FBI rescues 79 child sex slaves in massive three-day prostitution sweep across the US

So i asked of majority is ok with certain that how is that bad ?
And this is dictated by nature. Every man will be attracted to develoed tits, its in his nature.

Why minority has to set its morality over others.

You just lack reading comprehension and freaking brain.

You're not hearing me. Typical.

Read your post again and then give me shit for reading comprehension and lack of brains.

I can't even understand what the fuck you just said.

So i asked of majority is ok with certain that how is that bad ?
And this is dictated by nature. Every man will be attracted to develoed tits, its in his nature.

Why minority has to set its morality over others.

You just lack reading comprehension and freaking brain.

WOW you think majority thinking makes something right. Unfuckingbelievable.

Brief, Brief, Brief. I am a decent person, I do good deeds when I can and I respect authority. I do believe that the majority of the men and women who are police officers aren't "bad", I know a lot of them personally and they're all upstanding people, normal, like the rest of us. But just like there are good and bad doctors, good and bad lawyers, good and bad politicians, there are good and bad cops as well. You state emphatically that there is no such thing as a "bad" cop, so you are saying all of these people are liars? [link to www.google.com]

Now, I know you don't really care about being liked, respected, etc on here, but take it from a person who is pretty neutral when it comes to you (yes, your comments do annoy and frustrate me, but not to the point where I'll attack you for them.), but far from adding and contributing to the discussion at hand, it seems like your focus is more on riling others up, provoking, bickering.... which is frustrating to those of us actually interested in reading posts which relate to the actual topic. I know your values are old fashioned and traditional and there is nothing wrong with that. Nothing wrong with disagreeing with others, but the arrogance, the stubborn act in which you refuse to admit or accept that others' opinions also have merit has worn thin. You don't have to agree nor do you lose face by letting someone express themselves without insulting them. Not everyone who vents about cops is a future criminal, some just have had very bad experiences that you are fortunate to never have faced. Your constant name-calling, provocative posts and shit-stirring is getting really old. If you like arguing so much, start a thread for that purpose! I am asking you to please stop hijacking valuable threads with nonsensical bickering. Thanks!

If not then propably you are the chosen one that is right, correct ???

Fucking hyporcite.

It suppose to be So i asked if majority is ok with certain situation that how is that bad ?

Hypocrite? How so? You know nothing about me other than I fight for rights of a child.

It suppose to be So i asked if majority is ok with certain situation that how is that bad ?

Sex has consequences, physical, mental and emotional that children are NOT equipped to deal with. How hard is that for you to understand? A developed body isn't reason enough to lower age of consent. Sex is for adults, not children. There's much more to it than just sticking your dick into a hole and pumping away.

I 100% doubt if you asked a MAJORITY of 13 year old children whether they want to be fucked by old men, that they would say yes

I 100% doubt it

but they don't have any political power, do they, so you assume they agree with you.

you assume if a majority of creepy old men say its OK, then nothing is wrong with it

creepy old men who also control the laws and enjoy 13 year old bodies

the fact you don't understand this, that you sit here continuing with your "majority like sex with young bodies" line is repulsive

you have clearly never been a parent.

you are the kind of person parents fear

sorry, calling it as I see it

I 100% doubt if you asked a MAJORITY of 13 year old children whether they want to be fucked by old men, that they would say yes

I 100% doubt it

but they don't have any political power, do they, so you assume they agree with you.

you assume if a majority of creepy old men say its OK, then nothing is wrong with it

creepy old men who also control the laws and enjoy 13 year old bodies

the fact you don't understand this, that you sit here continuing with your "majority like sex with young bodies" line is repulsive

you have clearly never been a parent.

you are the kind of person parents fear

sorry, calling it as I see it

When they are coerced obviously , but it wasnt nature fault that makes women ready to be fucked at the age they are ( first period ) , and it wasnt a a nture fault for men to be attraced to young developed women.

It is just the way we evolved, no amount of laws or punishments can change that.

This is where it comes social contract regarding legal actions so no abuses can come in place.

But whining and screaming the way you do is pathetic.

I said coercion is bad, and they were coerced economically, i am aware of that and cosider this a problem not only for children but also for adults.

Having a period doesn't mean one is ready to be "fucked" as you put it.

I will keep screaming as long as pervs like you think it's ok to fuck a girl because she bleeds every month.

You are trying to justify something that is so wrong. But this thread is not about 'you' or 'me' - it is about the kids that are vulnerable - for whatever reason not only economically - and predators like you take advantage of. But clearly you do not understand. Just stop think about it will you please?

You are figthing against nature then.

Good luck with that.

So i could ask you whats the reason for periods but i wish to end this discussion at this stage i see no point continuing this.

Fuck you.
You are labeling me at something i am not, you actually make this thread about you and me instead of the kids you are trying to protect.

Hate hypocrites, will fight hypocrysy everywhere.

Fuck you.
You are labeling me at something i am not, you actually make this thread about you and me instead of the kids you are trying to protect.

Hate hypocrites, will fight hypocrysy everywhere.

The old period argument.

My daughter started hers at 10. You think she should have been fucked at that age? I mean her reproductive organs were ready, so why not, right?

You sick, sick bastard.

You are a predator.

You make excuses for them. You justify sex with children based on menstrual cycles. No one else would do such a thing unless they had an interest in raping children.

She shouldn't be eating shitty capitalistic food full of hormones.

It is kinda your fault what you are giving your daughter to eat.

From biological perspective "Biologically, a child (plural: children) is generally a human between the stages of birth and puberty"

If you will shaft with definition as you like it obviously we will never understad each other, so just stop posting , so will i.

Just leave the kids alone and we will stop.

The majority of her diet consists of fruits and vegetables, she's dairy free. She doesn't even eat bread and she rarely eats meat. She doesn't eat pizza, burgers, the normal garbage most teens eat. Same for my other child.

Don't place blame on me because you want to normalize the rape of children. Her period at any age isn't a green light to predators.

From biological perspective "Biologically, a child (plural: children) is generally a human between the stages of birth and puberty"

If you will shaft with definition as you like it obviously we will never understad each other, so just stop posting , so will i.

Of course ...



You wanting to protect your offspring is only natural, you dont want her to get pregnant and in difficult situation.

Even your actions derive from nature not "morality", its a thing you are oblivious to.

Definition of CHILD (medical definition)
1
: an unborn or recently born person
2
: a young person especially between infancy and youth


The age in which a person is considered a "youth", and thus eligible for special treatment under the law and throughout society varies around the world.

"Youth... those persons between the ages of 15 and 24 years." - United Nations General Assembly
"...youth ... comprises persons between the age of 15 and 24. It is used by ... the World Bank" - World Bank.
The Commonwealth Youth Programme works with "young people (aged 15-29)."
"A person... under 21 years of age." - National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
"Youth; an individual from 13 through 19 years of age." - Alternative Homes for Youth, Inc

The legal definition is anyone under 14.

Biologically, a child is anyone between birth and puberty or in the developmental stage of childhood, between infancy and adulthood.

Next time don't cut your definition short. You FAIL.