Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,758 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 772,926
Pageviews Today: 1,253,456Threads Today: 505Posts Today: 7,641
01:18 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13061469
United States
06/19/2012 08:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
Listen to 10-minute interview with Emory University professor Courtney Brown, Ph.D.

[link to www.splicd.com]


Read more here:

[link to farsight.org]



popcorn
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13061469
United States
06/19/2012 08:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17689295
United States
06/19/2012 08:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
What happened to the catastrophic situation happening on 12 21 12....
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13061469
United States
06/19/2012 08:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
What happened to the catastrophic situation happening on 12 21 12....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17689295




They discuss that, just listen and read it.

The first target dates were June 1, 2008, where all of the blind sessions indicated normal societal activities.

The second target date was June 1, 2013. Here we find a chaotic scene of the aftermath of meteor strikes and tsunamis worldwide.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13061469
United States
06/19/2012 08:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
I think some are absorbing this information before they post.

Good.

This is a blind scientific study, multiple results revealing nearly identical results.



bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13061469
United States
06/19/2012 08:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
I'm thinking One Second After, with multiple causes, natural and/or otherwise(?)

Heed the disclaimer. He clearly states more than once that this is not a prediction, just the data that resulted from their work.


hiding
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13061469
United States
06/19/2012 08:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
bump
ladyannie2009

User ID: 16637469
United States
06/19/2012 09:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
I've only recently started reading about remote viewing, and although I've not found any solid proof that the concept works or doesn't work, it is VERY interesting.

The first link OP listed (splicd.com) is interesting. I had listened to this last night. Over 2 hr interview, but worth it if you're wanting to learn more. Lady interviewing is annoying, but if you can stand her voice, has a lot of information.

I noticed something strange while listening to it. At around the 1:55:00 mark, the guys voice changes. It's subtle if you're not paying attention, but I felt it was VERY telling. If you don't have time for the entire interview and only wanna listen to that part, you may wanna back it up about 5-7 mins so you know what he's talking about, but this is the jist:

Lady interviewer asking him about his targets he chose for the remote viewing, then he starts explaining how the process is done.

There's a point when she asks him specifically about Yellowstone, and he explains that he had mostly chosen coastal areas, and that Yellowstone was not one of his targets.

He talks a cpl more minutes. Then she asks him about California and what he/his remote viewers seen in the future pertaining to California coastline.

It was during the few sentences after her question that made me back up and listen to it a few more times.

When he answered, his voice stammered...then a little bit of stuttering. And then he said no, he hadn't viewed California.

His voice to that point had been very rhythmic, and then all of a sudden on the Cali question, it changed.

Does it mean anything? Maybe yes. Maybe no. But to me....seemed like he wasn't being 100% truthful. Not lying but definitely holding information back. I've got that 'mom radar' and to me, it sorta sounded like my teenagers do when they're trying to feed me some load of hogwash.

Anyone else hear that? Wld love other opinions.
"the truth will stand up, when nothing else will"
- annie's mom

"When a great ship is in harbor and moored, it is safe, there can be no doubt. But that is not what great ships are built for."
- Dr. Clarissa Pinkola Estes
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17963035
Thailand
06/19/2012 09:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
Listen to 10-minute interview with Emory University professor Courtney Brown, Ph.D.

[link to www.splicd.com]


Read more here:

[link to farsight.org]



popcorn
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13061469


Get your ass back in line we still have plenty of 2012 doom to sort through. This isnt Walmart where you can jump the line anytime you feel the need.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12817237
United States
06/19/2012 09:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
I've only recently started reading about remote viewing, and although I've not found any solid proof that the concept works or doesn't work, it is VERY interesting.

The first link OP listed (splicd.com) is interesting. I had listened to this last night. Over 2 hr interview, but worth it if you're wanting to learn more. Lady interviewing is annoying, but if you can stand her voice, has a lot of information.

I noticed something strange while listening to it. At around the 1:55:00 mark, the guys voice changes. It's subtle if you're not paying attention, but I felt it was VERY telling. If you don't have time for the entire interview and only wanna listen to that part, you may wanna back it up about 5-7 mins so you know what he's talking about, but this is the jist:

Lady interviewer asking him about his targets he chose for the remote viewing, then he starts explaining how the process is done.

There's a point when she asks him specifically about Yellowstone, and he explains that he had mostly chosen coastal areas, and that Yellowstone was not one of his targets.

He talks a cpl more minutes. Then she asks him about California and what he/his remote viewers seen in the future pertaining to California coastline.

It was during the few sentences after her question that made me back up and listen to it a few more times.

When he answered, his voice stammered...then a little bit of stuttering. And then he said no, he hadn't viewed California.

His voice to that point had been very rhythmic, and then all of a sudden on the Cali question, it changed.

Does it mean anything? Maybe yes. Maybe no. But to me....seemed like he wasn't being 100% truthful. Not lying but definitely holding information back. I've got that 'mom radar' and to me, it sorta sounded like my teenagers do when they're trying to feed me some load of hogwash.

Anyone else hear that? Wld love other opinions.
 Quoting: ladyannie2009


Listened to the video a couple of nights ago.

I sensed possible deception when he was asked about Cali....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18225132
Brazil
06/19/2012 09:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
My ass!


If January 2, 2013, arrives, and everything is normal, then NOTHING WILL EVER HAPPEN!

January 2, 2013 is the limit.

After that, I will never come to GLP again, and will live a normal life, without fear of any doom.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18107423
United States
06/19/2012 09:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
I think some are absorbing this information before they post.

Good.

This is a blind scientific study, multiple results revealing nearly identical results.



bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13061469


they were split 50 50 and they have a worse track record for accuracy than Ed Dames.
Anne O'Mally

User ID: 8512443
United States
06/19/2012 09:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
Listen to 10-minute interview with Emory University professor Courtney Brown, Ph.D.

[link to www.splicd.com]


Read more here:

[link to farsight.org]



popcorn
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13061469


Get your ass back in line we still have plenty of 2012 doom to sort through. This isnt Walmart where you can jump the line anytime you feel the need.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17963035


uhm...these events they see happen BY june 1 2013. for the millionth time in this thread.

the way it is described, it happened significantly before, as everything is already destroyed and people are foraging, which means they've made it through the first and most difficult part: immediate survival.

fun stuff. :)
worth my weight in squirrels.
User ID: 3198332

User ID: 3198332
United Kingdom
06/19/2012 09:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
RVing is BS.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13061469
United States
06/19/2012 09:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
Listen to 10-minute interview with Emory University professor Courtney Brown, Ph.D.

[link to www.splicd.com]


Read more here:

[link to farsight.org]



popcorn
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13061469


Get your ass back in line we still have plenty of 2012 doom to sort through. This isnt Walmart where you can jump the line anytime you feel the need.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17963035




cruise
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17865384
United States
06/19/2012 09:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
RVing is BS.
 Quoting: User ID: 3198332


How can you be so sure?


------
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18107423
United States
06/19/2012 09:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
I've only recently started reading about remote viewing, and although I've not found any solid proof that the concept works or doesn't work, it is VERY interesting.

The first link OP listed (splicd.com) is interesting. I had listened to this last night. Over 2 hr interview, but worth it if you're wanting to learn more. Lady interviewing is annoying, but if you can stand her voice, has a lot of information.

I noticed something strange while listening to it. At around the 1:55:00 mark, the guys voice changes. It's subtle if you're not paying attention, but I felt it was VERY telling. If you don't have time for the entire interview and only wanna listen to that part, you may wanna back it up about 5-7 mins so you know what he's talking about, but this is the jist:

Lady interviewer asking him about his targets he chose for the remote viewing, then he starts explaining how the process is done.

There's a point when she asks him specifically about Yellowstone, and he explains that he had mostly chosen coastal areas, and that Yellowstone was not one of his targets.

He talks a cpl more minutes. Then she asks him about California and what he/his remote viewers seen in the future pertaining to California coastline.

It was during the few sentences after her question that made me back up and listen to it a few more times.

When he answered, his voice stammered...then a little bit of stuttering. And then he said no, he hadn't viewed California.

His voice to that point had been very rhythmic, and then all of a sudden on the Cali question, it changed.

Does it mean anything? Maybe yes. Maybe no. But to me....seemed like he wasn't being 100% truthful. Not lying but definitely holding information back. I've got that 'mom radar' and to me, it sorta sounded like my teenagers do when they're trying to feed me some load of hogwash.

Anyone else hear that? Wld love other opinions.
 Quoting: ladyannie2009


The reason is very likely that his "team" of "viewers" had already "viewed" multiple California destruction earthquake dates and none of them happened.

He keeps removing failures from his website but there are plenty of copies around.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13061469
United States
06/19/2012 09:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
RVing is BS.
 Quoting: User ID: 3198332


How can you be so sure?


------
 Quoting: BOWMAN




SHAMELESS bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1025215
United States
06/19/2012 09:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
this is just stupid.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13061469
United States
06/19/2012 09:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
this is just stupid.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1025215








verysad
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17468420
Mexico
06/19/2012 09:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
RVing is BS.
 Quoting: User ID: 3198332


How can you be so sure?


------
 Quoting: BOWMAN


Allow me to explain....

A bout 3-4 years ago, there was talk that RVérs couldn;t see beyond 2012 as there was a major blockage outage whatage ever you want, that prevented anyone form seeing beyond 2012.

If they can do this now, then either the 2012 hoax is a hoax, or the rv'ing hoax is a hoax.

Which is your poison?
superfluous moon
User ID: 1307911
Australia
06/19/2012 09:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
its my bday june 1 so i guess i'll party like its the end of the world......
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17865384
United States
06/19/2012 10:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
RVing is BS.
 Quoting: User ID: 3198332


How can you be so sure?


------
 Quoting: BOWMAN


Allow me to explain....

A bout 3-4 years ago, there was talk that RVérs couldn;t see beyond 2012 as there was a major blockage outage whatage ever you want, that prevented anyone form seeing beyond 2012.

If they can do this now, then either the 2012 hoax is a hoax, or the rv'ing hoax is a hoax.

Which is your poison?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17468420


That's a decent point, but I'm not sure if it's an absolute.


------
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18107423
United States
06/19/2012 10:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
RVing is BS.
 Quoting: User ID: 3198332


How can you be so sure?


------
 Quoting: BOWMAN


Allow me to explain....

A bout 3-4 years ago, there was talk that RVérs couldn;t see beyond 2012 as there was a major blockage outage whatage ever you want, that prevented anyone form seeing beyond 2012.

If they can do this now, then either the 2012 hoax is a hoax, or the rv'ing hoax is a hoax.

Which is your poison?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17468420


Both actually
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9503710
United States
06/19/2012 10:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
Know what I see.. bsflag
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13061469
United States
06/19/2012 10:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
RVing is BS.
 Quoting: User ID: 3198332


How can you be so sure?


------
 Quoting: BOWMAN


Allow me to explain....

A bout 3-4 years ago, there was talk that RVérs couldn;t see beyond 2012 as there was a major blockage outage whatage ever you want, that prevented anyone form seeing beyond 2012.

If they can do this now, then either the 2012 hoax is a hoax, or the rv'ing hoax is a hoax.

Which is your poison?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17468420





Hmmmmm...... Interesting...
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13061469
United States
06/19/2012 10:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5073312
United States
06/19/2012 10:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
Load up on seeds. I believe someone saw this being used as currency after this event.


bump
Anne O'Mally

User ID: 8512443
United States
06/19/2012 10:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
Load up on seeds. I believe someone saw this being used as currency after this event.


bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5073312


yeah i keep thinking seeds too.

for the naysayers, and i am not taking sides, consider this:

i am watching the full version, and he explains that all of these RV'ers have a MINIMUM of ten years MILITARY training as remote viewers. special ops and more.

so if remote viewing is such shit, why has our military been doing it for so long?
worth my weight in squirrels.
Anne O'Mally

User ID: 8512443
United States
06/19/2012 10:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
Remote Viewing History & Information
Your knowledge source for Remote Viewing
facts, documents, and training information.

[link to www.militaryremoteviewers.com]

[link to www.remoteviewed.com]

A visual map of Remote Viewing history
- showing people, methods, programs, schools & key milestones.


The Military Use of RV, Stargate and the CIA FOIA documents

The CIA Star Gate FOIA files - Project Star Gate

Project Star gate is the collective name for advanced psychic functioning or Remote viewing experiments and programs that were undertaken for over twenty years to create a trainable, repeatable, operational and if at all possible, accurate method of psychic spying or information gathering for the U.S. Military and intelligence agencies (CIA, NSA, DIA).


[link to www.remoteviewed.com]

Last Edited by Anne O'Mally on 06/19/2012 10:15 PM
worth my weight in squirrels.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18259530
United States
06/20/2012 12:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
Load up on seeds. I believe someone saw this being used as currency after this event.


bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5073312




Agreed.


hf





GLP