Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.

The Boeing 707 to enter service in 1958 and dominate the market for civilian airliners

Look at some movies made back in the 60's & 70's, and see if you can find any "chemtrails", oh i mean contrails. NOT

This?
"Could a full sized aircraft deploying sulfur dioxide 30 miles above the earth be confused with normal contrails? Not even your eyes could tell the difference at that altitude."

Irrelevant! What it would "look like" depends on what they are depositing in the air. The trails I see look exactly like contrails from high efficiency jet engines. To assume that a single aircraft can leave a trail thousands of miles long, which spreads out a mile or more, is "spraying" something instead of pushing the air past supersaturation within VERY cold (-40) temperatures is just STUPID. Can you imagine how much "chemical" that would take?!



look, stupid...I don't dispute that IF "geoengineering" were being performed, "they" would use aircraft!

My ONLY point is that the trails in the sky have NOT been shown to be anything more than contrails. I'm asking for evidence...and you people refuse to provide it...and then provide paranoid assumptions about "geoengineering" which you APPLY to the trails in the sky...with no reason to do so!

And YOUR concession that "most contrails get blamed for being chemtrails." is ALMOST enough...but, there is no evidence that ANY trail in the sky has ANYTHING to do with any program to place any type of chemical into the air intentionally.

Great, so does that mean planes which DON'T leave trails behind them could also be leaving behind sulfur compounds? Because, if you think the white trails wee see are white BECAUSE of the sulfur, then you are sadly mistaken.

[link to contrailscience.com]

How do you know without knowing the atmospheric data . . . ?

This?
"Could a full sized aircraft deploying sulfur dioxide 30 miles above the earth be confused with normal contrails? Not even your eyes could tell the difference at that altitude."

How do you know without knowing the atmospheric data . . . ?

I don't need the atmospheric data...

I'm not making any claim.


I'm just pointing out that planes with NO visible trail could EASILY be spraying something...and we wouldn't know it. So just because we see trails...doesn't mean it's indicative of a plane participating in a "spray program".

I don't need the atmospheric data...

I'm not making any claim.


I'm just pointing out that planes with NO visible trail could EASILY be spraying something...and we wouldn't know it. So just because we see trails...doesn't mean it's indicative of a plane participating in a "spray program".

He doesn't need data, he uses his eyes and that's good enough for him. Just not everyone else.......right Taco Libre?

My NOTE: There is no evidence the sulfur compounds are all from surface emissions . . . why . . . they were measured in or near the stratosphere . . .

My NOTE: There is no evidence the sulfur compounds are all from surface emissions . . . why . . . they were measured in or near the stratosphere . . .

That is simply because the concept of chemtrails is totally alien to their world view

The only evidence that an honest observer needs is the fact that trails from certain jets no longer dissipate, but expand into a soupy grey haze which blocks out the sun. This is the exact phenomenon described by the criminals at their geo-engineering conferences. It's not hard to put 2 and 2 together. Once you simply point out chemtrails some one, no amount of counter intelligence talking points will fool them. That's the main thing working against you guys. All your talking points and phoney dis-info jargon can be defeated just with a little observation, intuition, and common sense.

Everything else is superfluous.

A critical mass of people who are aware of the program is building.

I just stumbled upon a desperate piece of counter-intelligence put out by the Daily Mail. It try's to explain why all the sudden jet trails from certain jets don't dissipate, but spread into a grey mess which blocks out the sun. So many people were aware that they were actually chemtrails, they had to close the comment section down. Check out the comment section.

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

Soon they are going to have to go from covert to overt operations. Then at least we will have some debate.

The problem is..."honest observation" isn't enough. Your (all uneducated chemtards) lack of knowledge about contrails and evolving jet engine technology has failed you all. The fact that you believe a contrail must dissipate is evidence if YOUR ignorance...nothing more.

Or maybe I am more insightful and willing to explore more rational explanations