|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand.
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
To declare that there is no evidence that chemtrails are dangerous is to ignore the evidence, which is immense. The evidence varies in quality, some of it is even worthless and does not constitute actual evidence; nonetheless evidence abounds, much of it persuasive.
In response to the argument that contrails can expand like chemtrails under certain atmospheric conditions: sounds plausible. Except: how do you explain a commerical airliner flyover in which the contrail dissipates rapidly, followed quickly by another aircraft flyover in which the chemtrail expands for hours? Same atmospherics, remarkably different results.
And by the way, insulting people who disagree with you does not constitute an argument.
Quoting: dharmachatra 15177330 No, contrails dont expand like "chemtrails". The trails we all see, no matter how they behave, are contrails. I see no evidence to the contrary. The planes you were referring to could be at slightly differing altitudes, have different engine types, sizes or power settings. There are many variables. Differences in atmospheric conditions can take place in mere feet...which is why clouds have edges...think about it.mif the amount of water vapor from one jet isn't pushing the air past saturation, that doesn't mean the next one won't. I never said that insult anyone as part of my argument...it's just a bonus.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
