Vaccinated children have up to 500% more disease than unvaccinated children

“Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity.” – Marshall McCluhan

Caners is a hoax just like vaccines. Cancer is man made and easy to cure.

You folks do know that doctor get kickbacks from the pharma companies for selling drugs and vaccines? The more drugs they sell, the bigger bonus they get. That's why they never heal, just prescribe more toxins to create more problems to prescribe more toxins. It's good business.

Follow the money.

Kook boy, link doesn't work.
I bet you cant show scientifically that they are indeed
the same thing.

Look it up yourself, old fart. You must believe that military service is still done with spears...

Here, uselss bum! you are too stupid to even google it up!

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

"...the development of modern ventilators and widespread use of tracheal intubation and tracheotomy, the iron lung has virtually disappeared from modern medicine..."

I was fortunate enough to have great parents who refused to vaccinate me. I almost never get sick. Maybe once every few years and it's usually after getting very little sleep over a week or 2 and drinking and smoking lots during that time. The best thing you can do for your children is to not vaccinate them and breastfeed.

I don't need to look it up myself you made the assertion. The proof is on you. So prove it or I take your comment as BS. Show me a study where the people using those devices
were diagnosed with the polio virus in their system.
otherwise you're talking poop I'm afraid.

Let's see...

AP Report: Fewer Kids Being Vaccinated in Schools

[link to www.educationnews.org]

"...Exemption seekers are often middle-class, college-educated white people..."

OWNED!!!

It's the undereducated rednecks like yourself who buy the pharma sales pitch for ignornts and jab their kids.

Pre-1960 "polio" was not diagnosed with any virus because no virus diagnosing technology was available at the time, stupid ignorant!

Pre-1960 "polio" was ANYTHING that caused paralysis and doctors couldn't put a finger on the cause. Today all those "polio" illnesses are called FLACCID PARALYSIS.

What is a total ignrant of science and history doing discussing an issue like this?

Pre-1960 "polio" was not diagnosed with any virus because no virus diagnosing technology was available at the time, stupid ignorant!



So polio is not polio WTF?

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
oh but they had identified the virus right?

Science now can easily detect the microbe in the body, so please show that study showing the microbe is responsible for causing the disease _now_ under the disguise of another disease. I wait for your reply..

Fantastic news - ours kids are unvaccinated and never get ill.

:)

No. You see each vaccination causes at least a mild retardation. They have a cumulative effect. But of course the poor sufferer is not aware of the effect.

I'm so sorry.

You refuse to get it, moron... Flaccid Paralisys is a BROADER concept, encompassing 11 paralyses with 11 different causes and ONE of them is poliovirus. They were all called "polio" prior to 1960.

After 1960 the term "polio" was RESTRICTED to flaccid paralisys ONLY if poliovirus was demonstrated in the patient.

You don't get it yet, retardo?

Science now can easily detect the microbe in the body, so please show that study showing the microbe is responsible for causing the disease _now_ under the disguise of another disease. I wait for your reply..

That was never my claim, moron... it's your red herring. My argument is the RESTICTION IN THE DEFINITION subsequent to introducing the vaccine.

Read and UNDERSTAND my argument then try to get out of the stupid loop.

I don't even understand why this is disputed. We already know that mercury isn't processed by the human body but suddenly when it's injected directly into you it's good for you.


Btw, I know from first hand experience the dangers of vaccinations. I was paralyzed and had to re learn how to walk at the age of five after a simple flu vaccination. The doctors assured us there was no connection...

The same doctors that peddle vaccines but refuse to vaccine their own kids:

TV Dr. Oz Admits HE WILL NEVER VACCINATE HIS OWN KIDS

[link to www.youtube.com]

There are a couple of links in the Op that do not work>
[link to journal.livingfood.us]

[link to journal.livingfood.us]

vaccines + years of trans fat and sugar = cancer

Anyone still on the fence or not convinced by all the brilliant posts supporting the NON VACCINATION pathway, should avail themselves of this video, and this is just one of many that I will post if need be:



here's a link to her website:

[link to www.reversingvaccineinduceddiseases.com]

Last Edited by UseLessRepEATER on 06/19/2012 04:38 PM

That was never my claim, moron... it's your red herring. My argument is the RESTICTION IN THE DEFINITION subsequent to introducing the vaccine.

Read and UNDERSTAND my argument then try to get out of the stupid loop.


It was your claim by implication liar boy. and it is intrinsic to your argument.


Science now can easily detect the microbe in the body, so please show that study showing the microbe is responsible for causing the disease _now_ under the disguise of another disease. I wait for your reply..

They vaccinate one-day old newborns for Hep-B--it's a fucking travesty.

When the nurse at the hospital gave me a "you're a poor mother" attitude for refusing to allow them to vaccinate my daughter, I was infuriated.

For your information liar boy :-

Everytime you peddle your BS I am going to post that question to you.

Implication in your austistic world.

It's so simple that only a retard cannot figure it out:

1. Pre-1960: Broad definition of "polio" as any Flaccid Paralysis independently of their cause (11 known causes today):

“…Signs and symptoms of nonparalytic poliomyelitis with the addition of partial or complete paralysis of one or more muscle groups, detected on two examinations at least 24 hours apart.”[1, p. 88] (NO CAUSE MENTIONED)

2. Post-1960: "polio" gets restricted to Flaccid Paralyses where poliovirus is demonstratred:

“..Paralytic poliomyelitis may be clinically suspected in individuals experiencing acute onset of flaccid paralysis that cannot be attributed to another apparent cause. A laboratory diagnosis is usually made based on recovery of pliovirus from a stool sample or a swab…” [2]

3. Today, Flaccid Paralyises go as rampant as the pre-1960 "polio" went.

You'll never be able to get it in your lifetime, moron, but who gives a shit?


[1] The Present Status of Polio Vaccines (a panel discussion), Illinois Medical Journal, August, 1960.

[2] A Conversation with Paul Meier, Harry M. Marks. Clinical Trials 2004, 1, 131.
[link to www.hopkinsmedicine.org]

Here's another great interview with Dr. Tenpenny being interviewed by Mike Adams, the editor of Natural News and is truly the "Health Ranger".:

Nothing found at the health impact news link....
Removed?

Wouldn't be surprised at all about this.

I remember when I was ooh about Five years old... er atleast around that age and would always visit with my dad to a friend of his who had a farm. Never was allergic to the animals there( cows, dogs, horses,etc.) Then bam few years later went to visit a horse barn with my brother and had to worst allergy attack I've ever had due to the hay and horses.
Never figured out how I'd ended up with allergies when I've spent most of my early years around animals and farms without them then suddenly have them come up just like that.

I've always had my vaccines on time when I was growing up.
I guess was in 2004 when I was meant to get one for a vocational lab class but didn't was when I stopped getting them.

Unfortunately for children... some vaccines are mandatory for school, so it's no wonder that there's that many.

You are diverting again. You never answered my question, anti-vac wacko. I can quote polio papers off pubmed all day.
Why not answer my question? Your argument even contradicts
itself which is funny.