|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Remote Viewing -- Brisbane, Australia December 2012
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
I don't know a lot about remote viewing but from I have heard doesn't asking questions during the session taint the results? I thought all the more well known remote viewers have always said that you can't even know what your target is going into the session. Are you guys maybe doing something a little different than remote viewing?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6638540 WHAT THEY ARE DOING IS NOT REMOTE VIEWING. TITLE OF THIS THREAD IS WRONG. What a dissapointment to click on a thread hoping to read on others RV sessions work, only to see no RV, just the same old "visions" with no scientific or structured approach. Familiar with AOL driven sessions work? Thank you for the additional clarification for those people who *don't* actually read any of the posts in which I very carefully calrify that this is NOT techinical remote viewing. Look, I appreciate your spark, new viewers are fun, but again are just that, new, inexperienced. I'm tired of seeing these visions/meditations passed off as Remote Viewing as IS CLEARLY STATED IN YOUR THREAD TITLES. Why not have him work a session or three of actual Remote Viewing, post all stages, this way you are not misleading people with your thread titles and people will get to actually see what a real Remote Viewing session looks like. Actually, I do Technical Remote viewing. And we are working with a professional RVer on different projects to vette out this method. I keep those projects completely separate from what I post here because those projects are run by & belong to someone else. I appreciate that you want to keep the 'label' of remote viewing pure to 'Technical Remote Viewing' but the truth is that there are many methods (ARV, HRV, GeoLoc, Geofix, etc), and this method that we are working on has been, in fact, called 'very similar to the extended remote viewing protocol' (by the same pro RVer I mentioned above). This RVer even referred us to Robert Monroe's method (which before starting down this path, I had not read about before). I'm sorry if we don't fit into your paradigm, but this is my thread, and I can call it whatever I like.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
