| Users Online Now: 1,863 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 561,717 | |
| Pageviews Today: 933,144 | Threads Today: 281 | Posts Today: 5,294 |
| 09:43 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,863 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 561,717 | |
| Pageviews Today: 933,144 | Threads Today: 281 | Posts Today: 5,294 |
| 09:43 AM | ||
Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand. | |
| George B Extinct But Not Forgotten!  User ID: 1472645  United States06/25/2012 04:27 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You DO know there are schools which sample the atmosphere quite often...and aren't finding any evidence to support the chemtard claims...don't you? Again, the onus is on the chemtards...even though you Quoting: Noble people refuse to accept that fact. Have the chemtards sampled trails/the atmosphere? Or do they just make assumptions. Don't answer...it was rhetorical. The only thing I have seen the chemtards do is sample soil/water/air at ground level, and jump to conclusions based on their ignorance about geology and their atmosphere. When will the chemtards give us something more to laugh about? That one is getting kinda old.. Oh well...let the hilarity continue! I have never come across any of the findings you are referring about . . Show us . . . I would love to see what they have recorded. . . LINK!!!!  Show me that they ARE finding anything...Don't you think such information would be shared with the world...or at least someone...anyone?! Quoting: Noble So far...NOTHING! And I'm talking about schools, as well as private citizens, who make the atmosphere their passion. Why have we heard NOTHING about this? Could it be because it just isn't happening? If they are finding NOTHING. . . .why not publish it so all can see their data. .I would love to see it. . . .in Science. . ..negative results are as important as positive results. . ..are they not . . .Noble? . . .  So, you want them to publish the fact that they have found nothing?! Should they also publish the fact that they haven't found flying unicorns or Dracula up there also?! Why would they publish negative results? To make chemtards happy?! LOL!! Like THAT could ever happen! So we have NOTHING but your word Noble that these schools have been testing but getting NOTHING . . .Thanks. . . .just like the other non evidence you have been sharing for months. . . .it is best you say . . .. . . NOTHING because that is all you have presented . . .  Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17975050 United States06/25/2012 05:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: George B I have never come across any of the findings you are referring about . . Show us . . . I would love to see what they have recorded. . . LINK!!!! Show me that they ARE finding anything...Don't you think such information would be shared with the world...or at least someone...anyone?! Quoting: Noble So far...NOTHING! And I'm talking about schools, as well as private citizens, who make the atmosphere their passion. Why have we heard NOTHING about this? Could it be because it just isn't happening? If they are finding NOTHING. . . .why not publish it so all can see their data. .I would love to see it. . . .in Science. . ..negative results are as important as positive results. . ..are they not . . .Noble? . . . So, you want them to publish the fact that they have found nothing?! Should they also publish the fact that they haven't found flying unicorns or Dracula up there also?! Why would they publish negative results? To make chemtards happy?! LOL!! Like THAT could ever happen! So we have NOTHING but your word Noble that these schools have been testing but getting NOTHING . . .Thanks. . . .just like the other non evidence you have been sharing for months. . . .it is best you say . . .. . . NOTHING because that is all you have presented . . . Look it up...stupid. |
| George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1468869 United States06/25/2012 06:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: George B ... If they are finding NOTHING. . . .why not publish it so all can see their data. .I would love to see it. . . .in Science. . ..negative results are as important as positive results. . ..are they not . . .Noble? . . . So, you want them to publish the fact that they have found nothing?! Should they also publish the fact that they haven't found flying unicorns or Dracula up there also?! Why would they publish negative results? To make chemtards happy?! LOL!! Like THAT could ever happen! So we have NOTHING but your word Noble that these schools have been testing but getting NOTHING . . .Thanks. . . .just like the other non evidence you have been sharing for months. . . .it is best you say . . .. . . NOTHING because that is all you have presented . . . Look it up...stupid. You brought it up. . . .I am not going to do your work for you . . . Grow up Noble. . . .  Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17975050 United States06/25/2012 06:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Noble So, you want them to publish the fact that they have found nothing?! Should they also publish the fact that they haven't found flying unicorns or Dracula up there also?! Why would they publish negative results? To make chemtards happy?! LOL!! Like THAT could ever happen! So we have NOTHING but your word Noble that these schools have been testing but getting NOTHING . . .Thanks. . . .just like the other non evidence you have been sharing for months. . . .it is best you say . . .. . . NOTHING because that is all you have presented . . . Look it up...stupid. You brought it up. . . .I am not going to do your work for you . . . Grow up Noble. . . . ... Quoting: George B ... If they are finding NOTHING. . . .why not publish it so all can see their data. .I would love to see it. . . .in Science. . ..negative results are as important as positive results. . ..are they not . . .Noble? . . . So, you want them to publish the fact that they have found nothing?! Should they also publish the fact that they haven't found flying unicorns or Dracula up there also?! Why would they publish negative results? To make chemtards happy?! LOL!! Like THAT could ever happen! So we have NOTHING but your word Noble that these schools have been testing but getting NOTHING . . .Thanks. . . .just like the other non evidence you have been sharing for months. . . .it is best you say . . .. . . NOTHING because that is all you have presented . . . Look it up...stupid. So, are you suggesting that atmospheric mass-spectrometry isn't being performed all around the world by people who are much more intelligent/educated than you are? Again, look it up. Stop using your google powers to spread paranoid ignorance...do something useful. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17975050 United States06/25/2012 06:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to cires.colorado.edu] Lots of info...lots of links...feel free to contact these people and ask some questions... Or, remain paranoid chemtards... |
| George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1472645 United States06/25/2012 06:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So we have NOTHING but your word Noble that these schools have been testing but getting NOTHING . . .Thanks. . . .just like the other non evidence you have been sharing for months. . . .it is best you say . . .. . . NOTHING because that is all you have presented . . Quoting: George B . Look it up...stupid. So, are you suggesting that atmospheric mass-spectrometry isn't being performed all around the world by people who are much more intelligent/educated than you are? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050 Again, look it up. Stop using your google powers to spread paranoid ignorance...do something useful. Hmmmm. . . .when I used mass-spectrometry . . . It was very labor intensive and expensive and difficult to quantify, identify a substance was decent if one had perfect standards and controls . . .I know it has been a few years but I doubt that has completely changed. . . . According to the cited literature. . . .see below . . .it hasn't changed that much. . . .one mission each year. . . .that is going to be impressive. . . .  [link to www.uni-leipzig.de] Second paragraph page 244 Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17975050 United States06/25/2012 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So we have NOTHING but your word Noble that these schools have been testing but getting NOTHING . . .Thanks. . . .just like the other non evidence you have been sharing for months. . . .it is best you say . . .. . . NOTHING because that is all you have presented . . Quoting: George B . Look it up...stupid. So, are you suggesting that atmospheric mass-spectrometry isn't being performed all around the world by people who are much more intelligent/educated than you are? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17975050 Again, look it up. Stop using your google powers to spread paranoid ignorance...do something useful. Hmmmm. . . .when I used mass-spectrometry . . . It was very labor intensive and expensive and difficult to quantify, identify a substance was decent if one had perfect standards and controls . . .I know it has been a few years but I doubt that has completely changed. . . . According to the cited literature. . . .see below . . .it hasn't changed that much. . . .one mission each year. . . .that is going to be impressive. . . . [link to www.uni-leipzig.de] Second paragraph page 244 Bullshit. I don't believe for a second that you have any experience with ATMOSPHERIC mass spectrometry. And if there were anything to worry about, as far as aerosols, these people would have found it...somewhere in the world. There are only MILLIONS of people working with devices...all around the world....YOU, are not. I have to wonder why you are trying to discredit the science...oh, to further the spread of your particular brand of ignorance..im sure. Stop pretending that you understand what these people do...you're a chemtard...you don't know shit. |
| George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1463522 United States06/25/2012 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Interesting Noble. . . .in the MIT research below they didn't even measure the substances they only estimated them from fuel consumption. . . .surely if it were so easy they would have measured them or got their data from some reliable source. . . .don't you think?????? MIT study finds aircraft emissions at cruise altitude contribute to 8,000 premature deaths per year worldwide [link to www.greenaironline.com] (graphic: Christine Daniloff, MIT) Fri 8 Oct 2010 – Findings from a new study show that around 8,000 premature deaths a year can be attributed to the effects of oxides of nitrogen and sulphur (NOx and SOx) emissions from aircraft at cruise altitude, reports Morgan Bettex. Most of these emissions are caused by aircraft over North America and Europe but prevailing winds take them eastwards, where they can form a deadly mix with ammonia released from farming. Nearly half the total premature deaths occur in India and China. Up till now, regulation has only applied to such emissions up to the 3,000-feet level, the take-off and landing cycle, but the researchers recommend that cruise emissions be explicitly considered in the development of policies, technologies and operational procedures designed to mitigate the air quality impacts of transportation. Similar emissions from shipping are believed to be responsible for around 60,000 premature deaths annually. To study the effects of cruise emissions, Barrett used a computer model that combined data about plane trajectories, the amount of fuel burned during flights and the estimated emissions from those flights. He combined that with a global atmospheric model that accounts for air-circulation patterns in different parts of the globe and the effect of emissions to determine where aviation emissions might cause an increase in fine particulate matter. He then used data related to population density and risk of disease in different parts of the world to determine how the change in particulate matter over certain regions might affect people on the ground – specifically, whether the air pollutants would lead to an increased risk of death. Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17975050 United States06/25/2012 07:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Interesting Noble. . . .in the MIT research below they didn't even measure the substances they only estimated them from fuel consumption. . . .surely if it were so easy they would have measured them or got their data from some reliable source. . . .don't you think?????? Quoting: George B MIT study finds aircraft emissions at cruise altitude contribute to 8,000 premature deaths per year worldwide [link to www.greenaironline.com] (graphic: Christine Daniloff, MIT) Fri 8 Oct 2010 – Findings from a new study show that around 8,000 premature deaths a year can be attributed to the effects of oxides of nitrogen and sulphur (NOx and SOx) emissions from aircraft at cruise altitude, reports Morgan Bettex. Most of these emissions are caused by aircraft over North America and Europe but prevailing winds take them eastwards, where they can form a deadly mix with ammonia released from farming. Nearly half the total premature deaths occur in India and China. Up till now, regulation has only applied to such emissions up to the 3,000-feet level, the take-off and landing cycle, but the researchers recommend that cruise emissions be explicitly considered in the development of policies, technologies and operational procedures designed to mitigate the air quality impacts of transportation. Similar emissions from shipping are believed to be responsible for around 60,000 premature deaths annually. To study the effects of cruise emissions, Barrett used a computer model that combined data about plane trajectories, the amount of fuel burned during flights and the estimated emissions from those flights. He combined that with a global atmospheric model that accounts for air-circulation patterns in different parts of the globe and the effect of emissions to determine where aviation emissions might cause an increase in fine particulate matter. He then used data related to population density and risk of disease in different parts of the world to determine how the change in particulate matter over certain regions might affect people on the ground – specifically, whether the air pollutants would lead to an increased risk of death. So? How does this have anything to do with all the other scientists who are studying the atmosphere?! Why focus on those studying emissions...and not those studying the atmosphere itself? How is focusing on those who aren't studying the atmosphere in a way that meets your approval evidence that others aren't?! Sorry, if there were anything in the air...we'd know about it. Keep using those google powers to the least of your abilities...stupid loser... |
| George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1466091 United States06/25/2012 07:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Interesting Noble. . . .in the MIT research below they didn't even measure the substances they only estimated them from fuel consumption. . . .surely if it were so easy they would have measured them or got their data from some reliable source. . . .don't you think?????? Quoting: George B MIT study finds aircraft emissions at cruise altitude contribute to 8,000 premature deaths per year worldwide [link to www.greenaironline.com] (graphic: Christine Daniloff, MIT) Fri 8 Oct 2010 – Findings from a new study show that around 8,000 premature deaths a year can be attributed to the effects of oxides of nitrogen and sulphur (NOx and SOx) emissions from aircraft at cruise altitude, reports Morgan Bettex. Most of these emissions are caused by aircraft over North America and Europe but prevailing winds take them eastwards, where they can form a deadly mix with ammonia released from farming. Nearly half the total premature deaths occur in India and China. Up till now, regulation has only applied to such emissions up to the 3,000-feet level, the take-off and landing cycle, but the researchers recommend that cruise emissions be explicitly considered in the development of policies, technologies and operational procedures designed to mitigate the air quality impacts of transportation. Similar emissions from shipping are believed to be responsible for around 60,000 premature deaths annually. To study the effects of cruise emissions, Barrett used a computer model that combined data about plane trajectories, the amo nut of fuel burned during flights and the estimated emissions from those flights. He combined that with a global atmospheric model that accounts for air-circulation patterns in different parts of the globe and the effect of emissions to determine where aviation emissions might cause an increase in fine particulate matter. He then used data related to population density and risk of disease in different parts of the world to determine how the change in particulate matter over certain regions might affect people on the ground – specifically, whether the air pollutants would lead to an increased risk of death. So? How does this have anything to do with all the other scientists who are studying the atmosphere?! Why focus on those studying emissions...and not those studying the atmosphere itself? How is focusing on those who aren't studying the atmosphere in a way that meets your approval evidence that others aren't?! Sorry, if there were anything in the air...we'd know about it. Keep using those google powers to the least of your abilities...stupid loser... Noble, I have more than made my point . .. the ball they say is in your court . . .  "These particles are also called “aerosols," and the new paper explores their recent climate effects -- the reasons behind their increase remain the subject of ongoing research." [link to www.noaanews.noaa.gov] Last Edited by George B on 06/25/2012 07:42 PM Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17975050 United States06/25/2012 07:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Interesting Noble. . . .in the MIT research below they didn't even measure the substances they only estimated them from fuel consumption. . . .surely if it were so easy they would have measured them or got their data from some reliable source. . . .don't you think?????? Quoting: George B MIT study finds aircraft emissions at cruise altitude contribute to 8,000 premature deaths per year worldwide [link to www.greenaironline.com] (graphic: Christine Daniloff, MIT) Fri 8 Oct 2010 – Findings from a new study show that around 8,000 premature deaths a year can be attributed to the effects of oxides of nitrogen and sulphur (NOx and SOx) emissions from aircraft at cruise altitude, reports Morgan Bettex. Most of these emissions are caused by aircraft over North America and Europe but prevailing winds take them eastwards, where they can form a deadly mix with ammonia released from farming. Nearly half the total premature deaths occur in India and China. Up till now, regulation has only applied to such emissions up to the 3,000-feet level, the take-off and landing cycle, but the researchers recommend that cruise emissions be explicitly considered in the development of policies, technologies and operational procedures designed to mitigate the air quality impacts of transportation. Similar emissions from shipping are believed to be responsible for around 60,000 premature deaths annually. To study the effects of cruise emissions, Barrett used a computer model that combined data about plane trajectories, the amo nut of fuel burned during flights and the estimated emissions from those flights. He combined that with a global atmospheric model that accounts for air-circulation patterns in different parts of the globe and the effect of emissions to determine where aviation emissions might cause an increase in fine particulate matter. He then used data related to population density and risk of disease in different parts of the world to determine how the change in particulate matter over certain regions might affect people on the ground – specifically, whether the air pollutants would lead to an increased risk of death. So? How does this have anything to do with all the other scientists who are studying the atmosphere?! Why focus on those studying emissions...and not those studying the atmosphere itself? How is focusing on those who aren't studying the atmosphere in a way that meets your approval evidence that others aren't?! Sorry, if there were anything in the air...we'd know about it. Keep using those google powers to the least of your abilities...stupid loser... Noble, I have more than made my point . .. the ball they say is in your court . . . "These particles are also called “aerosols," and the new paper explores their recent climate effects -- the reasons behind their increase remain the subject of ongoing research." [link to www.noaanews.noaa.gov] And aerosols are both man made and natural...with no evidence of any of it being intentional. The ball is always in your court... And you continue to fail. Just because they hadn't pinpointed a source..doesn't meant there is an intentional aerosol program...sorry. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1611462 United States06/25/2012 08:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462 The length of your thread here proves the argument is not quite so easy. You're still a failure with your argument. Disinfo Agents.....government......covert.....you're the true losers. Bullshit covering lies. You crack me up. You'll always be riding the short bus, Snake/Noble The only reason you refer to me as a "failure with my argument" is because YOU are too stupid to understand it. There is NO EVIDENCE that the trails in the sky are anything more than contrails. There is no evidence that anything found in the sky, or on the ground, has been intentionally introduced into the atmosphere as part of any "aerosol program". You believe it...because you WANT to believe it....because you are a paranoid loser. That isn't to say that it's not happening, just that the "evidence" provided so far is extremely lacking. And there is no evidence that you are anything more than an uneducated paranoid moron. Please continue providing me with laughter. Evidence is not lacking. You've been prevented with plenty. If anyone is paranoid and uneducated, that would be you. The evidence of your ignorance is your double talk. You keep saying there is no evidence but, it could be happening. Now that's hilarious. That's like saying emphatically "There is not!" Then you say, "but there could be" You sound like an idiot. Sorry...So far, what has been presented as evidence, has been nothing but the chemtard ignorance about aviation, atmospheric science and geology...not to mention basic science. I AM educated in these subjects...much more so than any chemtard I have met. You wouldn't know...because you are an idiot. There is no evidence...but it "could be" happening. How is that a contradiction?! It's hilarious that you don't understand the distinction...yet you try to insult ME because YOU are ignorant. I have NEVER said "there is not"...stupid! I have said, I don't believe it's happening, because the evidence presented is only evidence of the ignorance of the chemtards. get it...stupid? I would say that your education is minimal at the least and you are full of it. You miss the distinction, because of your limited reading comprehension. You are so busy twisting and evading that you make no since. Please don't try to pass on your limited knowledge and mislead people, "conturd". And someone (you) who relies on "google" as their own bible should keep their opinions to themselves when criticizing other people. That's called "hypocrisy", you simple ass. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17975050 United States06/25/2012 08:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Noble The only reason you refer to me as a "failure with my argument" is because YOU are too stupid to understand it. There is NO EVIDENCE that the trails in the sky are anything more than contrails. There is no evidence that anything found in the sky, or on the ground, has been intentionally introduced into the atmosphere as part of any "aerosol program". You believe it...because you WANT to believe it....because you are a paranoid loser. That isn't to say that it's not happening, just that the "evidence" provided so far is extremely lacking. And there is no evidence that you are anything more than an uneducated paranoid moron. Please continue providing me with laughter. Evidence is not lacking. You've been prevented with plenty. If anyone is paranoid and uneducated, that would be you. The evidence of your ignorance is your double talk. You keep saying there is no evidence but, it could be happening. Now that's hilarious. That's like saying emphatically "There is not!" Then you say, "but there could be" You sound like an idiot. Sorry...So far, what has been presented as evidence, has been nothing but the chemtard ignorance about aviation, atmospheric science and geology...not to mention basic science. I AM educated in these subjects...much more so than any chemtard I have met. You wouldn't know...because you are an idiot. There is no evidence...but it "could be" happening. How is that a contradiction?! It's hilarious that you don't understand the distinction...yet you try to insult ME because YOU are ignorant. I have NEVER said "there is not"...stupid! I have said, I don't believe it's happening, because the evidence presented is only evidence of the ignorance of the chemtards. get it...stupid? I would say that your education is minimal at the least and you are full of it. You miss the distinction, because of your limited reading comprehension. You are so busy twisting and evading that you make no since. Please don't try to pass on your limited knowledge and mislead people, "conturd". And someone (you) who relies on "google" as their own bible should keep their opinions to themselves when criticizing other people. That's called "hypocrisy", you simple ass. Yeah...the chemtard says I "Make no since"....fucking idiot... Sorry, I don't use google to quote conspiracy sites..stupid. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1611462 United States06/25/2012 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462 Evidence is not lacking. You've been prevented with plenty. If anyone is paranoid and uneducated, that would be you. The evidence of your ignorance is your double talk. You keep saying there is no evidence but, it could be happening. Now that's hilarious. That's like saying emphatically "There is not!" Then you say, "but there could be" You sound like an idiot. Sorry...So far, what has been presented as evidence, has been nothing but the chemtard ignorance about aviation, atmospheric science and geology...not to mention basic science. I AM educated in these subjects...much more so than any chemtard I have met. You wouldn't know...because you are an idiot. There is no evidence...but it "could be" happening. How is that a contradiction?! It's hilarious that you don't understand the distinction...yet you try to insult ME because YOU are ignorant. I have NEVER said "there is not"...stupid! I have said, I don't believe it's happening, because the evidence presented is only evidence of the ignorance of the chemtards. get it...stupid? I would say that your education is minimal at the least and you are full of it. You miss the distinction, because of your limited reading comprehension. You are so busy twisting and evading that you make no since. Please don't try to pass on your limited knowledge and mislead people, "conturd". And someone (you) who relies on "google" as their own bible should keep their opinions to themselves when criticizing other people. That's called "hypocrisy", you simple ass. Yeah...the chemtard says I "Make no since"....fucking idiot... Sorry, I don't use google to quote conspiracy sites..stupid. Chuckles................................... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17975050 United States06/26/2012 04:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Noble Sorry...So far, what has been presented as evidence, has been nothing but the chemtard ignorance about aviation, atmospheric science and geology...not to mention basic science. I AM educated in these subjects...much more so than any chemtard I have met. You wouldn't know...because you are an idiot. There is no evidence...but it "could be" happening. How is that a contradiction?! It's hilarious that you don't understand the distinction...yet you try to insult ME because YOU are ignorant. I have NEVER said "there is not"...stupid! I have said, I don't believe it's happening, because the evidence presented is only evidence of the ignorance of the chemtards. get it...stupid? I would say that your education is minimal at the least and you are full of it. You miss the distinction, because of your limited reading comprehension. You are so busy twisting and evading that you make no since. Please don't try to pass on your limited knowledge and mislead people, "conturd". And someone (you) who relies on "google" as their own bible should keep their opinions to themselves when criticizing other people. That's called "hypocrisy", you simple ass. Yeah...the chemtard says I "Make no since"....fucking idiot... Sorry, I don't use google to quote conspiracy sites..stupid. Chuckles................................... The word is "sense", stupid. Please sue your school system. You have an excellent case. Not only do you fail to understand basic science, your English is terrible. |
| Noble (OP) User ID: 17975050 United States06/26/2012 05:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Noble The only reason you refer to me as a "failure with my argument" is because YOU are too stupid to understand it. There is NO EVIDENCE that the trails in the sky are anything more than contrails. There is no evidence that anything found in the sky, or on the ground, has been intentionally introduced into the atmosphere as part of any "aerosol program". You believe it...because you WANT to believe it....because you are a paranoid loser. That isn't to say that it's not happening, just that the "evidence" provided so far is extremely lacking. And there is no evidence that you are anything more than an uneducated paranoid moron. Please continue providing me with laughter. Evidence is not lacking. You've been prevented with plenty. If anyone is paranoid and uneducated, that would be you. The evidence of your ignorance is your double talk. You keep saying there is no evidence but, it could be happening. Now that's hilarious. That's like saying emphatically "There is not!" Then you say, "but there could be" You sound like an idiot. Sorry...So far, what has been presented as evidence, has been nothing but the chemtard ignorance about aviation, atmospheric science and geology...not to mention basic science. I AM educated in these subjects...much more so than any chemtard I have met. You wouldn't know...because you are an idiot. There is no evidence...but it "could be" happening. How is that a contradiction?! It's hilarious that you don't understand the distinction...yet you try to insult ME because YOU are ignorant. I have NEVER said "there is not"...stupid! I have said, I don't believe it's happening, because the evidence presented is only evidence of the ignorance of the chemtards. get it...stupid? I would say that your education is minimal at the least and you are full of it. You miss the distinction, because of your limited reading comprehension. You are so busy twisting and evading that you make no since. Please don't try to pass on your limited knowledge and mislead people, "conturd". And someone (you) who relies on "google" as their own bible should keep their opinions to themselves when criticizing other people. That's called "hypocrisy", you simple ass. My education is ..."minimal at the least" huh? LOL! And yours is minimal, at the most. I'm full of it? Seems I'm full of knowledge that you're not exposed to on the conspiracy sites...or in school. I understand the distinction just fine...you miss it...because you are stupid. I have yet to try to mislead anyone about anything...I leave that up to you ignorant chemtards. I certainly don't rely on google. There are no filters to separate fiction from non fiction. Which is why you chemtards are so confused. Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
| George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 1509033 United States06/26/2012 07:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My education is ..."minimal at the least" huh? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462 LOL! And yours is minimal, at the most. I'm full of it? Seems I'm full of knowledge that you're not exposed to on the conspiracy sites...or in school. I understand the distinction just fine...you miss it...because you are stupid. I have yet to try to mislead anyone about anything...I leave that up to you ignorant chemtards. I certainly don't rely on google. There are no filters to separate fiction from non fiction. Which is why you chemtards are so confused. Noble, You have been exposed as a shallow rather uneducated individual . . . posing as an expert that you are not . . . and you would be better leaving the debate to someone who knows what they are talking about . . .I don't know about anyone else but I am through with you . . . .  You add nothing but vile insults and cause people to become angry. . . You do nothing for your cause or for people seeking to understand more except raise their blood pressure. . . .  Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1611462 United States06/26/2012 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My education is ..."minimal at the least" huh? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462 LOL! And yours is minimal, at the most. I'm full of it? Seems I'm full of knowledge that you're not exposed to on the conspiracy sites...or in school. I understand the distinction just fine...you miss it...because you are stupid. I have yet to try to mislead anyone about anything...I leave that up to you ignorant chemtards. I certainly don't rely on google. There are no filters to separate fiction from non fiction. Which is why you chemtards are so confused. Noble, You have been exposed as a shallow rather uneducated individual . . . posing as an expert that you are not . . . and you would be better leaving the debate to someone who knows what they are talking about . . .I don't know about anyone else but I am through with you . . . . You add nothing but vile insults and cause people to become angry. . . You do nothing for your cause or for people seeking to understand more except raise their blood pressure. . . . Ditto to that, George. He's a fake!!!!! And not a good one. |
| SnakeAirlines User ID: 1086405 United States06/26/2012 10:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States06/26/2012 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My education is ..."minimal at the least" huh? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462 LOL! And yours is minimal, at the most. I'm full of it? Seems I'm full of knowledge that you're not exposed to on the conspiracy sites...or in school. I understand the distinction just fine...you miss it...because you are stupid. I have yet to try to mislead anyone about anything...I leave that up to you ignorant chemtards. I certainly don't rely on google. There are no filters to separate fiction from non fiction. Which is why you chemtards are so confused. Noble, You have been exposed as a shallow rather uneducated individual . . . posing as an expert that you are not . . . and you would be better leaving the debate to someone who knows what they are talking about . . .I don't know about anyone else but I am through with you . . . . You add nothing but vile insults and cause people to become angry. . . You do nothing for your cause or for people seeking to understand more except raise their blood pressure. . . . Ditto to that, George. He's a fake!!!!! And not a good one. Funny how nothing I write is in contradiction to the known facts...just the paranoid chemtard nonsense. fine by me...bye moron! Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17975050 United States06/26/2012 06:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States06/27/2012 07:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My education is ..."minimal at the least" huh? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462 LOL! And yours is minimal, at the most. I'm full of it? Seems I'm full of knowledge that you're not exposed to on the conspiracy sites...or in school. I understand the distinction just fine...you miss it...because you are stupid. I have yet to try to mislead anyone about anything...I leave that up to you ignorant chemtards. I certainly don't rely on google. There are no filters to separate fiction from non fiction. Which is why you chemtards are so confused. Noble, You have been exposed as a shallow rather uneducated individual . . . posing as an expert that you are not . . . and you would be better leaving the debate to someone who knows what they are talking about . . .I don't know about anyone else but I am through with you . . . . You add nothing but vile insults and cause people to become angry. . . You do nothing for your cause or for people seeking to understand more except raise their blood pressure. . . . You've been exposed as a stupid chemtard. I've never claimed to be an expert of any kind, but I AM more educated in the subjects of aviation and atmospheric science than YOU will ever be. You have failed to show that you know what you're talking about. In fact, you have continuously shown to be ignorant about EVERY SINGLE facet of this discussion (Appleman chart, unregistered flights, mass spectrometry..there are many). No wonder you're running away! You chemtards SHOULD BE angry...for allowing yourselves to be duped so easily. Maybe you should take the time to learn these subjects from reliable and reputable sources...and you, especially, should learn to stop taking things out of context and manipulating information to fit your delusion. It's sad and pathetic! My cause is truth...it really doesn't need me anyway...the truth will be the truth no matter what I say/do to entertain myself with the ignorance of the chemtards. Just because you and your stupid friends don't understand the truth, doesn't mean it isn't known by those who actually matter. I'm sorry to see you go...you are such an easy target. I guess I'll have to seek the entertainment you provide from other threads. Seeya soon! LOL!!! loser!Last Edited by Noble on 06/27/2012 08:07 AM Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
| Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States06/28/2012 08:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still no evidence that the trails in the sky are anything more than contrails?! Why am I not surprised.. Have you given up chemtards? I can understand why...complete failure makes quitters. Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17975050 United States06/30/2012 11:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17975050 United States07/01/2012 08:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| The Professor User ID: 16090108 United States07/01/2012 08:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States07/02/2012 03:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, all that is is evidence that chemtards are stupid. That's an aerodynamic contrail...nothing more. Can you hear the pilots laughing?! They are laughing at the chemtards... Listen to what they say...they are making fun of you morons... Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
| Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States07/06/2012 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So...Chemtards...STILL no evidence that the trails we all see in the sky are anything more than contrails?! Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17975050 United States07/08/2012 07:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Noble (OP) User ID: 1211465 United States07/10/2012 11:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No? Still nothing? STILL no evidence that the trails in the sky are anything more than contrails?! I wonder why... Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |
