With Only Nine Aircraft . . . . I Can Change The Climate . . . CHEMTRAILS?

And you have to climb to max altitude over NORTHERN Canada to even get started.

LOL

Riiiiiight. That will work. LOL Go see a doc.

And, you still haven't explained why Dennis Kucinich hasn't rallied to your cause.

Where's Pelosi? Clinton? Come on George. Where's the political firepower?

Either you cannot read or you are the one that needs meds . . .

Maybe he is going to congress!

And commercial airlines don't do that all the time . . . Ever hear of the polar routes to and from Europe????

Last Edited by George B on 07/05/2012 02:09 PM

Ever notice the uber cool guys in DC wear sunglasses? You are halfway there. I think you are learning all the counter arguments to prepare.

[link to www.answerbag.com]

United flies 10,000th polar flight

USA TODAY Updated 7/28/2009 4:58 PM


"United Airlines Flight 898 from Beijing to Washington Dulles today became the carrier's 10,000th flight to cross the North Pole region. United says the "polar flights" – or flights that fly north over the North Pole region
– are often the most direct routes between certain cities in Asia and North America."

I would have to lower my standards . . . .

Wow George, you've reached a new low. Not only do you refuse to explain why you have no politicians backing your cause, and no science to back your hypothesis, now you're trying to tell me that 10,000 flights over the pole is a lot. There are probably, oh, I dunno, 20,000,000 commercial airline flights per year and civilian light aircraft and military add up to more than that.

Way to go George - epic fail.

1) If you could read you would see the article is about only one airline . . . [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] . . . Please don't talk about fail until you exceed a 5th
grade reading level . . .


2) Politics has nothing to do with the concepts presented here . . . However, The President's Science Czar has discussed the pros and cons of similar actions like (placing reflective particles in earth's orbit) . . .


3) Everything presented is found in geoengineering research papers,
aerospace sources and is cited appropriately . . [link to climate.envsci.rutgers.edu] So I don't know what you are talking about . . . All you are is making yourself look ridiculous . . .

Last Edited by George B on 07/06/2012 08:34 AM

It's possible that geoengineering is causing the planet to be visible from a distance in a way that it hasn't been before. So what I am saying is that we may be easier to spot in space by ETs. :)

Interesting concept. . . And possible. . . .

[link to m.youtube.com]

If advanced spacefaring aliens exploit resources like humans we'd better hope they don't find us anytime soon Stephen Hawking's Universe Fear The Aliens part 1 of 10 [link to www.yourdiscovery.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]

Onboard spaceship conversation translated:

Oh (excited) looky looky there is a planet over there. I haven't seen it before have you? No, me neither. Redirecting fleet. Why didn't we see that before? I dunno but shit howdy it is visible now. Fly like the wind, fly fly fly

Over there, over there, get the planet over there. :)

Anything is possible.

Do not worry about aliens we are shining brightly with a whole spectrum of civization induced signals. High power radars, lights at dark side of Earth. Advanced ones can spot as easily. Geoengineering may add something more, but hardly something unexpected. Geoengineering is not that much advanced.

Excellent point . . .

But the planetary shields were made before geonengineering. They may not work now. :) I might be kidding.

Could be but if you are in an area that has mountains and go on for long slow descents the chemplanes will folow the terrain at a set altitude where as normal air traffic never does= 2+2=4 in my book, just a casual observation of looking up.;)

Jesus Christ. You had to go to northern Canada and now you're in outer space. Get a grip, man.

No imigination . . .

Not necessarly . . . The idea would be to stay above the tropopause . . . In at least the lowest level of the stratosphere . . . It may vary a bit with major changes in terrain but probably not much . . . . . . See Post below. . .

It does change during seasonal changes . . . Lower in the winter . . . Higher in the summer.

Last Edited by George B on 07/07/2012 07:43 AM

:C - Atmosphere:

You really don't get it do you . . . Agent 96 . . . The Science Czar is talking about a project needing far more technology, effort, tonnage and cost than the simple and elegant solution presented using a handful of aircraft flying only 290 out of 365 days. . . .

He is proposing to use an atomic bomb while the researched geoengineering paper (which is cited several times in this thread) is suggesting we only need to use a cherry bomb . . . Which is just a big
firecracker. . . .

Last Edited by George B on 07/07/2012 08:44 AM

Based on the same research paper [link to climate.envsci.rutgers.edu] the 15 KC-135s could do the same mission. . . .they can carry and unload 91 tons each flight. . .




KC-135 STRATOTANKER

[link to www.af.mil]

General Characteristics
Primary Function: Aerial refueling and airlift
Prime Contractor: The Boeing Company
Power Plant: CFM International CFM-56 turbofan engines
Thrust: 21,634 pounds each engine
Wingspan: 130 feet, 10 inches (39.88 meters)
Length: 136 feet, 3 inches (41.53 meters)
Height: 41 feet, 8 inches (12.7 meters)
Speed: 530 miles per hour at 30,000 feet (9,144 meters)
Ceiling: 50,000 feet (15,240 meters)
Range: 1,500 miles (2,419 kilometers) with 150,000 pounds (68,039 kilograms) of transfer fuel; ferry mission, up to 11,015 miles (17,766 kilometers)
Maximum Takeoff Weight: 322,500 pounds (146,285 kilograms)
Maximum Transfer Fuel Load: 200,000 pounds (90,719 kilograms)
Maximum Cargo Capability: 83,000 pounds (37,648 kilograms), 37 passengers
Pallet Positions: 6
Crew: Three: pilot, co-pilot and boom operator. Some KC-135 missions require the addition of a navigator. The Air Force has a limited number of
navigator suites that can be installed for unique missions.
Aeromedical Evacuation Crew: A basic crew of five (two flight nurses and three medical technicians) is added for aeromedical evacuation missions. Medical crew may be altered as required by the needs of patients.
Unit Cost: $39.6 million (fiscal 98 constant dollars)
Date Deployed: August 1956
Inventory: Active duty, 167; Air National Guard, 180; Air Force Reserve, 67


Last Edited by George B on 07/07/2012 08:18 AM