Chuck Norris fights to keep Gay agenda out of Boy Scouts (yeah, the fags want Gay scout leaders)

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

That nambla shit is nasty. Man/boy love?

Is it just me or are Gay guys a little creepy? They have this 'thing' about them where they want to make you gay.

They feel like everyone is gay and it's not true. I'm sorry butt yall are ASS-Backwards.

Most pedos are straight? Where are the facts to back that up - or do you have personal experience? :)

What you're saying about NAMBLA being 'happily married and faithful' just means their liars until they can get a divorce and come out of the closet as an open pedo and sodomite. They are NOT straight, only lying because they are cowards - If they were straight they'd be part of man-girl, not man-boy.

Not all Catholic bishops or whatever are pedos either - the media exaggerates it into the majority - but even so, the outed Catholic bishops are usually relocated to continue service as they are being protected by the horrendous Vatican.

Is that what will happen if we let fags into the scouts - when they get caught they will just be relocated to continue fucking little boys as they are protected by some gay agenda law?


Lastly we'd have to question *WHY* homosexuals want to be boyscout leaders IN THE FIRST PLACE! What is their obsession to pass a law to enable them to be around a lot of boys?

Exactly...!!

yeah, Chuckie's a closet gay without doubt.

Jeez! Has anyone who's commented even read the article the OP posted? It mocks Chuck Norris for being the idiot he is.

When asked for comment on Norris's editorial, Boy Scouts of America spokesperson Deron Smith E-mailed, "The BSA values the freedom of everyone to express their opinion and teaches members to treat those with different opinions with courtesy and respect."

Or maybe what Smith was trying to say is that Chuck Norris is free to crush facts with his bare opinions.



As far as the proof you ask for showing the majority of pedophiles are 'straight':

1 out of every 6 American women has been the victim of an attempted or completed rape in her lifetime (14.8% completed rape; 2.8% attempted rape).

17.7 million American women have been victims of attempted or completed rape.

9 of every 10 rape victims were female in 2003.

Lifetime rate of rape /attempted rape for women by race:

All women: 17.6%
White women: 17.7%
Black women: 18.8%
Asian Pacific Islander women: 6.8%
American Indian/Alaskan women: 34.1%
Mixed race women: 24.4%

Men

About 3% of American men — or 1 in 33 — have experienced an attempted or completed rape in their lifetime.1

In 2003, 1 in every ten rape victims were male.2
2.78 million men in the U.S. have been victims of sexual assault or rape.1

Children

15% of sexual assault and rape victims are under age 12.3

29% are age 12-17.
44% are under age 18.3
80% are under age 30.3
12-34 are the highest risk years.
Girls ages 16-19 are 4 times more likely than the general population to be victims of rape, attempted rape, or sexual assault.

7% of girls in grades 5-8 and 12% of girls in grades 9-12 said they had been sexually abused.

3% of boys grades 5-8 and 5% of boys in grades 9-12 said they had been sexually abused.

In 1995, local child protection service agencies identified 126,000 children who were victims of either substantiated or indicated sexual abuse. Of these, 75% were girls.

Nearly 30% of child victims were between the age of 4 and 7.

93% of juvenile sexual assault victims know their attacker.

34.2% of attackers were family members.

58.7% were acquaintances.

Only 7% of the perpetrators were strangers to the victim.




[link to www.rainn.org]

Just to see if those with such passionate arguments against gays in Boy Scouts actually have an unbiased opinion:

What would your reaction be if Heterosexual men fought for the right to be Girl Scout Leaders?

And with that, I also meant to ask of all the Stone Cold heterosexual men here: If given the opportunity to join the Girl Scouts as an honorable leader, to bring female youth a greater understanding of nature and survival in the great outdoors, would you take and trust yourself in that role to never cross the line between adult and child?

I would have thought that parents would be the only logical candidates. I'ld find an enthusiastic single dingle highly suspect. How many single blokes have any interest in kids? Not many in my experience.

Single blokes I should imagine have better things to do than marshall a bunch of kids.

yep at least you get molested by the mother of your school friend instead of unknown pedo

Absolutely...but what about Borat the obsessed homophobe...it makes you wonder....

Give it up Borat...gays are here to stay...YAY!

That's kind of a dumb question - personally, why would I want to be a girl scout leader when it's GIRL scouts?

If I really wanted to educate girl scouts on survival and the outdoors then perhaps I'd supply information and education to the girl scout LEADERS and have them use it to educate the scouts in their classes and outings.

Many dads would already be helping their daughters at home and if they sense an inadequate knowledge or understanding in their daughters then the smart thing would be to approach the organization and/or leaders and communicate those worries.


Like the other poster said, why WOULD homosexuals WANT to take drastic measures to force their way into somewhere they are not allowed and/or unwanted?

Why not just start their own rainbow scouts or something rather than push their way into everything that wasn't theirs?

Same with marriage - why not make some new homo-marriage thing rather than FORCE their way into the heterosexual marriage - after all, it's only the 'official' signed marriage paper their after to be seen as a couple in the sight of the law.

Seems odd that they would want to use the Christianized marriage-type where the vast majority are using the Bible - the same Bible that calls them sodomites, disgusting, unnatural, sinful, abhorred in the eyes of God and, in the Old Testament, should be put to death. You'd think they'd want something other than this traditional hetro-Bible marriage.

There's no guarantees in life...all you try and do as a parent is minimise the risks.

Having said that, it's fairly rare to find a single bloke who has an interest in kids, heterosexual or homosexual. I'ld not be too keen with my kids being in a troop led by a single person.

A homosexual parent would be fine with me so the issue for me is any single person.

They're here because of the pagan New World Order and because of all the leaders you GLPers bag all the time, that's all.

I just don't understand why gays think they are natural - it's not and does not create life, it's mostly based on lust and sex.

Some use the 'lots of animals do it' to help defend themselves - but then 'lots of animals kill each other', so should we use that to legalize murders so we can kill each other with no repercussion?

I know - homosexual men can be girl scout troop leaders and lesbians can be boy scout troop leaders...That way -

Everybody happy

yep and nop

the "family member" card is really pernicious because it's in that way that most of the abuse left unpunished.

For example is a total fraud telling that most of pedos are males since the different approach and the social acceptance of females handling children let them act unnoticed

then again parents are not surely formed for such work.

better someone with degrees in social and pediatric to manage a mixed group of parents and other educators with prof of abilities or developing abilities for the position internally at the institution gradually

to give the first fuck the position because is a parent, or not because is a single is stupid

I dislike children as I dislike the parents who rise them, but I'm sure there are singles with high capabilities of education who should not be keep out because of some destorced perception of danger.

Shallow is your wisdom, young wordtalker.

Well not to worry, I'm sure that there is enough room in hell for all of them who die in their sins.

Like. +1 op.

Being "natural", or "born that way" doesn't equal GOOD. Several mental disorders are genetic, therefore natural and from birth. In nature males eat other males offspring, some species rape everything that cant get away, distressed mothers eat their young, some animals torture their prey before eating it, the list of "natural" goes on.

While as humans we show compassion to the noncriminal disordered, we should not allow the criminally disordered to run free, or hide in the dark, protected because they are "different". Pretending not to "see" evil because we dont want to hurt gays feelings by calling them out on this part of their disorder IS evil. Gay men who are attracted to boys will flock to the boy scouts, gay men without that part of the disorder will be largely disinterested. There is a difficult enough time keeping closeted gay pedos away from the scouts, to open the door to abusers is insanity.

i'd be scared shitless if i was a gay scout leader right now.

Chuck norris kicks all kinds of ass.

It's not a dumb question, because it levels the playing field.

I personally don't think too many men would want to be a Girl Scout leader either, but perhaps there are some who do. So, in the hypothetical, is that as uncomfortable to the empassioned posters on this thread as it is to have homosexuals in Scouts? If it is as uncomfortable, your opinion comes from reason. If only the homo leaders are uncomfortable, your opinion is in my opinion, one of biggotry.

I'm all for equal rights for anyone who doesn't touch on kids or take away the rights of another (which is what Pedos and Beastos do really). Beyond that, I'm all for Do as thou will, and if more people could make their arguments from that Foundation, we'd probably get somewhere as a society.

And while I do support equal gay rights in nearly all situations, I agree about the marriage thing. If you want to be strong and independant when being repressed, just do it anyways and make it your own. Humanity has done this with the conquest and settlement of every country we know. Shit sucked where you were at, so you went where you could start something and make it yours. So yeah, call it something really cool, prove that it works and get the public behind that. Going for Civil-Unions would have probably avoided most of the angry frustration I see on GLP every day. It should have never became offensive.

With that being said, this Scouts question is a tricky one to argue down, because I would argue against forcing the allowance of heterosexual men into Girl Scouts, simply because it opens a door to male pedos. But, if there are already gay men in Scouts, than there is probably gay women in Girl Scouts, and as one astute poster pointed out, it's already happening in secrecy as it is.

At the end of the day I think we need to leave what people do at home, at home, drop the mind-numbing label slandering and just focus on protecting children from those who prey on children and who come from every label; homosexual, heterosexual, pastor, politician, business man Factory Worker, Uncle, Dad, and sometimes even Mom.

So, the fact of the matter is, if you are worried about the scouts not having enough structure and leadership recruitment skills to keep an outted homo in your organization from touching on little boys when they can suddenly join up or come out, than maybe you shouldn't trust that organization with your little boys to begin with.

Truth of the matter is, hetero or homo, if you're letting your sexuality spill out on the job or onto kids, than you should probably go. I personally find overt oversexualization, again, especially in front of kids, to be the most unprofessional, most unadult thing to do in just about any situation, and that's from the mindset that I don't care who you're fuckin' or lovin', I don't need or want to hear about it unless its us doing it.

Gonna lead to some weird new merit badges

Good post.


Similar to the crack-babies whom are born already addicted because of their cracked-out mothers.

Should we nurture their addiction and allow them to have doses of crack - or should we help them and try to heal their disorder and unnatural addiction.

It seems that the elite want society to nurture the unnatural disorder of homosexuality and move them from a minority into an accepted majority (especially with all the pro-gay agendas in schools) - when in fact we should be helping them see their unnatural fixation and counseling them into a natural way of life.

Two of the major themes in the destruction of societies (such as ancient Greece and Rome) were the rise of pornography and the rise of homosexuality - guess that means we are heading to the teetering point of destruction now, along with everything else that is happening - and the elite KNOW this and have already planned the next dominate society as the New World Order or New Age of Aquarius.

Guess that's what all the movies, games, TV series, books, etc depicting end-of-the-world scenarios are all about (funnily enough, many new games have incorporated homosexuality into the players choices) - predictively programming us for a possible end-of-world event to usher in the satanic 'savior' and New World Order to bring the satanic version of peace and prosperity, at the cost of murdering everyone that does not accept it 'to avoid another world-wide disaster'.

Badge 1) 'Not crying when your arse is ripped apart'.

Badge 2) 'Not telling mum and dad what happened or I will get in trouble'.

Badge 3) 'Making leather goods'.

Say no to children penis suckers !

Send then to Suck horse penises at the SEX farm stables of the white house !


Obama presiding the YES we can suck a 36 inch one !