"Elektable" - Ron Paul 2012 Film | |
Osura (OP) User ID: 1423082 United States 07/01/2012 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rebelucio User ID: 4938108 United States 07/01/2012 09:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was corny acting with the couple at the beginning but I enjoyed the rest of it. +pin Last Edited by Rebelucio on 07/01/2012 09:54 PM Love thy enemy. |
Osura (OP) User ID: 1423082 United States 07/01/2012 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands 07/01/2012 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ancient User ID: 1433265 Netherlands 07/01/2012 10:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
RD47 User ID: 17584691 United States 07/01/2012 10:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rebelucio User ID: 4938108 United States 07/01/2012 10:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands 07/01/2012 10:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm just guessing, but I presume it has to do with K corresponding to the term Communism. They might be saying that the current use of the word electable is only applied to communist or socialist candidates. Hmm? The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
Rebelucio User ID: 4938108 United States 07/01/2012 10:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rebelucio User ID: 4938108 United States 07/01/2012 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
RD47 User ID: 17584691 United States 07/01/2012 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rebelucio User ID: 4938108 United States 07/01/2012 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah, yeah. You can only push an idea for so long until you have to back it up with substantial evidence. Until then, sorry. The evidence as it stands has not convinced me. Isn't rather hard to look around with your head up your ass. Hahaha... sure. I've given the man a handshake. I've given many old men handshakes. It's the way the hand deteriorates in old age that makes them hold their fingers a certain way, including when they shake hands. Love thy enemy. |
Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands 07/01/2012 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah, yeah. You can only push an idea for so long until you have to back it up with substantial evidence. Until then, sorry. The evidence as it stands has not convinced me. Isn't rather hard to look around with your head up your ass. Hahaha... sure. I've given the man a handshake. I've given many old men handshakes. It's the way the hand deteriorates in old age that makes them hold their fingers a certain way, including when they shake hands. There is a single sentence above ^ that made me chuckle : ) Sorry. The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15831268 Thailand 07/01/2012 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rebelucio User ID: 4938108 United States 07/01/2012 10:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Rebelucio Yeah, yeah. You can only push an idea for so long until you have to back it up with substantial evidence. Until then, sorry. The evidence as it stands has not convinced me. Isn't rather hard to look around with your head up your ass. Hahaha... sure. I've given the man a handshake. I've given many old men handshakes. It's the way the hand deteriorates in old age that makes them hold their fingers a certain way, including when they shake hands. There is a single sentence above ^ that made me chuckle : ) Sorry. Which one? Love thy enemy. |
Rebelucio User ID: 4938108 United States 07/01/2012 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Bazingaaa User ID: 17346074 United States 07/01/2012 10:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18924244 United States 07/01/2012 10:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands 07/01/2012 10:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hahaha... sure. I've given the man a handshake. I've given many old men handshakes. It's the way the hand deteriorates in old age that makes them hold their fingers a certain way, including when they shake hands. There is a single sentence above ^ that made me chuckle : ) Sorry. Which one? That one ^ : ) The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
Frater User ID: 18312371 United States 07/01/2012 11:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12428498 United States 07/01/2012 11:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rebelucio User ID: 4938108 United States 07/01/2012 11:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
RD47 User ID: 17584691 United States 07/01/2012 11:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Obama was also presented as an alternative to the "more of the same." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12428498 How did that work out? The difference? Look at the records. Before Obama was elected to the presidency, you knew he would vote without principle. Ron Paul has never compromised. You are brainwashed aren't you. What about GMO foods, Chem-trails, Immigration, 911, etc.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18602520 United States 07/01/2012 11:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3983306 China 07/01/2012 11:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Obama was also presented as an alternative to the "more of the same." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12428498 How did that work out? The difference? Look at the records. Before Obama was elected to the presidency, you knew he would vote without principle. Ron Paul has never compromised. Even when he quit the Republican party for what he called "differences in philosophy", and then re-joined the same party later when it suit his personal purposes? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18602520 United States 07/01/2012 11:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Obama was also presented as an alternative to the "more of the same." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12428498 How did that work out? The difference? Look at the records. Before Obama was elected to the presidency, you knew he would vote without principle. Ron Paul has never compromised. You are brainwashed aren't you. What about GMO foods, Chem-trails, Immigration, 911, etc.. Actually, I don't think Ron Paul has ever given much thought to those items. As he shouldn't. Those issues are for the states to decide. He just says the Feds shouldn't be involved. It's pretty simple really. So if a state doesn't want GMO foods, they vote on it. The feds don't get in the way. Done. Move on. |
RD47 User ID: 17584691 United States 07/01/2012 11:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 405868 United States 07/01/2012 11:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18957586 United States 07/02/2012 12:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18602520 United States 07/02/2012 12:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Obama was also presented as an alternative to the "more of the same." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12428498 How did that work out? The difference? Look at the records. Before Obama was elected to the presidency, you knew he would vote without principle. Ron Paul has never compromised. Even when he quit the Republican party for what he called "differences in philosophy", and then re-joined the same party later when it suit his personal purposes? Our congressmen should NOT be "restricted" to ANY platform that makes them make decisions against their beliefs. If he decided to switch and then switch back, who the fuck cares? He's a man of principle, making decisions based on merit, not political affiliation. YOU want to put him in a Category, be my guest. I don't believe in categories. Republican Party, Democratic party.....just a bunch of horseshit designed by the elite to keep us all graveling for the scraps from LongShanks' table while the elite are out there running the whole show by donating the Big Bucks to ALL the congressmen. So THEY can run things. So while they're out there not giving a shit about Repub, or Dem, just giving money to both of them so that no matter who wins, that person owes them a favor...... you and I are spatting over dem and Repub issues. Kind of a joke don't you think? Doesn't it seem to you, that it may be time to give those party affiliations up, and start thinking like the people who know it doesn't make a damn bit of difference? |