Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013 | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 13061469 United States 06/19/2012 08:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17689295 United States 06/19/2012 08:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 13061469 United States 06/19/2012 08:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What happened to the catastrophic situation happening on 12 21 12.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17689295 They discuss that, just listen and read it. The first target dates were June 1, 2008, where all of the blind sessions indicated normal societal activities. The second target date was June 1, 2013. Here we find a chaotic scene of the aftermath of meteor strikes and tsunamis worldwide. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 13061469 United States 06/19/2012 08:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 13061469 United States 06/19/2012 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 13061469 United States 06/19/2012 08:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ladyannie2009 User ID: 16637469 United States 06/19/2012 09:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've only recently started reading about remote viewing, and although I've not found any solid proof that the concept works or doesn't work, it is VERY interesting. The first link OP listed (splicd.com) is interesting. I had listened to this last night. Over 2 hr interview, but worth it if you're wanting to learn more. Lady interviewing is annoying, but if you can stand her voice, has a lot of information. I noticed something strange while listening to it. At around the 1:55:00 mark, the guys voice changes. It's subtle if you're not paying attention, but I felt it was VERY telling. If you don't have time for the entire interview and only wanna listen to that part, you may wanna back it up about 5-7 mins so you know what he's talking about, but this is the jist: Lady interviewer asking him about his targets he chose for the remote viewing, then he starts explaining how the process is done. There's a point when she asks him specifically about Yellowstone, and he explains that he had mostly chosen coastal areas, and that Yellowstone was not one of his targets. He talks a cpl more minutes. Then she asks him about California and what he/his remote viewers seen in the future pertaining to California coastline. It was during the few sentences after her question that made me back up and listen to it a few more times. When he answered, his voice stammered...then a little bit of stuttering. And then he said no, he hadn't viewed California. His voice to that point had been very rhythmic, and then all of a sudden on the Cali question, it changed. Does it mean anything? Maybe yes. Maybe no. But to me....seemed like he wasn't being 100% truthful. Not lying but definitely holding information back. I've got that 'mom radar' and to me, it sorta sounded like my teenagers do when they're trying to feed me some load of hogwash. Anyone else hear that? Wld love other opinions. "the truth will stand up, when nothing else will" - annie's mom "When a great ship is in harbor and moored, it is safe, there can be no doubt. But that is not what great ships are built for." - Dr. Clarissa Pinkola Estes |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17963035 Thailand 06/19/2012 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Listen to 10-minute interview with Emory University professor Courtney Brown, Ph.D. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13061469 [link to www.splicd.com] Read more here: [link to farsight.org] Get your ass back in line we still have plenty of 2012 doom to sort through. This isnt Walmart where you can jump the line anytime you feel the need. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12817237 United States 06/19/2012 09:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've only recently started reading about remote viewing, and although I've not found any solid proof that the concept works or doesn't work, it is VERY interesting. Quoting: ladyannie2009 The first link OP listed (splicd.com) is interesting. I had listened to this last night. Over 2 hr interview, but worth it if you're wanting to learn more. Lady interviewing is annoying, but if you can stand her voice, has a lot of information. I noticed something strange while listening to it. At around the 1:55:00 mark, the guys voice changes. It's subtle if you're not paying attention, but I felt it was VERY telling. If you don't have time for the entire interview and only wanna listen to that part, you may wanna back it up about 5-7 mins so you know what he's talking about, but this is the jist: Lady interviewer asking him about his targets he chose for the remote viewing, then he starts explaining how the process is done. There's a point when she asks him specifically about Yellowstone, and he explains that he had mostly chosen coastal areas, and that Yellowstone was not one of his targets. He talks a cpl more minutes. Then she asks him about California and what he/his remote viewers seen in the future pertaining to California coastline. It was during the few sentences after her question that made me back up and listen to it a few more times. When he answered, his voice stammered...then a little bit of stuttering. And then he said no, he hadn't viewed California. His voice to that point had been very rhythmic, and then all of a sudden on the Cali question, it changed. Does it mean anything? Maybe yes. Maybe no. But to me....seemed like he wasn't being 100% truthful. Not lying but definitely holding information back. I've got that 'mom radar' and to me, it sorta sounded like my teenagers do when they're trying to feed me some load of hogwash. Anyone else hear that? Wld love other opinions. Listened to the video a couple of nights ago. I sensed possible deception when he was asked about Cali.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18225132 Brazil 06/19/2012 09:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18107423 United States 06/19/2012 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anne O'Mally User ID: 8512443 United States 06/19/2012 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Listen to 10-minute interview with Emory University professor Courtney Brown, Ph.D. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13061469 [link to www.splicd.com] Read more here: [link to farsight.org] Get your ass back in line we still have plenty of 2012 doom to sort through. This isnt Walmart where you can jump the line anytime you feel the need. uhm...these events they see happen BY june 1 2013. for the millionth time in this thread. the way it is described, it happened significantly before, as everything is already destroyed and people are foraging, which means they've made it through the first and most difficult part: immediate survival. fun stuff. :) worth my weight in squirrels. |
User ID: 3198332 User ID: 3198332 United Kingdom 06/19/2012 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 13061469 United States 06/19/2012 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Listen to 10-minute interview with Emory University professor Courtney Brown, Ph.D. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13061469 [link to www.splicd.com] Read more here: [link to farsight.org] Get your ass back in line we still have plenty of 2012 doom to sort through. This isnt Walmart where you can jump the line anytime you feel the need. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17865384 United States 06/19/2012 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18107423 United States 06/19/2012 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've only recently started reading about remote viewing, and although I've not found any solid proof that the concept works or doesn't work, it is VERY interesting. Quoting: ladyannie2009 The first link OP listed (splicd.com) is interesting. I had listened to this last night. Over 2 hr interview, but worth it if you're wanting to learn more. Lady interviewing is annoying, but if you can stand her voice, has a lot of information. I noticed something strange while listening to it. At around the 1:55:00 mark, the guys voice changes. It's subtle if you're not paying attention, but I felt it was VERY telling. If you don't have time for the entire interview and only wanna listen to that part, you may wanna back it up about 5-7 mins so you know what he's talking about, but this is the jist: Lady interviewer asking him about his targets he chose for the remote viewing, then he starts explaining how the process is done. There's a point when she asks him specifically about Yellowstone, and he explains that he had mostly chosen coastal areas, and that Yellowstone was not one of his targets. He talks a cpl more minutes. Then she asks him about California and what he/his remote viewers seen in the future pertaining to California coastline. It was during the few sentences after her question that made me back up and listen to it a few more times. When he answered, his voice stammered...then a little bit of stuttering. And then he said no, he hadn't viewed California. His voice to that point had been very rhythmic, and then all of a sudden on the Cali question, it changed. Does it mean anything? Maybe yes. Maybe no. But to me....seemed like he wasn't being 100% truthful. Not lying but definitely holding information back. I've got that 'mom radar' and to me, it sorta sounded like my teenagers do when they're trying to feed me some load of hogwash. Anyone else hear that? Wld love other opinions. The reason is very likely that his "team" of "viewers" had already "viewed" multiple California destruction earthquake dates and none of them happened. He keeps removing failures from his website but there are plenty of copies around. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 13061469 United States 06/19/2012 09:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1025215 United States 06/19/2012 09:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 13061469 United States 06/19/2012 09:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17468420 Mexico 06/19/2012 09:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Allow me to explain.... A bout 3-4 years ago, there was talk that RVérs couldn;t see beyond 2012 as there was a major blockage outage whatage ever you want, that prevented anyone form seeing beyond 2012. If they can do this now, then either the 2012 hoax is a hoax, or the rv'ing hoax is a hoax. Which is your poison? |
superfluous moon User ID: 1307911 Australia 06/19/2012 09:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17865384 United States 06/19/2012 10:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Allow me to explain.... A bout 3-4 years ago, there was talk that RVérs couldn;t see beyond 2012 as there was a major blockage outage whatage ever you want, that prevented anyone form seeing beyond 2012. If they can do this now, then either the 2012 hoax is a hoax, or the rv'ing hoax is a hoax. Which is your poison? That's a decent point, but I'm not sure if it's an absolute. ------ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18107423 United States 06/19/2012 10:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Allow me to explain.... A bout 3-4 years ago, there was talk that RVérs couldn;t see beyond 2012 as there was a major blockage outage whatage ever you want, that prevented anyone form seeing beyond 2012. If they can do this now, then either the 2012 hoax is a hoax, or the rv'ing hoax is a hoax. Which is your poison? Both actually |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9503710 United States 06/19/2012 10:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 13061469 United States 06/19/2012 10:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Allow me to explain.... A bout 3-4 years ago, there was talk that RVérs couldn;t see beyond 2012 as there was a major blockage outage whatage ever you want, that prevented anyone form seeing beyond 2012. If they can do this now, then either the 2012 hoax is a hoax, or the rv'ing hoax is a hoax. Which is your poison? Hmmmmm...... Interesting... |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 13061469 United States 06/19/2012 10:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5073312 United States 06/19/2012 10:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anne O'Mally User ID: 8512443 United States 06/19/2012 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Load up on seeds. I believe someone saw this being used as currency after this event. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5073312 yeah i keep thinking seeds too. for the naysayers, and i am not taking sides, consider this: i am watching the full version, and he explains that all of these RV'ers have a MINIMUM of ten years MILITARY training as remote viewers. special ops and more. so if remote viewing is such shit, why has our military been doing it for so long? worth my weight in squirrels. |
Anne O'Mally User ID: 8512443 United States 06/19/2012 10:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Remote Viewing History & Information Your knowledge source for Remote Viewing facts, documents, and training information. [link to www.militaryremoteviewers.com] [link to www.remoteviewed.com] A visual map of Remote Viewing history - showing people, methods, programs, schools & key milestones. The Military Use of RV, Stargate and the CIA FOIA documents The CIA Star Gate FOIA files - Project Star Gate Project Star gate is the collective name for advanced psychic functioning or Remote viewing experiments and programs that were undertaken for over twenty years to create a trainable, repeatable, operational and if at all possible, accurate method of psychic spying or information gathering for the U.S. Military and intelligence agencies (CIA, NSA, DIA). [link to www.remoteviewed.com] Last Edited by Anne O'Mally on 06/19/2012 10:15 PM worth my weight in squirrels. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18259530 United States 06/20/2012 12:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |