Smoking Gun NASA UFO footage proven Legit!

more of the same things leaving the earths atmosphere (rare footage)-

[link to www.youtube.com]

As a registered user, you will probably suffer a few karma kicks in the ass for this

[link to www.youtube.com]

HMMM NO MASS SIGHTINGS HUH?



1997 PHOENIX ARIZONA, very well documented

as well as...



1952 WASHINGTON, DC, probably one of the most documented mass sightings

and there are many more, and much more footage that simply can't be explained. perhaps this video is not legitimately a portrayal of ETs, but there is still thousands of much more unexplained occurrences and evidence.

this man...



consider the chances of ET life... even the drake equation, which is widely accepted by scientists, gives us a pretty high estimate even for life in our own galaxy. soon, we will probably find out it's elsewhere even in our solar system. billions of new galaxies are discovered all the time. there are now known to be multiple trillions of stars in our observable universe.

do you REALLY think the government wouldn't deny ET contact?

you think they wouldn't take measures to protect the information of their existence?

the information is all there, just dig deep enough

I think there is something more to be explained. It just isn't logical that that many UFO's are flying around above Earth if those are really UFO's. I am 100% certain that these are some sort of lens interference.

How come the dude from China isn't stupid enough to believe this shit?

And why say we are ALL doomed Dude from China how many of your friends believe this is UFO's? I'll bet....Zero

I believe in ufo's btw... this is just little yellow bus sort of stuff

Camera operation. Adjustments to accommodate nominal viewing of bright objects in the foreground, leaves any subtle star background lost to blackness.

now THIS is what GLP is all about.

5*

Glp's all about 2009?

This isn't the History Channel.

These are biological entities, they are silicon in nature, they work on a advanced thermal coupling with the surrounding space the volume. they have been found to travel into earth for sometime. they appear around North America and parts of North Europe the reason is for reproduction purposes.

we found one of these in our research long time ago, on a old lake in the united states south west of Texas . some of them appear to be a biological living cell some sort of space ship they have a crew of 3. short about 2.8 meters tall, medium arms, black eyes. their ship appears to always have a common design, a notch cutout within the next of their ships.

there are other types of biological entities we have encountered but they are very much classified in nature.

the Baltic sea anomaly is the prime example of their ship design and shape. over time when their ships appear to die, they turn into solid materials.


that is all i could tell you, because of the work i do

yep old as the hills...still good but

there's always one fuckstick^ in the room

wow. do you have a site/link ?

So where is Astroturd ?

We have to build our own rocket with cameras and send it up there.. for some moments at least..

I have no idea what it would cost.. but i would donate 100%

So the GAS makes the objects move round the other objects eh, an do u-turns eh?

he wouldnt touch this with a bargepole because he knows he would get owned.

production company OMG retards

y is this BS pinned

42 votes 7000 views WAKE UP RETARDS

An interesting article on it:
[link to www.viewzone.com]

Their irregular shape and organic appearance says to me that they probably aren't any kind of craft. So either the official explanation is true, or they are some kind of organic life form. What confuses me is that in certain footage they very clearly appear to move behind the tether.
Also, if they are just random debris, why are they all (roughly) the same shape?

What the fuck? This proves nothing. You come here showing a video of moving shit.. That could be ANYTHING.. Post a fuckin link or some shit from NASAs website or something..

Then I'd believe.

But posting some fuckin video of flying random shit that anyone can make doesnt prove anything..

So you'll believe a NASA video of moving shit, but not anyone elses video of moving shit?

Filmed in a deep water studio.
Keep paying the NAZA tax!

What's needed is a side by side comparison of the original footage with the new (trails added) footage. If it's from the original tether footage, that should be easy enough to do, and the individual trajectories can be compared frame by frame.

bullshit.

they are ice and debris, reminds something I shot with my video camera

unfocused lens and digital processing make funny artifacts, for example zoom into a plane up in the sky so that there is a radio mast in between and the plane may appear in FRONT of the mast, a friend of mine showed me a pic he took which looked like that

same applies to orbs that appear sometimes in digital photos, they are small particles out of focus, scattered light from the out of focus particle goes through a dozen of lens optics and scatters even more unexpected ways + the way rgb sensor algorithms sum up those bits in a matrix + jpeg compression on the top of that

you are looking inside photonics and processing algorithms, not real objects ... those objects are of course real but reflect laws of physics & math but not in the sense they are tangible objects of physical space