"you're being psychopathic by claiming that that is what christianity teaches and that that is what every christian does." In this statement I differentiated between the institutions and the persons, you understand that? I defended the institution of Christianity by claiming that what he was saying was not what Christianity teaches, understand? I also defended the individuals claiming that what he was saying is not one of their beliefs. Of course we can judge institutions by what they teach certainly Nazism is not good, but are you going to condemn a 9 year Hitler youth for being a Hitler youth when that is what s/he was raised to understand. I would hope not, you would decry the institution but not condemn the child, you'd hope to re-educate the child. Also this is what I've been trying to get at this whole time, how can we judge the individuals of the illuminati if we don't know who they are, and if they are a secret religion or "have secrets" how can we judge their institution.

"The problem you run into is that in order to be in any of these three religions, and a good and decent person, YOU MUST OBEY THEIR BOOKS." - this claim is complete nonsense, you are demonstrating that you actually do not understand these religions at all. For example, in the Catholic Church private interpretation of scripture is expressly forbidden. There are actually only two English translations and commentaries that have recieved full approval (meaning the commentary was approved with the translations) Unless you've read the 1582 Douay Rheims with annotations or the 2006 Navarre, you haven't even come close to understanding what the institution of the Catholic Church teaches... you'd also have to read 21 church councils to understand this. Also, it is a part of the Catholic faith that there can be conflicts between an individual's conscience and church teaching that are acceptable to the church. It is the same with Lutheranism, Calvinism, Evangelicals, various sects of Judaism and various sects of Islam as well.

Also you need to understand that sometimes people do things in the name of an institution that they don't belong to or that they don't represent. For instance there was recently a girl on youtube who said she was christian and was thanking God for all the Japanese that were killed in the tsunami. The video went viral and she later came out and admitted she was an atheist troll to stop the hate coming at her. Now am I supposed to declare that what this girl is doing represents all atheists and claim that Dawkins' book "The God Delusion" teaches this or that kids learn this behavior in Evolutionary theory class or should I read Dawkins' book, take an evolutionary theory class and then decide she was acting on her own and should be judged on her own? Also, should I judge christianity based on her initial video or also perhaps study it first?