|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
And there is no evidence that natural processes and occurrences didn't result in that sulfur. As they have since the beginning of time itself.
Quoting: Noble Funny thing Noble. . . .the author never even acknowledges the possibility that the unknown increase in stratospheric particulates could come from aviation. . . .it is not even in their graphic of sources. . . though atmospheric scientists for years have been proposing such a solution especially with sulfur compounds. . . .and NASA has been suggesting for years that aviation has an effect as well. . . why ignore this potential explanation???? IMO, their blindness is intentional. . . any suggestion of such an effect would be heresy !!!!!! . . .  Look, stupid....I don't deny that such things are possible...that people are researching such things... All I'm saying is that there is no evidence that the trails in the sky that chemtards refer to as "chemtrails" are anything more than contrails. You keep bringing up irrelevant shit in response to my claim, but all you are doing is showing that people perform research....NO SHIT!!! The trails are contrails, and there is no evidence that "they" are using them intentionally. Evidence that they could be laced with sulfur compounds and therefore no longer contrails but a vehicle to inject sulfur compounds to change the climate. . . .
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
