|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
|
|
Poster Handle
|
George B |
|
Post Content
|
Guess you failed to read the last paragraph on page 5, regarding commercial maximums. . . .  Read paragraph 2 on that page again... S L O W L Y  [ link to www.exxonmobil.com] Tables one, two, 19 and 20. . . read it and weep . . .  Maximum Sulfur content 3,000 ppm. . . And your lovely paper starts off with 'Joint Operations'... The only jet fuel requirements in the US and UK are dictated by their respective DOD's... The Aviation Fuel Quality Requirements for Jointly Operated Systems (AFQRJOS) for Jet A-1 are based on the most stringent requirements of the following two specifications:
(a) British Ministry of Defence Standard
DEF STAN 91-91/Issue 5 of 8 February 2005 for Turbine Fuel, Aviation 'Kerosine Type', Jet A-1, NATO Code F-35, Joint Service
Designation AVTUR.
(b) ASTM Standard Specification D1655-04a of 1 Nov 2004 for Aviation Turbine Fuels ‘Jet A-1’
Jet fuel that meets the AFQRJOS is usually referred to as “Jet A-1 to Check List” or “Check List Jet A-1” and, by definition, generally, meets the requirements of both of the
above specifications.
While the Table and Notes are central to the Joint Check List, fuels produced to this standard must satisfy the requirements detailed in the
text of both primary specifications. These standards are accepted by all or most national and international commercial operations. . . that is the point. . . .whether they are in military standards or not is basically irrelevant. . . .except the military is a big segment of fuel use and drives the industry . . .3,000 ppm is effectively the recognized standard maximum sulfur concentration in jet fuel. . . and is stated as such in all the research literature. . . .so pound your sand down some other rat hole. . . . 
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
