Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,026 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,083,345
Pageviews Today: 1,955,565Threads Today: 862Posts Today: 15,039
10:05 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject NEW message from a DHS insider...copy and paste this, they are actively going from one site to the next and taking them offline.
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
We've been right all along and this confirms it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1533318


when ye believe ye have the "truth" damn near anything proves it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7810219


i confess, i have only been on GLP since the fukushima event. and i was scared shitless. i have gone through the gamut of the fear cycle, and recently just removed all of my groups and affiliations because i grew out of it and can't be bothered re-inventing the wheel for those who still choose to fearmonger and by so doing, spread disinfo based on paranoid BS. we have our 'right' and our 'left' info sources, and both have proven to be biased and full of crap in most instances. lack of bias in modern journalism is a rare and wonderful thing.

to me, this article, regardless of ambiguity, gives us some answers that make sense. we know there's all kinds of top secret stuff going on, we know the information is being suppressed and lies are told. 'twas ever thus.

"“Also, this group is often proactive in terms of mitigating potential threats. Their process is to ‘identify, infiltrate, disrupt, marginalize and ultimately, destroy.’” The last part, “destroy,” got my attention. Asking how, my source provided a rather vague answer. “In the most efficient manner possible. The tactics vary. You couldn’t just take down the Drudge website, for example, but things could be done to weaken its effectiveness in a number of areas. Remember, the infrastructure of the internet is being more tightly controlled. Look at the proposed legislation. What do you think that’s for? And it also depends on the nature of the [political] threat.”"

HERE are your shills. ask yourself why they are so heavy on GLP. and how it is that GLP is so spot on with many of the things discussed in the article.
 Quoting: Anne O'Mally

yep, glp nails it many times. that does not make any of the threads "truth". even if they make sense, it does not convert to "truth". been my experience folks who claim to have the "truth" really just want ye to stop thinking. and that was and is my only objection to the op. the claim that is was all proven truth. that is where my disagreement comes from. it may well be "true" but what i read was not proven, just stated. i've not seen evidence to "prove" it and i reserve the right to use my own bullshit meter....

don't like using fear myself. it sure persuades a lot of folks, but i don't like fear. smacks of control. for any single item there are always other possibilities and interpretations. i'm not in a position to know which, if any, are true but i do know fear sells nearly as much as sex.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP