AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

Its a mental chess match for sure ... you could also, theoretically, turn over all those 'ids, 'passports'" to your true name ..

although me and you know they hold no value there are particular corporations (persons) who just have to have them to operate ... bonded information to fund their daily operations that is ...


could alos straight notice and grace the county clerk and recorder ... could recuse the county clerk ... 30 days cure.

also could work in the 'grey' area building and destroying kingdoms everytime a new correspondence is reached with another sovereign ... and reserving rights through your signature with any corporations ....

however the FED will try to box you in with a legal name ....

may use an electrical pad for signing ...

or may require direct deposit ...


all designed to thwart unlimited right of contract

I believe this Affidavit covers that. It states that we carry the "papers" for convenience but we are not bound by them.

Last Edited by 422 on 07/12/2012 02:47 PM

What the government is currently doing is deceiving the People into waiving their Constitutional Rights. The People aren't KNOWINGLY doing it.

This position is in accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Brady v. U.S., 379 U.S. 742 at 748 (1970):

"Waivers of Constitutional Rights not only must be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts, done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and consequences."


All these "papers" they are requiring to have are waiving our Constitutional Rights.

Yup and its all fraud ... all across the face ... thing is you can't hold em to it unless you know your being frauded ...

and to know that, you have to know what your owed ..


most the people think they are owed american idol , healthcare, and football ....


yet we still protect the original estate ... one day they'll come ... and our work will never be for not ...

"THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT IS A FOREIGN CORPORATION WITH RESPECT TO A STATE." [emphasis added] Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. §1785: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct.1973, 41 L.Ed.287.

This is further confirmed by the following quote from the Internal Revenue Service:

Federal jurisdiction "includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa." - Internal Revenue Code Section 312(e).

In legal terminology, the word "includes" means "is limited to."

Thanks Op. I am going to warn you right now, your affidavit will be ignored.

Why? Because you are trying to file it in a Corporations records.

The ONLY place such an Affidavit carries any weight is in court of Competent Jurisdiction.

That is only found outside the current Bankrupt Corporation know as the UNITED STATES. It is an Article III court (known as a District Court).

It is only accessed in your true name and with money redeemed per 12 United states Code 411 (lawful money of the people).

I know because I have done it both ways. The one filed in the County without being Sealed and Recognized by the Art III district court is not worth the paper it is written on.

The one filed, sealed, recorded in my District Court is recognized and is MY record that I am not part of the their re-venue collection service for their debt.

Anyone who tells you their Affidavits have stood up in a county or State court, without going through the process I have talked about is most likely never had to test their beliefs in court, like I have.

if they claim otherwise, I want a case number where it has worked.

That's exactly the kind of information I'm looking for. Have you run into or experienced any complications regarding this. Thanks.

I will tell you this, if you are endorsing the foreign currency of the District (Federal Reserve) you are presumed and assumed to be in 'its' Federal jurisdiction.

There are many sitting in Federal prison right now who have filed plenty of affidavits of standing in the county (also part of DC) paid for it with Federal Reserve currency and then been imprisoned like it never happened.

FOLLOW THE MONEY.

For the record, US Treasury NOTES/US Bank notes and coins have never been property of the Federal Reserve or any 'foreign' Government.

My experiences and others are recorded here:

Thread: Pay No Taxes legally -End the FED -synopsis page 8-Why are waiting for someone to do it for us like Ron paul

it will take some time, but it has tons of information and documentation. I personally have my own record on the land, in the District Court.

They will just claim that they have told us the truth and the lie will continue

I think its been made very clear that the People have no idea they are waiving their Constitutional Rights. That alone makes them guilty.

"Waivers of Constitutional Rights not only must be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts, done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and consequences."

lol, no i understand what you are trying to do, but americans(as a whole) are lazy and this will go nowhere. i truly hope this does work, but ive seen similar things before...which went nowhere

What I'm saying is, the government can't claim anything. If a person is unaware that they have waived their Constitutional Rights, that automatically puts the government at fault.

Yes, That document is a declaration of being a sovereign citizen.

When we are read our rights or when we are in court you are asked: Do you understand<stand under mans law.

Just say no you do not understand and that you abide by common law and/or gods law(basicly not mans law)

[link to discharge-debt.com]



And it must be lagit if the FBI is against it:

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

"The sovereign citizen movement is a loose grouping of American litigants, commentators, and financial scheme promoters, classified as an "extremist anti-government group" by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation."

It's the non-violent solution to "the government problem."
[link to www.sovereign-citizenship.net]

Last Edited by DoubleHelix on 07/12/2012 03:48 PM

Also, it will go nowhere for those that are lazy and don't get off their asses. But for the rest, we know where we stand.

look up some of Dean Clifford's lectures.

setoffdebt.com

This guy has similar stuff. Except, he is claiming to the postmaster general of north america.

He even has a friggin stamp thingy from the Vatican to support his claim.


[link to notice-recipient.com]

You have already LIED just to be standing behind the BAR in one of 'their' courts.

How have you lied (lie in that you have born false witness a violation of Gods law and mans).

Here is how:

1. You have used their Birth Certificate (or a certified copy thereof) as ID. It clearly states that Birth Certs or Copies are NOT to be used as ID. But, you also cannot get ID without one. Unless you have a family bible. There is your first lie/commercial crime.

2. You have testified to the time, place and country of your BIRTH. More false witnessing. No man or woman can be a witness to their own birth, you were a baby. Lie #2.

3. You have lied about the SPELLING and nature of your 'name'. All court documents, government IDs or licenses will have the legal name written in all CAPS. They give you a chance to correct this when they ask "the Spelling of your name at arraignment.

You should be telling them, Upper case X, lower case xxxxx and only a first name.

4. When you 'take the oath' to "tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. No man or woman knows the Whole truth about anything, ever. Another lie, this time before God.

5. The Lord tells us in no uncertain terms "swear no oaths" another violation of the law.

there are many other things, but those are enough proof that you subject your self to the Father of all LIES just by appearing in their private court.

So much for your AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH.

And, yes, the US Congress officially recognizes the Bible to be the word of God, so it is the law, like or not, bible haters.

Yeah - I really like this guy's affidavit. He's saying, "sure, I signed these things and have these licenses. But, it's only because I don't want to be harassed." I think this is a valid argument. The parties to a contract has to fully disclose all terms of the contract. By getting a driver's license but then saying you are only doing it to protect yourself would not put you under their jurisdiction.

I have a modified version of this filed at the county clerk. Never had to test it in court. Redeeming lawful money per 12usc411.

The locals seem to think its awsome secretly and try nearly as hard as me at not having conflict. I know cops and lawyers personally. We just dont discuss it personally. They know, and I know. The lawyers know more than the LEO but they are more reticent to discuss anything and look frightened when I speak of sui juris. But some of the LEO know alot too. Not everyone runs off training scrips for training their officers on procedure and consent. Some know the details, some just know of my status non-specifically. But its a small town mentality and such frank discussion is rarely necessary. I don't self define with conflict and while many codes and other private law of theirs has no jurisdiction over my word, I generally obey their laws and am a good member of the community, regardless of the fact that I operate with full commercial liability.

I was in court recently. A violent crime happened on a shift I was managing, and they summoned (with no service/signature, no judge signature) the name of the ceste que trust. I was sympathetic to justice being done so I showed up to correct into the record the error that occurred and give truth and balance into the record. The Administrator called their ceste que trust name and I stood and said that there has been an error and that my true name is other than the trust but I am here in good faith as the witness summoned to give truth and balance to the record. The judge tried to get me to admit variations of my true name as being a first last name for the trust. I explained I have no first or last name. That my true name was the only one permissible, as the last name of the trust was a family name and not of my self. I also forbade its usage. Not in those words exactly for I know the power of the google. The poor guy didn't seem to know what to do until I repeated that I was there to give truth and balance into the record because I (flesh and blood) was indeed the witness.

He said he would correct the record to reflect my true name. I had my affidavit of truth and my "book of the law" but never served the one nor swore by the other because the defendant settled.

Good times.

Do you have more info on this process you went through?

btw soveriegnty is something you are born with, not something you are awarded for getting the paperwork right. If you know what you are and will not let someone else tell you, then paper helps, but if you can't carry what you say on paper in word, then you are one thing in life and one thing on paper. If this is the case you will lose.

If you know yourself and place in this holographical universe and know the LAW, do your homework and no paper is nessissary for most things. REMEDY and RECOURSE are available to anyone who is capable of self mastery. Its all in the public record.

"I AM NOT A PERSON"...

I am a man of god and i only abide by his laws.

Common Law:

Do not kill unless it is self defense and necessary.
Do not steal.
Do not break a previously agreed upon contract.

You can apply gods law to this also if you so choose to, but basically the above is what's most important here.

SO WHO'S WITH ME!!!

You can do this on your own and there is nothing to fear. There is no need to organiz a group. Just reserch and be familer with it...and by all means, pass on the knowledge.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

"Freemen on the land" are people who believe that all statute law is contractual, and that such law is applicable only if an individual consents to be governed by it. They believe that they can therefore declare themselves independent of government jurisdiction, holding that the only "true" law is common law, as they define it. The "Freeman on the land" movement has its origins in various United States-based groups in the 1970s and 1980s, reaching the United Kingdom soon after 2000. The phrase "Freeman-on-the-Land" (FOTL) first appeared around 2004 and was coined by Robert Arthur Menard.

Yes, it is here: Thread: Pay No Taxes legally -End the FED -synopsis page 8-Why are waiting for someone to do it for us like Ron paul

I have been doing full time research on this subject for over 4 years. I have been exposed to it all and NONE of it works without telling the truth and demanding your redemption of lawful money per united States Code 12-411.

i have been to jail for it, and I have stood in front of their so called JUDGES and proven they have NO claim on me, to the point now where if there is an in custody arrest, no charges are filed.

I have no Government issued ID, no legal name, no birth certificate nor numbers from their system because I stand apart from their citizen-SHIP.

legally, it has been said that I walk on water, since I do not need their SHIPS.

This begs the question: Not if we have consented, but rather "exactly how have we consented?

Find that answer, and all the others will fall into place.

Thread: Pay No Taxes legally -End the FED -synopsis page 8-Why are waiting for someone to do it for us like Ron paul

Thanks friend:)

it's valid, but if it's your first exposition to that concept you may google freeman on the land, dean clifford, common law rights.

Take your time to be familiar with the all concept.

Basically you bear full liability. But as long as you do no arm, your fine (well almost).

Check also 'fee schedule'.