Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013

Great thread.

Better prepare peeps.

Our electrical grid is comin down. Make sure you have food, water and protection...

Read "One Second After"

It can happen.

Remote viewing is not only possible, it is the next sense that you will develop (if you haven't already) in the near future.

Yup. Just read One Second After over the weekend.. Whew...

The ending is sad but we must know what may confront us.

Not another date yet again on GLP for fucks sake it's always the same on this crappy site date after fucking date where nothing ever happens.

They should try remote viewing a non-disaster 2013 future just to see what's there

What if we're not even on that disaster timeline anymore, what if ETs decided in 2009 to save our butts in 2013?

Or what if you only get into a disaster timeline by expecting one.

I've only recently started reading about remote viewing, and although I've not found any solid proof that the concept works or doesn't work, it is VERY interesting.

The first link OP listed (splicd.com) is interesting. I had listened to this last night. Over 2 hr interview, but worth it if you're wanting to learn more. Lady interviewing is annoying, but if you can stand her voice, has a lot of information.

I noticed something strange while listening to it. At around the 1:55:00 mark, the guys voice changes. It's subtle if you're not paying attention, but I felt it was VERY telling. If you don't have time for the entire interview and only wanna listen to that part, you may wanna back it up about 5-7 mins so you know what he's talking about, but this is the jist:

Lady interviewer asking him about his targets he chose for the remote viewing, then he starts explaining how the process is done.

There's a point when she asks him specifically about Yellowstone, and he explains that he had mostly chosen coastal areas, and that Yellowstone was not one of his targets.

He talks a cpl more minutes. Then she asks him about California and what he/his remote viewers seen in the future pertaining to California coastline.

It was during the few sentences after her question that made me back up and listen to it a few more times.

When he answered, his voice stammered...then a little bit of stuttering. And then he said no, he hadn't viewed California.

His voice to that point had been very rhythmic, and then all of a sudden on the Cali question, it changed.

Does it mean anything? Maybe yes. Maybe no. But to me....seemed like he wasn't being 100% truthful. Not lying but definitely holding information back. I've got that 'mom radar' and to me, it sorta sounded like my teenagers do when they're trying to feed me some load of hogwash.

Anyone else hear that? Wld love other opinions.

for all those that think remote veiwings BS.

please watch this and learn something.

at 10min approx he talks about remote veiwing experiments run by the C/A

At approx 28.30sec he talks about a man called Sean Harribance, who they say they used to locate Saddam in his cave etc.

The vid explains how these type things work.

For all those that say professors etc will laugh at Rving, try argue that with the people at Laurentian in Canada.

get educated properly before you discredit stuff.