Breaking News: Centaurus Cloud Just Vanished, Astrophysicists Totally Baffled

black hole cleaned it up

Maybe it wasn't dust, but ice, that just boiled away.

Since my feeble brain has a proclivity to categorize every god damn thing it encounters, my pee sized brain says, "well it must be the FLUFF" as if I have a freakin clue.
The intelligence of an ant is wasted space...between my ears.

sorry but no GRB, no supernova, no imploding star.

neither theory currently mentioned in the article relate to the stars death.

"Where did the dust disappear to so quickly? Two different theories have been advanced to explain what caused the sudden loss.

The first model suggests that the dust fell into the star, while the second proposes that the explosive impacts could have blown much of the dust completely out of the system. "

nice try turning just another non story article into doom, better luck next time.

us centaurs/sagitarrius are just good that way.

we can disappear like nothing else.

Where does this delusion come from that NASA is the only source of astronomical information?

I like this idea the best

Genius

What an interesting read.

I would like to next read it with pen in hand.

As for now, the 'forward wave' of excitement that I initially experienced when starting this article is now being followed by cascading waves of joy at having read it at all.

This is good stuff, with soooo much information, I cannot tell when its reverberations will finally abate.

I think it's a work of beauty.

Thanks.

tbar? your aforementioned post ( immediately above ) is absolutely correct in-that 'i did not provide any links to data' showing that other galaxies and solar systems are currently being affected by the Cen-A GRB', which 'they are', nevertheless my question was posed solely to determine whether anyone reading may already be aware or be able to ascertain what i did, was all, and while i did not provide anywhere in any of my posts that information, i saw that you were the only one who was able to single-out the obvious "... failed miserably trying to claim the anomaly was caused by something that would affect the surrounding Stars ..."

i am 'currently' not at liberty to provide any further support information lending further official credence to this, however there is something greater going on, and i'll try to briefly explain what without going into too many details.

Compton effect Cherenkov muon light radiation subatomic particle multi-messenger linked Gamma-Ray photonic primary band strings within this particular jet developed thick 'Thomson scatter branches' of this Cherenkov intense bright blue-white hot pin-prick light beam strands powered now at levels above EeV, and they are rapidly spreading by some unknown attraction to additional areas throughout our galactic universe. primary issues of concern being two ( 2 ) under current ( 2012 ) study:

1. why are these Cherenkov muon light radiation particles 'increasing / breaking forward time / speed' having already incredible speed faster than light itself within these Thomson scatter ( self-ricochet patterned bright hot light intensity ) multi-branches - while passing other planetary or star superconducting core magnetic objects or becoming superluminescently energized beyond anything our instruments are able to sense and or collect and thereby additionally experiencing some forward projection gravitational wave boost? Cen-A bombardments on Earth are 'increasing' and that's what tipped a few off to look further where they found something new i was recently tipped about; and,

2. 'galactic universe saturation point' is at what point after having received excessive fills of mutiple Thomson scatter Cherenkov subatomic and atomic particle elements?

thank you.

- RE

If I missed it, I apologize, but why are you dying this year?
I hope it is only a figure of speech.


Excellent thread. Thank you.

The star is not as far away as they think it is.
The star is not as large as they think it is.
Their telescopes can't see as far as they think they do.
Things happen faster than they thought they did.

In closing, Red Shift is not a reliable method of calculating distance or movement, and radio-carbon dating is not a reliable method for calculating age.

Science has a lot more to learn, but first the scientist have to be willing to admit the were wrong about things.

Oh gee maybe because its so far away it wasn't even "there" when they saw it?

wish it 'were', but unfortunately no figure of speech.

thank you.

- RE