The Real Reason Barack Obama And Michele Lost Their Law License. | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 17893453 United States 06/22/2012 09:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Trbl Ivan User ID: 18258222 United States 06/22/2012 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to wiki.answers.com] Both of the Obamas decided to allow their licenses to lapse, since they were no longer going to be active lawyers; Barack ran for the presidency and Michelle focused on her family and being First Lady. However, it is a myth that there was some problem with either of their licenses; they simply allowed them to become inactive. It should be noted that since both the Obamas were lawyers in good standing, they could decide to renew the licenses and return to the practice of law at some future time. Another myth debunked. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. * |
Trbl Ivan User ID: 18258222 United States 06/22/2012 09:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, they simply didn't renew their licenses, what has to be done biannually. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Law practice licence renewal? Spending good chunk on money and life to get that licence...... bleh...who needs that stinking law license....lets simply dump the renewal notice in a trash... You people speak so lightly of war; you don't know what you're talking about. Sherman |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15433861 United States 06/22/2012 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to factcheck.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. * fuck you factcheck? a fucking bullshit commi dis-info site run by the DNC |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, they simply didn't renew their licenses, what has to be done biannually. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Law practice licence renewal? Spending good chunk on money and life to get that licence...... bleh...who needs that stinking law license....lets simply dump the renewal notice in a trash... Can't you even read, dumbfuck? [link to factcheck.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. * |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to factcheck.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. * fuck you factcheck? a fucking bullshit commi dis-info site run by the DNC Yeah and wiki.answers, snopes etc. etc. as well, suuuure [link to wiki.answers.com] [link to www.snopes.com] Cretin. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10783814 United States 06/22/2012 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to factcheck.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. * fuck you factcheck? a fucking bullshit commi dis-info site run by the DNC Give it up. There's no cure for that kind of stupid. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10783814 United States 06/22/2012 09:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to factcheck.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. * fuck you factcheck? a fucking bullshit commi dis-info site run by the DNC Give it up. There's no cure for that kind of stupid. Even wikipedia states: "His law license became inactive in 2002" - he didn't lose it or being disbarred. [link to en.wikipedia.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 851544 United States 06/22/2012 09:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license five seconds before the state suspends you. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17893453 2 Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993. after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud! Wow, reminds me of the Clintoons. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Trbl Ivan User ID: 18258222 United States 06/22/2012 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, they simply didn't renew their licenses, what has to be done biannually. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Law practice licence renewal? Spending good chunk on money and life to get that licence...... bleh...who needs that stinking law license....lets simply dump the renewal notice in a trash... Can't you even read, dumbfuck? [link to factcheck.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. * FactCheck.org is Sponsored by Decidedly LEFTIST Organization: ANNENBERG Public Policy Foundation [link to www.freerepublic.com] Oblabla must be proud of you. You people speak so lightly of war; you don't know what you're talking about. Sherman |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18216861 United States 06/22/2012 09:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17883560 United States 06/22/2012 09:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to factcheck.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. * Might as well call "factcheck" as propaganda check. It's pure bullshit. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1432018 United States 06/22/2012 09:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, they simply didn't renew their licenses, what has to be done biannually. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Law practice licence renewal? Spending good chunk on money and life to get that licence...... bleh...who needs that stinking law license....lets simply dump the renewal notice in a trash... Can't you even read, dumbfuck? [link to factcheck.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. * FactCheck.org is Sponsored by Decidedly LEFTIST Organization: ANNENBERG Public Policy Foundation [link to www.freerepublic.com] Oblabla must be proud of you. And you're proving that with a link to a rabid right wing-nuttery forum??? Is Wikipedia commie site as well? Neo-cons typically label anyone who disagrees with their lies as communist. How cheap you are. * |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wikipedia states: "His law license became inactive in 2002" - he didn't lose it or being disbarred. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 [link to en.wikipedia.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8792154 United States 06/22/2012 09:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11196657 United States 06/22/2012 09:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Albino Rhino User ID: 9985180 United States 06/22/2012 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to factcheck.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. * fuck you factcheck? a fucking bullshit commi dis-info site run by the DNC Yeah and wiki.answers, snopes etc. etc. as well, suuuure [link to wiki.answers.com] [link to www.snopes.com] Cretin. I am not saying I agree with his assertions, but snopes is a George Soros outfit. So they are much to be questioned. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Trbl Ivan User ID: 18258222 United States 06/22/2012 09:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Trbl Ivan Law practice licence renewal? Spending good chunk on money and life to get that licence...... bleh...who needs that stinking law license....lets simply dump the renewal notice in a trash... Can't you even read, dumbfuck? [link to factcheck.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. * FactCheck.org is Sponsored by Decidedly LEFTIST Organization: ANNENBERG Public Policy Foundation [link to www.freerepublic.com] Oblabla must be proud of you. And you're proving that with a link to a rabid right wing-nuttery forum??? Is Wikipedia commie site as well? Neo-cons typically label anyone who disagrees with their lies as communist. How cheap you are. * Factchektard Im providing you with idea...you need to stop drinking oblabla love juice and present facts not "fucktcheck" facts .... IF you have any bit of critical thinking...what would change the wording on her record.. From this: [link to www.wnd.com] Look for screen shot of her ARDC records at the time the story broke. To this: [link to www.iardc.org] It is GLP...and 95% of info posted here pure bs...but if you had any real life experience and quit being oblabla fuckcheektard...you at least would entertain the idea that 5% of GLP info got some gems. You people speak so lightly of war; you don't know what you're talking about. Sherman |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2145552 Canada 06/22/2012 10:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license five seconds before the state suspends you. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17893453 2 Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993. after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud! Have you seen the [link to www.muckety.com] social-relations diagrams on these two yahoos? They are like Mr. and Mrs. CRIMINAL CORRUPTION OF CHICAGO AND ILLINOIS. There is a line of insurance fraud, real-estate fraud, bank fraud, identity fraud... And they're connected with like, Eli-Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Monsanto, various Petroleums, banks and various 'charities' like the Annenburg Fund and other 'charities' which I am sure they regularly rip off or use to do evil shit and get a tax write-off. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18391115 Slovenia 06/22/2012 10:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to factcheck.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. * fuck you factcheck? a fucking bullshit commi dis-info site run by the DNC Yeah and wiki.answers, snopes etc. etc. as well, suuuure [link to wiki.answers.com] [link to www.snopes.com] Cretin. I am not saying I agree with his assertions, but snopes is a George Soros outfit. So they are much to be questioned. Again, how about Wikipedia? Wikipedia states: "His law license became inactive in 2002" - he didn't lose it or being disbarred. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18391115 [link to en.wikipedia.org] Again: |