Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand. | |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 08:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Or, you are failing to properly communicate your beliefs. What I see is people are posting images of long lasting trails which they refer to as "chemtrails" and short lived trails, which they refer to as "ordinary contrails"....and I never see you try to help. Yes, these things are aerosols...just as the billions and billions of other sources of aerosols which you cant prove are intentional. Quoting: Noble And these trails have a name...and chemtards are calling them something else...which makes them WRONG! It's not about what I call them, it''s what they ARE!~ They have always been, and always will be...CONTRAILS...regardless of what paranoid losers call them...or what they believe their purpose to be. Why do you refuse to help them? Oh yeah...because you "believe" that contrails are a subset of "chemtrails". Convenient...even though you perfectly explained above how these trails of water vapor behave...with or without the added sulfur you claim to be in them... It's up to you to provide evidence of intent...and you have failed...over and over again. Just because they don't see the benefit VS cost doesn't mean it's a concious decision to place the aerosols into the air. And what about the AWAC contrail over the UK, didn't you spend days on the fact that it was visible?! I love how you flip-flop back in forth on the importance of whether or not the visibility matters. Noble, it takes time for people to understand the complexities of atmospheric concepts. . . .you have said so your self. . . .but by calling people idiots, etc is not the way to accomplish an education. . . . or change of understanding . . . I also don't know what other people know or have witnessed . . . so unlike you I keep an open mind . . . I am not sure that everything on video and photos are simply persistent contrails as you say . . . I simply don't know 1) The persistent trails in the sky when noticed by people illicit an emotional response. . . .usually a negative almost primeval response. . . . 2) Visibility of trails though fleeting is how most people interested in the issue became fascinated by the concept or conspiracy theory . . . So even though visibility is a limited characteristic it is important and cannot be ignored in the discussion. . . . 3) IMO, A careful investigation of the history, behavior and scientific discussions from NASA, NOAA, DoE, IPCC, International Regulatory Groups, Treaties, laws, Military tactical and Strategic capabilities and weapon systems, Geoengineering Symposia & research, etc . alone would alert someone that some type of intentional covert aerosol injection program could have and presently exists. . . . And calling me a "shill"...and other things...for attempting to explain the truth isn't very helpful either. I'm not here to educate anyone about anything...THAT would be a waste of time...and has been! I'm just posting truth where paranoid nutcases post their beliefs....because the truth is just that important. Regardless of whether or not chemtards are able to recognize it. Those who have been sent to this site by the chemtards may appreciate what I post. I have an open mind...Just because I don't accept "chemtrails" as truth...doesn't mean I'm not open to new ideas! It's just that there is NO EVIDENCE to support this nonsense...and much evidence to support the fact that these people are uneducated. I have never said that "everything in these videos are persistent contrails". I have said that there is NO EVIDENCE that they are anything more. There is quite a difference! 1) Primeval...or primitive? 2) But, making assumptions about what one sees...without the benefit of education in these subjects...is stupid. Then, in an attempt to educate themselves, they find like minded (also uneducated) conspiracy nuts and accept everything they say/write as truth/fact. It's ridiculous! They don't even TRY to seek those who are actually educated in these subjects? Why?! Because they don't TRUST them! Why? Because they have been "educated" by the mainstream...and they are brainwashed...and are part of the deception... One cant invent better comedy! 3) Your opinion? Noted... And immediately attributed to your paranoia and propensity to accept conspiracy theories as truth. Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1478114 United States 06/25/2012 09:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Or, you are failing to properly communicate your beliefs. What I see is people are posting images of long lasting trails which they refer to as "chemtrails" and short lived trails, which they refer to as "ordinary contrails"....and I never see you try to help. Yes, these things are aerosols...just as the billions and billions of other sources of aerosols which you cant prove are intentional. Quoting: Noble And these trails have a name...and chemtards are calling them something else...which makes them WRONG! It's not about what I call them, it''s what they ARE!~ They have always been, and always will be...CONTRAILS...regardless of what paranoid losers call them...or what they believe their purpose to be. Why do you refuse to help them? Oh yeah...because you "believe" that contrails are a subset of "chemtrails". Convenient...even though you perfectly explained above how these trails of water vapor behave...with or without the added sulfur you claim to be in them... It's up to you to provide evidence of intent...and you have failed...over and over again. Just because they don't see the benefit VS cost doesn't mean it's a concious decision to place the aerosols into the air. And what about the AWAC contrail over the UK, didn't you spend days on the fact that it was visible?! I love how you flip-flop back in forth on the importance of whether or not the visibility matters. Noble, it takes time for people to understand the complexities of atmospheric concepts. . . .you have said so your self. . . .but by calling people idiots, etc is not the way to accomplish an education. . . . or change of understanding . . . I also don't know what other people know or have witnessed . . . so unlike you I keep an open mind . . . I am not sure that everything on video and photos are simply persistent contrails as you say . . . I simply don't know 1) The persistent trails in the sky when noticed by people illicit an emotional response. . . .usually a negative almost primeval response. . . . 2) Visibility of trails though fleeting is how most people interested in the issue became fascinated by the concept or conspiracy theory . . . So even though visibility is a limited characteristic it is important and cannot be ignored in the discussion. . . . 3) IMO, A careful investigation of the history, behavior and scientific discussions from NASA, NOAA, DoE, IPCC, International Regulatory Groups, Treaties, laws, Military tactical and Strategic capabilities and weapon systems, Geoengineering Symposia & research, etc . alone would alert someone that some type of intentional covert aerosol injection program could have and presently exists. . . . And calling me a "shill"...and other things...for attempting to explain the truth isn't very helpful either. I'm not here to educate anyone about anything...THAT would be a waste of time...and has been! I'm just posting truth where paranoid nutcases post their beliefs....because the truth is just that important. Regardless of whether or not chemtards are able to recognize it. Those who have been sent to this site by the chemtards may appreciate what I post. I have an open mind...Just because I don't accept "chemtrails" as truth...doesn't mean I'm not open to new ideas! It's just that there is NO EVIDENCE to support this nonsense...and much evidence to support the fact that these people are uneducated. I have never said that "everything in these videos are persistent contrails". I have said that there is NO EVIDENCE that they are anything more. There is quite a difference! 1) Primeval...or primitive? 2) But, making assumptions about what one sees...without the benefit of education in these subjects...is stupid. Then, in an attempt to educate themselves, they find like minded (also uneducated) conspiracy nuts and accept everything they say/write as truth/fact. It's ridiculous! They don't even TRY to seek those who are actually educated in these subjects? Why?! Because they don't TRUST them! Why? Because they have been "educated" by the mainstream...and they are brainwashed...and are part of the deception... One cant invent better comedy! 3) Your opinion? Noted... And immediately attributed to your paranoia and propensity to accept conspiracy theories as truth. Either would be correct in my opinion. . . . 2) But, making assumptions about what one sees...without the benefit of education in these subjects...is stupid. Then, in an attempt to educate themselves, they find like minded (also uneducated) conspiracy nuts and Quoting: Noble accept everything they say/write as truth/fact. It's ridiculous! They don't even TRY to seek those who are actually educated in these subjects? Why?! Because they don't TRUST them! Why? Because they have been "educated" by the mainstream...and they are brainwashed...and are part of the deception... People will seek what they can understand. . . .the "experts" have been awful about communicating their side of the issue . . . .have sometimes been dismissive and condescending, like you, in their explanations . . . they are reaping what they have sowed . . . Last Edited by George B on 06/25/2012 09:46 AM Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1611462 United States 06/25/2012 09:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Noble Am I to understand that you don't think you can tell the difference between a contrail and "chemtrail" just by looking at them? And you understand the variables which change the behavior of the visible trails in the sky?! Wow, you chemtards are finally understanding what contrails are... Congratulations! Now, if you could only provide even the slightest evidence that "chemtrails" exist... Good Luck! It is a waste of time and money. . . .since they are basically the same thing. . .except for possibly a rare dedicated flight . . . The chance to catch that flight would be like finding a needle in an ocean. . . What's a waste of time and money? And no, contrails aren't "chemtrails" any more than the exhaust from my car is "chemtrails"... When things already have a name...you are NOT qualified to change the name. If you think contrails are polluting or are part of an intentional aerosol program...they are STILL contrails regardless. Sorry! And there is NO EVIDENCE that anything is being deposited into the atmosphere through any "flight". It could be dedicated balloons...or blimps, or done through some secret space plane that NASA has...or any number of other devices...if its actually happening. You have NO EVIDENCE that any airplane is involved whatsoever. I am just as qualified as anyone else to change the name or definition of a word or concept . . . Either people accept what I present or reject it. . . That is the way it works. . . .do you think words have only one meaning and never change. . . .???? They change all the time. . . .especially when they don't properly describe a seed change in a concept or meaning when new data or understanding is uncovered. . . . You can yell all you want . . . It is the people who ultimately decide by their use of a word what meaning it will or will not have and not necessarily the experts . . . LoL!!!!! George, you are arguing with a blind fool. LOL He's so smitten with himself and his disinfo knowledge that's he's a huge help to the information that you and others are getting out to us and it's great! The more I read on this thread, the more apparent the chemtrails are for real. Not to mention just looking up at these weird skies. That is the most damning proof to those of us who are not "A-vee-a-tion" (hee-hee =N) enthusiasts. But it's not rocket science to see the huge changes in the atmosphere and read up on why it is the way it looks. It is......what it is. The evidence is abundant!!! |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Or, you are failing to properly communicate your beliefs. What I see is people are posting images of long lasting trails which they refer to as "chemtrails" and short lived trails, which they refer to as "ordinary contrails"....and I never see you try to help. Yes, these things are aerosols...just as the billions and billions of other sources of aerosols which you cant prove are intentional. Quoting: Noble And these trails have a name...and chemtards are calling them something else...which makes them WRONG! It's not about what I call them, it''s what they ARE!~ They have always been, and always will be...CONTRAILS...regardless of what paranoid losers call them...or what they believe their purpose to be. Why do you refuse to help them? Oh yeah...because you "believe" that contrails are a subset of "chemtrails". Convenient...even though you perfectly explained above how these trails of water vapor behave...with or without the added sulfur you claim to be in them... It's up to you to provide evidence of intent...and you have failed...over and over again. Just because they don't see the benefit VS cost doesn't mean it's a concious decision to place the aerosols into the air. And what about the AWAC contrail over the UK, didn't you spend days on the fact that it was visible?! I love how you flip-flop back in forth on the importance of whether or not the visibility matters. Noble, it takes time for people to understand the complexities of atmospheric concepts. . . .you have said so your self. . . .but by calling people idiots, etc is not the way to accomplish an education. . . . or change of understanding . . . I also don't know what other people know or have witnessed . . . so unlike you I keep an open mind . . . I am not sure that everything on video and photos are simply persistent contrails as you say . . . I simply don't know 1) The persistent trails in the sky when noticed by people illicit an emotional response. . . .usually a negative almost primeval response. . . . 2) Visibility of trails though fleeting is how most people interested in the issue became fascinated by the concept or conspiracy theory . . . So even though visibility is a limited characteristic it is important and cannot be ignored in the discussion. . . . 3) IMO, A careful investigation of the history, behavior and scientific discussions from NASA, NOAA, DoE, IPCC, International Regulatory Groups, Treaties, laws, Military tactical and Strategic capabilities and weapon systems, Geoengineering Symposia & research, etc . alone would alert someone that some type of intentional covert aerosol injection program could have and presently exists. . . . And calling me a "shill"...and other things...for attempting to explain the truth isn't very helpful either. I'm not here to educate anyone about anything...THAT would be a waste of time...and has been! I'm just posting truth where paranoid nutcases post their beliefs....because the truth is just that important. Regardless of whether or not chemtards are able to recognize it. Those who have been sent to this site by the chemtards may appreciate what I post. I have an open mind...Just because I don't accept "chemtrails" as truth...doesn't mean I'm not open to new ideas! It's just that there is NO EVIDENCE to support this nonsense...and much evidence to support the fact that these people are uneducated. I have never said that "everything in these videos are persistent contrails". I have said that there is NO EVIDENCE that they are anything more. There is quite a difference! 1) Primeval...or primitive? 2) But, making assumptions about what one sees...without the benefit of education in these subjects...is stupid. Then, in an attempt to educate themselves, they find like minded (also uneducated) conspiracy nuts and accept everything they say/write as truth/fact. It's ridiculous! They don't even TRY to seek those who are actually educated in these subjects? Why?! Because they don't TRUST them! Why? Because they have been "educated" by the mainstream...and they are brainwashed...and are part of the deception... One cant invent better comedy! 3) Your opinion? Noted... And immediately attributed to your paranoia and propensity to accept conspiracy theories as truth. Either would be correct in my opinion. . . . 2) But, making assumptions about what one sees...without the benefit of education in these subjects...is stupid. Then, in an attempt to educate themselves, they find like minded (also uneducated) conspiracy nuts and Quoting: Noble accept everything they say/write as truth/fact. It's ridiculous! They don't even TRY to seek those who are actually educated in these subjects? Why?! Because they don't TRUST them! Why? Because they have been "educated" by the mainstream...and they are brainwashed...and are part of the deception... People will seek what they can understand. . . .the "experts" have been awful about communicating their side of the issue . . . .have sometimes been dismissive and condescending, like you, in their explanations . . . they are reaping what they have sowed . . . Conspiracy nuts add a paranoia element to all of that. These people ARE different in their thought processing. The "experts" have done a FANTASTIC job of communicating the truth! Yet, when one looks at the videos online, the conspiracy nuts just shout them down! Look at the comments of videos which come from the science side of things. I forget where I saw it, but there is one video in particular where a scientist is being accosted by a group of chemtards on a sidewalk somewhere...the chemtards in the video shoot every single fact down because they have been "educated" (conditioned) by like minded morons to only accept "chemtrails" as the answer...no matter HOW obvious it is that they know nothing about science and aviation. It's hilarious because it's so pathetic. As long as I'm accused of horrific things such as being a "shill" and cointel...and such...I WILL continue to point out that these people are as paranoid as they are ignorant. Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: George B It is a waste of time and money. . . .since they are basically the same thing. . .except for possibly a rare dedicated flight . . . The chance to catch that flight would be like finding a needle in an ocean. . . What's a waste of time and money? And no, contrails aren't "chemtrails" any more than the exhaust from my car is "chemtrails"... When things already have a name...you are NOT qualified to change the name. If you think contrails are polluting or are part of an intentional aerosol program...they are STILL contrails regardless. Sorry! And there is NO EVIDENCE that anything is being deposited into the atmosphere through any "flight". It could be dedicated balloons...or blimps, or done through some secret space plane that NASA has...or any number of other devices...if its actually happening. You have NO EVIDENCE that any airplane is involved whatsoever. I am just as qualified as anyone else to change the name or definition of a word or concept . . . Either people accept what I present or reject it. . . That is the way it works. . . .do you think words have only one meaning and never change. . . .???? They change all the time. . . .especially when they don't properly describe a seed change in a concept or meaning when new data or understanding is uncovered. . . . You can yell all you want . . . It is the people who ultimately decide by their use of a word what meaning it will or will not have and not necessarily the experts . . . LoL!!!!! George, you are arguing with a blind fool. LOL He's so smitten with himself and his disinfo knowledge that's he's a huge help to the information that you and others are getting out to us and it's great! The more I read on this thread, the more apparent the chemtrails are for real. Not to mention just looking up at these weird skies. That is the most damning proof to those of us who are not "A-vee-a-tion" (hee-hee =N) enthusiasts. But it's not rocket science to see the huge changes in the atmosphere and read up on why it is the way it looks. It is......what it is. The evidence is abundant!!! I rest my case.... "weird skies" = "chemtrails".. Yup...a chemtard said it..it must be true...no evidence required. Last Edited by Noble on 06/25/2012 10:14 AM Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1478043 United States 06/25/2012 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | George, you are arguing with a blind fool. LOL He's so smitten with himself and his disinfo knowledge that's he's a huge help to the information that you and others are getting out to us and it's great! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462 The more I read on this thread, the more apparent the chemtrails are for real. Not to mention just looking up at these weird skies. That is the most damning proof to those of us who are not "A-vee-a-tion" (hee-hee =N) enthusiasts. But it's not rocket science to see the huge changes in the atmosphere and read up on why it is the way it looks. It is......what it is. The evidence is abundant!!! Thanks for your comment. . . .I have had a similar reaction. . . .the more I understand the issues and atmospheric concepts, the more I feel it is possible to conduct a covert aerosol injection program without interference. . . .the appearance and data coming from all over the world tends to indicate possible trends which cannot be ignored . . . The sky in many populated areas is altered more frequently than before . . . And people from many walks of life are noticing it every day . . . When you turn to the experts you get plausible explanations, yet your intuition that something is wrong is still not abated . . . this along with a distrust of the authorities who have been known to have lied many times gives no comfort . . . Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1611462 United States 06/25/2012 10:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Noble What's a waste of time and money? And no, contrails aren't "chemtrails" any more than the exhaust from my car is "chemtrails"... When things already have a name...you are NOT qualified to change the name. If you think contrails are polluting or are part of an intentional aerosol program...they are STILL contrails regardless. Sorry! And there is NO EVIDENCE that anything is being deposited into the atmosphere through any "flight". It could be dedicated balloons...or blimps, or done through some secret space plane that NASA has...or any number of other devices...if its actually happening. You have NO EVIDENCE that any airplane is involved whatsoever. I am just as qualified as anyone else to change the name or definition of a word or concept . . . Either people accept what I present or reject it. . . That is the way it works. . . .do you think words have only one meaning and never change. . . .???? They change all the time. . . .especially when they don't properly describe a seed change in a concept or meaning when new data or understanding is uncovered. . . . You can yell all you want . . . It is the people who ultimately decide by their use of a word what meaning it will or will not have and not necessarily the experts . . . LoL!!!!! George, you are arguing with a blind fool. LOL He's so smitten with himself and his disinfo knowledge that's he's a huge help to the information that you and others are getting out to us and it's great! The more I read on this thread, the more apparent the chemtrails are for real. Not to mention just looking up at these weird skies. That is the most damning proof to those of us who are not "A-vee-a-tion" (hee-hee =N) enthusiasts. But it's not rocket science to see the huge changes in the atmosphere and read up on why it is the way it looks. It is......what it is. The evidence is abundant!!! I rest my case.... "weird skies" = "chemtrails".. Yup...a chemtard said it..it must be true...no evidence required. You have no case. What you have is your delusional concept of persistent contrails and contard science. |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 10:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: George B I am just as qualified as anyone else to change the name or definition of a word or concept . . . Either people accept what I present or reject it. . . That is the way it works. . . .do you think words have only one meaning and never change. . . .???? They change all the time. . . .especially when they don't properly describe a seed change in a concept or meaning when new data or understanding is uncovered. . . . You can yell all you want . . . It is the people who ultimately decide by their use of a word what meaning it will or will not have and not necessarily the experts . . . LoL!!!!! George, you are arguing with a blind fool. LOL He's so smitten with himself and his disinfo knowledge that's he's a huge help to the information that you and others are getting out to us and it's great! The more I read on this thread, the more apparent the chemtrails are for real. Not to mention just looking up at these weird skies. That is the most damning proof to those of us who are not "A-vee-a-tion" (hee-hee =N) enthusiasts. But it's not rocket science to see the huge changes in the atmosphere and read up on why it is the way it looks. It is......what it is. The evidence is abundant!!! I rest my case.... "weird skies" = "chemtrails".. Yup...a chemtard said it..it must be true...no evidence required. You have no case. What you have is your delusional concept of persistent contrails and contard science. LOL!!!! George, do you agree with that statement? Last Edited by Noble on 06/25/2012 10:30 AM Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1472645 United States 06/25/2012 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Conspiracy nuts add a paranoia element to all of that. These people ARE different in their thought processing. The "experts" have done a FANTASTIC job of communicating the truth! Yet, when one looks at the videos online, the conspiracy nuts just shout them down! Look at the comments of videos which come from the science side of things. Quoting: Noble I forget where I saw it, but there is one video in particular where a scientist is being accosted by a group of chemtards on a sidewalk somewhere...the chemtards in the video shoot every single fact down because they have been "educated" (conditioned) by like minded morons to only accept "chemtrails" as the answer...no matter HOW obvious it is that they know nothing about science and aviation. It's hilarious because it's so pathetic. As long as I'm accused of horrific things such as being a "shill" and cointel...and such...I WILL continue to point out that these people are as paranoid as they are ignorant. Conspiracies by their nature are difficult to suppress or argue against because at their foundation is the belief that information has and is being intentionally withheld . . . Those who are the experts are intelligent enough or should be intelligent enough to understand that . . . Therefore, if they wish to quell a conspiracy they feel is wrong . . . it takes ten times the effort other arguments require . . . IMO, They have not done so . . . It is true people who believe in conspiracies in general are more intuitive than others who rely on concrete, verifiable, evidence . . . However, this doesn't make them wrong . . . it makes them more difficult to argue with . . . Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1472645 United States 06/25/2012 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I rest my case.... Quoting: Noble "weird skies" = "chemtrails".. Yup...a chemtard said it..it must be true...no evidence required. You have no case. What you have is your delusional concept of persistent contrails and contard science. I wouldn't say you have no case . . . I would say . . . In spite of the evidence you have presented . . . Which is the majority opinion, especially of the authorities . . . I still hold fast to the conclusion . . . the existence of an intentional covert aerosol injection program is high . . . So high, in fact, I would publicly argue for that conclusion . . . Last Edited by George B on 06/25/2012 10:52 AM Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 10:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Conspiracy nuts add a paranoia element to all of that. These people ARE different in their thought processing. The "experts" have done a FANTASTIC job of communicating the truth! Yet, when one looks at the videos online, the conspiracy nuts just shout them down! Look at the comments of videos which come from the science side of things. Quoting: Noble I forget where I saw it, but there is one video in particular where a scientist is being accosted by a group of chemtards on a sidewalk somewhere...the chemtards in the video shoot every single fact down because they have been "educated" (conditioned) by like minded morons to only accept "chemtrails" as the answer...no matter HOW obvious it is that they know nothing about science and aviation. It's hilarious because it's so pathetic. As long as I'm accused of horrific things such as being a "shill" and cointel...and such...I WILL continue to point out that these people are as paranoid as they are ignorant. Conspiracies by their nature are difficult to suppress or argue against because at their foundation is the belief that information has and is being intentionally withheld . . . Those who are the experts are intelligent enough or should be intelligent enough to understand that . . . Therefore, if they wish to quell a conspiracy they feel is wrong . . . it takes ten times the effort other arguments require . . . IMO, They have not done so . . . It is true people who believe in conspiracies in general are more intuitive than others who rely on concrete, verifiable, evidence . . . However, this doesn't make them wrong . . . it makes them more difficult to argue with . . . LOL!!! You actually believe it's a REQUIREMENT for the experts to put 10 times more effort into proving chemtards wrong?! No wonder they don't try as hard as you'd like! It's just not worth the effort! In their minds, they feel the chemtards are just a bunch of online losers who are too stupid to grasp the concepts no matter how well they are explained. And PLEASE back up that statement about how conspiracy nuts are more "intuitive". If you ask me, you are confusing the words imaginative and intuitive! Ill give the chemtards this...they are CERTAINLY imaginative...just as Chicken Little and Don Quixote. That DOESN'T make them right! They aren't "difficult" to argue with..they are hilarious to argue with! Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
SnakeAirlines User ID: 1086405 United States 06/25/2012 11:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 11:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I rest my case.... Quoting: Noble "weird skies" = "chemtrails".. Yup...a chemtard said it..it must be true...no evidence required. You have no case. What you have is your delusional concept of persistent contrails and contard science. I wouldn't say you have no case . . . I would say . . . In spite of the evidence you have presented . . . Which is the majority opinion, especially of the authorities . . . I still hold fast to the conclusion . . . the existence of an intentional covert aerosol injection program is high . . . So high, in fact, I would publicly argue for that conclusion . . . Which you do... and I appreciate the comedy. Thanks. Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1611462 United States 06/25/2012 11:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Conspiracy nuts add a paranoia element to all of that. These people ARE different in their thought processing. The "experts" have done a FANTASTIC job of communicating the truth! Yet, when one looks at the videos online, the conspiracy nuts just shout them down! Look at the comments of videos which come from the science side of things. Quoting: Noble I forget where I saw it, but there is one video in particular where a scientist is being accosted by a group of chemtards on a sidewalk somewhere...the chemtards in the video shoot every single fact down because they have been "educated" (conditioned) by like minded morons to only accept "chemtrails" as the answer...no matter HOW obvious it is that they know nothing about science and aviation. It's hilarious because it's so pathetic. As long as I'm accused of horrific things such as being a "shill" and cointel...and such...I WILL continue to point out that these people are as paranoid as they are ignorant. Conspiracies by their nature are difficult to suppress or argue against because at their foundation is the belief that information has and is being intentionally withheld . . . Those who are the experts are intelligent enough or should be intelligent enough to understand that . . . Therefore, if they wish to quell a conspiracy they feel is wrong . . . it takes ten times the effort other arguments require . . . IMO, They have not done so . . . It is true people who believe in conspiracies in general are more intuitive than others who rely on concrete, verifiable, evidence . . . However, this doesn't make them wrong . . . it makes them more difficult to argue with . . . LOL!!! You actually believe it's a REQUIREMENT for the experts to put 10 times more effort into proving chemtards wrong?! No wonder they don't try as hard as you'd like! It's just not worth the effort! In their minds, they feel the chemtards are just a bunch of online losers who are too stupid to grasp the concepts no matter how well they are explained. And PLEASE back up that statement about how conspiracy nuts are more "intuitive". If you ask me, you are confusing the words imaginative and intuitive! Ill give the chemtards this...they are CERTAINLY imaginative...just as Chicken Little and Don Quixote. That DOESN'T make them right! They aren't "difficult" to argue with..they are hilarious to argue with! The length of your thread here proves the argument is not quite so easy. You're still a failure with your argument. Disinfo Agents.....government......covert.....you're the true losers. Bullshit covering lies. You crack me up. You'll always be riding the short bus, Snake/Noble |
SnakeAirlines User ID: 1086405 United States 06/25/2012 11:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 11:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Conspiracy nuts add a paranoia element to all of that. These people ARE different in their thought processing. The "experts" have done a FANTASTIC job of communicating the truth! Yet, when one looks at the videos online, the conspiracy nuts just shout them down! Look at the comments of videos which come from the science side of things. Quoting: Noble I forget where I saw it, but there is one video in particular where a scientist is being accosted by a group of chemtards on a sidewalk somewhere...the chemtards in the video shoot every single fact down because they have been "educated" (conditioned) by like minded morons to only accept "chemtrails" as the answer...no matter HOW obvious it is that they know nothing about science and aviation. It's hilarious because it's so pathetic. As long as I'm accused of horrific things such as being a "shill" and cointel...and such...I WILL continue to point out that these people are as paranoid as they are ignorant. Conspiracies by their nature are difficult to suppress or argue against because at their foundation is the belief that information has and is being intentionally withheld . . . Those who are the experts are intelligent enough or should be intelligent enough to understand that . . . Therefore, if they wish to quell a conspiracy they feel is wrong . . . it takes ten times the effort other arguments require . . . IMO, They have not done so . . . It is true people who believe in conspiracies in general are more intuitive than others who rely on concrete, verifiable, evidence . . . However, this doesn't make them wrong . . . it makes them more difficult to argue with . . . LOL!!! You actually believe it's a REQUIREMENT for the experts to put 10 times more effort into proving chemtards wrong?! No wonder they don't try as hard as you'd like! It's just not worth the effort! In their minds, they feel the chemtards are just a bunch of online losers who are too stupid to grasp the concepts no matter how well they are explained. And PLEASE back up that statement about how conspiracy nuts are more "intuitive". If you ask me, you are confusing the words imaginative and intuitive! Ill give the chemtards this...they are CERTAINLY imaginative...just as Chicken Little and Don Quixote. That DOESN'T make them right! They aren't "difficult" to argue with..they are hilarious to argue with! The length of your thread here proves the argument is not quite so easy. You're still a failure with your argument. Disinfo Agents.....government......covert.....you're the true losers. Bullshit covering lies. You crack me up. You'll always be riding the short bus, Snake/Noble The only reason you refer to me as a "failure with my argument" is because YOU are too stupid to understand it. There is NO EVIDENCE that the trails in the sky are anything more than contrails. There is no evidence that anything found in the sky, or on the ground, has been intentionally introduced into the atmosphere as part of any "aerosol program". You believe it...because you WANT to believe it....because you are a paranoid loser. That isn't to say that it's not happening, just that the "evidence" provided so far is extremely lacking. And there is no evidence that you are anything more than an uneducated paranoid moron. Please continue providing me with laughter. Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1460999 United States 06/25/2012 11:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Conspiracy nuts add a paranoia element to all of that. These people ARE different in their thought processing. The "experts" have done a FANTASTIC job of communicating the truth! Yet, when one looks at the videos online, the conspiracy nuts just shout them down! Look at the comments of videos which come from the science side of things. Quoting: Noble I forget where I saw it, but there is one video in particular where a scientist is being accosted by a group of chemtards on a sidewalk somewhere...the chemtards in the video shoot every single fact down because they have been "educated" (conditioned) by like minded morons to only accept "chemtrails" as the answer...no matter HOW obvious it is that they know nothing about science and aviation. It's hilarious because it's so pathetic. As long as I'm accused of horrific things such as being a "shill" and cointel...and such...I WILL continue to point out that these people are as paranoid as they are ignorant. Conspiracies by their nature are difficult to suppress or argue against because at their foundation is the belief that information has and is being intentionally withheld . . . Those who are the experts are intelligent enough or should be intelligent enough to understand that . . . Therefore, if they wish to quell a conspiracy they feel is wrong . . . it takes ten times the effort other arguments require . . . IMO, They have not done so . . . It is true people who believe in conspiracies in general are more intuitive than others who rely on concrete, verifiable, evidence . . . However, this doesn't make them wrong . . . it makes them more difficult to argue with . . . LOL!!! You actually believe it's a REQUIREMENT for the experts to put 10 times more effort into proving chemtards wrong?! No wonder they don't try as hard as you'd like! It's just not worth the effort! In their minds, they feel the chemtards are just a bunch of online losers who are too stupid to grasp the concepts no matter how well they are explained. And PLEASE back up that statement about how conspiracy nuts are more "intuitive". If you ask me, you are confusing the words imaginative and intuitive! Ill give the chemtards this...they are CERTAINLY imaginative...just as Chicken Little and Don Quixote. That DOESN'T make them right! They aren't "difficult" to argue with..they are hilarious to argue with! It is their burden if they wish to change the minds of chemtrail advocates . . . Intuitive or imaginative . . . Whatever you wish to call it is fine with me . . . Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1460999 United States 06/25/2012 11:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I rest my case.... Quoting: Noble "weird skies" = "chemtrails".. Yup...a chemtard said it..it must be true...no evidence required. You have no case. What you have is your delusional concept of persistent contrails and contard science. I wouldn't say you have no case . . . I would say . . . In spite of the evidence you have presented . . . Which is the majority opinion, especially of the authorities . . . I still hold fast to the conclusion . . . the existence of an intentional covert aerosol injection program is high . . . So high, in fact, I would publicly argue for that conclusion . . . Which you do... and I appreciate the comedy. Thanks. You are welcome . . . Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 11:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Conspiracy nuts add a paranoia element to all of that. These people ARE different in their thought processing. The "experts" have done a FANTASTIC job of communicating the truth! Yet, when one looks at the videos online, the conspiracy nuts just shout them down! Look at the comments of videos which come from the science side of things. Quoting: Noble I forget where I saw it, but there is one video in particular where a scientist is being accosted by a group of chemtards on a sidewalk somewhere...the chemtards in the video shoot every single fact down because they have been "educated" (conditioned) by like minded morons to only accept "chemtrails" as the answer...no matter HOW obvious it is that they know nothing about science and aviation. It's hilarious because it's so pathetic. As long as I'm accused of horrific things such as being a "shill" and cointel...and such...I WILL continue to point out that these people are as paranoid as they are ignorant. Conspiracies by their nature are difficult to suppress or argue against because at their foundation is the belief that information has and is being intentionally withheld . . . Those who are the experts are intelligent enough or should be intelligent enough to understand that . . . Therefore, if they wish to quell a conspiracy they feel is wrong . . . it takes ten times the effort other arguments require . . . IMO, They have not done so . . . It is true people who believe in conspiracies in general are more intuitive than others who rely on concrete, verifiable, evidence . . . However, this doesn't make them wrong . . . it makes them more difficult to argue with . . . LOL!!! You actually believe it's a REQUIREMENT for the experts to put 10 times more effort into proving chemtards wrong?! No wonder they don't try as hard as you'd like! It's just not worth the effort! In their minds, they feel the chemtards are just a bunch of online losers who are too stupid to grasp the concepts no matter how well they are explained. And PLEASE back up that statement about how conspiracy nuts are more "intuitive". If you ask me, you are confusing the words imaginative and intuitive! Ill give the chemtards this...they are CERTAINLY imaginative...just as Chicken Little and Don Quixote. That DOESN'T make them right! They aren't "difficult" to argue with..they are hilarious to argue with! It is their burden if they wish to change the minds of chemtrail advocates . . . Intuitive or imaginative . . . Whatever you wish to call it is fine with me . . . They don't care...It's NOT their burden! chemtards try to MAKE it their burden, but the onus is on the chemtards to prove there are any such things as "chemtrails". So far, chemtards have failed to support their accusations. I also call them "delusional". Thanks for your support. Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1471216 United States 06/25/2012 12:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: George B Conspiracies by their nature are difficult to suppress or argue against because at their foundation is the belief that information has and is being intentionally withheld . . . Those who are the experts are intelligent enough or should be intelligent enough to understand that . . . Therefore, if they wish to quell a conspiracy they feel is wrong . . . it takes ten times the effort other arguments require . . . IMO, They have not done so . . . It is true people who believe in conspiracies in general are more intuitive than others who rely on concrete, verifiable, evidence . . . However, this doesn't make them wrong . . . it makes them more difficult to argue with . . . LOL!!! You actually believe it's a REQUIREMENT for the experts to put 10 times more effort into proving chemtards wrong?! No wonder they don't try as hard as you'd like! It's just not worth the effort! In their minds, they feel the chemtards are just a bunch of online losers who are too stupid to grasp the concepts no matter how well they are explained. And PLEASE back up that statement about how conspiracy nuts are more "intuitive". If you ask me, you are confusing the words imaginative and intuitive! Ill give the chemtards this...they are CERTAINLY imaginative...just as Chicken Little and Don Quixote. That DOESN'T make them right! They aren't "difficult" to argue with..they are hilarious to argue with! It is their burden if they wish to change the minds of chemtrail advocates . . . Intuitive or imaginative . . . Whatever you wish to call it is fine with me . . . They don't care...It's NOT their burden! chemtards try to MAKE it their burden, but the onus is on the chemtards to prove there are any such things as "chemtrails". So far, chemtards have failed to support their accusations. I also call them "delusional". Thanks for your support. Feelings are mutual . . . Chemtrail advocate think the "experts" are just too conditioned by their training, education and career restraints to think with an open mind . . . We think their inability to see common sense is delusional as well . . . Last Edited by George B on 06/25/2012 12:49 PM Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18345296 United States 06/25/2012 12:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Noble LOL!!! You actually believe it's a REQUIREMENT for the experts to put 10 times more effort into proving chemtards wrong?! No wonder they don't try as hard as you'd like! It's just not worth the effort! In their minds, they feel the chemtards are just a bunch of online losers who are too stupid to grasp the concepts no matter how well they are explained. And PLEASE back up that statement about how conspiracy nuts are more "intuitive". If you ask me, you are confusing the words imaginative and intuitive! Ill give the chemtards this...they are CERTAINLY imaginative...just as Chicken Little and Don Quixote. That DOESN'T make them right! They aren't "difficult" to argue with..they are hilarious to argue with! It is their burden if they wish to change the minds of chemtrail advocates . . . Intuitive or imaginative . . . Whatever you wish to call it is fine with me . . . They don't care...It's NOT their burden! chemtards try to MAKE it their burden, but the onus is on the chemtards to prove there are any such things as "chemtrails". So far, chemtards have failed to support their accusations. I also call them "delusional". Thanks for your support. Feelings are mutual . . . Chemtrail advocate think the "experts" are just too conditioned by their training, education and career restraints to think with an open mind . . . We think their inability to see common sense is delusional as well . . . You DO know there are schools which sample the atmosphere quite often...and aren't finding any evidence to support the chemtard claims...don't you? Again, the onus is on the chemtards...even though you people refuse to accept that fact. Have the chemtards sampled trails/the atmosphere? Or do they just make assumptions. Don't answer...it was rhetorical. The only thing I have seen the chemtards do is sample soil/water/air at ground level, and jump to conclusions based on their ignorance about geology and their atmosphere. When will the chemtards give us something more to laugh about? That one is getting kinda old.. Oh well...let the hilarity continue! Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1478093 United States 06/25/2012 02:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: George B It is their burden if they wish to change the minds of chemtrail advocates . . . Intuitive or imaginative . . . Whatever you wish to call it is fine with me . . . They don't care...It's NOT their burden! chemtards try to MAKE it their burden, but the onus is on the chemtards to prove there are any such things as "chemtrails". So far, chemtards have failed to support their accusations. I also call them "delusional". Thanks for your support. Feelings are mutual . . . Chemtrail advocate think the "experts" are just too conditioned by their training, education and career restraints to think with an open mind . . . We think their inability to see common sense is delusional as well . . . You DO know there are schools which sample the atmosphere quite often...and aren't finding any evidence to support the chemtard claims...don't you? Again, the onus is on the chemtards...even though you people refuse to accept that fact. Have the chemtards sampled trails/the atmosphere? Or do they just make assumptions. Don't answer...it was rhetorical. The only thing I have seen the chemtards do is sample soil/water/air at ground level, and jump to conclusions based on their ignorance about geology and their atmosphere. When will the chemtards give us something more to laugh about? That one is getting kinda old.. Oh well...let the hilarity continue! I have never come across any of the findings you are referring about . . Show us . . . I would love to see what they have recorded. . . LINK!!!! Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1611462 United States 06/25/2012 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: George B Conspiracies by their nature are difficult to suppress or argue against because at their foundation is the belief that information has and is being intentionally withheld . . . Those who are the experts are intelligent enough or should be intelligent enough to understand that . . . Therefore, if they wish to quell a conspiracy they feel is wrong . . . it takes ten times the effort other arguments require . . . IMO, They have not done so . . . It is true people who believe in conspiracies in general are more intuitive than others who rely on concrete, verifiable, evidence . . . However, this doesn't make them wrong . . . it makes them more difficult to argue with . . . LOL!!! You actually believe it's a REQUIREMENT for the experts to put 10 times more effort into proving chemtards wrong?! No wonder they don't try as hard as you'd like! It's just not worth the effort! In their minds, they feel the chemtards are just a bunch of online losers who are too stupid to grasp the concepts no matter how well they are explained. And PLEASE back up that statement about how conspiracy nuts are more "intuitive". If you ask me, you are confusing the words imaginative and intuitive! Ill give the chemtards this...they are CERTAINLY imaginative...just as Chicken Little and Don Quixote. That DOESN'T make them right! They aren't "difficult" to argue with..they are hilarious to argue with! The length of your thread here proves the argument is not quite so easy. You're still a failure with your argument. Disinfo Agents.....government......covert.....you're the true losers. Bullshit covering lies. You crack me up. You'll always be riding the short bus, Snake/Noble The only reason you refer to me as a "failure with my argument" is because YOU are too stupid to understand it. There is NO EVIDENCE that the trails in the sky are anything more than contrails. There is no evidence that anything found in the sky, or on the ground, has been intentionally introduced into the atmosphere as part of any "aerosol program". You believe it...because you WANT to believe it....because you are a paranoid loser. That isn't to say that it's not happening, just that the "evidence" provided so far is extremely lacking. And there is no evidence that you are anything more than an uneducated paranoid moron. Please continue providing me with laughter. Evidence is not lacking. You've been prevented with plenty. If anyone is paranoid and uneducated, that would be you. The evidence of your ignorance is your double talk. You keep saying there is no evidence but, it could be happening. Now that's hilarious. That's like saying emphatically "There is not!" Then you say, "but there could be" You sound like an idiot. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1611462 United States 06/25/2012 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 03:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Noble They don't care...It's NOT their burden! chemtards try to MAKE it their burden, but the onus is on the chemtards to prove there are any such things as "chemtrails". So far, chemtards have failed to support their accusations. I also call them "delusional". Thanks for your support. Feelings are mutual . . . Chemtrail advocate think the "experts" are just too conditioned by their training, education and career restraints to think with an open mind . . . We think their inability to see common sense is delusional as well . . . You DO know there are schools which sample the atmosphere quite often...and aren't finding any evidence to support the chemtard claims...don't you? Again, the onus is on the chemtards...even though you people refuse to accept that fact. Have the chemtards sampled trails/the atmosphere? Or do they just make assumptions. Don't answer...it was rhetorical. The only thing I have seen the chemtards do is sample soil/water/air at ground level, and jump to conclusions based on their ignorance about geology and their atmosphere. When will the chemtards give us something more to laugh about? That one is getting kinda old.. Oh well...let the hilarity continue! I have never come across any of the findings you are referring about . . Show us . . . I would love to see what they have recorded. . . LINK!!!! Show me that they ARE finding anything...Don't you think such information would be shared with the world...or at least someone...anyone?! So far...NOTHING! And I'm talking about schools, as well as private citizens, who make the atmosphere their passion. Why have we heard NOTHING about this? Could it be because it just isn't happening? Last Edited by Noble on 06/25/2012 03:14 PM Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 03:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Noble LOL!!! You actually believe it's a REQUIREMENT for the experts to put 10 times more effort into proving chemtards wrong?! No wonder they don't try as hard as you'd like! It's just not worth the effort! In their minds, they feel the chemtards are just a bunch of online losers who are too stupid to grasp the concepts no matter how well they are explained. And PLEASE back up that statement about how conspiracy nuts are more "intuitive". If you ask me, you are confusing the words imaginative and intuitive! Ill give the chemtards this...they are CERTAINLY imaginative...just as Chicken Little and Don Quixote. That DOESN'T make them right! They aren't "difficult" to argue with..they are hilarious to argue with! The length of your thread here proves the argument is not quite so easy. You're still a failure with your argument. Disinfo Agents.....government......covert.....you're the true losers. Bullshit covering lies. You crack me up. You'll always be riding the short bus, Snake/Noble The only reason you refer to me as a "failure with my argument" is because YOU are too stupid to understand it. There is NO EVIDENCE that the trails in the sky are anything more than contrails. There is no evidence that anything found in the sky, or on the ground, has been intentionally introduced into the atmosphere as part of any "aerosol program". You believe it...because you WANT to believe it....because you are a paranoid loser. That isn't to say that it's not happening, just that the "evidence" provided so far is extremely lacking. And there is no evidence that you are anything more than an uneducated paranoid moron. Please continue providing me with laughter. Evidence is not lacking. You've been prevented with plenty. If anyone is paranoid and uneducated, that would be you. The evidence of your ignorance is your double talk. You keep saying there is no evidence but, it could be happening. Now that's hilarious. That's like saying emphatically "There is not!" Then you say, "but there could be" You sound like an idiot. Sorry...So far, what has been presented as evidence, has been nothing but the chemtard ignorance about aviation, atmospheric science and geology...not to mention basic science. I AM educated in these subjects...much more so than any chemtard I have met. You wouldn't know...because you are an idiot. There is no evidence...but it "could be" happening. How is that a contradiction?! It's hilarious that you don't understand the distinction...yet you try to insult ME because YOU are ignorant. I have NEVER said "there is not"...stupid! I have said, I don't believe it's happening, because the evidence presented is only evidence of the ignorance of the chemtards. get it...stupid? Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1466091 United States 06/25/2012 03:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You DO know there are schools which sample the atmosphere quite often...and aren't finding any evidence to support the chemtard claims...don't you? Again, the onus is on the chemtards...even though you Quoting: Noble people refuse to accept that fact. Have the chemtards sampled trails/the atmosphere? Or do they just make assumptions. Don't answer...it was rhetorical. The only thing I have seen the chemtards do is sample soil/water/air at ground level, and jump to conclusions based on their ignorance about geology and their atmosphere. When will the chemtards give us something more to laugh about? That one is getting kinda old.. Oh well...let the hilarity continue! I have never come across any of the findings you are referring about . . Show us . . . I would love to see what they have recorded. . . LINK!!!! Show me that they ARE finding anything...Don't you think such information would be shared with the world...or at least someone...anyone?! Quoting: Noble So far...NOTHING! And I'm talking about schools, as well as private citizens, who make the atmosphere their passion. Why have we heard NOTHING about this? Could it be because it just isn't happening? If they are finding NOTHING. . . .why not publish it so all can see their data. .I would love to see it. . . .in Science. . ..negative results are as important as positive results. . ..are they not . . .Noble? . . . Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States 06/25/2012 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You DO know there are schools which sample the atmosphere quite often...and aren't finding any evidence to support the chemtard claims...don't you? Again, the onus is on the chemtards...even though you Quoting: Noble people refuse to accept that fact. Have the chemtards sampled trails/the atmosphere? Or do they just make assumptions. Don't answer...it was rhetorical. The only thing I have seen the chemtards do is sample soil/water/air at ground level, and jump to conclusions based on their ignorance about geology and their atmosphere. When will the chemtards give us something more to laugh about? That one is getting kinda old.. Oh well...let the hilarity continue! I have never come across any of the findings you are referring about . . Show us . . . I would love to see what they have recorded. . . LINK!!!! Show me that they ARE finding anything...Don't you think such information would be shared with the world...or at least someone...anyone?! Quoting: Noble So far...NOTHING! And I'm talking about schools, as well as private citizens, who make the atmosphere their passion. Why have we heard NOTHING about this? Could it be because it just isn't happening? If they are finding NOTHING. . . .why not publish it so all can see their data. .I would love to see it. . . .in Science. . ..negative results are as important as positive results. . ..are they not . . .Noble? . . . So, you want them to publish the fact that they have found nothing?! Should they also publish the fact that they haven't found flying unicorns or Dracula up there also?! Why would they publish negative results? To make chemtards happy?! LOL!! Like THAT could ever happen! Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |