Breaking!!!!SCOTUS refuses to hear another "birther" case!!! Will you Vattel people NOW admit that you are wrong?

You know I have received a bombardment of red karma for this thread. But it was worth it to watch you "birthers" squirm, and have to break out old debunked arguments. To back your ridiculous claims.

your just antisocial asshole who enjoys watching america gets fucked by a jagoff

You know I have received a bombardment of red karma for this thread. But it was worth it to watch you "birthers" squirm, and have to break out old debunked arguments. To back your ridiculous claims.

I am a "birther" as you put it (and frankly a bit disturbed that there aren't more of us in light of the mountain of evidence that has YET to be refuted in any substantial form), but have always known that this case would never see the light of day.

WTF would you expect of SCOTUS? They're damned either way they might rule, so they're simply going to refuse to hear any case that comes close to legitimizing either side. That is the only reason birthers (like me at least) have backed away from devoting much more energy to this, and focused instead on the obvious travesties this administration has undertaken since taking office.

The system is most definitely fixed though, and the SCOTUS position clearly reflects it.

In short, it is very much time to clear ALL houses come November - including many republicans (i.e. RINO's - of which most are today) - in hopes of cleaning up the rest of the shitpile over the next 50 years or so (because that's about how long it will take to right this ship given the insanity of the past 8 years or so).

Unfortunately, I fear that it might be too late, but that won't stop me...

You have proven nothing here! There was a DECISION to NOT HEAR the case! NOT A DECISION THAT HE IS US BORN! NOTHING HAS CHANGED.

You have proven nothing here! There was a DECISION to NOT HEAR the case! NOT A DECISION THAT HE IS US BORN! NOTHING HAS CHANGED.

It is a valid argument, without trying to be something your not and cut and pasting. Thank you. However, as I said, if the court thought that there were proof that the president was ineligible. Every citizen in the country could claim irreparable harm.

"indicates that the term “natural born” citizen would mean"

this excerpt from your quote is about as vague as it can be.

"indicates...would mean"

again, Obama had submitted no documented proof THAT EXISTED BEFORE THE CONTROVERSY AROSE of any kind to support any of his claims. it has all been conjured up as required, or ignored. he has deliberately avoided submitting documents and records of any kind. in my opinion, he is not an honorable person.

you argue minor issues, but ignore the meat.

is Obama a liar, deceiver, charlatan, cheat, crook, double-dealer, fake, forger, four-flusher, hoaxer, horse trader, impostor, phony, play actor, pretender, racketeer, and swindler, or not?

No, that's the logical fallacy you after-birthers keep trying to make us dance to.

You can't prove a negative. And it is up to the person in question to prove eligibility, not for anyone else to prove ineligibility.

Same old shit, no proof.

[link to www.azcentral.com]

why is this hoax pinned??
The topic title is a lie.
Where in the article does the scotus say they won't hear another birther case???

snip:

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal challenging President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship and his eligibility to serve as commander in chief. Without comment, the high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Alan Keyes, Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson

it IS BS that they say there is no standing as usual but this thread is a hoax...

why is this hoax pinned??
The topic title is a lie.
Where in the article does the scotus say they won't hear another birther case???

snip:

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal challenging President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship and his eligibility to serve as commander in chief. Without comment, the high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Alan Keyes, Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson

it IS BS that they say there is no standing as usual but this thread is a hoax...

and he has.....


[link to www.azcentral.com]

title says another, not "any more". Therefore, not a hoax.