Chemtards don't understand some simple concepts...
For instance...
Chemtards have ZERO evidence that the trails in the sky are anything more than contrails.
Contrails can and DO spread out to fill the sky based on the how much moisture is already present, and how cold it is. This is a fact...not all contrails must dissipate within ANY time frame to be contrails. The atmospheric conditions determine how long a trail will last...or if it won't last at all.
Finding natural elements at ground level is evidence that natural elements are in nature...not that these elements (aluminum, barium, strontium...whatever) came from the trails.Natural elements are spread all around the earth through wind, water, erosion (wind and water) and many other natural processes including volcanoes, and the water cycle.
Those who disagree with the chemtards are NOT "disinfo-agents" or "shills". That's just ridiculous paranoid nonsense. One doesn't have to be working for "them" to point out that basic science and principles of aviation easily explain the trails in the sky. Just because I believe you to be wrong...and KNOW there is no evidence to support the chemtrail myth...Doesnt mean I'm a bad guy for pointing it out.
Just because someone finds a "patent" for a device or process for placing chemicals into the air...for any purpose...doesn't mean the trails we see have ANYTHING to do with the patent or process. It's pure assumption to believe that just because something you found on the internet involves "airplanes and spraying" that the trails must be related to the patent or process.
Many patents are filed for and are never made into a working model and not ever implemented. Now, this isn't to say that in the past...or even right now..someone isn't using one of these patents to spray something into the sky...I'm just saying that there isn't ANY evidence to link any trail in the sky, referred to as a "chemtrail", to any patent whatsoever. It's all speculation and assumptions...sorry!
Most chemtards are completely oblivious to to the world around them...and believe that they are supposed to have the right to pure, clean "air". There is no such thing...and never has been! There is always natural/man made products in our air...in varying quantities...from region to region...town to town...neighborhood to neighborhood. The industrial revolution has resulted in factories and industries spread all over the world...and each one of these facilities produces wastes based on their production and use of resources. There are many industries which use barium and aluminum in manufacturing and processes and these items end up in our air...all over the world.
Not to mention our personal contributions...Those of us with cars leave behind minute pieces of metal from internal friction...we create brake dust form our brake pads (guess what THEY are made of) we burn hydrocarbons and add water and combustion gases into the air through those processes. Chlorine from our pools is in the air...we spray all sorts of chemicals into the air with our household products. The HVAC industry is responsible for TONS of freon being but into our air...The list is literally endless...we are, and always have been, exposed to many chemicals and processes and you people focus on trails of water vapor in the sky?! It's just so sad that you people concentrate your efforts on such things...while ignoring/avoiding all the sources of pollution all around you.
I will be adding more things to this thread, based on the title, as I Think of them. Debunkers, feel free to add your own...chemtards, don't bother...This is a thread about what you people don't understand...there is an endless supply of threads with that information in them on GLP. No need to post your ignorance here.
Just because places have "banned chemtrails" or are working to do so, doesn't mean the trails in the sky are anything more than contrails. Any place which bans "chemtrails" will be in for a big surprise when it turns out that the trails remain in the sky....which they will...because they are contrails.
Quoting: Noble Checklist. . . Aerosol Injection
Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Checklist1. Is there evidence of particulate or aerosols in the atmosphere which cannot be completely explained as to source and amount by Atmospheric Scientists? . . . Yes2. Is there evidence suggesting that the rate of global warming has changed? . . . Yes
3. Is there evidence of unaccounted budget and mechanisms to allocate, spend and manage projects without the public's knowledge or consent? . . . Yes
4. Are there unidentified Aircraft that fly daily which the public has no information about their mission, goals, flight path, altitude or purpose? . . . Yes5. Do these unidentified Aircraft sometime leave persistent Trails? . . . Yes
6. Are there whistleblowers who have indicated that a Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering program is ongoing?. . . Yes
7. Are there in existence technology to accomplish a program of aerosol dispersal at altitude and a set of airframes available to accomplish such a mission? . . . Yes
8. Has there been sufficient time from the development of technology and motive for Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering programs to see them fully tested, deployed, and operational? . . . Yes 9. Are there sufficient aerosol materials readily available to accomplish such a dispersal program? . . . Yes
10. Is there history of pre-existing or similar aerosol dispersal programs?. . . Yes
11. Is there sufficient process and infrastructure to maintain secrecy and covert operations? . . . Yes
12. Is there a history of operational research regarding the effects of (chemical) aerosols being added to jet fuel to monitor the visual and atmospheric measurement effects? . . .Yes
13. Are there Local, National, and Global motives to engage in an aerosol dispersal program? . . . Yes14. Are the motives for such programs and the technology and procedures for their implementations being discussed in scientific and political organizations worldwide? . . . Yes
15. Are there national and international laws, regulations, treaties, and organizations available ready to facilitate and not eliminate such aerosol injection programs? . . .Yes
16. Are there any monitoring programs where data is available to the public that eliminates the possibility of the existence of such a dispersal program? . . . No
17. Is there any evidence other than official announcements from Governmental and Political sources that Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering don't exist? . . . No
18. Is there a small yet vocal group of people who insist that such a program exists? . . . Yes
19. Is there a history of unexplained substances which have been documented that have fallen from the sky? . . .Yes
20. Have the rates of respiratory diseases, allergies, and conditions associated with the atmosphere continually risen? . . .Yes
21. Has there been a steady increase in the number of persistent trails observed by people and reported as unusual to their memory? . . . Yes
22. Has NASA & NOAA as well as similar organizations in the UK invested significant budget and effort in soliciting the public's help to identify and report persistent trails in the sky? . . . Yes
23. Has any practical contrail mitigation procedures or technology been invested in, deployed, installed or become operational? . . . No24. Has NASA utilized satellite imaging in an effort to correlate the presence of persistent trails visualized and detected from space with ground observations ? . . . Yes
25. Has NASA and other organizations presented significant research that persistent Trails and cirrus clouds may result in significant climatic impact? . . .Yes
26. Are governments capable of initiating, implementing, maintaining, and covering up programs which have been proven to be against the best interest to the health and welfare of their citizens? . . .Yes
27. Do you have any reason to believe some type of coordinated, high tech, aerosol injection program from altitude, dispersed by some type of airframe has not, is not, or will not be implemented ?. . . No 
