Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,605 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,235,818
Pageviews Today: 1,742,387Threads Today: 480Posts Today: 8,947
02:08 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional

 
The Bulgarian
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 13376305
Bulgaria
06/07/2012 02:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Sorry, Mr. President. A US Federal judge has clarified a decision made last month with some news sure to upset the Obama administration: the White House cannot use the NDAA to indefinitely detain American citizens.

Judge Katherine B. Forrest has answered a request made by US President Barack Obama last month to more carefully explain a May 16 ruling made in a Southern District of New York courtroom regarding the National Defense Authorization Act. Clarifying the meaning behind her injunction, Judge Forrest confirms in an eight-page memorandum opinion this week that the NDAA’s controversial provision that permits indefinite detention cannot be used on any of America's own citizens.

Last month Judge Forrest ruled in favor of a group of journalists and activists whom filed a suit challenging the constitutionality of Section 1021 of the NDAA, a defense spending bill signed into law by President Obama on New Year’s Eve. Specifically, Judge Forrest said in her injunction that the legislation contained elements that had a "chilling impact on First Amendment rights” and ruled that no, the government cannot imprison Americans over suspected ties with terrorists.

[link to rt.com]
Soliloquy

User ID: 13144059
United States
06/07/2012 02:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
thank God, or whatever fairytale you subscribe to
If it's a circle peg, into a square hole... bang harder. Sometimes in order for the blind to see, one who takes no sides has to wedge themselves right in the middle of all sides.

To whom it may concern; You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile, posts, and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee, agent, student, or any personnel under your direction or control. The contents of this account are private and legally privileged and confidential information meant only for the ones to whom any correspondence was proffered to, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law. UCC 1-103 1-308 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15453728
United States
06/07/2012 02:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
clappa
Bluebird

User ID: 730536
United States
06/07/2012 02:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Sounds good. Hope it holds.
One of the most important aspects of conspiracy theories is being able to discern when there isn't one.

Oh yeah, like you'd understand anyway.

Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?. . .J. Handy
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1526444
United States
06/07/2012 02:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
dogpile
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10743044
United States
06/07/2012 02:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
clappa
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15453728
-GooGooFlexy-

User ID: 1238529
United States
06/07/2012 02:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
borat
-GooGooFlexy-
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1667343
United States
06/07/2012 02:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Sorry, Mr. President. A US Federal judge has clarified a decision made last month with some news sure to upset the Obama administration: the White House cannot use the NDAA to indefinitely detain American citizens.

Judge Katherine B. Forrest has answered a request made by US President Barack Obama last month to more carefully explain a May 16 ruling made in a Southern District of New York courtroom regarding the National Defense Authorization Act. Clarifying the meaning behind her injunction, Judge Forrest confirms in an eight-page memorandum opinion this week that the NDAA’s controversial provision that permits indefinite detention cannot be used on any of America's own citizens.

Last month Judge Forrest ruled in favor of a group of journalists and activists whom filed a suit challenging the constitutionality of Section 1021 of the NDAA, a defense spending bill signed into law by President Obama on New Year’s Eve. Specifically, Judge Forrest said in her injunction that the legislation contained elements that had a "chilling impact on First Amendment rights” and ruled that no, the government cannot imprison Americans over suspected ties with terrorists.

[link to rt.com]
 Quoting: The Bulgarian


SO.... what about the Patriot Act?
Damrod

User ID: 11544146
United States
06/07/2012 02:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Fantastic! Now if we can just get them to block H.R. 347!

Just a reminder of that Bill which has been signed in btw...



H.R.347

One Hundred Twelfth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

An Act

To correct and simplify the drafting of section 1752 (relating to restricted buildings or grounds) of title 18, United States Code.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011'.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTED BUILDING OR GROUNDS.

Section 1752 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

-`Sec. 1752. Restricted building or grounds

`(a) Whoever--

`(1) knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so;

`(2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions;

`(3) knowingly, and with the intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, obstructs or impedes ingress or egress to or from any restricted building or grounds; or

`(4) knowingly engages in any act of physical violence against any person or property in any restricted building or grounds;

or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

`(b) The punishment for a violation of subsection (a) is--

`(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, if--

`(A) the person, during and in relation to the offense, uses or carries a deadly or dangerous weapon or firearm; or

`(B) the offense results in significant bodily injury as defined by section 2118(e)(3); and

`(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, in any other case.

`(c) In this section--

`(1) the term `restricted buildings or grounds' means any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area--

`(A) of the White House or its grounds, or the Vice President's official residence or its grounds;

`(B) of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting; or

`(C) of a building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance; and

`(2) the term `other person protected by the Secret Service' means any person whom the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect under section 3056 of this title or by Presidential memorandum, when such person has not declined such protection.'.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
CultivatingMass

User ID: 15716609
United States
06/07/2012 02:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
yeah and barry is asking for a 2nd term??

come on, now...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4619492
United States
06/07/2012 02:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Judiciary stepping up, kicking ass and taking names.cool2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 108458
United States
06/07/2012 02:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Do not get to excited.

The executive can choose to ignore this and do as it pleases.
It has done so in the past. For example Andrew Jackson's expulsion of the Cherokee.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10503161
Canada
06/07/2012 02:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
It's about time some sanity shines through the madness that has become the new America!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4619492
United States
06/07/2012 02:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Do not get to excited.

The executive can choose to ignore this and do as it pleases.
It has done so in the past. For example Andrew Jackson's expulsion of the Cherokee.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 108458


lol
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17020816
Canada
06/07/2012 02:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
They will now put kiddy porn on that judges computer, ruin her reputation and then enact a new law of which no judge will interfere.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11976018
United States
06/07/2012 02:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
That's a big lose to the Congress that made this!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9204853
United States
06/07/2012 03:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Now they will just kill you....no need for detainment.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1330824
United States
06/07/2012 03:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Lol and you really think this means anything?
8 ball is already otw to corner pocket.
Syria is officially about to be under way, Iran enters, China and Russia finally forced to enter, NK from the flank...wouldn't be surprised if NK send 60 million ground troops on horses to Iran. Right after they sling 2 or so nukes at SK and Japan. (joke about them not making it all you want).
It wasn't Bush you should have all kept your eyes on it was Mr Antichrist himself...
Who needs those part of NDAA when Marshal law is about to be enacted. (where none of those things matter anyway)
Plus the fact he openly states he will deify such things...

Starting to believe there will be no elections for real this time around.

All hail, Long live King Osama.... *cough, yeah intentional

But hey I have family so, I have, I love China, Russia and Obama Shirts along with Russian and Chinese dictionary's on stand by...

I just hope our (non existant space weapons) are online and ready to protect us from 80k plus warheads coming our way.

Then again Im starting to believe they fully intend to let them get through.

Told you all that loud metal noise n booming was them on over time on those bases underground.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17550240
Poland
06/07/2012 03:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Sorry, Mr. President. A US Federal judge has clarified a decision made last month with some news sure to upset the Obama administration: the White House cannot use the NDAA to indefinitely detain American citizens.

Judge Katherine B. Forrest has answered a request made by US President Barack Obama last month to more carefully explain a May 16 ruling made in a Southern District of New York courtroom regarding the National Defense Authorization Act. Clarifying the meaning behind her injunction, Judge Forrest confirms in an eight-page memorandum opinion this week that the NDAA’s controversial provision that permits indefinite detention cannot be used on any of America's own citizens.

Last month Judge Forrest ruled in favor of a group of journalists and activists whom filed a suit challenging the constitutionality of Section 1021 of the NDAA, a defense spending bill signed into law by President Obama on New Year’s Eve. Specifically, Judge Forrest said in her injunction that the legislation contained elements that had a "chilling impact on First Amendment rights” and ruled that no, the government cannot imprison Americans over suspected ties with terrorists.

[link to rt.com]
 Quoting: The Bulgarian


The ruling means Obama will institute a sharp uptick in extra judiciary killings.
reitze

User ID: 7276302
United States
06/07/2012 03:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Now if all of congress and the POTUS could be arrested on the grounds of perjury since they swore an oath to uphold the constitution and then went on record working directly against it intentionally ... Or should we consider that treason and give them all the death penalty? It sure would help the 1% manipulation of our goverment against the will of the people and against the constitution that's been paid for in blood. yoda
Dare to dream
Resister

User ID: 669410
United States
06/07/2012 03:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Oh the irony. Russia Today is the only media outlet reporting on America's violation of it's own constitution.

sad
"God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, & always, well informed... If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty... Let them take arms... What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. " - Thomas Jefferson in 1787
uscrusader1

User ID: 9491757
United States
06/07/2012 03:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
affirmative action negroes obongo and holder are above the law.
Andrew Jackson

User ID: 17551265
United States
06/07/2012 03:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Do not get to excited.

The executive can choose to ignore this and do as it pleases.
It has done so in the past. For example Andrew Jackson's expulsion of the Cherokee.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 108458


You have no idea what you are talking about, Jackson did not ignore the courts ruling.

He could not enforce a ruling to stop Georgia from taking Cherokee land.

"John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it"

Meaning, it will be civil war if I ( Jackson ) try to enforce it.

Jackson's removal was legal by treaty. FYI the Cherokee where removed under Martin Van Buren.
“Wash yourselves, make yourselves clean;
Remove the evil of your deeds from My sight.
Cease to do evil,
Learn to do good;Seek justice,
Reprove the ruthless,Defend the orphan,Plead for the widow.

Your Governance is puppet whore of the Banks, it is not a real boy. Stop pretending it can move on it's own.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15737046
United States
06/07/2012 03:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
They will now put kiddy porn on that judges computer, ruin her reputation and then enact a new law of which no judge will interfere.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17020816


cruise
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17551194
Poland
06/07/2012 03:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
clappashitstreamshitstreamogrrrahole
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1330824
United States
06/07/2012 03:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Lol I started thinking about that yesterday...Americans want the real news they need to start watching RT...
Its Russia's way of saying it supports the American Public.
ParadigmShifter

User ID: 16216661
United States
06/07/2012 03:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
I hope this is just the start of something good.
ParadigmShifter
IvantZtrooth

User ID: 16671767
United States
06/07/2012 03:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
too bad this doesnt mean shit. they dont care if its constitutional at all
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12358237
United States
06/07/2012 03:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Oh the irony. Russia Today is the only media outlet reporting on America's violation of it's own constitution.

sad
 Quoting: Resister

^^^ THIS is the real story here! ^^^
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16520024
United States
06/07/2012 03:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
banana2chorus
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1330824
United States
06/07/2012 03:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Federal judge bans NDAA unconstitutional
Seriously Thats a good point...

Why detain when he can still just kill you now...

Not like hes guna listen to any of this anyway.

And that judge should I wish GL too... *seriously

Nationalism was already twisted and subverted.

Patriots seem to be on the menu now.





GLP