out the sun. This is the exact phenomenon described by the criminals at their geo-engineering conferences. It's not hard to put 2 and 2 together. Once you simply point out chemtrails some one, no amount of counter intelligence talking points will fool them. That's the main thing working against you guys. All your talking points and phoney dis-info jargon can be defeated just with a little observation, intuition, and common sense.

Everything else is superfluous.

A critical mass of people who are aware of the program is building.

I just stumbled upon a desperate piece of counter-intelligence put out by the Daily Mail. It try's to explain why all the sudden jet trails from certain jets don't dissipate, but spread into a grey mess which blocks out the sun. So many people were aware that they were actually chemtrails, they had to close the comment section down. Check out the comment section.

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

Soon they are going to have to go from covert to overt operations. Then at least we will have some debate.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


The problem is..."honest observation" isn't enough. Your (all uneducated chemtards) lack of knowledge about contrails and evolving jet engine technology has failed you all. The fact that you believe a contrail must dissipate is evidence if YOUR ignorance...nothing more.
 Quoting: Noble


It's not evidence of ignorance, it's evidence that the substance coming from those particular jets is not the same as it used to be. You so called knowledge about evolving jet engine technology is bogus counter-intel meant to confuse people.

All your counter-intelligence jargon is not going to change anyones mind.

The amount of people aware is increasing by orders of magnitude. You know it, and I know it.

The amount of searches for ""chemtrails" on search engines increases. The amount of documentation on you tube increases. The amount of calls to officials increases.

Most important, the amount of people aware that the symptoms of climate change and global usually blamed on carbon dioxide, are in fact being caused by covert geo-engineering programs is increasing.
Noble (OP)

User ID: 1211465
United States
06/21/2012 04:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
...


I don't expect you to back up your claims!

Fucking DUH!

That's the point, there is no evidence that the trails are anything more than contrails, stupid!

You won't prove anything...because you can't!


There is no evidence that the trails in the sky have anything do do with what you wrote. You know it...and it frustrates you.

Chemtard is obvious fail tard!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050



The only evidence that an honest observer needs is the fact that trails from certain jets no longer dissipate, but expand into a soupy grey haze which blocks out the sun. This is the exact phenomenon described by the criminals at their geo-engineering conferences. It's not hard to put 2 and 2 together. Once you simply point out chemtrails some one, no amount of counter intelligence talking points will fool them. That's the main thing working against you guys. All your talking points and phoney dis-info jargon can be defeated just with a little observation, intuition, and common sense.

Everything else is superfluous.

A critical mass of people who are aware of the program is building.

I just stumbled upon a desperate piece of counter-intelligence put out by the Daily Mail. It try's to explain why all the sudden jet trails from certain jets don't dissipate, but spread into a grey mess which blocks out the sun. So many people were aware that they were actually chemtrails, they had to close the comment section down. Check out the comment section.

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

Soon they are going to have to go from covert to overt operations. Then at least we will have some debate.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


The problem is..."honest observation" isn't enough. Your (all uneducated chemtards) lack of knowledge about contrails and evolving jet engine technology has failed you all. The fact that you believe a contrail must dissipate is evidence if YOUR ignorance...nothing more.
 Quoting: Noble


It's not evidence of ignorance, it's evidence that the substance coming from those particular jets is not the same as it used to be. You so called knowledge about evolving jet engine technology is bogus counter-intel meant to confuse people.

All your counter-intelligence jargon is not going to change anyones mind.

The amount of people aware is increasing by orders of magnitude. You know it, and I know it.

The amount of searches for ""chemtrails" on search engines increases. The amount of documentation on you tube increases. The amount of calls to officials increases.

Most important, the amount of people aware that the symptoms of climate change and global usually blamed on carbon dioxide, are in fact being caused by covert geo-engineering programs is increasing.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14542172


Sorry, larger, more efficient jet engines create more water vapor. YOUR ignorance of that fact is NOT my problem.

Again, there is NO EVIDENCE that the trails are anything more than contrails. Thanks for proving my point...paranoid loser.

Just because people search for "chemtrails" doesn't mean they exist...

People search for vampires and unicorns also...
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 6288112
United States
06/21/2012 04:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Or maybe I am more insightful and willing to explore more rational explanations
 Quoting: George B


1rof1

laugh

cruise

That were a knee slapper, that were...
"Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail"

deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM
George B

User ID: 1478093
United States
06/21/2012 04:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
Or maybe I am more insightful and willing to explore more rational explanations
 Quoting: George B


1rof1

laugh

cruise

That were a knee slapper, that were...
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


That's it . . . What a disappointment . . . You can do better than that . . . coffee4

I repeat . . .

More particulate in the stratosphere than can be explained = (unknown source) + declining ground sources - major volcanic eruptions

(unknown source) = some unknown volcanic activity

Or

(unknown source) = intentional aerosol injection program

I choose = intentional aerosol injection program

Last Edited by George B on 06/21/2012 04:57 PM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6288112
United States
06/21/2012 04:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
More particulate in the stratosphere than can be explained unknown source
 Quoting: George B


Except I proved with your own link that NOAA disagrees with you...

lmao

News