Indiana legalizes shooting cops!!

Bullshit.

I don't hate cops but I'm not stupid enough to fall for the shit that just came out of your mouth.

It's not like there are a bunch of Barney Fife's running around out there.

Many are bullies that took the job because they can pretty much get away with anything. Nice job, being able to do what you want to anyone you want and get away with it.

Take off those rose colored glasses.



Last Edited by Debauchery on 06/12/2012 01:41 PM

You must like being able to be abused with impunity by the authorities. This law ensures that Indiana police remain as civil servants as opposed to their masters. It's like the saying goes: God made man, Samuel Colt equalized them. That applies to the police as well as the citizens.

WOW! Slow-down there turbo! I hope the innocent police that you defend do not think like you do! Because if they do I suppose they are not so innocent after-all and we will all die soon.

Besides that there are alot of good police videos out there. Fact is, there are a lot more corrupt cops out there. Has been for the last 20 years. They no longer communicate with the public at local events. Talk with the local kids to INFLUENCE them to stay off drugs, and stay out of trouble. That is too boring for them, to serve the public that is. They would rather be out on Route 78 setting up a no-win speed trap to antagonize someone into taking a swing at them so they can taze their ass. I hear it all the time FROM COPS! So go ahead and defend them. At least until the day that you have your run-in with the bad one, then you will regret that you ever stood up for all of them and be a little more selective on the ones you say are "just".

And yes, I am a Hoosier and very proud that my state made the distinction to include "public servants" are not above the law.


So settle down and go back to piecing together your collage of human body parts and old newspapers, you fucking psycho-fucktard dimwit. I hope the smell of the sphincter draped around your neck chokes you out, homo.

fuck you you idiot

+1

1 star

Great job guys, don't suppose you can help us get our right to bare arms back? Lol

Got some awesome freedoms over there guys, don't ever let the assholes take 'em.

Every board has a few copsuckers. No surprises there. Suck it deep, sheep.

I wonder if the Bilderberg assholes told Mitch Daniels to do this.

These crazy assholes want us all dead.

Cops and Citizens: unite and turn your guns on these parasitic assholes so humanity can go back to being PRODUCTIVE, not destructive.

If cops were more 'peacekeepers' than judge and jury, and lied about something an alledged perp did or said just to make a bust, this would not have happened.

Once you get arrested, you can never get a job again, even if found not guilty. Thank you mugshots.com and your extortion ring.

Cops have earned this backlash. I feel pity for the few good ones, however most deserve this kind of treatment. Just as society judges you for one mistake called an arrest by an over aggressive cop, cops are judged by their own standard. They are not above the law yet have abused it constantly.

I have always said high school bullies become cops. Sad but true.

A cop that enters a house Illegally may be a cop by profession, but at that point, he's no different than any other intruder.

The point being if it's illegal, it's illegal, no matter who you are.

They should not be above the law, so the fact that Only one state has legislated this is ridiculous. It should be self evident in any state.

Au contraire, mon frere.

Do you know what castle law is? Stand your ground law?

It IS legal for me to shoot at anyone that comes through my door with force and intends to harm me or my family.

No one said people could just go around shooting cops or anyone else for shits and giggles. No one said THAT was legal.

This means all the young LEOS will have to learn to read a map and not rely on the GPS that gives them wrong directions. The LEOS will have to do their job and make sure they are kicking in the correct door.

If the cops don't enter houses ILLEGALLY, there shouldn't be a problem. Those charged with upholding the law should be required to follow it.

Well, this should cut back on the no knock warrants in Indiana. I suppose now the druggies will be able to flush their drugs down the toilet before the cops can get in. The cops will actually have to wait for a judge to issue a search warrant.

Most likely? The cops will just show up to a domestic disturbance call and start shooting automatic weapons through the doors and windows so that they don't have to face the "danger" of knocking on the door first.

I mean that is the excuse for the force used by police isn't it? "I felt I was in danger, or granny near by was in danger so I shot him in his eye 97 times." Better some random civilian go down that captain flat foot. They put their lives on the line for the citizens every day protecting the citizens by killing the citiziens.

should be interesting.

You idiots. This law doesn't mean a damn thing to the cops. They are trained to automatically ASSUME everyone is armed. They are trained to ASSUME ESPECIALLY that in the event of entering a home for search and or seizure, the occupants ARE armed and dangerous. They don't care if you have a gun on the otherside of the door. They WANT you to be holding it when they chuck a flashbang thru your fucking windows, so they can all enthusiastically empty their mags.

Cops are also trained, that if ONE officer discharges a weapon in the direction of a suspect, all others must let off some rounds as well.... do you know why? Idiots.

HEROES
AHHHAHAHHHHAHAHAHA

Why are all the people against this so eager to let cops enter houses illegally?

These Laws have been on the books for some time from the Supreme Court, and the State Supreme Courts.

"Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”

“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.

“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.

“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.

“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).

“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).

“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).

“Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his own writings, he had admitted that ‘a situation could arise in which the checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.’ There would be no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded, ‘If there be any remedy at all ... it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.’ That was the ‘ultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.’” (From Mutiny on the Amistad by Howard Jones, Oxford University Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court.

That might just be the best thing I have read today.

Thanks for posting it Zombie First Reponder!

I do not have to respect anyone who does not EARN it.

Exactly. Why are cops entitled to this idol worship?

Because they choose the job?

Firefighters deserve respect. For their job is putting their lives on the line to help others.

Cops kill family dogs that are in kennels, and homeless folks for the fun of it. Enough said.

Cops killing family dogs, and the homeless is going to come to an end very shortly now. In fact, cops are going to be as they should be very soon, as all Government should be, and is going to be.

Afraid of the People. As the founding fathers recommended.

Our servants.

We only need to look at the past to see what happens when servants get out of line.

The office demands respect. Idiots can't seperate the office from the person.

An officer is a administrator for the laws of the people. He is duly sworn to uphold the laws that the poeple have decided by their represetitives for all of us. This demands respect. The Officer represents we the governed and no single individual is above that office.

An officer wh steps unlawfully outside the laws of the people then has stepped down from his office and is no longer an administrator of the people.

This however never negates the respect for the office of a police officer. It is not earned, it is inherent.

Lets hope their "fellow officers" Protect us from these types.

I suggest no violence...Make Love not war with your own countryman

Wrong. It's earned.

People generalize and they are stupid.

Your head is stuck so fucking far up your ass that it's truly amazing.

Heroes? HEROES? Are you fucking KIDDING ME?!

Being governed is by Consent. An Officer is actually a Statue Citizen, which is the lowest on the totem pole.

Government derives its power from the delegation of it, from the People.

So who is governed?

Do you understand that word?

It means limited, restricted.

That is the reason for the Constitution, it is restrictions on Government.

The only restriction you and I have is where one or the others Rights begin, and both of our end.

Meaning, we can do what we please, as long as we dont violate the rights of others. Meaning basically, that we dont bring harm to anyone else, or their property.

That is the only true Law that the People must follow.

Government officials on the other hand are subject to all Laws, Statues, and Codes. That is what the government is there for, to govern themselves. That is why the 3 branches of Government are there as well, to Govern the Government, which 'serves' the People.

If you dont believe that, then read ALL of the founding documents, specifically the Federalist Papers and Anti Federalist papers, and then the correspondence of the founding fathers to each other, to see the thoughts spurring the documents.

Probably.
I have amnesia. I woke up in a hospital, and couldn't remember a thing. Seems the world went to hell while I was in a coma.