With Only Nine Aircraft . . . . I Can Change The Climate . . . CHEMTRAILS?

TO ACCOMPLISH an Intentional Covert Atmospheric Aerosol Injection Program (ICAAIP), I would do the following . . .

1) Pick my objectives, goals and mission . . . In this case . . . I Pick:  geoengineering using sulfur compounds injected into the stratosphere to alter the rate of global climate change
2) access the technical capabilities at my disposal, review the history, scientific knowledge, locate the experts, retain those experts needed and identify any potential individuals or organizations that could blow the whistle on my activities and strategize ways to marginalize and/or neutralize them . . . 
3) Leverage any pre-existing practices to accomplish my purposes without risk . . . Such as . . . encourage the use of high sulfur jet fuels or at least keep the maximum allowable concentration of sulfur (3,000 ppm) as high as possible as long as possible . . . 
4) access the security risks and develop the policies and measures that would be necessary
5) project the infrastructure, budget, timeline, probabilities of success versus risks of discovery, identify all legal and criminal liabilities 
6) do computer simulations and experimental prototyping
7) procure infrastructure for implementation, buy land and necessary facilities, contract supplies, aircraft, personnel, and all other needs prior to deployment, develop cover stories for all activities and minimize information to "need to know, only"
8) develop and test the capability in small test runs
9) rehearse methods of concealment and strategies to respond if discovered  . . Develop .contingencies to evade discovery, misdirection,  etc.  
10) Implement small scale operation and evaluate outcome
11)  implement full scale operations 
12)  Monitor procedures, process, impact and maintain security . . . neutralize any threat to operations, periodically measure outcome and
metrics of success . . . 

--------------

Last Edited by George B on 07/04/2012 07:17 AM

On initial investigation I would have found near consensus from the scientific community that the easiest, most cost effective and quickest way to alter the rate of global climate change was to increase the amount of sulfur compounds and particulates into the stratosphere or at least as high in the atmosphere as I could cost effectively get it. . . . [link to en.wikipedia.org]

Scientific American published the following about the general public. . . .
A full 72 percent of participants in the survey, published in Environmental Research Letters, said they "supported" or "somewhat supported" the study of solar radiation management (SRM). The technique seeks to inject sulfur into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight and offset the warming caused by carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.   [link to www.scientificamerican.com]

------------

First, I would find and utilize one of the most famous and influential scientist of the 20th century. . . .for example . . . Dr Edward Teller . . . Who suggested stratospheric injection of aerosols . . .note: he was one of the fathers of the atomic bomb, the Manhattan Project and Star Wars . .   I would have retained his services and leveraged his reputation and those around him to my benefit . . .

Next, I would then use his think tank at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories to fill in my technical and speculative issues . . . 

Then, I would then find a corporate partner with the Governmental clout and capability to round out my covert technical needs . . . For example. . . Raytheon Corporation  . . . aka. . . . the new Hughes Aviation Corporation  . . . I would have a couple of their scientists submit a few unclassified patents to push speculation away from my sulfur strategy towards aluminum and other particulates being a potential culprit incase someone were to discover some ICAAIP operations.

Contract one or more refineries or natural gas producers to procure about 1,000,000 to 1.25 Million Metric tons of selected sulfur compounds  . . . Canada would be a perfect source. . .they have an over abundance of the stuff. . .  [link to www.nrcan.gc.ca]

Finally, contract an air operations firm to retrofit and fly a few  aircraft at about $1.25 Billion 2008 dollars per year ( according to  . . .lines 138 - lines 143 and graph on line 528 in  [link to climate.envsci.rutgers.edu] according to this paper the required amount of sulfur aerosol can be delivered easily by dedicated flights by only [. . . line 528] using nine (9) KC 10 Extenders or equivalent aircraft, each flying three (3) flights a day, 250 days per year. . . . 27 flights per day). 


:C - Gun:


They could easily operate from one or more locations in the world . . . Canada would also be perfect for the air operations . . They are also close to source of the compounds needed and have remote airfields, as well as close to the lowest altitude for the stratosphere on the globe  around 36,000 feet. . . .where injection would the most effective cost effective. . . .
----------

Last Edited by George B on 07/04/2012 06:06 PM

NOTE: The altitude of the bottom of the stratosphere varies with latitude and with the seasons, occurring between about 8 and 16 km (5 and 10 miles, or 26,000 to 53,000 feet). The bottom of the stratosphere is around 16 km (10 miles or 53,000 feet) above Earth's surface near the equator, around 10 km (6 miles) at mid-latitudes, and around 8 km (5 miles) near the poles. It is slightly lower in winter at mid- and high-latitudes, and slightly higher in the summer. The boundary between the stratosphere and the troposphere below is called the tropopause.  [link to www.windows2universe.org]
-----------
Commercial airliners typically cruise at altitudes of 9–12 km (30,000–39,000 ft) in temperate latitudes (in the lower reaches of the stratosphere).[2] This optimizes fuel burn, mostly thanks to the low temperatures encountered near the tropopause and low air density, reducing parasitic drag on the airframe. It also allows them to stay above hard weather (extreme turbulence).
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
--------

Last Edited by George B on 07/04/2012 06:06 PM

So I have chosen to increase sulfur compounds in the atmosphere to a sufficient enough level to alter the rate of climate change . . . Covertly, cheaply, legally, and with the smallest risk of discovery . . .

Which by-the-way may have already been done already. . . .
 
---------

ANY Questions?????????.

Last Edited by George B on 07/04/2012 07:14 AM

Seems this info is from 2011 . . .

NOAA study: Increase in particles high in Earth’s atmosphere has offset some recent climate warming

July 21, 2011

A recent increase in the abundance of particles high in the atmosphere has offset about a third of the current climate warming influence of carbon dioxide (CO2) change during the past decade, according to a new study led by NOAA and published today in the online edition of Science

“Stratospheric aerosol increased surprisingly rapidly in that time, almost doubling during the decade,” Daniel said. “The increase in aerosols since 2000 implies a cooling effect of about 0.1 watts per square meter – enough to offset some of the 0.28 watts per square meter warming effect from the carbon dioxide increase during that same period.”

Sources of aerosols reach the stratosphere from above and below as shown in the graph. Sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbonyl sulfide (OCS), and dimethyl sulfide(DMS) are the dominant surface emissions which contribute to aerosol formation.
[link to www.noaanews.noaa.gov]


My NOTE: There is no evidence the sulfur compounds are all from surface emissions . . . why . . . they were measured in or near the stratosphere . . .

:Sulfur Graph:

:C - Gun:


In the stratosphere, miles above Earth’s surface, small, airborne particles reflect sunlight back into space, which leads to a cooling influence at the ground. These particles are also called “aerosols," and the new paper explores their recent climate effects -- the reasons behind their increase remain the subject of ongoing research.

[link to www.noaanews.noaa.gov]

Last Edited by George B on 07/04/2012 07:56 AM

Thread: Your number one REASON CHEMTRAILs EXIST. . . (1 out of 12 choices)


POLL: Your number one reason CHEMTRAILs EXIST. . . .
1) Geo-engineering. . . .promote global dimming to slow global warming   20.7% (17)
6) Fertility and population reduction, soft kill experimentation or operations   19.5% (16)
4) Solar Storm, sun spots or EMP mitigation efforts    15.9% (13)
2) Weather modification. . . Increase or decrease rain, snow, intensity of storms, etc. Peaceful   9.8% (8)
10) Media to visually block or hinder viewing celestial events, objects   8.5% (7)
5) Mind or mood control. . . .population behavioral modification   7.3% (6)
7) Biochemical, chemical or radiation weapons testing or operations   6.1% (5)
9) Media used to detect, enhance or neutralize weapons (i.e. HAARP)   6.1% (5)
3) Weather war experimentation or operations or defense from or countermeasures to same   2.4% (2)
8) Media to enhance communications or over the horizon visualization . . . Holographic Media. . . Operation Blue Beam. .   2.4% (2)
12) Wide area neutralization of biochemical attack immunizations, etc.   1.2% (1)
11) Riot control or crowd management experimentation, operations   0% (0)
Blank (View Results) (23)

Non-Blank Votes: 82

Last Edited by George B on 07/04/2012 07:34 AM

So if all I need are (9) nine dedicated aircraft. . . .what is all this other crap in the skies . . .??????.

:What Most People:
replaced photo with new photo. . . .

:2012 New Trail:

Last Edited by George B on 07/04/2012 10:16 AM

Why are you posting a PIA Boeing 747 flying over Russia?
[link to www.airliners.net]

1) Sulfur is one of the most abundant elements on the earth. . . .
2) There is an over abundance of Sulfur and sulfur compounds available to procure, use and/dispose of . . . 61.8 million metric tons are produced world wide each year and most comes as a byproduct from refining oil and natural gas (de-souring) 
3) Sulfur compounds are found in abundance in crude oil . . . From one to three percent by volume . . . 3%  = 30,000 ppm
4) Jet fuel presently contains on the average world wide of between 300 and 600 ppm
5) The near universal maximum allowable ppm for all aviation fuel is 3,000 ppm, and has gone as high as 1% or 10,000 ppm in 1975. [link to www.dtic.mil]
6) 218,000,000 metric tons of jet fuel are burned each year and is increasing . . .
7) Testing in 1995 has concluded jet engines can burn fuel laced with sulfur in concentrations of up to 5,500 ppm or more without performance or visibility issues . . . 
8) To refine out or remove sulfur to double digits would raise the cost of jet fuel by 2% or so . . . 
9) It is way cheaper to leave sulfur in jet fuel than to remove it . . . 
10) Testing for sulfur content in jet fuel is simple? Common? Done by few people? answer . . . It is only tested to see if it is below maximum concentration . . .
10) There is no way flight crews would ever know the concentration of sulfur in the jet fuel they burn . . . 

It is a demonstration of visibility only. . . It matters not the aircraft or location . . .

By-the-way, visibility is a very short lived property of exhausts or aerosols, whether a few seconds or several hours eventually it all but disappears. . . It is the other implications of their existence that is important, the visual aspects, while not trivial, are more emotional than of substance . . .

This is what it is all about friends . . . It is all we really have!!!!!

There is always visible aerosol in even the "blue" skies above me.

I can see shadows cast through the suspension. If one cloud passes near the sun then visible shadow ray is cast, always.

Also mountains (5km away) always appear to be behind mist, even though relative humidity is below 40%

I believe the aerosol operation is for defense purposes, it makes the invisible visible to radar. Much like you could see an invisible boats progress by observing its wake.

Everything being done is preperation for war. For example I do not believe fukushima is releasing much hot particles, that's just a cover for the up coming bunker buster bombs, they will all be mini nukes and an excuse will be needed for elevated global plut readings.

Perhaps after WW3 has played out then we will have clear old fashioned skies again with natural fluffy clouds, you remember the good old cotton ball clouds, the types you could see shapes in. Now all I see is smokey looking crap arranged in spastic linear fashion. I do see a few cumulus struggling for natural shape when a big storm brews over the sea, but even thouse have there edge definition ruined by the crap.

Hmmmm. . . . It is hard to disagree with your observations and speculations. . . .I think some of the things you are talking about could possibly be witnessed in the first Gulf War. . . .

Thread: Chemtrail Poll . . . do you think chemtrails are real? See the Results NOW! (Page 7)
This NOAA picture was taken 28 Jan 1991 which was about a month before the end of the First Gulf War according to wikipedia . . . so one can assume that :Air Supremacy had been achieved by the allies . . . and possibly no one was overly concerned about Contrail visibility; however, until hostilities were totally suppressed doesn't it seem reckless?

1. Why would you expose the visual location of Tankers, AWACS, etc. for possible targeting?

2. Makes one wonder if some of the persistent Trails over Iraq and Saudi may have had other objectives?


The Persian Gulf War (commonly referred to as the Gulf War) (August 2, 1990 – February 28, 1991), was the final conflict initiated with United Nations authorization, by a coalition force from 34 nations against Iraq, with the expressed purpose of expelling Iraqi forces from Kuwait after its invasion and annexation on 2 August 1990. [link to en.wikipedia.org]

Last Edited by George B on 07/04/2012 10:11 AM

:Teller:

Interesting post, OP. Pinned.

Chemtrails are just "OIL SMOKE"- [link to chemtruth.ning.com]

I don't buy the climate engineering theory.
It's just smoke and mirrors.

I am glad to see you are putting some effort into ending chemtrails thou.

Fucking hell OP you do rabbit on dont ya.

they stopped chem trailing in my area... right before this heat wave

What do you think the other objectives are?

Do you live in central Arizona, because they always stop spraying during summer months.

My video 'Chem-trails Over Arizona'

[link to www.youtube.com]

Common Symptoms of CRI (Chemtrail Related Illnesses)
Neck pain/stiff neck
Stomach cramps
headaches/sinus
Sinus problems
Nausea
Dizziness/light headed
Can't can't catch breath
Weepy feeling of sadness
No energy/ massive or light fatigue
crying spells
Loose bowels
Feeling disconnected/ "spaced out"
Can't focus thoughts/speech/confusion
Deep coldness
Depression
Tight chest/gets worse when laying down
Anxiety
Symptoms never seem to go away
Tests from doctors show nothing
Congestion in chest
Body pain
Dramatic mood swings/anger, sadness
Tightness in chest and/or stomach
Ear aches
Sore throat
Tightness in shoulders both or one side going in to neck, head, and sinusus
Sorness all over
Dry cough
Metallic taste in mouth
Stomach acid problems
Heat flushes
Unexplained rashes
Short term memory loss





[link to tv.naturalnews.com]

1. Because we had total air superiority and air dominance. The Iraquis had nothing to target us with.

The con-level happened to be where the tankers needed to be to refuel our jets. That's all that is.

George B. seek professional help, soonest.

haha no i live in Michigan
summers here are never filled with blue skys
but this year they are, and we will hit around 100 today
when i moved here in 2000, since then, we will get around 1 week of 80s and that is around the 1st week in Aug
its been constant high 80s, into 90s and 100 for over 2 weeks straight now

Thanks Much!!!'

Why would I need help???!