Bottom-line argument for the EXISTENCE of an ICAAIP (Intentional Covert Atmospheric Aerosol Injection Program)

IMO,


1) There is no significant barrier to full implementation of efforts to alter the climate . . . Except public scrutiny!!!!!

2) The technology, materials, budget, infrastructure, and motives have been ripe for decades . . . 

3) The timeline between scientific proposals and feasibility has been more than sufficient. . . . The arguments of unintended side effects have been engaged and found acceptable. . . .

4) The materials are abundant, the airframes are more than adequate for the missions. . . . The manpower, facilities and techniques for security and secrecy are well practiced  . . . 

5) THE ONLY ARGUMENT is HAVE they been doing it for years, just recently started or have yet to start????????
 
:C - Gun: :C - Gun: :C - Gun:

 
January 30, 1998
hoover digest » 1998 no. 1 » environment
Sunscreen for Planet Earth
by Edward Teller

"Global warming is too serious to be left to the politicians. Hoover fellow Edward Teller suggests a scientific solution to the problem. (If there is a problem, that is.)"

"Injecting sunlight-scattering particles into the stratosphere appears to be a promising approach. Why not do that?"



[link to www.hoover.org]