| Users Online Now: 1,511 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 409,459 | |
| Pageviews Today: 656,857 | Threads Today: 187 | Posts Today: 3,297 |
| 07:01 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,511 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 409,459 | |
| Pageviews Today: 656,857 | Threads Today: 187 | Posts Today: 3,297 |
| 07:01 AM | ||
"Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! | |
TBar1984  User ID: 13725461  United States07/08/2012 01:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! Good morning Astromut. Nice to see your Sky... Quoting: TBar1984 I was wondering...Have you seen the new Skyview coordinates? Yes, they have new numbers and someone trolled my site today talking about how I should use a 'telescope' if I wanted to try to 'discredit' Skyview. Snicker. I just happen to notice Neptune is above the horizon. It's a little close to the Moon though. Anyway you could sight in on Neptune? Here are their numbers, just as they printed them, 00 09 29.32 -06 47 05.3 That's at time 2:15 here [link to www.youtube.com] I just plotted that position. It's twice as close to Uranus as it is to Neptune. WTH? It just came over the horizon. Oh well. It should be close to Star HIP 792... I'll have to wait till it gets much higher to see it, but yeah i'll have a look sometime before morning twilight. Thanks. I appreciate it. I submitted an image from their last video to Astrometry.net and it failed to resolve. It has a square & arrow on the image. Do you think it would help to remove the square & arrow or not? The image is here [link to nova.astrometry.net] Last Edited by TBar1984 on 07/08/2012 01:47 AM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19124876  France07/08/2012 01:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 14594410 United States07/08/2012 01:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut (OP)Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1524705 United States07/08/2012 01:57 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! Good morning Astromut. Nice to see your Sky... Quoting: TBar1984 I was wondering...Have you seen the new Skyview coordinates? Yes, they have new numbers and someone trolled my site today talking about how I should use a 'telescope' if I wanted to try to 'discredit' Skyview. Snicker. I just happen to notice Neptune is above the horizon. It's a little close to the Moon though. Anyway you could sight in on Neptune? Here are their numbers, just as they printed them, 00 09 29.32 -06 47 05.3 That's at time 2:15 here [link to www.youtube.com] I just plotted that position. It's twice as close to Uranus as it is to Neptune. WTH? It just came over the horizon. Oh well. It should be close to Star HIP 792... I'll have to wait till it gets much higher to see it, but yeah i'll have a look sometime before morning twilight. Thanks. I appreciate it. I submitted an image from their last video to Astrometry.net and it failed to resolve. It has a square & arrow on the image. Do you think it would help to remove the square & arrow or not? The image is here [link to nova.astrometry.net] Based on the extraction image, i'd say yes; it is locking on the arrow. If after removing it still won't solve, then i'll take a crack at it with the offline version I have on my linux box. Unlike the online version, there's no mandatory cpu timeout.  |
| Astromut (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1524705 United States07/08/2012 02:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 14594410 United States07/08/2012 02:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 14594410 United States07/08/2012 02:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1351486 United States07/08/2012 02:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 14922799  Canada07/08/2012 02:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Astromut (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1400855 United States07/08/2012 02:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| TBar1984 User ID: 13725461 United States07/08/2012 02:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! ... Quoting: Astromut I'll have to wait till it gets much higher to see it, but yeah i'll have a look sometime before morning twilight. Thanks. I appreciate it. I submitted an image from their last video to Astrometry.net and it failed to resolve. It has a square & arrow on the image. Do you think it would help to remove the square & arrow or not? The image is here [link to nova.astrometry.net] Based on the extraction image, i'd say yes; it is locking on the arrow. If after removing it still won't solve, then i'll take a crack at it with the offline version I have on my linux box. Unlike the online version, there's no mandatory cpu timeout. It failed again  Interesting. The new attempt is here [link to nova.astrometry.net] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19242093 United States07/08/2012 02:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Astromut (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1400855 United States07/08/2012 02:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! Wow TBar, based on the new extraction image, I'm starting to think it's substantially faked. It looks like it locked onto quite a few stars this time, it should have worked. I'll give it a go tomorrow after I get home. |
| TBar1984 User ID: 13725461 United States07/08/2012 02:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| JimTheOwl User ID: 997239 United States07/08/2012 02:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! Awesome! Thanks, OP!!  ''Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country.'' —President George W. Bush, Sept. 6, 2004 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973  Netherlands07/08/2012 02:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! Thank you to you guys who have sorted this out : ) I'm sat watching your feed of the Nebula(or what-ever it may be)whilst listening to an old audio of the well of knowledge that unfolds from the mind of P.Manly-Hall - The talk I am listening to is 'Opening the Doors to the Invisable'. [link to www.youtube.com] (If you so wish) Amazing. Last Edited by Spittin'Cesium on 07/08/2012 03:04 AM The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands07/08/2012 03:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! If you tilt the screen back and forth you can make out two denser areas within the arms of what appears to be something spinning(view it with tilted screen) around a central point creating two conical/sickle shaped arms - Or have I read that incorrect and it is just how it appears at first,a kind of Bubble Nebula!? The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Astromut (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1524705 United States07/08/2012 03:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! Good morning Astromut. Nice to see your Sky... Quoting: TBar1984 I was wondering...Have you seen the new Skyview coordinates? Yes, they have new numbers and someone trolled my site today talking about how I should use a 'telescope' if I wanted to try to 'discredit' Skyview. Snicker. I just happen to notice Neptune is above the horizon. It's a little close to the Moon though. Anyway you could sight in on Neptune? Here are their numbers, just as they printed them, 00 09 29.32 -06 47 05.3 That's at time 2:15 here [link to www.youtube.com] I just plotted that position. It's twice as close to Uranus as it is to Neptune. WTH? It just came over the horizon. Oh well. It should be close to Star HIP 792... Alright, I'm going to try to slew to those coordinates now. Not entirely sure if it's high enough yet, but I'm going to give it a shot. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 12053116 United States07/08/2012 03:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Astromut (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1524705 United States07/08/2012 03:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! Good morning Astromut. Nice to see your Sky... Quoting: TBar1984 I was wondering...Have you seen the new Skyview coordinates? Yes, they have new numbers and someone trolled my site today talking about how I should use a 'telescope' if I wanted to try to 'discredit' Skyview. Snicker. I just happen to notice Neptune is above the horizon. It's a little close to the Moon though. Anyway you could sight in on Neptune? Here are their numbers, just as they printed them, 00 09 29.32 -06 47 05.3 That's at time 2:15 here [link to www.youtube.com] I just plotted that position. It's twice as close to Uranus as it is to Neptune. WTH? It just came over the horizon. Oh well. It should be close to Star HIP 792... Alright, I'm going to try to slew to those coordinates now. Not entirely sure if it's high enough yet, but I'm going to give it a shot. Schweet, it's just above the tree. |
| TBar1984 User ID: 13725461 United States07/08/2012 03:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! Good morning Astromut. Nice to see your Sky... Quoting: TBar1984 I was wondering...Have you seen the new Skyview coordinates? Yes, they have new numbers and someone trolled my site today talking about how I should use a 'telescope' if I wanted to try to 'discredit' Skyview. Snicker. I just happen to notice Neptune is above the horizon. It's a little close to the Moon though. Anyway you could sight in on Neptune? Here are their numbers, just as they printed them, 00 09 29.32 -06 47 05.3 That's at time 2:15 here [link to www.youtube.com] I just plotted that position. It's twice as close to Uranus as it is to Neptune. WTH? It just came over the horizon. Oh well. It should be close to Star HIP 792... Alright, I'm going to try to slew to those coordinates now. Not entirely sure if it's high enough yet, but I'm going to give it a shot. Schweet, it's just above the tree. But, I don't see the Red Object with it's Moons. |
| Astromut (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1524705 United States07/08/2012 03:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! Good morning Astromut. Nice to see your Sky... Quoting: TBar1984 I was wondering...Have you seen the new Skyview coordinates? Yes, they have new numbers and someone trolled my site today talking about how I should use a 'telescope' if I wanted to try to 'discredit' Skyview. Snicker. I just happen to notice Neptune is above the horizon. It's a little close to the Moon though. Anyway you could sight in on Neptune? Here are their numbers, just as they printed them, 00 09 29.32 -06 47 05.3 That's at time 2:15 here [link to www.youtube.com] I just plotted that position. It's twice as close to Uranus as it is to Neptune. WTH? It just came over the horizon. Oh well. It should be close to Star HIP 792... Alright, I'm going to try to slew to those coordinates now. Not entirely sure if it's high enough yet, but I'm going to give it a shot. Schweet, it's just above the tree. But, I don't see the Red Object with it's Moons. Gee, I wonder why... lol Another bullshit artist exposed. |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands07/08/2012 03:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! What just happened to that Star? It looked like a very bright Star just disappeared..what happened? The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands07/08/2012 03:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! Star just appeared in the bottom of the screen? Eh? The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands07/08/2012 03:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! Oh..your doing something. The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Astromut (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1524705 United States07/08/2012 03:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Astromut (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1524705 United States07/08/2012 03:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! Good morning Astromut. Nice to see your Sky... Quoting: TBar1984 I was wondering...Have you seen the new Skyview coordinates? Yes, they have new numbers and someone trolled my site today talking about how I should use a 'telescope' if I wanted to try to 'discredit' Skyview. Snicker. I just happen to notice Neptune is above the horizon. It's a little close to the Moon though. Anyway you could sight in on Neptune? Here are their numbers, just as they printed them, 00 09 29.32 -06 47 05.3 That's at time 2:15 here [link to www.youtube.com] I just plotted that position. It's twice as close to Uranus as it is to Neptune. WTH? It just came over the horizon. Oh well. It should be close to Star HIP 792... Alright, I'm going to try to slew to those coordinates now. Not entirely sure if it's high enough yet, but I'm going to give it a shot. Schweet, it's just above the tree. But, I don't see the Red Object with it's Moons. By the way TBar, feel free to record this or use the recording on Justin.tv to throw it in their faces. The coordinates are visible at the point where the view looks really "red." There's a bit of light pollution from the moon which is coming through my ultra high contrast filter as being red. |
| TBar1984 User ID: 13725461 United States07/08/2012 03:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! ... Quoting: Astromut Alright, I'm going to try to slew to those coordinates now. Not entirely sure if it's high enough yet, but I'm going to give it a shot. Schweet, it's just above the tree. But, I don't see the Red Object with it's Moons. By the way TBar, feel free to record this or use the recording on Justin.tv to throw it in their faces. The coordinates are visible at the point where the view looks really "red." There's a bit of light pollution from the moon which is coming through my ultra high contrast filter as being red. There's an inverted image on the same 'DARK STAR COMETH' video that the last image came from. I'm running that image now, it doesn't look like it's going to solve either. I'll post the link as soon as it's finished. Another fail. What's Up With That? [link to nova.astrometry.net] The Dark Star is supposed to be the large one on the bottom near center. Last Edited by TBar1984 on 07/08/2012 03:49 AM |
| Astromut (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1524705 United States07/08/2012 03:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! By the way TBar, feel free to record this or use the recording on Justin.tv to throw it in their faces. The coordinates are visible at the point where the view looks really "red." There's a bit of light pollution from the moon which is coming through my ultra high contrast filter as being red. There's an inverted image on the same 'DARK STAR COMETH' video that the last image came from. I'm running that image now, it doesn't look like it's going to solve either. I'll post the link as soon as it's finished. Another fail. What's Up With That? [link to nova.astrometry.net] The Dark Star is supposed to be the large one on the bottom near center. You have to make the image a negative (make it normal again) first; the solver doesn't know to lock onto the dark spots as stars, it automatically locks onto the bright points in the image. |
| TBar1984 User ID: 13725461 United States07/08/2012 04:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Skyview" Debunked (page 4)! They suggest that TBar and I should die! I show 'em how it's done and take a picture of a REAL KBO! By the way TBar, feel free to record this or use the recording on Justin.tv to throw it in their faces. The coordinates are visible at the point where the view looks really "red." There's a bit of light pollution from the moon which is coming through my ultra high contrast filter as being red. There's an inverted image on the same 'DARK STAR COMETH' video that the last image came from. I'm running that image now, it doesn't look like it's going to solve either. I'll post the link as soon as it's finished. Another fail. What's Up With That? [link to nova.astrometry.net] The Dark Star is supposed to be the large one on the bottom near center. You have to make the image a negative (make it normal again) first; the solver doesn't know to lock onto the dark spots as stars, it automatically locks onto the bright points in the image. No joy...Another Failure [link to nova.astrometry.net]  Last Edited by TBar1984 on 07/08/2012 04:43 AM |
