REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Why the chemtrail HOAX is the most ridiculous conspiracy on the net.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23624505 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23624505
Wouldnt it be possible to release such ingredients without the white chemtrail? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33059191
Seems retarded that the big bad government would allow it to happen in such a way that could be seen and questioned by billions of people.
Surely any government 'agency' who is advanced enough to pull off such amazing feats of mass weather manipulation could also have the ability to hide people from witnessing it.
Why hide it when a multi
Billion dollar ad campaign marketed toward the public with enough lies to get the funding they would actually need to pull off such a stunt.
Why would the government, with their undeniable ability to carry out operations we never see, and their ability
To pretty much make a fucking tank invisible, choose to allow chemtrails to be identified?
Te government would have no financial gain in hiding it. Only a blind conspiracist would use evidence alone as a proof to the action.
If a murderer is on trial and all the evidence points to them, the question remains Why? Sure you can prove how someone may have done something but can never answer WHY. Motive, reason, etc.
It's called hiding in plain sight. People don't even look up, they plod along like a bunch of sightless idiots, let's face it.
This should settle it once and for all, from the weather channel awhile back, she is qualified to speak on this I think??
[link to www.youtube.com
SO there's your proof, keep debunking though LOL...what a joke to deny what's been admitted all over the place.
No, it's called chemtard paranoid assumption.
And just because someone discusses proposals about "geoengineering", doesn't mean "they" are doing it...and it CERTAINLY doesn't prove the trails have anything to do with it...and aren't just contrails.
What you believe is an admission is nothing of the sort.
If you say so.
I suppose YOU have the credentials to know more than she does? OK. I honestly hope YOU are right, believe me!
You should be sorry, that you can deny away, while saying absolutely NOTHING constructive at all. I can say the same back, how DOESN'T it prove it? You have to do better than just calling whoever doesn't agree with you, a "chemtard" ...doesn't make it so, doesn't prove it as YOU'D say? There's even patents for this stuff.
[link to www.chemtrails911.com
Wait, let me guess your next reply..."How do you know this is a real patent, no proof of it" and "That's not proof they're talking about the trails you see in the air." Am I close, predictable...now come up with another.
Yes, I do have the credentials. She, does not.
And the burden of proof is on the chemtards to show that the trails aren't contrails. And you (they) have failed.
And add "patents" to the long list of things you know nothing about.
Just because something is patented...doesn't mean it's ever been used or built.
Also, there is ZERO evidence that anything we see in the sky as far as "trails" go, have anything to do with any patent...sorry!
Please verify you're human:
Reason for reporting: